Swedish technology teachers’ attitudes to their subject and its teaching

References

• van Aalderen-Smeets, Sandra I., Juliette H. Walma van der Molen, and Lieke J. F. Asma. 2012. “Primary Teachers’ Attitudes Toward Science: A New Theoretical Framework.” Science Education 96 (1): 158–182.10.1002/sce.v96.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Aalderen-Smeets, S., and J. Walma van der Molen. 2013. “Measuring Primary Teachers’ Attitudes Toward Teaching Science: Development of the Dimensions of Attitude Toward Science (DAS) Instrument.” International Journal of Science Education 35 (4): 577–600.10.1080/09500693.2012.755576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almutairi, Abbad. 2009. “Teachers’ Perceptions of Technology and Technology Education, Years 7 to 10.” Thesis, Auckland University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Ardies, J., S. De Maeyer, and D. Gijbels. 2015. “A Longitudinal Study on Boys’ and Girls’ Career Aspirations and Interest in Technology.” Research in Science and Technological Education 33 (3): 366–386.10.1080/02635143.2015.1060412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beavers, A. S., J. W. Lounsbury, J. K. Richards, S. W. Huck, G. J. Skolits, and S. L. Esquivel. 2013. “Practical Considerations for Using Exploratory Factor Analysis in Educational Research.” Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation 18 (6): 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Bjurulf, Veronica. 2008. Teknikämnets gestaltningar: en studie av lärares arbete med skolämnet teknik, Karlstad university studies: 2008:29 [Embodying Technology Education: A Study of Teachers' Work with the Subject Technology]. Karlstad: Estetisk-filosofiska fakulteten, Pedagogiskt arbete, Karlstads universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Clatworthy, J., D. Buick, M. Hankins, J. Weinman, and R. Horne. 2005. “The Use and Reporting of Cluster Analysis in Health Psychology: A Review.” British Journal of Health Psychology 10 (3): 329–358.10.1348/135910705X25697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dziuban, C. D., and E. C. Shirkey. 1974. “When is a Correlation Matrix Appropriate for Factor Analysis? Some Decision Rules.” Psychological Bulletin 81 (6): 358–361.10.1037/h0036316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elgström, Ole, and Ulla Riis. 1990. Läroplansprocesser och förhandlingsdynamik: exemplet obligatorisk teknik i grundskola [Curriculum Processes and the Dynamics of Negotiation: the Example of Obligatory Technology in Compulsory Education]. Linköping: Linköping University..
   Google Scholar
• Field, Andy. 2009. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS: (And Sex and Drugs and Rock ‘n’ Roll). 3rd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gumaelius, Lena, Eva Hartell, and Joakim Svärdh. 2013. “Teachers’ Views Regarding Assessment in Technology Education.” In Technology Education for the Future: A Play on Sustainability, edited by P. John Williams and Dilani Gedera, 196–205. Waikato: University of Waikato.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, Joseph F., William C. Black, Barry J. Babin, and Rolph E. Anderson. 2010. Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hartell, Eva, Lena Gumaelius, and Joakim Svärdh. 2015. “Investigating Technology Teachers’ Self-efficacy on Assessment.” International Journal of Technology & Design Education 25 (3): 321–337.10.1007/s10798-014-9285-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henson, Robin K., and J. Kyle Roberts. 2006. “Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Published Research: Common Errors and Some Comment on Improved Practice.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 66 (3): 393–416.10.1177/0013164405282485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holroyd, Colin, and Wynne Harlen. 1996. “Primary Teachers’ Confidence About Teaching Science and Technology.” Research Papers in Education 11 (3): 323–335.10.1080/0267152960110308
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Alister, Cathy Buntting, and Marc J. de Vries. 2013. “The Developing Field of Technology Education: A Review to Look Forward.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 23 (2): 191–212.10.1007/s10798-011-9174-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, Alister, and Malcolm Carr. 1992. “Teachers’ Perceptions of Technology Education: Implications for Curriculum Innovation.” Research in Science Education 22 (1): 230–239.10.1007/BF02356900
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Alister, Ann Harlow, and Bronwen Cowie. 2004. “New Zealand Teachers’ Experiences in Implementing the Technology Curriculum.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 14 (2): 101–119.10.1023/B:ITDE.0000026549.08795.9e
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, Kathryn, and Leanna Archambault. 2012. “Offering Preservice Teachers Field Experiences in K-12 Online Learning.” Journal of Teacher Education 63 (3): 185.10.1177/0022487111433651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattsson, Gunilla. 2005. “Lärares teknikdidaktiska kompetens och dess betydelse för elevers teknikintresse [Teachers' Educational Competence in Technology and its Significance for Pupils' Interest in Technology].” Nordina 1 (1): 31–42.
   Google Scholar
• Mooi, Erik, and Marko Sarstedt. 2011. A Concise Guide to Market Research. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-12541-6
   Google Scholar
• Nordlander, Edvard. 2011. “Vad tycker tekniklärarna? [What do technology teachers think?]” In Teknikutbildning för framtiden [Technology Education for the Future], edited by Sven Ove Hansson, Edvard Nordlander and Inga-Britt Skogh, 90–102. Stockholm: Liber AB.
   Google Scholar
• O’connor, Brian P. 2000. “SPSS and SAS Programs for Determining the Number of Components Using Parallel Analysis and Velicer’s MAP Test.” Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 32 (3): 396–402.10.3758/BF03200807
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Osborne, Jonathan, Shirley Simon, and Sue Collins. 2003. “Attitudes Towards Science: A Review of the Literature and its Implications.” International Journal of Science Education 25 (9): 1049–1079.10.1080/0950069032000032199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pett, Majorie A., Nancy R. Lackey, and John J. Sullivan. 2003. Making Sense of Factor Analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Rohaan, E. J., R. Taconis, and W. M. G. Jochems. 2012. “Analysing Teacher Knowledge for Technology Education in Primary Schools.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 22 (3): 271–280.10.1007/s10798-010-9147-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shih, Tse-Hua, and Xitao Fan. 2009. “Comparing Response Rates in e-mail and Paper Surveys: A meta-analysis.” Educational Research Review 4 (1): 26–40.10.1016/j.edurev.2008.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skolinspektionen. 2014. “Teknik - gör det osynliga synligt. Om kvaliteten i grundskolans teknikundervisning [Technology - make the invisible visible. On the quality of compulsory school technology education].” Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket. 2011. Curriculum for the Compulsory School, Preeschool Class and the Recreation Centre. Stockholm: Ordförrådet AB.
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket. 2013. Attityder till skolan 2012 [Attitudes to the school, 2012]. Stockholm: Fritzes.
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket. 2014. Redovisning av uppdrag om hur stor del av undervisningen som bedrivs av behöriga lärare. Accessed August 18, 2015. http://www.skolverket.se/publikationer?id=3312
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket. 2016. SiriS statistik avseende grundskolan. Accessed December 02, 2016. https://siris.skolverket.se/siris/f?p=SIRIS:36:0::NO:::
   Google Scholar
• Svenningson, Johan, Magnus Hultén, and Jonas Hallström. 2015. “Swedish Students’ View on Technology: Results from a Pilot Study Using an Adaptation of the PATT-SQ Questionnaire.” In PATT 29 Plurality and Complementarity of Approaches in Design & Technology Education, edited by Marjolaine Chatoney, 397–403. Marseille: Presses Universitaires de Provence.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, Barbara G., and Linda S. Fidell. 2014. Using Multivariate Statistics. 6th ed. New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Teknikföretagen. 2012. Teknikämnet i träda; teknikföretagens och CETIS rapport om teknikundervisningen i grundskolan [Technology Education in Repose: The Teknikföretagen and CETIS Report on Technology Education in Compulsory School]. Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• de Vries, Marc J. 1991. “What Do Students in Dutch Technology Teacher Programmes Think of Their Subject?” Research in Science and Technological Education 9 (2): 173–179.10.1080/0263514910090205
   Google Scholar