Effects of physical models and simulations to understand daily life applications of electromagnetic induction

References

• Abraham, M. R., V. M. Williamson, and S. L. Westbrook. 1994. “A Cross-Age Study of the Understanding of Five Chemistry Concepts.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 31 (2): 147–165.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aina, K. J. 2013. “Instructional Materials and Improvisation in Physics Class: Implications for Teaching and Learning.” Journal of Research & Method in Education 2 (5): 38–42.
   Google Scholar
• Akıllı, M. 2011. “The Teaching of ‘Structure of Atom’ Subject with the Help of 3D Computer Models to 2. Year Primary Science Education Students.” PhD diss., Atatürk University, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Albe, V., P. Venturini, and J. Lascours. 2001. “Electromagnetic Concepts in Mathematical Representations of Physics.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 10 (2): 197–203.10.1023/A:1009429400105
   Google Scholar
• Allen, L. D. 2001. “An Investigation into Student Understanding of Magnetic Induction.” PhD diss., The Ohio State University. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.
   Google Scholar
• Almudi, J. M., and M. Ceberio. 2015. “Analysis of Arguments Constructed By First-Year Engineering Students Addressing Electromagnetic Induction Problems.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 13 (S1): 215–236.10.1007/s10763-014-9528-y
   Google Scholar
• Atwood, R. K., J. E. Christopher, R. K. Combs, and E. A. E. Roland. 2010. “In-Service Elementary Teachers’ Understanding of Magnetism Concepts before and after Non-Traditional Instruction.” Science Educator 19 (1): 64–76.
   Google Scholar
• Burkaz, S. 2012. “Application of Three-Dimensional Modeling in the Context of Constructivist Learning in Teaching Science and Technology.” MA thesis, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Çalık, M., and A. Ayas. 2005. “A Cross-Age Study on the Understanding of Chemical Solutions and Their Components.” International Education Journal 6 (1): 30–41.
   Google Scholar
• Chittleborough, G. D., D. F. Treagust, T. L. Mamiala, and M. Mocerino. 2005. “Students’ Perceptions of the Role of Models in the Process of Science and in the Process of Learning.” Research in Science & Technological Education 23 (2): 195–212. doi:10.1080/02635140500266484.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., L. Manion, and K. Morrison. 2011. Research Methods in Education. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dale, E. 1946. Audio-Visual Methods in Teaching. New York: Dryden Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Almeida, M. J. BM, A. Salvador, and M. M. RR Costa. 2014. “Analogy for Drude’s Free Electron Model to Promote Students’ Understanding of Electric Circuits in Lower Secondary School.” Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research 10 (2): 020118-(1-12).
   Google Scholar
• Dean, J., and D. A. Allwood. 2014. “From Compass to Hard Drive-Integrated Activities for Studying Magnets.” Physics Education 49 (6): 663–670.10.1088/0031-9120/49/6/663
   Google Scholar
• Demirel, Ö. 2010. Öğretim Teknolojileri Ve Materyal Tasarımı. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
   Google Scholar
• Dufresne, R. J., W. J. Gerace, W. J. Leonard, J. P. Mestre, and L. Wenk. 1996. “Classtalk: A Classroom Communication System for Active Learning.” Journal of Computing in Higher Education 7 (2): 3–47.10.1007/BF02948592
   Google Scholar
• Efthimiou, C., R. Llewellyn, D. Maronde, and T. Winningham. 2006. “Physics in Films: An Assessment.” http://arxiv.org/ftp/physics/papers/0609/0609154.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Eylon, B. S., M. Ronen, and U. Ganiel. 1996. “Computer Simulations as Tools for Teaching and Learning: Using a Simulation Environment in Optics.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 5 (2): 93–110.10.1007/BF01575150
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, S., and S. Watt Ireton. 2003. Understanding Models in Earth and Space Science. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greca, I. M., and M. A. Moreira. 2000. “Mental Models, Conceptual Models, and Modelling.” International Journal of Science Education 22 (1): 1–11.10.1080/095006900289976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greca, I. M., and M. A. Moreira. 2001. “Mental, Physical, and Mathematical Models in the Teaching and Learning of Physics.” Science Education 86: 106–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guisasola, J., J. M. Almudi, and K. Zuza. 2013. “University Students’ Understanding of Electromagnetic Induction.” International Journal of Science Education 35 (16): 2692–2717.10.1080/09500693.2011.624134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handbook for Instructional Materials. District School Board of Pasco County Instructional Media & Technology Services. n.d. http://www.pasco.k12.fl.us/library/media/dsbpc_instructional_materials_handbook.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hargunani, S. P. 2010. “Teaching of Faraday’s and Lenz’s Theory of Electromagnetic Induction Using Java Based Faraday’s Lab Simulations.” Latin-American Journal of Physics Education 4 (3): 520–522.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, C. 2008. “Models in Physics, Models for Physics Learning, and Why the Distinction May Matter in the Case of Electric Circuits.” Research in Science Education 38: 529–544.10.1007/s11165-007-9060-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holec, S., M. Spodniaková Pfefferová, and J. Raganová. 2004. “Computer Simulations in Mechanics at the Secondary School.” Informatics in Education 3 (2): 229–238.
   Google Scholar
• Jimoyiannis, A., and V. Komis. 2002. “Computer Simulations in Physics Teaching and Learning: A Case Study on Students’ Understanding of Trajectory Motion.” Computers & Education 36: 183–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Joolingen, W. R., and T. de Jong. 1991. “Characteristics of Simulations for Instructional Settings.” Education & Computing 6: 241–262.10.1016/0167-9287(91)80004-H
   Google Scholar
• Kocakülah, A. 2006. “The Effect of Traditional Teaching on Primary, Secondary and University Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Image Formation and Colours.” PhD diss., Balıkesir University, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Laws, P., D. Sokoloff, and R. Thornton. 1999. “Promoting Active Learning Using the Results of Physics Education Research.” UniServe Science News 13: 14–19.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. F. 2009. “Using Computer Simulations to Facilitate Conceptual Understanding of Electromagnetic Induction.” PhD diss., State University of New York at Buffalo. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, G., and N. Fang. 2016. “Student Misconceptions about Force and Acceleration in Physics and Engineering Mechanics Education.” International Journal of Engineering Education 32 (1): 19–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauk, H. V., and D. Hingley. 2005. “Student Understanding of İnduced Current: Using Tutorials in İntroductory Physics to Teach Electricity and Magnetism.” American Journal of Physics 73 (12): 1164–1171.10.1119/1.2117167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, L. C. 1991. “Millikan Lecture 1990: What We Teach and What is Learned—Closing the Gap.” American Journal of Physics 59: 301–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, L. C. 1993. “Guest Comment: How We Teach and How Students Learn—A Mismatch?” American Journal of Physics 61 (4): 295–298.10.1119/1.17258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., and A. M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mioković, Ž., S. Ganzberger, and V. Radolić. 2012. “Assessment of the University of Osijek Engineering Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Electricity and Magnetism.” Technical Gazette 19 (3): 563–572.
   Google Scholar
• Narjaikaew, P., N. Emarat, K. Arayathanitkul, and B. Cowie. 2010. “Magnetism Teaching Sequences Based on an Inductive Approach for First-Year Thai University Science Students.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 8 (5): 891–910.10.1007/s10763-009-9191-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oladejo, M. A., G. R. Olosunde, A. O. Ojebisi, and O. M. Isola. 2011. “Instructional Materials and Students’ Academic Achievement in Physics: Some Policyimplications.” European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 2 (1): 112–126.
   Google Scholar
• Onasanya, S. A. 2004. “Selection and Utilization of Instructional Media for Effective Practice Teaching.” Institute Journal of Studies in Education 2 (1): 127–133.
   Google Scholar
• Onasanya, S. A., and E. O. Omosewo. 2011. “Effect of Improvised and Standard Instructional Materials on Secondary School Students’ Academic Performance in Physics in Ilorin, Nigeria.” Singapore Journal of Scientific Research 1 (1): 68–76.
   Google Scholar
• Örnek, F. 2008. “Models in Science Education: Aplication of Models in Learning and Teaching Science.” International Journal of Environmental & Science Education 3 (2): 35–45.
   Google Scholar
• Özmen, H. 2003. “Chemistry Student Teachers’ Levels of Thinking Their Knowledge with Daily Life about Acid and Base Concepts.” Gazi University Kastamonu Education Journal 11: 317–324.
   Google Scholar
• Quarteroni, A. 2009. “Mathematical Models in Science and Engineering.” Notices of the AMS 56 (1): 10–19.
   Google Scholar
• Raduta, C. 2005. “General Students’ Misconceptions Related to Electricity and Magnetism.” http://arxiv.org/ftp/physics/papers/0503/0503132.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sağlam Arslan, A. 2010. “Cross-Grade Comparison of Students’ Understanding of Energy Concepts.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 19 (3): 303–313.10.1007/s10956-009-9201-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauer, T. 2000. “The Effect of Mathematical Model Development on the Instruction of Acceleration to Introductory Physics Students.” PhD diss., University of Minnesota. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.
   Google Scholar
• Shemwell, J. T., C. C. Chase, and D. L. Schwartz. 2015. “Seeking the General Explanation: A Test of Inductive Activities for Learning and Transfer.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 52 (1): 58–83.10.1002/tea.v52.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, J., O. L. Liu, and H. Y. Chang. 2017. “Assessing Students’ Deep Conceptual Understanding in Physical Sciences: An Example on Sinking and Floating.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 15 (1): 57–70.10.1007/s10763-015-9680-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sierra-Fernandez, J. L., and F. J. Perales-Palacios. 2003. “The Effect of İnstruction with Computer Simulation as a Research Tool on Open-Ended Problem-Solving in a Spanish Classroom of 16-Year-Olds.” The Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching 22: 119–140.
   Google Scholar
• Sowell, E. 1974. “Another Look at Materials in Elementary School Mathematics.” School Science and Mathematics 74 (3): 207–211.10.1111/ssm.1974.74.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Tanahoung, C., R. Chitaree, C. Soankwan, M. D. Sharma, and I. D. Johnston. 2009. “The Effect of Interactive Lecture Demonstrations on Students’ Understanding of Heat and Temperature: A Study from Thailand.” Research in Science & Technological Education 27 (1): 61–74.10.1080/02635140802658909
   Google Scholar
• Thong, W. M., and R. Gunstone. 2008. “Some Student Conceptions of Electromagnetic Induction.” Research in Science Education 38 (1): 31–44.10.1007/s11165-007-9038-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weller, H. G. 1996. “Assessing the Impact of Computer-Based Learning in Science.” Journal of Research on Computing in Education 28 (4): 461–485.10.1080/08886504.1996.10782178
   Google Scholar
• Zacharia, Z., and O. Anderson. 2003. “The Effects of an Interactive Computer-Based Simulation prior to Performing a Laboratory Inquiry-Based Experiment on Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Physics.” American Journal of Physics 71: 618–629.10.1119/1.1566427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuza, K., J. M. Almudí, A. Leniz, and J. Guisasola. 2014. “Addressing Students’ Difficulties with Faraday’s Law: A Guided Problem Solving Approach.” Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research 10: 1–16.
   Google Scholar