132
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Recognition as support for reasoning about horizontal motion: a further resource for school science?

, &

References

  • Baillargeon, R. 2002. “The Acquisition of Physical Knowledge in Infancy: A Summary of Eight Lessons.” In Blackwell Handbook of Childhood Cognitive Development, edited by U. Goswami, 47–83. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470996652
  • Bond, T. G., and C. M. Fox. 2007. Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Carey, S., and E. S. Spelke. 1994. “Domain-Specific Knowledge and Conceptual Change.” In Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture, edited by L. A. Hirschfeld and S. A. Gelman, 169–200. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511752902
  • Chinn, C. A., and W. F. Brewer. 1993. “The Role of Anomalous Data in Knowledge Acquisition: A Theoretical Framework and Implications for Science Instruction.” Review of Educational Research 63: 1–49.10.3102/00346543063001001
  • Crook, C. 1994. Computers and the Collaborative Experience of Learning. London: Routledge.
  • Duit, R. 2007. Bibliography STCSE (Students’ and Teachers’ Conceptions and Science Education). http://www.ipn.uni-kiel.de/aktuell/stcse/stcse.html.
  • Duit, R., D. F. Treagust, and A. Widodo. 2008. “Teaching Science for Conceptual Change: Theory and Practice.” In International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change, edited by S. Vosniadou, 629–646. New York: Routledge.
  • Ebersbach, M., W. Van Dooren, and L. Verschaffel. 2011. “Knowledge on Accelerated Motion as Measured by Implicit and Explicit Tasks in 5 to 16 Year Olds.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 9: 25–46.10.1007/s10763-010-9208-5
  • Fodor, J. A. 1980. “On the Impossibility of Acquiring ‘More Powerful’ Structures: Fixation of Belief and Concept Acquisition.” In Language and Learning, edited by M. Piatelli, 142–162. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Göksun, T., N. R. George, K. Hirsh-Pasek, and R. M. Golinkoff. 2013. “Forces and Motion: How Young Children Understand Causal Events.” Child Development 84: 1285–1295.10.1111/cdev.2013.84.issue-4
  • Gunstone, R., and M. Watts. 1985. “Force and Motion.” In Children’s Ideas in Science, edited by R. Driver, E. Guesne and A. Tiberghien, 85–104. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
  • Harlen, W. 1999. Effective Teaching of Science: A Review of Research. Edinburgh: Scottish Council for Research in Education.
  • Hast, M., and C. Howe. 2013. “Towards a Complete Commonsense Theory of Motion: The Interaction of Dimensions in Children's Predictions of Natural Object Motion.” International Journal of Science Education 35: 1649–1662.10.1080/09500693.2011.604685
  • Hogarth, R. M. 2001. Educating Intuition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Howe, C. J. 1998. Conceptual Structure in Childhood and Adolescence: The Case of Everyday Physics. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203440780
  • Howe, C., A. Devine, and J. Tavares Taylor. 2013. “Supporting Conceptual Change in School Science: A Possible Role for Tacit Understanding.” International Journal of Science Education 25: 864–883.
  • Howe, C., J. Tavares Taylor, and A. Devine. 2012. “Everyday Conceptions of Object Fall: Explicit and Tacit Understanding in Middle Childhood.” Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 111: 351–366.
  • Howe, C., J. Taylor Tavares, and A. Devine. 2014. “Children’s Understanding of Physical Events: Explicit and Tacit Understanding of Horizontal Motion.” British Journal of Developmental Psychology 32: 141–162.
  • Howe, C. J., and A. Tolmie. 2003. “Group Work in Primary School Science: Discussion, Consensus and Guidance from Experts.” International Journal of Educational Research 39: 51–72.10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00073-9
  • Howe, C. J., A. Tolmie, V. Duchak-Tanner, and C. Rattray. 2000. “Hypothesis Testing in Science: Group Consensus and the Acquisition of Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge.” Learning and Instruction 10: 361–391.10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00004-9
  • Howe, C. J., A. Tolmie, K. Greer, and M. Mackenzie. 1995. “Peer Collaboration and Conceptual Growth in Physics: Task Influences on Children's Understanding of Heating and Cooling.” Cognition and Instruction 13: 483–503.10.1207/s1532690xci1304_2
  • Inhelder, B., and J. Piaget. 1958. The Growth of Logical Thinking. New York: Basic Books.
  • Karmiloff-Smith, A. 1992. Beyond Modularity: A Developmental Perspective on Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.
  • Kim, I.-K., and E. S. Spelke. 1992. “Infants’ Sensitivity to Effects of Gravity on Visible Object Motion.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 18: 385–393.
  • Kim, I.-K., and E. S. Spelke. 1999. “Perception and Understanding of Effects of Gravity and Inertia on Object Motion.” Developmental Science 2: 339–362.10.1111/desc.1999.2.issue-3
  • Kotovsky, L., and R. Baillargeon. 1994. “Calibration-Based Reasoning about Collision Events in 11-Month-Old Infants.” Cognition 51: 107–129.10.1016/0010-0277(94)90012-4
  • Kotovsky, L., and R. Baillargeon. 1998. “The Development of Calibration-Based Reasoning about Collision Events in Young Infants.” Cognition 67: 311–351.10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00036-5
  • Krist, H. 2001. “Development of Naive Beliefs about Moving Objects: The Straight-down Belief in Action.” Cognitive Development 15: 397–424.
  • Langford, J.M., and Zollman, D. 1982. Conceptions of Dynamics Held by Elementary and High School Students. Paper presented at annual meeting of American Association of Physics Teachers, San Francisco, USA.
  • Limón, M. 2001. “On the Cognitive Conflict as an Instructional Strategy for Conceptual Change: A Critical Appraisal.” Learning and Instruction 11: 357–380.10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00037-2
  • McCloskey, M. 1983. “Naive Theories of Motion.” In Mental Models, edited by D. Gentner and A. L. Stevens, 299–324. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • McDermott, L. C. 1984. “Research on Conceptual Understanding in Mechanics.” Physics Today 37: 24–32.10.1063/1.2916318
  • Osborne, R. J. 1980. Force. LISP Working Paper No. 16, University of Waikato.
  • Piaget, J. 1972. La direction des mobiles lors de chocs et de poussées [The Direction of Moving Objects When Colliding and Pushing]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
  • Plessner, H., and S. Czenna. 2008. “The Benefits of Intuition.” In Intuition in Judgement and Decision Making, edited by H. Plessner, C. Betsch and T. Betsch, 251–265. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • van de Pol, J., M. Volman, and J. Beishuizen. 2011. “Patterns of Contingent Teaching in Teacher-Student Interaction.” Learning and Instruction 21: 46–57.
  • Posner, G. J., K. A. Strike, P. W. Hewson, and W. A. Gertzog. 1982. “Accommodation of a Scientific Conception: Toward a Theory of Conceptual Change.” Science Education 66: 211–227.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
  • Roser, M. E., J. A. Fugelsang, K. N. Dunbar, P. M. Corballis, and M. S. Gazzaniga. 2005. “Dissociating Processes Supporting Causal Perception and Causal Inference in the Brain.” Neuropsychology 19: 591–602.10.1037/0894-4105.19.5.591
  • Scott, P., H. Asoko, and J. Leach. 2007. “Student Conceptions and Conceptual Learning in Science.” In Handbook of Research on Science Education, edited by S. K. Abell and N. G. Ledermann, 31–56. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • diSessa, A. A. 1982. “Unlearning Aristotelian Physics: A Study of Knowledge-Based Learning.” Cognitive Science 6: 37–75.10.1207/s15516709cog0601_2
  • Tolmie, A., C. J. Howe, M. Mackenzie, and K. Greer. 1993. “Task Design as an Influence on Dialogue and Learning: Primary School Group Work with Object Flotation.” Social Development 2: 183–201.10.1111/sode.1993.2.issue-3
  • Whitaker, R. J. 1983. “Aristotle is Not Dead: Student Understanding of Trajectory Motion.” American Journal of Physics 51: 352–358.10.1119/1.13247

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.