2,473
Views
59
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The role of perceived classroom goal structures, self-efficacy, and engagement in student science achievement

&

References

  • Ainley, M. 2012. “Students’ Interest and Engagement in Classroom Activities.” In Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, edited by S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly and C. Wylie, 283–302. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7
  • Ames, C. 1992a. “Achievement Goals and Adaptive Motivation Patterns: The Role of the Environment.” In Motivation in Sport and Exercise, edited by G. Roberts, 161–176. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
  • Ames, C. 1992b. “Achievement Goals and Classroom Motivational Climate.” In Students’ Perceptions in the Classroom, edited by J. Meece and D. Schunk, 327–348. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Ames, C. 1992c. “Classrooms: Goals, Structures, and Student Motivation.” Journal of Educational Psychology 84: 261–271.10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261
  • Ames, C., and J. Archer. 1988. “Achievement Goals in the Classroom: Student’s Learning Strategies and Motivation Processes.” Journal of Educational Psychology 80 (3): 260–267.10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.260
  • Anderman, E. M., and H. Patrick. 2012. “Achievement Goal Theory, Conceptualization of Ability/Intelligence, and Classroom Climate.” In Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, edited by S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly and C. Wylie, 173–191. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7
  • Archambault, I., M. Janosz, J. S. Fallu, and L. S. Pagani. 2009. “Student Engagement and its Relationship with Early High School Dropout.” Journal of Adolescence 32 (3): 651–670.10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.06.007
  • Areepattamannil, S., J. G. Freeman, and D. A. Klinger. 2011. “Influence of Motivation, Self-beliefs, and Instructional Practices on Science Achievement of Adolescents in Canada.” Social Psychology of Education 14 (2): 233–259.10.1007/s11218-010-9144-9
  • Avenilla, F. R. 2003. “Assessing the Links between Emotional and Behavioral School Engagement and Academic Outcomes among High School Students.” Doctoral diss., The Pennsylvania State University.
  • Bandura, A. 1994. “Self-efficacy.” In Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, edited by V. S. Ramachaudran, Vol. 4, 71–81. New York: Academic Press.
  • Bandura, A. 1997. Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W.H.Freeman.
  • Blackburn, M. A. 1998. “Cheating and Motivation: An Examination of the Relationships among Cheating Behaviors, Motivational Goals, Cognitive Engagement, and Perceptions of Classroom Goal Structures.” Unpublished doctoral diss., University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK.
  • Britner, S. L., and F. Pajares. 2006. “Sources of Science Self-efficacy Beliefs of Middle School Students.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 43: 485–499. doi:10.1002/tea.20131.
  • Connell, J. P., and J. G. Wellborn. 1991. “Competence, Autonomy, and Relatedness: A Motivational Analysis of Self-system Processes.” In Self-Processes and Development, edited by M. R. Gunnar and L. A. Sroufe, 43–77. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Chemers, M. M., L. Hu, and B. F. Garcia. 2001. “Academic Self-Efficacy and First-Year College Student Performance and Adjustment.” Journal of Educational Psychology 93: 55–64. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.93.1.55.
  • Davis, M. H., and J. M. McPartland. 2012. “High School Reform and Student Engagement.” In Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, edited by S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly and C. Wylie, 515–539. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7
  • Dindar, H., and S. Yangın. 2007. “İlköğretim fen ve teknoloji dersi öğretim programına geçiş sürecinde öğretmenlerin bakış açılarının değerlendirilmesi [Teachers’ Perceptions About the Transition Process to Elementary School Science and Technology Teaching Curriculum].” Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi 15 (1): 185–198.
  • Ergür, O. D. 2010. “Yabancı Dil Öğretiminde Öğrenen Özerkliğinin Geliştirilmesinde Program Temelli Yaklaşımlar.” [Curriculum Based Approaches in Improving the Autonomy of Learner in Foreign Language Teaching] Sempozyum: 1.Ulusal Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Kongres, Balıkesir, Mayıs 13–15.
  • Friedel, J. M., K. S. Cortina, J. C. Turner, and C. Midgley. 2007. “Achievement Goals, Efficacy Beliefs and Coping Strategies in Mathematics: The Roles of Perceived Parent and Teacher Goal Emphases.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 32 (3): 434–458.10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.10.009
  • Gökçe, İ. 2006. “Fen Ve Teknoloji Dersi Programı İle Öğretmen Kılavuzunun İçsel Olarak Değerlendirilmesi ve Uygulamada Karşılaşılan Sorunlar (Balıkesir Örneği).” [Evaluation of the Inner Valume of the Science and Technology Curriculum and Teacher’s Guide and the Problems Faced in the Practice (Balıkesir Example)] Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Balıkesir Üniversitesi, Balıkesir.
  • Greene, B. A., R. B. Miller, H. M. Crowson, B. L. Duke, and K. L. Akey. 2004. “Predicting High School Students’ Cognitive Engagement and Achievement: Contributions of Classroom Perceptions and Motivation.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 29 (4): 462–482.10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.006
  • Guo, Y. C. 2007. “The Relationships between Elementary School Students’ Perceptions of English Classroom Structures and Achievement Goals in Taiwan.” Unpublished master thesis, National Pingtung University of Eduation, Taiwan.
  • Heckhausen, J. 2000. “Evolutionary Perspectives on Human Motivation.” American Behavioral Scientist 43 (6): 1015–1029.10.1177/00027640021955739
  • Kıran, D., and S. Sungur. 2012. “Middle School Students’ Science Self-Efficacy and Its Sources: Examination of Gender Difference.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 21 (5): 619–630.
  • Lam, S., B. P. H. Wong, H. Yang, and Y. Liu. 2012. “Understanding Student Engagement with a Contextual Model.” In Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, edited by S. L. Christenson, et al., 403–419. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7
  • Lau, K. L., and J. Lee. 2008. “Examining Hong Kong Students’ Achievement Goals and their Relations with Students’ Perceived Classroom Environment and Strategy Use.” Educational Psychology 28 (4): 357–372.10.1080/01443410701612008
  • Lau, S., and R. W. Roeser. 2002. “Cognitive Abilities and Motivational Processes in High School Students’ Situational Engagement and Achievement in Science.” Educational Assessment 8: 139–162. doi:10.1207/S15326977EA0802_04.
  • Lawson, M. A., and H. A. Lawson. 2013. “New Conceptual Frameworks for Student Engagement Research, Policy, and Practice.” Review of Educational Research 83 (3): 432–479.10.3102/0034654313480891
  • Lee, O., and J. Brophy. 1996. “Motivational Patterns Observed in Sixth-Grade Science Classrooms.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 33: 303–318.
  • Li, Y., and R. M. Lerner. 2013. “Interrelations of Behavioral, Emotional, and Cognitive School Engagement in High School Students.” Journal of Youth and Adolescence 42 (1): 20–32.10.1007/s10964-012-9857-5
  • Linnenbrink, E. A., and P. R. Pintrich. 2003. “The Role of Self-efficacy Beliefs in Student Engagement and Learning in the Classroom.” Reading & Writing Quarterly 19: 119–137.10.1080/10573560308223
  • Lodewyk, K. R., and P. H. Winne. 2005. “Relations among the Structure of Learning Tasks, Achievement, and Changes in Self-efficacy in Secondary Students.” Journal of Educational Psychology 97 (1): 3–12.10.1037/0022-0663.97.1.3
  • Mason, L., P. Boscolo, M. C. Tornatora, and L. Ronconi. 2013. “Besides Knowledge: A Cross-sectional Study on the Relations between Epistemic Beliefs, Achievement Goals, Self-beliefs, and Achievement in Science.” Instructional Science 41 (1): 49–79.10.1007/s11251-012-9210-0
  • Mo, Y. 2008. “Opportunity to Learn, Engagement, and Science Achievement: Evidence Form TIMSS 2003 Data.” Unpublished doctoral diss., State University, VA.
  • Multon, K. D., S. D. Brown, and R. W. Lent. 1991. “Relation of Self-efficacy Beliefs to Academic Outcomes: A Meta-analytic Investigation.” Journal of Counseling Psychology 38 (1): 30.10.1037/0022-0167.38.1.30
  • Nolen, S. B., and T. M. Haladyna. 1990. “Motivation and Studying in High School Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 27: 115–126.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
  • OECD. 2007. PISA 2006 Science Competencies for Tomorrow’s World. http://www.oecd.org/edu/school/programmeforinternationalstudentassessmentpisa/pisa2006results.htm.
  • Örnek, F. 2015. “Culture’s Effect on Students’ Attitude toward Science.” Education Policy Management and Quality 7: 27–44.
  • Pajares, F. 1996. “Self-efficacy Beliefs in Academic Settings.” Review of Educational Research 66: 543–578.10.3102/00346543066004543
  • Palmer, D. 2005. “A Motivational View of Constructivist‐informed Teaching.” International Journal of Science Education 27: 1853–1881.10.1080/09500690500339654
  • Patrick, B. C., E. A. Skinner, and J. P. Connell. 1993. “What Motivates Children’s Behavior and Emotion? Joint Effects of Perceived Control and Autonomy in the Academic Domain.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65 (4): 781–791. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.781.
  • Peach, D., and J. Matthews. 2011. “Work Integrated Learning for Life: Encouraging Agentic Engagement.” Paper presented at the HERSA Conference 2011: Higher Education on the Edge, Radisson Resort, Gold Coast, QLD, July 4–7.
  • Pintrich, P. R. 2003. “A Motivational Science Perspective on the Role of Student Motivation in Learning and Teaching Contexts.” Journal of Educational Psychology 95 (4): 667–686.10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667
  • Pintrich, P. R., and D. H. Schunk. 1996. Motivation in Education: Theory, Research and Applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill Company.
  • Pintrich, P. R., D. A. F. Smith, T. Garcia, and W. J. McKeachie. 1991. A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) ( Technical Report 91-B-004). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan, School of Education.
  • Reeve, J. 2012. “A Self-determination Theory Perspective on Student Engagement.” In Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, edited by S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly and C. Wylie, 149–172. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7
  • Reeve, J. 2013. “How Students Create Motivationally Supportive Learning Environments for Themselves: The Concept of Agentic Engagement.” Journal of Educational Psychology 105: 579–595. doi:10.1037/a0032690.
  • Reeve, J., H. Jang, D. Carrell, S. Jeon, and J. Barch. 2004. “Enhancing Students’ Engagement by Increasing Teachers’ Autonomy Support.” Motivation and Emotion 28 (2): 147–169.10.1023/B:MOEM.0000032312.95499.6f
  • Reeve, J., and C.-M. Tseng. 2011. “Agency as a Fourth Aspect of Students’ Engagement during Learning Activities.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 36: 257–267.10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002
  • Reeve, J., and W. Lee. 2014. “Students' Classroom Engagement Produces Longitudinal Changes in Classroom Motivation.” Journal of Educational Psychology 106: 527–540.
  • Reschly, A. L., E. S. Huebner, J. J. Appleton, and S. Antaramian. 2008. ““Engagement as Flourishing: The Contribution of Positive Emotions and Coping to Adolescents' Engagement at School and With Learning.” Psychology in the Schools 45 (5): 419–431.
  • Rostami, M., E. Hejazi, and M. G. Lavasani. 2011. “The Relationship between Gender, Perception of Classroom Structure, Achievement Goals, Perceived Instrumentality and Academic Achievement in English Course Third Grad Middle School Students (English as Second Language).” Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 29: 703–712.10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.295
  • Schunk, D. H. 1981. “Modeling and Attributional Effects on Children’s Achievement; a Self-efficacy Analysis.” Journal of Educational Psychology 73: 93–105.10.1037/0022-0663.73.1.93
  • Schunk, D. H. 1989. “Self-efficacy and Achievement Behaviors.” Educational Psychology Review 1 (3): 173–208.10.1007/BF01320134
  • Schunk, D. H., and C. A. Mullen. 2012. “Self-efficacy as an Engaged Learner.” In Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, edited by S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, and C. Wylie, 219–235. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7
  • Schunk, D. H., and B. J. Zimmerman. 2006. “Competence and Control Beliefs: Distinguishing the Means and Ends.” In Handbook of Educational Psychology, edited by P. A. Alexander and P. H. Winne, 349–367. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Skinner, E. A., and M. J. Belmont. 1993. “Motivation in the Classroom: Reciprocal Effects of Teacher Behavior and Student Engagement across the School Year.” Journal of Educational Psychology 85: 571–581.10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.571
  • Skinner, E. A., T. A. Kindermann, and C. J. Furrer. 2009. “A Motivational Perspective on Engagement and Disaffection: Conceptualization and Assessment of Children’s Behavioral and Emotional Participation in Academic Activities in the Classroom.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 69 (3): 493–525.
  • Sungur, S. 2004. An Implementation of Problem Based Learning in High School Biology Courses. PhD diss.: Middle East Technical University.
  • Sungur, S., and S. Güngören. 2009. “The Role of Classroom Environment Perceptions in Self-Regulated Learning and Science Achievement.” Elementary Education Online 8 (3): 883–900.
  • Tytler, R., J. Osborne, G. Williams, K. Tytler, and J. Cripps Clark. 2008. Opening up Pathways: Engagement in STEM across the Primary-secondary School Transition. Melbourne: Deakin University.
  • Urdan, T. C., and M. L. Maehr. 1995. “Beyond a Two-goal Theory of Motivation and Achievement: A Case for Social Goals.” Review of Educational Research 65 (3): 213–243.10.3102/00346543065003213
  • Walker, C. O., B. A. Greene, and R. A. Mansell. 2006. “Identification with Academics, Intrinsic/Extrinsic Motivation, and Self-efficacy as Predictors of Cognitive Engagement.” Learning and Individual Differences 16 (1): 1–12.10.1016/j.lindif.2005.06.004
  • Wolters, C. A. 2004. “Advancing Achievement Goal Theory: Using Goal Structures and Goal Orientations to Predict Students’ Motivation, Cognition, and Achievement.” Journal of Educational Psychology 96 (2): 236–250.10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.236
  • Yerdelen, S. 2013. “Multilevel Investigations of Students’ Cognitive and Affective Learning Outcomes and their Relationships with Perceived Classroom Learning Environment and Teacher Effectiveness.” Unpublished doctoral diss., Middle East Technical University.
  • Yumusak, N., S. Sungur, and J. Cakiroglu. 2007. “Turkish High School Students’ Biology Achievement in Relation to Academic Self-regulation.” Educational Research and Evaluation 13: 53–69.10.1080/13803610600853749
  • Zusho, A., P. R. Pintrich, and B. Coppola. 2003. “Skill and Will: The Role of Motivation and Cognition in the Learning of College Chemistry.” International Journal of Science Education 25: 1081–1094.10.1080/0950069032000052207

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.