Effectiveness of the REACT Strategy on 12th Grade Students’ Understanding of the Alkenes Concept

References

• Abraham, M. R., E. B. Grzybowski, J. W. Renner, and E. A. Marek. 1992. “Understandings and Misunderstandings of Eighth Graders of Five Chemistry Concepts Found in Textbooks.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 29 (2): 105–120.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acar, B., and M. Yaman. 2011. “The Effects of Context-Based Learning on Students’ Levels of Knowledge and Interest.” Hacettepe University Journal of Education 40: 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, V., and R. Millar. 1999. “Students' reasoning about chemical reactions: what changes occur during a context-based post-16 chemistry course?” International Journal of Science Education 21 (6): 645–665.10.1080/095006999290499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belt, S. T., M. J. Leisvik, A. J. Hyde, and T. L. Overton. 2005. “Using a context-based approach to undergraduate chemistry teaching – a case study for introductory physical chemistry.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 6 (3): 166–179.10.1039/B5RP90007G
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J., C. Gräsel, I. Parchmann, and D. Waddington. 2005. “Context-Based And Conventional Approaches To Teaching Chemistry: Comparing Teachers’ Views.” International Journal of Science Education 27 (13): 1521–1547.10.1080/09500690500153808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, J., and F. Lubben. 2006. “Context Based Chemistry: The Salters Approach.” International Journal of Science Education 28 (9): 999–1015.10.1080/09500690600702496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, A. E., and E. L. Deci. 2000. “The Effects of Instructors' Autonomy Support and Students' Autonomous Motivation on Learning Organic Chemistry: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective.” Science Education 84: 740–756.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broman, K., S. Bernholt, and I. Parchmann. 2015. “Analysing Task Design and Students’ Responses to Context-Based Problems Through Different Analytical Frameworks.” Research in Science & Technological Education 33 (2): 143–161. doi:10.1080/02635143.2014.989495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulte, A. M. W., H. B. Westbroek, O. de Jong, and A. Pilot. 2006. “A Research Approach to Designing Chemistry Education using Authentic Practices as Contexts.” International Journal of Science Education 28 (9): 1063–1086.10.1080/09500690600702520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çalik, M., and A. Ayas. 2005. “A Comparison of Level of Understanding of Eighth-Grade Students And Science Student Teachers Related To Selected Chemistry Concepts.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 42 (6): 638–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çalık, M., A. Ayas, and J. V. Ebenezer. 2009. “Analogical Reasoning For Understanding Solution Rates: Students’ Conceptual Change And Chemical Explanations.” Research in Science & Technological Education 27 (3): 283–308.
   Google Scholar
• Çalık, M., A. Kolomuç, and Z. Karagölge. 2010. “The Effect of Conceptual Change Pedagogy on Students; Conceptions of Rate of Reaction.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 19 (5): 422–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çam, A., and Ö. Geban. 2013. “Effectiveness of Case-Based Learning Instruction On Students’ Understanding of Solubility Equilibium Concepts.” Hacettepe University Journal of Education 44: 97–108.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, B., F. Lubben, and Z. Dlamini. 2000. “Learning Science through Contexts: Helping Pupils Make Sense of Everyday Situations.” International Journal of Science Education 22: 239–252.10.1080/095006900289859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Childs, P. E., and M. Sheehan. 2009. “What's Difficult about Chemistry? An Irish Perspective.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 10: 204–218.10.1039/b914499b
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çiğdemoğlu, C., and Ö. Geban. 2015. “Improving Students’ Chemical Literacy Levels On Thermochemical And Thermodynamics Concepts Through A Context-Based Approach.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 16: 302–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., L. Manion, and K. Morrison. 2013. Research Methods in Education. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• CORD Communications. 1999. Teaching science contextually. Waco, TX: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, M. L. 2001. Teaching Contextually: Research, Rationale, and Techniques for Improving Student Motivation and Achievement in Mathematics and Science. Waco, TX: CCI Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Demircioğlu, H., G. Demircioğlu, and M. Çalik. 2009. “Investigating the Effectiveness of Storylines Embedded Within a Context-Based Approach: The Case for the Periodic Table.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 10: 241–249.10.1039/b914505m
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demircioğlu, H., M. Dinç, and M. Çalık. 2013. “The Effect of Storylines Embedded Within Context-Based Learning Approach on Grade 6 Students’ Understanding of ‘Physcial And Chemcal Change’ Concepts.” Journal of Baltic Science Education 12 (5): 682–691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demircioğlu, H., S. Vural, and G. Demircioğlu. 2012. “The Effect of A Teaching Material Developed Based On ‘REACT’ Strategy On Gifted Students’ Achievement.” On Dokuz Mayıs University Journal of Education Faculty 31 (2): 101–144.
   Google Scholar
• Ekinci, M. 2010. “The Effect of Context Based Teaching Method on Teaching Chemical Bonds to 1st Grade High School Students.” Master diss., Gazi University.
   Google Scholar
• Fensham, P. 2009. “Real World Contexts in Pısa Science: Implications For Context-Based Science Education.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 46 (8): 884–896. doi:10.1002/tea.20334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. K. 2006. “On the Nature of “Context” in Chemical Education.” International Journal of Science Education 28 (9): 957–976.10.1080/09500690600702470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. K., A. M. W. Bulte, and A. Pilot. 2011. “Concept Development and Transfer in Context-Based Science Education.” International Journal of Science Education 33 (6): 817–837.10.1080/09500693.2010.493185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glynn, S.M., and T.R. Koballa. 2005. “The Contextual Teaching and Learning Instructional Approach.” In Exemplary Science: Best Practices in Professional Development. edited by E. R. Yager, 75–84. Arlington, VA: NSTA press.
   Google Scholar
• Hassan, A. K., R. A. Hill, and N. Reid. 2004. “Ideas Underpinning Success in an Introductory Course in Organic Chemistry.” University Chemistry Education 8: 40–51.
   Google Scholar
• Hennessy, S. 1993. “Situated Cognition and Cognitive Apprentice Ship: İmplications For Classroom Learning.” Studies in Science Education 22 (1): 1–41.10.1080/03057269308560019
   Google Scholar
• Holman, J., and G. Pilling. 2004. “Thermodynamics in Context: A Case Study of Contextualized Teaching for Undergraduates.” Journal of Chemical Education 81 (3): 373–375.10.1021/ed081p373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingram, S. J. 2003. “The Effects of Contextual Learning Instruction on Science Achievement Male and Female Tenth Grade Students.” PhD diss., University of South Alabama.
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone, A. 2006. “Chemical Education Research in Glasgow in Perspective.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 7: 49–63.10.1039/B5RP90021B
   Google Scholar
• Karslı, F., and K. Kara-Patan. 2016. “Effects of the Context- Based Approach on Students’ Conceptual Understanding: “The Umbra, the Solar Eclipse and the Lunar eclipse”.” Journal of Baltic Science Education 15 (2): 246–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karslı, F., and M. Çalık. 2012. “Can Freshman Science Student Teachers’ Alternative Conceptions of ‘Electrochemical Cells’ Be Fully Diminished?” Asian Journal of Chemistry 23 (12): 485–491.
   Google Scholar
• Karslı, F., and M. Yiğit. 2015. “Effect of Context-Based Learning Approach on 12th Grade Students’ Conceptual Understanding About Alkanes.” Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education 16 (1): 43–62. doi:10.17679/iuefd.16124860.
   Google Scholar
• King, D., A. Bellocchi, and S. M. Ritchie. 2008. “Making Connections: Learning and Teaching Chemistry in Context.” Research in Science Education 38: 365–384.10.1007/s11165-007-9070-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutu, H., and M. Sözbilir. 2011. “Teaching ‘Chemistry in Our Lives’ Unit in the 9th Grade Chemistry Course through Context-Based ARCS Instructional Model.” Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 30 (1): 29–62.
   Google Scholar
• Markic, S., and I. Eilks. 2006. “Cooperative and Context-Based Learning on Electrochemical Cells in Lower Secondary Science Lessons- A Project of Participatory Action Research.” Science Education International 4 (17): 253–273.
   Google Scholar
• Maroto, B., C. Camusso, and M. Cividini. 1997. “Evaluation of Learning Processes in an Organic Chemistry Course.” Journal of Chemical Education 74 (10): 1233–1234.10.1021/ed074p1233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsden, E., and C. J. Torgerson. 2012. “Single Group, Pre-and Post-Test Research Designs: Some Methodological Concerns.” Oxford Review of Education 38 (5): 583–616.10.1080/03054985.2012.731208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., and J. Dillon. 2008. Science Education in Europe: Critical Reflections. London: King’s College.
   Google Scholar
• Parchmann, I, C. Gräsel, A. Baer, P. Nentwig, R. Demuth, B. Ralle, and the ChiK Project Group. 2006. ““Chemie im Kontext”: A symbiotic implementation of a context‐based teaching and learning approach.” International Journal of Science Education 28 (9): 1041–1062.10.1080/09500690600702512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilot, A., and A. M. W. Bulte. 2006. “Why Do You “Need to Know”? Context‐Based Education.” International Journal of Science Education 28 (9): 953–956.10.1080/09500690600702462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, N. M., and T. L. Overton. 2006. “Chemistry in Sport: Context-Based e-Learning in Chemistry.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 7 (3): 195–202.10.1039/B6RP90008A
   Google Scholar
• Ratcliffe, M. 2002. “What is Difficult About a-Level Chemistry.” Education in Chemistry 39 (3): 76–80.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, N. 2000. “The Presentation of Chemistry Logically Driven or Applications-Led?” Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe 1 (3): 381–392.
   Google Scholar
• Rushton, G. T., R. C. Hardy, K. P. Gwaltney, and S. E. Lewis. 2008. “Alternative Conceptions of Organic Chemistry Topics Among Fourth Year Chemistry Students.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 9: 122–130.10.1039/B806228P
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D. 2009. “Situated Learning in Science Education: Socioscientific Issues as Contexts for Practice.” Studies in Science Education 45: 1–42.10.1080/03057260802681839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Şendur, G. 2012. “Prospective Science Teachers’ Misconceptions in the Subjects of Organic Chemistry: Alkenes.” Journal of Turkish Science Education 9 (3): 160–185.
   Google Scholar
• Şendur, G., and M. Toprak. 2013. “The Role of Conceptual Change Texts to Improve Students’ Understanding of Alkenes.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 14: 431–449. doi:10.1039/c3rp00019b.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shwartz, Y., R. Ben-Zvi, and A. Hofstein. 2005. “The Importance of Involving High-School Chemistry Teachers in The Process of Defining the Operational Meaning of ‘Chemical Literacy’.” International Journal of Science Teaching 27: 323–344.
   Google Scholar
• Shwartz, Y., R. Ben-Zvi, and A. Hofstein. 2006. “The Use of Scientific Literacy Taxonomy for Assessing the Development Of Chemical Literacy Among High-School Students.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 7 (4): 203–225.10.1039/B6RP90011A
   Google Scholar
• Stolk, M. J., A. M. W. Bulte, O. de Jong, and A. Pilot. 2009. “Strategies for a Professional Development Programme: Empowering Teachers for Context-Based Chemistry Education.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 10: 154–163.10.1039/B908252M
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taasoobshirazi, G. 2007. “Gender Differences in Physics: A Focus on Motivation.” Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online 4 (3): 7–12.
   Google Scholar
• Taber, K. S. 2001. “Shifting Sands: A Case Study of Conceptual Development as Competition between Alternative Conceptions.” International Journal of Science Education 23 (7): 731–753.10.1080/09500690010006572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thyer, B. A. 2012. Quasi-Experimental Research Designs. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195387384.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Trochim, W. M. K. 2001. The Research Methods Knowledge Base. Cincinnati, OH: Atomic Dog, edn, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Ültay, N. 2012. “Designing, Implementing And Comparing ‘Acids And Bases’ Instructional Tasks Based on REACT Strategy And 5E Model.” PhD diss., Karadeniz Technical University.
   Google Scholar
• Ültay, N. 2015. “The Effect of Concept Cartoons Embedded Within Context-Based Chemistry: Chemical Bonding.” Journal of Baltic Science Education 14 (1): 96–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ültay, N., Ü. G. Durukan, and E. Ültay. 2015. “Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Conceptual Change Texts in REACT Strategy.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 16: 22–38. doi:10.1039/C4RP00182F.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulusoy, F. M., and A. S. Onen. 2014. “A Research on The Generative Learning Model Supported by Context-Based Learning.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education 10 (6): 537–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westbroek, H. B. 2005. “Characteristics of Meaningful Chemistry Education, the Case of Water Quality.” PhD diss., Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar