Classroom learning and achievement: how the complexity of classroom interaction impacts students’ learning

References

• Aufschnaiter, C. V., and S. V. Aufschnaiter. 2003. “Theoretical Framework and Empirical Evidence of Students’ Cognitive Processes in Three Dimensions of Content, Complexity, and Time.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 40 (7): 616–648.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernholt, S., and I. Parchmann. 2011. “Assessing the complexity of students' knowledge in chemistry.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 12: 167–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, T. G., and C. M. Fox. 2001. Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences. Mahawah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bravo-Torija, B., and M.-P. Jiménez-Aleixandre. 2011. “Progression in Complexity: Contextualizing Sustainable Marine Resources Management in a 10th Grade Classroom.” Res Sci Educ 42 (1): 5–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broman, K., and I. Parchmann. 2014. Students’ Application of Chemical Concepts When Solving Chemistry Problems in Different Contexts. Chem: Educ. Res. Pract. doi:10.1039/c4rp00051j.
   Google Scholar
• Brückmann, M. 2009. Sachstrukturen im Physikunterricht: Ergebnisse einer Videostudie [Content Structures in Physics Instruction: Findings from a Videostudy]. Studien zu Physik- und Chemielernen 94. Berlin: Logos.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. S. 1977. The Process of Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Case, R. 1985. Intellectual Development: A Systematic Reinterpretation. New York, NJ: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T., J. D. Slotta, and N. de Leeuw. 1994. “From Things to Processes: A Theory of Conceptual Change for Learning Science Concepts.” Learning and Instruction 4 (1): 27–43.10.1016/0959-4752(94)90017-5
   Google Scholar
• Clausen, M., K. Reusser, and E. Klieme. 2003. “Unterrichtsqualität auf der Basis hoch-inferenter Unterrichtsbeurteilungen: Ein Vergleich zwischen Deutschland und der deutschsprachigen Schweiz [Lesson quality on basis of high-inferent codings: a comparison between Germany and the German-speaking part of Switzerland].” Unterrichtswissenschaft 31 (2): 122–141.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., F. Ell, L. Ludlow, L. Grudnoff, and G. Aitken. 2014. “The Challenge and Promise of Complexity Theory for Teacher Education Research.” Teachers College Record 116 (5): 1–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1960. “A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 20: 37–46.10.1177/001316446002000104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commons, M. L., E. J. Trudeau, S. A. Stein, F. A. Richards, and S. R. Krause. 1998. “Hierarchical Complexity of Tasks Shows the Existence of Developmental Stages.” Developmental Review 18: 237–278.10.1006/drev.1998.0467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, B., and D. Sumara. 2008. “Complexity as a Theory of Education.” Transnational Curriculum Inquiry 5 (2). Accessed June 08, 2015. http://nitinat.library.ubc.ca/ojs/index.php/tci
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, C. 2014. “Towards a Conceptual Profile: Rethinking Conceptual Mediation in the Light of Recent Cognitive and Neuroscientific Findings.” Res Sci Educ 44 (3): 389–414. doi:10.1007/s11165-013-9388-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson-Tunik, T. L. 2006. “Stage-like Patterns in the Development of Conceptions of Energy.” In Applications of Rasch Measurement in Science Education, edited by X. Liu and W. Boone, 111–135. Maple Grove, MN: JAM Press. Accessed October 07, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. P., J. Miles, and Z. Field. 2012. Discovering Statistics Using R. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, K. W. 1980. “A Theory of Cognitive Development: The Control and Construction of Hierarchies of Skills.” Psychological Review 87 (6): 477–531.10.1037/0033-295X.87.6.477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, K. W., and T. R. Bidell. 2006. “Dynamic Development of Action and Thought.” In Theoretical Models of Human Development. Handbook of Child Psychology. Vol. 1, edited by W. Damon and R. M. Lerner, 313‐399. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, H. E., A. Kauertz, and K. Neumann. 2008. “Standards of Science Education.” In Four Decades of Research in Science Education: From Curriculum Development to Quality Improvement, edited by Silke Mikelskis-Seifert and Ute Ringelband, 29–42. Münster: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, B., and H. J. Walberg. 1981. “Psychosocial Leaming Environment in Science Classrooms: A Review of Research.” Studies in Science Evaluation 8: 67–92.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, B. J., H. J. Walberg, Wayne W. Welch, and John A. Hattie. 1987. “Syntheses of Educational Productivity Research.” International Journal of Educational Research 11: 145–252.
   Google Scholar
• Givry, D., and A. Tiberghien. 2012. “Studying Students’ Learning Processes Used during Physics Teaching Sequence about Gas with Networks of Ideas and Their Domain of Applicability.” International Journal of Science Education 34 (2): 223–249. doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.566289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartig, J., E. Klieme, and D. Leutner. 2008. Assessment of Competencies in Educational Contexts. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Jimenez-Aleixandre, M.-P., and C. Reigosa. 2006. “Contextualizing Practices across Epistemic Levels in the Chemistry Laboratory.” Science Education 90 (4): 707–733.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H., and I. G. Ionas. 2008. “Designing Effective Supports for Causal Reasoning.” Educational Technology Research and Development 56: 287–308.10.1007/s11423-006-9021-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauertz, A., and H. E. Fischer. 2006. “Assessing Students’ Level of Knowledge and Analysing the Reasons for Learning Difficulties in Physics by Rasch Analysis.” In Applications of Rasch Measurement in Science Education, edited by X. Liu and W. J. Boone, 212–246. Maple Grove: JAM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knobloch, R., E. Sumfleth, and M. Walpuski. 2012. “How Does the Quality of Content-Related Communication Influence the Learning Outcome in Small-Groups?” Giornale Di Didattica E Cultura Della Società Chimica Italiana 34 (3): 175–178.
   Google Scholar
• Koponen, I. T., and L. Huttunen. 2013. “Concept Development in Learning Physics: The Case of Electric Current and Voltage Revisited.” Sci & Educ 22 (9): 2227–2254. Accessed April 24, 2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, A. 2011. Passung und vertikale Vernetzung im Chemie- und Physikunterricht [Fit and vertical linkage in chemistry and physics lessons]. Studien zum Physik- und Chemielernen 124. Berlin: Logos.
   Google Scholar
• Mainzer, K. 1997. Thinking in Complexity: The Complex Dynamics of Matter, Mind, and Mankind. 3rd ed. Berlin, New York: Springer.10.1007/978-3-662-13214-2
   Google Scholar
• Mair, P., R. Hatzinger, and M. J. Maier. 2012. eRm: Extended Rasch Modeling. R Package Version 0.15–1. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=eRm.
   Google Scholar
• Mandl, H., and G. L. Huber. 1978. “Kognitive Komplexität: Einleitung, Übersicht, Diskussionslinien.” In Kognitive Komplexität: Bedeutung, Weiterentwicklung, Anwendung [Cognitive Complexity: Introduction, Overview, and Lines of Discussion], edited by H. Mandl and G. L. Huber, 9–34. Göttingen: Verlag für Psychologie Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, C. A., and S. J. Fitzpatrick. 1992. Direct and Indirect Equating: A Comparison of Four Methods Using the Rasch Model. Measurement and Evaluation Research Bulletin. Austin, TX: The University of Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., and J. Dillon. 2008. Science Education in Europe: Critical Reflections. London: King′s College. A Report to the Nuffield Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Pauli, C., and K. Reusser. 2010. “Selbst- und Unterrichtswahrnehmung der Lehrperson.” In Unterrichtsgestaltung und Unterrichtsqualität: Ergebnisse einer internationalen und schweizerischen Videostudie zum Mathematikunterricht [Self- and lesson-perception of teachers], edited by K. Reusser, C. Pauli and M. Waldis, 143–170. Münster: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Pellegrino, J. W., N. Chudowsky, and R. Glaser. 2001. Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Praetorius, A. K., C. Pauli, K. Reusser, K. Rakoczy, and E. Klieme. 2014. “One Lesson is All You Need? Stability of Instructional Quality across Lessons.” Learning and Instruction 31: 2–12. Accessed April 24, 2014. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2013. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Core Team.
   Google Scholar
• Renkl, A. 1996. “Träges Wissen [Inert Knowledge].” Psychologische Rundschau 47: 78–92.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenshine, B. 1970. “Evaluation of Classroom Instruction.” Review of Educational Research [Inert Knowledge] 40 (2): 279–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnotz, W. 1994. Aufbau von Wissensstrukturen. Untersuchungen zur Kohärenzbildung beim Wissenserwerb mit Texten [Development of Knowledge Structures. Studies on Coherence When Learning From Texts]. Weinheim: Beltz.
   Google Scholar
• Seidel, T., M. Prenzel, R. Duit, and M. Lehrke, eds. 2003. Technischer Bericht zur Videostudie “Lehr-Lern-Prozesse im Physikunterricht” [Technical Report to the Video Study "Learning and Teaching Processes in Physics"]. Kiel: Leibniz-Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften (IPN).
   Google Scholar
• Shavelson, R. J. 2007. A Brief History of Studens Learning Assessment: How We Got Where We Are and a Proposal for Where to Go Next. The Academy in Transition. Washington, D.C. Association of American Colleges and Universities. Accessed October 07, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. 1986. “Those Who Understand: Knowledge Grows in Teaching.” Educational Researcher 15 (2): 4–14.10.3102/0013189X015002004
   Google Scholar
• Taber, K. S., and P. Bricheno. 2009. “Coordinating Procedural and Conceptual Knowledge to Make Sense of Word Equations: Understanding the Complexity of a ‘Simple’ Completion Task at the Learner’s Resolution.” International Jounal of Science Education 31 (15): 2021–2055.10.1080/09500690802326243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinert, F. E. 2001. “Concept of Competence: A Conceptual Clarification.” In Defining and Selecting Key Competencies, edited by D. S. Rychen and L. H. Salganik, 45–65. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Welzel, M. 1995. Interaktionen und Physikerlenen [Interactions and Physics learning]. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Welzel, M. 1998. “The Emergence of Complex Cognition during a Unit on Static Electricity.” International Journal of Science Education 20 (8): 1107–1118.10.1080/0950069980200907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woitkowski, D., J. Riese, and P. Reinhold. 2011. “Modellierung fachwissenschaftlicher Kompetenz angehender Physiklehrkräfte [Modelling Content Knowledge of Prospective Physics Teachers].” Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften 17: 289–313.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, B. D., and M. J. Linacre. 1994. “Reasonable Mean-Square Fit Values.” Rasch Measurement Transactions 8 (3): 370.
   Google Scholar