Teacher and student reflections on ICT-rich science inquiry

References

• ACARA. 2010. “Science.” http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/science/rationale.
   Google Scholar
• Aikenhead, G. S. 2005. Science for Everyday Life: Evidence-Based Practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• AAAS (American Association for the Advancement of Science) 1993. Benchmarks for Science Literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. D. 2002. “Reforming Science Teaching: What Research Says about Inquiry.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 13 (1): 1–12.10.1023/A:1015171124982
   Google Scholar
• Bell, R., L. Smetana, and I. Binns. 2005. “Simplifying Inquiry Instruction.” The Science Teacher 72 (7): 30–34.
   Google Scholar
• Bolstad, R., and R. Hipkins. 2008. Seeing Yourself in Science (Report). Wellington: New Zealand Council For Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Cowie, B., J. Moreland, and K. Otrel-Cass. 2013. Expanding Notions of Assessment for Learning. Rotterdam: Sense.10.1007/978-94-6209-061-3
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, B. A. 2000. “Embracing the Essence of Inquiry: New Roles for Science Teachers.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37 (9): 916–937.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, B. A. 2007. “Learning to Teach Science as Inquiry in the Rough and Tumble of Practice.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 44 (4): 613–642.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duschl, R. A., H. A. Schweingruber, and A. W. Shouse. 2007. Taking Science to School: Learning and Teaching Science in Grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erstad, O. 2005. “Expanding Possibilities: Project Work Using ICT.” Human Technology: An Interdisciplinary Journal on Humans in ICT Environments 1 (2): 216–245.10.17011/ht/urn.201506212391
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, A., C. Konold, B. Coulter, B. Conroy, C. Hutchison, and N. London. 2000. Network Science, a Decade Later: The Internet and Classroom Learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Fensham, P. J. 2004. Defining an Identity: The Evolution of Science Education as a Field of Research. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.10.1007/978-94-010-0175-5
   Google Scholar
• Fensham, P. J. 2006. “Humanistic Science Education: Moves from Within and Challenges from Without.” In Proceedings of XII IOSTE Symposium. International Organisation for Science and Technology Education (IOSTE). http://eprints.qut.edu.au/28420/.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, R., R. Pea, B. Barron, and S. J. Derry. 2007. Video Research in the Learning Sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Guba, E., and Y. Linclon. 1994. “Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, 105–117. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://us.share.geocities.com/dian_marie_hosking/PdfFiles/GubaLincoln.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hackling, M. W. 2000. “Using Open Investigation for Improving Scientific Literacy.” Investigating 16 (1): 9–15.
   Google Scholar
• Haigh, M. 2001. “Supporting Student Investigators.” New Zealand Science Teacher 96: 39–41.
   Google Scholar
• Hipkins, R. 2006. Learning to Do Research: Challenges for Students and Teachers. Wellington: New Zealand Council For Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Keys, C., and L. A. Bryan. 2001. “Co-Constructing Inquiry-Based Science with Teachers: Essential Research for Lasting Reform.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 38: 631–645.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H., M. C. Linn, K. Varma, and O. L. Liu. 2010. “How Do Technology-Enhanced Inquiry Science Units Impact Classroom Learning?” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47 (1): 71–90. doi:10.1002/tea.20304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linn, M. C., D. Clark, and J. D. Slotta. 2003. “WISE Design for Knowledge Integration.” Science Education 87: 517–538.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luft, J., R. L. Bell, J. Gess-Newsome, eds. 2008. Inquiry in the Secondary Science Classroom. Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association
   Google Scholar
• McCrory, W. R., J. Kupperman, J. Krajcik, and E. Soloway. 2000. “Science on the Web: Students Online in a Sixth-Grade Classroom.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 9 (1): 75–104. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0901_5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLoughlin, C., and M. J. W. Lee. 2007. “Social Software and Participatory Learning: Pedagogical Choices with Technology Affordances in the Web 2.0 Era.” ICT: Providing Choices for Learners and Learning. Proceedings Ascilite Singapore 2007. http://www.dlc-ubc.ca/wordpress_dlc_mu/educ500/files/2011/07/mcloughlin.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. 2002. Qualitative Research in Practice: Examples for Discussion and Analysis. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. 2007. The New Zealand Curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media.
   Google Scholar
• Minner, D., A. Levy, and J. Century. 2010. “Inquiry-Based Science Instruction – What is It and Does It Matter? Results from a Research Synthesis Years 1984 to 2002.” Journal of Research in Science and Teaching 47 (4): 474–496. doi:10.1002/tea.20347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, J., B. Williamson, T. Lee, and K. Facer. 2007. Enquiring Minds. Bristol: Futurelab. http://www.enquiringminds.org.uk/pdfs/Enquiring_Minds_guide.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 1996. National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, A., U. Boz, G. Broadwell, and T. Sadler. 2014. “Student Leadership in Small Group Science Inquiry.” Research in Science & Technological Education 32 (3): 281–297. doi:10.1080/02635143.2014.942621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otrel-Cass, K., B. Cowie, and E. Khoo. 2011. Augmenting Primary Teaching and Learning Science through ICT. Summary Report. Wellington: Teaching Learning Research Initiative. http://www.tlri.org.nz/sites/default/files/projects/9271_otrel-cass-summaryreport.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Renken, M., M. Peffer K. Otrel-Cass, I. Girault, and A. Chiocarriello. 2016. Simulations as Scaffolds in Science Education. Springer Briefs in Educational Communication and Technology. Heidelberg: Springer10.1007/978-3-319-24615-4
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, L., and J. Twidle. 2013. “A Pedagogical Framework for Developing Innovative Science Teachers with ICT.” Research in Science & Technological Education 31 (3): 227–251. doi:10.1080/02635143.2013.833900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M. 2008. “The Nature of Scientific Conceptions: A Discursive Psychological Perspective.” Educational Research Review 3 (1): 30–50. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2007.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M., M. Van Eijck, G. Reis, and P.-L. Hsu. 2008. Authentic Science Revisited: In Praise of Diversity, Heterogeneity, Hybridity. Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Scardamalia, M., and C. Bereiter. 1991. Higher Levels of Agency for Children in Knowledge Building: A Challenge for the Design of New Knowledge Media. Journal of the Learning Sciences 1 (1): 37–68.10.1207/s15327809jls0101_3
   Google Scholar
• Schauble, L., R. Glaser, R. A. Duschl, S. Schulze, and J. John. 1995. “Students’ Understanding of the Objectives and Procedures of Experimentation in the Science Classroom.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 4 (2): 131–166. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0402_1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng, C., H. Tuan, and C. Chin. 2013. “How to Help Teachers Develop Inquiry Teaching: Perspectives from Experienced Science Teachers.” Research in Science Education 43: 809–825.10.1007/s11165-012-9292-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tytler, R., J. F. Osborne, G. Williams, K. Tytler, J. C. Clark, A. Tomei, and others. 2008. Opening up Pathways: Engagement in STEM across the Primary-Secondary School Transition. a Review of the Literature concerning Supports and Barriers to Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Engagement at Primary-Secondary Transition. Commissioned by the Australian Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations. Melbourne: Deakin University.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J., B. Cowie, E. Khoo, K. Saunders, S. Taylor, and K. Otrel-Cass. 2013. Networked Inquiry Learning in Secondary Science Classrooms. Wellington. Teaching Learning Research Initiative. http://www.tlri.org.nz/sites/default/files/projects/9291_summaryreport.pdf.
   Google Scholar