University students’ meta-modelling knowledge

References

• Al-Balushi, S. 2011. “Students’ Evaluation of the Credibility of Scientific Models That Represent Natural Entities and Phenomena.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 9: 571–601.10.1007/s10763-010-9209-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailer-Jones, D. 2003. “When Scientific Models Represent.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17: 59–74.10.1080/02698590305238
   Google Scholar
• Bayir, E., Y. Cakici, and O. Ertas. 2014. “Exploring Natural and Social Scientists’ Views of Nature of Science.” International Journal of Science Education 36: 1286–1312.10.1080/09500693.2013.860496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charness, G., U. Gneezy, and M. Kuhn. 2012. “Experimental Methods: Between-Subject and within-Subject Design.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 81: 1–8.10.1016/j.jebo.2011.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. 1962. Explanatory Models in Linguistic. In Logic, Methodology and the Philosophy of Science, edited by E. Nagel, P. Suppes, and A. Tarski, 528–550. Stanford: Stanford U.P.
   Google Scholar
• Dobson, A. 2014. Epidemiology. Science 346: 1294–1295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firestone, J., S. Wong, J. Luft, and D. Fay. 2012. “The Nature of Science or the Nature of Teachers.” In Advances in Nature of Science Research, edited by M. Khine, 189–206. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-2457-0
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, K., D. Bullock, E. Rotenberg, and P. Raya. 1993. “The Dynamics of Competence.” In Development in Context, edited by R. Wozniak and K. Fischer, 93–117. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Frigg, R., and S. Hartmann. 2006. “Scientific Models.” In The Philosophy of Science, edited by S. Sarkar and J. Pfeifer, 740–749. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Giere, R. 2004. “How Models Are Used to Represent Reality.” Philosophy of Science 71: 742–752.10.1086/425063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gobert, J., L. O’Dwyer, P. Horwitz, B. C. Buckley, S. Levy, and U. Wilensky. 2011. “Examining the Relationship between Students' Understanding of the Nature of Models and Conceptual Learning in Biology, Physics, and Chemistry.” International Journal of Science Education 33: 653–684.10.1080/09500691003720671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosslight, L., C. Unger, E. Jay, and C. Smith. 1991. “Understanding Models and Their Use in Science: Conceptions of Middle and High School Students and Experts.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 28: 799–822.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grünkorn, J., A. Upmeier zu Belzen, and D. Krüger. 2014. “Assessing Students’ Understandings of Biological Models and Their Use in Science to Evaluate a Theoretical Framework.” International Journal of Science Education 36: 1651–1684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerra-Ramos, M. 2012. “Teachers’ Ideas about the Nature of Science: A Critical Analysis of Research Approaches and Their Contribution to Pedagogical Practice.” Science & Education 21: 631–655.10.1007/s11191-011-9395-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, S., A. Upmeier zu Belzen, D. Krüger, and H. Pant. 2015. “Scientific Reasoning in Higher Education.” Zeitschrift für Psychologie 223: 47–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heesterbeek, H., R. Anderson, V. Andreasen, S. Bansal, D. de Angelis, C. Dye, C. Viboud, et al. 2015. “Modeling Infectious Disease Dynamics in the Complex Landscape of Global Health.” Science 347: 1216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson, D. 2014. “Learning Science, Learning about Science, Doing Science: Different Goals Demand Different Learning Methods.” International Journal of Science Education 36: 2534–2553.10.1080/09500693.2014.899722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofer, B. 2006. “Domain Specificity of Personal Epistemology: Resolved Questions, Persistent Issues, New Models.” International Journal of Educational Research 45: 85–95.10.1016/j.ijer.2006.08.006
   Google Scholar
• Justi, R., and J. K. Gilbert. 2003. “Teachers' Views on the Nature of Models.” International Journal of Science Education 25: 1369–1386.10.1080/0950069032000070324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Justi, R., and J. K. Gilbert. 2005. “Investigating Teachers’ Ideas about Models and Modelling: Some Issues of Authenticity.” In Research and the Quality of Science Education, edited by K. Boersma, M. Goedhart, O. de Jong and H. Eijkelhof, 325–335. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/1-4020-3673-6
   Google Scholar
• King, P., and K. Kitchener. 2004. “Reflective Judgment: Theory and Research on the Development of Epistemic Assumptions through Adulthood.” Educational Psychologist 39: 5–18.10.1207/s15326985ep3901_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KMK [Sekretariat der Ständigen Konferenz der Kultusminister der Länder in der BRD], ed. 2005. Bildungsstandards Im Fach Biologie Für Den Mittleren Schulabschluss [Biology education standards for the Mittlere Schulabschluss]. München & Neuwied: Wolters Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Krell, M., A. Upmeier zu Belzen, and D. Krüger. 2012. "Students’ Understanding of the Purpose of Models in Different Biological Contexts." International Journal of Biology Education 2 (2): 1–34. http://www.ijobed.com/2_2/Moritz-2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Krell, M., A. Upmeier zu Belzen, and D. Krüger. 2014a. "Context-specificities in students’ understanding of models and modelling." In E-Book proceedings of the ESERA 2013 conference. Part 6, edited by C. Constantinou, N. Papadouris, and A. Hadjigeorgiou, 41–52. Nicosia, Cyprus: ESERA. http://www.esera.org/media/eBook_2013/strand%206/ESERA_ebook_Part_6.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Krell, M., A. Upmeier zu Belzen, and D. Krüger. 2014b. “Students’ Levels of Understanding Models and Modelling in Biology.” Research in Science Education 44: 109–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krell, M., B. Reinisch, and D. Krüger. 2015. “Analyzing Students’ Understanding of Models and Modeling Referring to the Disciplines Biology, Chemistry, and Physics.” Research in Science Education 45: 367–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krell, M., J. Koska, F. Penning, and D. Krüger. 2015. “Fostering Pre-service Teachers’ Views About Nature of Science.” Research in Science & Technological Education 33: 344–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krell, M., and D. Krüger. 2016. “Testing models: A Key Aspect to Promote Teaching-Activities Related to Models and Modelling in Biology Lessons?” Journal of Biological Education 50: 160–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kupferschmidt, K. 2014. “Imagining Ebola’s Next Move.” Science 346: 151–152.10.1126/science.346.6206.151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, J., R. Millar, J. Ryder, and M.-G. Séré. 2000. “Epistemological Understanding in Science Learning: The Consistency of Representations Across Contexts.” Learning and Instruction 10: 497–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, J.-W. 2014. “Elementary School Teachers’ Knowledge of Model Functions and Modeling Processes.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 12: 1197–1220.10.1007/s10763-013-9446-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnani, L., and N. J. Nersessian, eds. 2002. Model-Based Reasoning. New York, NY: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Mahr, B. 2011. “On the Epistemology of Models.” In Rethinking Epistemology, edited by G. Abel and J. Conant, 301–352. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Mathesius, S., S. Hartmann, A. Upmeier zu Belzen, and D. Krüger. 2016. “Scientific inquiry as an aspect of pre-service biology teacher education.” In The Future of Biology Education Research. Proceedings of the 10th conference of European Researchers in Didactics of Biology (ERIDOB), edited by T. Tal and A. Yarden, 93–110. Haifa, Israel.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, M. S., and M. Morrison, eds. 1999. Models as Mediators. Cambridge: Cambridge U.P.
   Google Scholar
• Muis, K., L. Bendixen, and F. Haerle. 2006. “Domain-Generality and Domain-Specificity in Personal Epistemology Research: Philosophical and Empirical Reflections in the Development of a Theoretical Framework.” Educational Psychology Review 18: 3–54. doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9003-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nehm, R. H., and M. Ha. 2011. “Item Feature Effects in Evolution Assessment.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 48: 237–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States, ed. 2013. Next Generation Science Standards. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Odenbaugh, J. 2005. “Idealized, Inaccurate but Successful: A Pragmatic Approach to Evaluating Models in Theoretical Ecology.” Biology & Philosophy 20: 231–255.10.1007/s10539-004-0478-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passmore, C., J. Gouvea, and R. Giere. 2014. “Models in Science and in Learning Science.” In International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching, edited by M. Matthews, 1171–1202. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, C. 2002, October. Is There a Connection? The Role of Meta-Modeling Knowledge in Learning with Models. Paper presented at the fifth International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Seattle, WA. http://schwarz.wiki.educ.msu.edu/file/view/Schwarz_ICLS_metapaper.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, C., B. Reiser, E. Davis, L. Kenyon, A. Achér, D. Fortus, Y. Shwartz, et al. 2009. “Developing a Learning Progression for Scientific Modeling: Making Scientific Modeling Accessible and Meaningful for Learners.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 46: 632–654.10.1002/tea.v46:6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shavelson, R. 2013. “On an Approach to Testing and Modeling Competence.” Educational Psychologist 48: 73–86.10.1080/00461520.2013.779483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sins, P., E. Savelsbergh, W. van Joolingen, and B. van Hout‐Wolters. 2009. “The Relation between Students’ Epistemological Understanding of Computer Models and Their Cognitive Processing on a Modelling Task.” International Journal of Science Education 31: 1205–1229.10.1080/09500690802192181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sophian, C. 1997. “Beyond Competence: The Significance of Performance for Conceptual Development.” Cognitive Development 12: 281–303.10.1016/S0885-2014(97)90001-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treagust, D., G. Chittleborough, and T. Mamiala. 2002. “Students’ Understanding of the Role of Scientific Models in Learning Science.” International Journal of Science Education 24: 357–368.10.1080/09500690110066485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upmeier zu Belzen, A., and D. Krüger. 2010. "Modellkompetenz im Biologieunterricht" [Model competence in biology teaching]. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften 16: 41–57.
   Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S. 2002. “Mental Models in Conceptual Development.” In Model-Based Reasoning, edited by L. Magnani and N. Nersessian, 353–368. New York: Kluwer.10.1007/978-1-4615-0605-8
   Google Scholar
• White, B., A. Collins, and J. Frederiksen. 2011. “The Nature of Scientific Meta-Knowledge.” In Models and Modeling, edited by M. Khine and I. Saleh, 41–76. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-0449-7
   Google Scholar
• Wirtz, M., and F. Caspar. 2002. Beurteilerübereinstimmung Und Beurteilerreliabilität [Rater Agreement and Rater Reliability]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar