The effectiveness of hybrid dynamic visualisation in learning genetics in a Hong Kong secondary school

References

• Bahar, M., A. Johnstone, and M. Hansell. 1999. “Revisiting Learning Difficulties in Biology.” Journal of Biological Education 33 (2): 84–86.10.1080/00219266.1999.9655648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H, and R. D. Roscoe. 2002. “The Processes and Challenges of Conceptual Change.” In Reconsidering Conceptual Change: Issues in Theory and Practice, edited by Limon and L. Mason, 3–27. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Chinnici, J., J. Yue, and K. Torres. 2004. “Students as “Human Chromosomes” in Role-Playing Mitosis & Meiosis.” The American Biology Teacher 66 (1): 35–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., L. Manion, and K. Morrison. 2000. Research Methods in Education. 5th ed. London: Routledge Falmer.10.4324/9780203224342
   Google Scholar
• Curriculum Development Council and the Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority. (2007). Biology Curriculum and Assessment Guide (Secondary 4-6). Accessed May 14, 2013. http://www.edb.gov.hk/attachment/en/curriculum-development/kla/science-edu/ref-and-resources/Bio_supplement_e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, R. 2007. “The Role of Domain-Specific Knowledge in Generative Reasoning about Complicated Multileveled Phenomena.” Cognition and Instruction 25 (4): 271–336.10.1080/07370000701632355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, R., and B. Reiser. 2007. “Reasoning across Ontologically Distinct Levels: Students’ Understandings of Molecular Genetics.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 44 (7): 938–959.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gericke, N. M. (2009). “Science Versus School-Science–Multiple Models in Genetics: The Depiction of Gene Function in Upper Secondary Textbooks and its Influence on Students’ Understanding.” PhD diss., Karlstad University Studies, Karlstad.
   Google Scholar
• Hickey, D., A. Kindfield, P. Horwitz, and M. Christie. 2003. “Integrating Curriculum, Instruction, Assessment, and Evaluation in a Technology-Supported Genetics Learning Environment.” American Educational Research Journal 40 (2): 495–538.10.3102/00028312040002495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HKEAA (Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority). 2012. 2012 Hong Kong Diploma of Secondary Education Examination Annual Report: Biology. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Höffler, T., and D. Leutner. 2007. “Instructional Animation versus Static Pictures: A Meta-Analysis.” Learning and Instruction 17 (6): 722–738.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Infante-Malachias, M., I. Padilha, M. Weller, and S. Santos. 2010. “Comprehension of Basic Genetic Concepts by Brazilian Undergraduate Students.” Revista Electrónica De Enseñanza De Las Ciencias 9 (3): 657–668.
   Google Scholar
• Jaber, L., and S. BouJaoude. 2012. “A Macro–Micro–Symbolic Teaching to Promote Relational Understanding of Chemical Reactions.” International Journal of Science Education 34 (7): 973–998.10.1080/09500693.2011.569959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., A. B. Rodriguez, and R. A. Duschl. 2000. ‘“Doing the Lesson” or “Doing Science”: Argument in High School Genetics.’ Science Education 84 (6): 757–792.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knippels, M. (2002). “Coping with the Abstract and Complex Nature of Genetics in Biology Education – The Yo-Yo Learning and Teaching Strategy.” Doctoral diss., Universiteit Utrecht. http://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/219/full.pdf?sequence=2.
   Google Scholar
• Knippels, M., A. Waarlo, and K. Boersma. 2005. “Design Criteria for Learning and Teaching Genetics.” Journal of Biological Education 39 (3): 108–112.10.1080/00219266.2005.9655976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, K. 2010. Biology Success Key for HKDSEE 2 & 4. Hong Kong: Times Publishing (Hong Kong) Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J., and U. Kattmann. 2004. “Traits, Genes, Particles and Information: Re-Visiting Students’ Understandings of Genetics.” International Journal of Science Education 26 (2): 195–206.10.1080/0950069032000072782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J., J. Leach, and C. Wood-Robinson. 2000a. “Chromosomes: The Missing Link — Young People's Understanding of Mitosis, Meiosis, and Fertilisation.” Journal of Biological Education 34 (4): 189–199.10.1080/00219266.2000.9655717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J., J. Leach, and C. Wood-Robinson. 2000b. “Genes, Chromosomes, Cell Division and Inheritance, Do Students See Any Relationship?” International Journal of Science Education 22 (2): 177–195.10.1080/095006900289949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J., J. Leach, and C. Wood-Robinson. 2000c. “What's in a Cell? — Young People's Understanding of the Genetic Relationship between Cells, within an Individual.” Journal of Biological Education 34 (3): 129–132.10.1080/00219266.2000.9655702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marbach-Ad, G., and R. Stavy. 2000. “Students’ Cellular and Molecular Explanations of Genetic Phenomena.” Journal of Biological Education 34 (4): 200–205.10.1080/00219266.2000.9655718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsden, E., and C. Torgerson. 2012. “Single Group, Pre-and Post-Test Research Designs: Some Methodological Concerns.” Oxford Review of Education 38 (5): 583–616.10.1080/03054985.2012.731208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. 2002. “Rote versus Meaningful Learning.” Theory into Practice 41 (4): 226–232.10.1207/s15430421tip4104_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R., and R. Moreno. 2002. “Animation as an Aid to Multimedia Learning.” Educational Psychology Review 14 (1): 87–99.10.1023/A:1013184611077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Meij, J., and T. de Jong. 2006. “Supporting Students’ Learning with Multiple Representations in a Dynamic Simulation-Based Learning Environment.” Learning and Instruction 16 (3): 199–212.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills Shaw, K. R., K. Van Horne, H. Zhang, and J. Boughman. 2008. “Essay Contest Reveals Misconceptions of High School Students in Genetics Content.” Genetics 178 (3): 1157–1168.10.1534/genetics.107.084194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, J., B.Tversky and M.Betrancourt (2000). Animation: Does It Facilitate Learning? In Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Smart Graphics (pp. 53–59).
   Google Scholar
• Novak, J. 2002. “Meaningful Learning: The Essential Factor for Conceptual Change in Limited or Inappropriate Propositional Hierarchies Leading to Empowerment of Learners.” Science Education 86 (4): 548–571.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozcan, T., O. Yildirim, and S. Ozgur. 2012. “Determining of the University Freshmen Students’ Misconceptions and Alternative Conceptions about Mitosis and Meiosis.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 46: 3677–3680.10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.126
   Google Scholar
• Pitts, S., J. Prost, and J. Winters. 2004. “Quasi-Experimental Designs in Developmental Research: Design and Analysis Considerations.” In Handbook of Research Methods in Developmental Science, edited by D. Teti, 81–100. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, F., J. Pegg, and D. Panizzon. 2009. “First-Year Biology Students’ Understandings of Meiosis: An Investigation Using a Structural Theoretical Framework.” International Journal of Science Education 31 (10): 1279–1305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichardt, C., and M. Mark. 1998. “Quasi-Experimentation.” In Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods, edited by L. Bickman and D. Rog, 182–213. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Scheiter, K., P. Gerjets, T. Huk, B. Imhof, and Y. Kammerer. 2009. “The Effects of Realism in Learning with Dynamic Visualizations.” Learning and Instruction 19 (6): 481–494.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheiter, K., P. Gerjets, and J. Schuh. 2010. “The Acquisition of Problem-Solving Skills in Mathematics: How Animations Can Aid Understanding of Structural Problem Features and Solution Procedures.” Instructional Science 38 (5): 487–502.10.1007/s11251-009-9114-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt-Weigand, F., A. Kohnert, and U. Glowalla. 2010. “A Closer Look at Split Visual Attention in System-and Self-Paced Instruction in Multimedia Learning.” Learning and Instruction 20 (2): 100–110.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnotz, W., and M. Bannert. 2003. “Construction and Interference in Learning from Multiple Representation.” Learning and Instruction 13 (2): 141–156.10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00017-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwonke, R., K. Berthold, and A. Renkl. 2009. “How Multiple External Representations Are Used and How They Can Be Made More Useful.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 23 (9): 1227–1243.10.1002/acp.v23:9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrinivasan, Y., and J. van Wijk (2008, April). “Supporting the Analytical Reasoning Process in Information Visualization.” In Proceedings from the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1237–1246). New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Slack, S., and J. Stewart. 1990. “High School Students’ Problem-Solving Performance on Realistic Genetics Problems.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 27 (1): 55–67.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southerland, S., E. Abrams, C. Cummins, and J. Anzelmo. 2001. “Understanding Students’ Explanations of Biological Phenomena: Conceptual Frameworks or P-Prims?” Science Education 85: 328–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsui, C., and D. Treagust. 2007. “Understanding Genetics: Analysis of Secondary Students’ Conceptual Status.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 44 (2): 205–235.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsui, C., and D. Treagust. 2010. “Evaluating Secondary Students’ Scientific Reasoning in Genetics Using a Two‐Tier Diagnostic Instrument.” International Journal of Science Education 32 (8): 1073–1098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsui, C.-Y., and D. F. Treagust. 2013. “Secondary Students’ Understanding of Genetics Using BioLogica: Two Case Studies.” In Multiple Representations in Biological Education, edited by D. F. Treagust and C.-Y., Tsui, 269–292. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tufte, E. 2001. The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. 2nd ed. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
   Google Scholar
• Venville, G., and D. Treagust. 2002. “Teaching about the Gene in the Genetic Information Age.” Australian Science Teachers’ Journal 48 (2): 20–24.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, J. 2005. “The Probabilistic Reasoning of Middle School Students.” Mathematics Education Library 40: 145–169.10.1007/b105829
   Google Scholar
• Wellington, J. 2000. Teaching and Learning Secondary Science: Contemporary Issues and Practical Approaches. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203059876
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, C., J. Stewart, and C. Passmore. 2001. “High School Students’ Use of Meiosis When Solving Genetics Problems.” International Journal of Science Education 23 (5): 501–515.10.1080/09500690121597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yung, H., K. Ho, Y. Ho, K. Tam, and L. Tong. 2010. Mastering Biology 4. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar