Modeling the influences of upper-elementary school students’ digital reading literacy, socioeconomic factors, and self-regulated learning strategies

References

• Ackerman, R., and M. Goldsmith. 2011. “Metacognitive Regulation of Text Learning: On Screen versus on Paper.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 17 (1): 18–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bannert, M. 2004. “Designing Metacognitive Support for Hypermedia Learning.” In Instructional Design for Multimedia-Learning, edited by H. M. Niegemann, D. Leutner, and R. Brunken, 19–30. Munster: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Busch, T. 1995. “Gender Differences in Self-Efficacy and Attitudes toward Computers.” Journal of Educational Computing Research 12 (2): 147–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsen, W. S. 2007. “Language and Science Learning.” In Handbook of Research on Science Education, edited by S. K. Abell and N. G. Lederman, 57–74. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Carnap, R. 2002. The Logical Syntax of Language. Translated by A. Smeaton. Chicago, IL: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, S.-W., and W.-G. Yang. 2006. “The Impact of a Systemic Functional Linguistics-Based Science Text and a Conventional Science Text on Students’ Reading Comprehension.” Journal of Taiwan Normal University: Mathematics & Science Education 51 (1–2): 107–124.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, S.-F. 2013. “Structural equation modeling analysis of factors affecting science language achievement among elementary students.” Research and Development in Science Education Quarterly 67: 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, S.-F. 2014. Structural Equation Modeling: The Application of Mplus. Taipei, TW: Psychological Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Coiro, J., and E. Dobler. 2007. “Exploring the Online Reading Comprehension Strategies Used by Sixth-Grade Skilled Readers to Search for and Locate Information on the Internet.” Reading Research Quarterly 42 (2): 214–257.10.1598/RRQ.42.2.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVellis, R. F. 2011. Scale Development: Theory and Applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Efklides, A., and S. P. Vlachopoulos. 2012. “Measurement of Metacognitive Knowledge of Self, Task, and Strategies in Mathematics.” European Journal of Psychological Assessment 28 (3): 227–239.10.1027/1015-5759/a000145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, C. L., and L. D. Yore. 2012. “Toward Convergence of Critical Thinking, Metacognition, and Reflection: Illustrations from Natural and Social Sciences Teacher Education, and Classroom Practice.” In Metacognition in Science Education: Trends in Current Research. 40 vols, edited by A. Zohar and Y. J. Dori, 251–271. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, and R. E. Anderson. 2014. Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th ed. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, L. A. 2006. “SEARCHing for an Answer: The Critical Role of New Literacies While Reading on the Internet.” The Reading Teacher 59 (7): 614–627.10.1598/RT.59.7.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, Y.-S., M.-H. Yen, W.-H. Chang, C.-Y. Wang, and S. Chen. 2016. “Content Analysis of 1998–2012 Empirical Studies in Science Reading Using a Self-Regulated Learning Lens.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 14 (1): 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, H.-P., and L. D. Yore. 2003. “A Comparative Study of Canadian and Taiwanese Grade 5 Children’s Environmental Behaviors, Attitudes, Concerns, Emotional Dispositions, and Knowledge.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 1 (4): 419–448.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. E., and S. G. Paris. 1987. “Children’s Metacognition about Reading: Issues in Definition, Measurement, and Instruction.” Educational Psychologist 22 (3–4): 255–278.10.1080/00461520.1987.9653052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. 2011. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Korat, O. 2011. “Mothers’ and Teachers’ Estimations of First Graders’ Literacy Level and Their Relation to the Children’s Actual Performance in Different SES Groups.” Education and Treatment of Children 34 (3): 347–371.10.1353/etc.2011.0021
   Google Scholar
• Lee, D.-R., and M.-N. Yu. 2005. “The Verification of a Structural Equation Model on SES, Siblings, Household Education Resources and Educational Achievement: Using the Empirical Data of the 2001 TEPS.” Taiwan Journal of Sociology of Education 5 (2): 1–48.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y.-H., and J.-Y. Wu. 2012. “The Effect of Individual Differences in the Inner and Outer States of ICT on Engagement in Online Reading Activities and PISA 2009 Reading Literacy: Exploring the Relationship between the Old and New Reading Literacy.” Learning and Individual Differences 22 (3): 336–342.10.1016/j.lindif.2012.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leu, D. J. 2007. Expanding the Reading Literacy Framework of PISA 2009 to Include Online Reading Comprehension. A working paper commissioned by the PISA 2009 Reading Expert Group. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Services.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, H.-F. 2009. “The Study of Junior High School Students’ Scientific Literacy: The Cases of Taiwan, Japan, Korea and Hong Kong in PISA 2006.” Journal of Educational Research and Development 5 (4): 77–108.
   Google Scholar
• Miser, T. M., and J. M. Hupp. 2012. “The Influence of Socioeconomic Status, Home Environment, and Childcare on Child Language Abilities.” Current Psychology 31: 144–159.10.1007/s12144-012-9139-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokhtari, K., and C. A. Reichard. 2002. “Assessing Students’ Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies.” Journal of Educational Psychology 94 (2): 249–259.10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullis, I. V. S., M. O. Martin, A. M. Kennedy, K. L. Trong, and M. Sainsbury. 2009. The PIRLS 2011 Assessment Framework. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2006. Assessing Scientific, Reading and Mathematical Literacy. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2013. PISA 2015 Draft Science Framework. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., and E. V. de Groot. 1990. “Motivational and Self-Regulated Learning Components of Classroom Academic Performance.” Journal of Educational Psychology 82 (1): 33–40.10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelstuen, M. S., and I. Braten. 2005. “Decoding, Knowledge, and Strategies in Comprehension of Expository Text.” Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 46 (2): 107–117.10.1111/sjop.2005.46.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schellings, G., C. Aarnoutse, and J. V. Leeuwe. 2006. “Third-Grader’s Think-Aloud Protocols: Types of Reading Activities in Reading an Expository Text.” Learning and Instruction 16 (6): 549–568.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmar-Dobler, E. 2003. “Reading on the Internet: The Link between Literacy and Technology.” Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 47 (1): 80–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schraw, G., K. Crippen, and K. Hartley. 2006. “Promoting Self-Regulation in Science Education: Metacognition as Part of a Broader Perspective on Learning.” Research in Science Education 36 (1–2): 111–139.10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schraw, G., and R. S. Dennison. 1994. “Assessing Metacognitive Awareness.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 19: 460–475.10.1006/ceps.1994.1033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. 2004. “Family, Gender, and Educational Attainment in Britain: A Longitudinal Study.” Journal of Comparative Family Studies 35 (4): 565–589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sperling, R. A., B. C. Howard, L. A. Miller, and C. Murphy. 2002. “Measures of Children’s Knowledge and Regulation of Cognition.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 27 (1): 51–79.10.1006/ceps.2001.1091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, G. P., and D. Anderson. 2013. “Parents’ Metacognitive Knowledge: Influences on Parent–Child Interactions in a Science Museum Setting.” Research in Science Education 43 (3): 1245–1265.10.1007/s11165-012-9308-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tippett, C. D., & R. J. Anthony, (2011). “Changing from users to producers of multimodal texts: A theoretical framework based on cognition, metacognition, semiotics, and systemic functional linguistics. Paper presented at the annual international conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Orlando, April 7.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J.-R., S.-F. Chen, I. Fang, and C.-T. Chou. 2013. “Comparison of Taiwanese and Canadian Students' Metacognitive Awareness of Science Reading, Text, and Strategies.” International Journal of Science Education 36 (4): 693–713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J.-R., and S.-F. Chen. 2014. “Exploring mediating effect of metacognitive awareness on comprehension of science texts through structural equation modeling analysis.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 51 (2): 175–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worthington, R., and T. Whittaker. 2006. “Scale Development Research: A Content Analysis and Recommendations for Best Practices.” The Counseling Psychologist 34: 806–838.10.1177/0011000006288127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., and J.-E. Gustafsson. 2004. “Measuring Socioeconomic Status at Individual and Collective Levels.” Educational Research and Evaluation 10 (3): 259–288.10.1076/edre.10.3.259.30268
   Google Scholar
• Yore, L. D., and C. D. Tippett. 2014. “Reading and Science Learning.” In Encyclopedia of Science Education, edited by R. Gunstone, 1–9. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar