The development of the nature of science view scale (NOSvs) at university level

References

• Abd-El-Khalick, F., R. L. Bell, and N. G. Lederman. 1998. “The Nature of Science and Instructional Practice: Making the Unnatural Natural.” Science Education 82 (4): 417–436.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abd-El-Khalick, F., and N. G. Lederman. 2000. “Improving Science Teachers' Conceptions of Nature of Science: A Critical Review of the Literature.” International Journal of Science Education 22 (7): 665–701.10.1080/09500690050044044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aikenhead, G. S. 1973. “The Measurement of High School Students’ Knowledge about Science and Scientist.” Science Education 57: 539–549.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Google Scholar
• Aikenhead, G., A. Ryan, and J. Desautels. 1989. “Monitoring Student Views on Science Technology-Society Issues: The Development of Multiple Choice Items.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• (AAAS) American Association for the Advancement of Science. 1989. Project 2061. Science for All Americans. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
   Google Scholar
• (AAAS) American Association for the Advancement of Science. 1990. Science for All Americans. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• (AAAS) American Association for the Advancement of Science. 1993. Benchmarks for Literacy: A Project 2061 Report. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aslan, O., and M. F. Taşar. 2013. “How Do Science Teachers View and Teach the Nature of Science? A Classroom Investigation.” Education and Science 38 (167): 65–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. 1990. “Comparative Fit Indexes in Structural Models.” Psychological Bulletin 107: 238–246.10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird, A. 1998. Philosophy of Science. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.10.4324/9780203165348
   Google Scholar
• Broadhurst, N. A. 1970. “A Study of Selected Learning Outcomes of Graduating High School Students in South Australian Schools.” Science Education 54: 17–21.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. A. 2015. Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., and R. Cudeck. 1993. “Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit.” In Testing Structural Equation Models, edited by K. A. Bollen and J. S. Long, 136–162. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. W. 1997. Achieving Scientific Literacy: From Purposes to Practices. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Duschl, R. A. 1990. Restructuring Science Education: The Importance of Theories and Their Development. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. 2009. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. 3rd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Garver, M. S., and J. T. Mentzer. 1999. “Logistics Research Methods: Employing Structural Equation Modeling to Test for Construct Validity.” Journal of Business Logistics 20 (1): 33–57.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, A. K., and C. R. Barman. 1995. “High School Students’ Views about the Nature of Science: Results from Three Countries.” School Science and Mathematics 95: 248–255.10.1111/ssm.1995.95.issue-5
   Google Scholar
• Hambleton, R. K., and L. Patsula. 1999. “Increasing the Validity of Adapted Tests: Myths to Be Avoided and Guidelines for Improving Test Adaptation Practices.” Journal of Applied Testing Technology 1: 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Horner, J. K., and P. A. Rubba. 1978. “The Myth of Absolute Truth.” The Science Teacher 45 (1): 29–30.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L. T., and P. M. Bentler. 1995. “Evaluating Model Fit.” In Structural Equation Modelling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications, edited by R. Hoyle, 76–99. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hurley, A. E., T. A. Scandura, C. A. Schriesheim, M. T. Brannick, A. Seers, R. J. Vandenberg, and L. J. Williams. 1997. “Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis: Guidelines, Issues, and Alternatives.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 18 (6): 667–683.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khishfe, R., and F. Abd-El-Khalick. 2002. “Influence of Explicit and Reflective versus Implicit Inquiry-Oriented Instruction on Sixth Graders’ Views of Nature of Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39 (7): 551–578.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimball, M. E. 1967–68. “Understanding the Nature of Science: A Comparison of Scientists and Science Teachers.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 5: 110–120.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Google Scholar
• Kline, P. 1999. The Handbook of Psychological Testing. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Larochelle, M., and J. Desautels. 1991. “The Epistemological Turn in Science Education: The Return of the Actor.” In Research in Physics Learning: Theoretical Issues and Empirical Studies, edited by R. Duit, F. Goldberg and H. Niedderer, 155–175. Kiel: Institute for Science Education.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G. 1986. “Relating Teaching Behaviour and Classroom Climate to Change in Students’ Conceptions of the Nature of Science.” Science Education 70 (1): 3–19.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G. 1992. “Students’ and Teachers’ Conceptions of the Nature of Science: A Review of the Research.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 29 (4): 331–359.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G., F. Abd-El-Khalick, R. L. Bell, and R. S. Schwartz. 2002. “Views of Nature of Science Questionnaire: Toward Valid and Meaningful Assessment of Learners’ Conceptions of Nature of Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39 (6): 497–521.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G., and M. O’Malley. 1990. “Students’ Perceptions of Tentativeness in Science: Development, Use, and Sources of Change.” Science Education 74: 225–239.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G., P. D. Wade, and R. L. Bell. 1998. “Assessing Understanding of the Nature of Science: A Historical Perspective.” In The Nature of Science and Science Education: Rationales and Strategies, edited by W. McComas, 331–350. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, L. L., S. Chen, X. Chen, O. N. Kaya, A. D. Adams, M. Macklin, and J. Ebenezer. 2009. “Preservice Teachers’ Views about Nature of Scientific Knowledge Development: An International Collaborative Study.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 7: 987–1012.10.1007/s10763-008-9140-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loose, J. 1993. A Historical Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mackay, L. D. 1971. “Development of Understanding about the Nature of Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 8: 57–66.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Google Scholar
• Millar, R., and J. F. Osborne. 1998. Beyond 2000: Science Education for the Future. London: King’s College London.
   Google Scholar
• (NRC) National Research Council. 1996. National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• (NSTA) National Science Teacher Association. 1982. Science - Technology-Society: Science Education for the 1980s. Position Paper. Washington, DC: National Science Teacher Association.
   Google Scholar
• Rubba, P. A. 1977. “The Development, Field Testing and Validation of an Instrument to Assess Secondary School Students’ Understandings of the Nature of Scientific Knowledge.” Dissertations Abstracts International, 38, 5378A (University Microfilms No. 78-00,998).
   Google Scholar
• Rubba, P., and H. Andersen. 1978. “Development of an Instrument to Assess Secondary School Students Understanding of the Nature of Scientific Knowledge.” Science Education 62 (4): 449–458.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Google Scholar
• Rubba, P., J. Homer, and J. M. Smith. 1981. “A Study of Two Misconceptions about the Nature of Science among Junior High School Students.” School Science and Mathematics 81: 221–226.10.1111/ssm.1981.81.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, A. G., and G. S. Aikenhead. 1992. “Students’ Preconceptions about the Epistemology of Science.” Science Education 76 (6): 559–580.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamir, P., and A. Zohar. 1991. “Anthropomorphism and Teleology in Reasoning about Biological Phenomena.” Science Education 75: 57–67.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taşar, M. F. 2003. “Teaching History and the Nature of Science in Science Teacher Education Programs.” Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 1 (13): 30–42.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, L. J. 1995. “Covariance Structure Modeling in Organizational Research: Problems with the Method versus Applications of the Method.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 16: 225–233.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, L. 1954. “A Study of Opinions Related to the Nature of Science and Its Purpose in Society.” Science Education 38: 159–164.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Google Scholar