1,391
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Teaching global climate change to pre-service middle school teachers through inquiry activities

ORCID Icon ORCID Icon

References

  • Akerson, V. L., and D. L. Hanuscin. 2007. “Teaching Nature of Science through Inquiry: Results of a 3-Year Professional Development Program.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 44 (5): 653–680. doi:10.1002/tea.
  • Aksan, Z., and D. Çelikler. 2013. “Pre-Service Elementary Teachers’ Perceptions and Opinions about Greenhouse Effect.” Journal of Baltic Science Education 12: 159–177.
  • Alger, C., and T. J. Kopcha. 2009. “ESupervision: A Technology Framework for the 21st Century Field Experience in Teacher Education.” Issues in Teacher Education 18 (2): 31–46.
  • Ambusaidi, A., E. Boyes, M. Stanisstreet, and N. Taylor. 2012. “Omani Pre-Service Science Teachers ‘ Views about Global Warming : Beliefs about Actions and Willingness to Act.” International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 7 (2): 233–251.
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. 1993. Benchmarks for Science Literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Arslan, H. O., C. Cigdemoglu, and C. Moseley. 2012. “A Three-Tier Diagnostic Test to Assess Pre-Service Teachers’ Misconceptions about Global Warming, Greenhouse Effect, Ozone Layer Depletion, and Acid Rain.” International Journal of Science Education 34 (11): 1667–1686. doi:10.1080/09500693.2012.680618.
  • Bell, R. L., and N. G. Lederman. 2003. “Understandings of the Nature of Science and Decision Making on Science and Technology Based Issues.” Science Education 87: 352–377.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
  • Bernard, H. R. 2013. Social Research Methods. Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
  • Bleicher, R. E., and J. L. Lambert. 2013. “Preservice Teachers’ Perspectives on Global Climate Change.” The International Journal of Climate Change: Impacts and Responses 4 (1): 65–72.
  • Boon, H. J. 2010. “Climate Change? Who Knows? A Comparison of Secondary Students and Pre-Service Teachers.” Australian Journal of Teacher Education 35 (1): 104–120.
  • Borko, H., and R. T. Putnam. 1996. “Learning to Teach.” In Handbook on Educational Psychology, edited by R. C. Calfee and D. Berliner, 673–708. New York: Macmillan.
  • Brand, B. R., and S. J. Moore. 2011. “Enhancing Teachers’ Application of Inquiry‐Based Strategies Using a Constructivist Sociocultural Professional Development Model.” International Journal of Science Education 33 (7): 889–913. doi:10.1080/09500691003739374.
  • Cavas, B. 2012. “The meaning of and need for “Inquiry Based Science Education (IBSE)”.” Journal of Baltic Science Education 11 (1): 4–6.
  • Chichekian, T., and B. M. Shore. 2016. “Preservice and Practicing Teachers’ Self-Efficacy for Inquiry-Based Instruction.” Cogent Education 3 (1): 1–19. doi:10.1080/2331186X.2016.1236872.
  • Clark, D. B., and M. Linn. 2003. “Scaffolding Knowledge Integration through Curricular Depth.” Journal of Learning Sciences 12 (4): 451–494.10.1207/S15327809JLS1204_1
  • Conner, L. N. 2000. The Significance of an Approach to the Teaching of Societal Issues Related to Biotechnology. In Creating Knowledge in the 21st Century: Insights from Multiple Perspectives. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 1–16. New Orleans, LA.
  • Corbin, J., and A. Strauss. 2008. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.10.4135/9781452230153
  • Council of Higher Education. 2017. Faculty of Education Teacher Training Undergraduate Programs. http://www.yok.gov.tr/web/guest/icerik/-/journal_content/56_INSTANCE_rEHF8BIsfYRx/10279/49875.
  • Dawson, V. 2012. “Science Teachers’ Perspectives about Climate Change.” Teaching Science: The Journal of the Australian Science Teachers Association 58 (3): 8–13.
  • Demirbag, M., and M. Gunel. 2014. “Integrating Argument-Based Science Inquiry with Modal Representations: Impact on Science Achievement, Argumentation, and Writing Skills.” Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice 14 (1): 386–392. http://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2014.1.1632.
  • Dewey, J. 1938. Education and experience. New York: Collier Books.
  • Donnelly, D. F., J. M. Vitale, and M. C. Linn. 2015. “Automated Guidance for Thermodynamics Essays: Critiquing versus Revisiting.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 24 (6): 861–874. doi:10.1007/s10956-015-9569-1.
  • Donnelly, D. F., B. Namdar, J. M. Vitale, K. Lai, and M. C. Linn. 2016. “Enhancing Student Explanations of Evolution: Comparing Elaborating and Competing Theory Prompts.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 53 (9): 1341–1363. doi:10.1002/tea.21331.
  • Dori, Y. J., R. T. Tal, and M. Tsaushu. 2003. “Teaching Biotechnology through Case Studies?Can We Improve Higher Order Thinking Skills of Nonscience Majors?” Science Education 87 (6): 767–793. doi:10.1002/sce.10081.
  • Eggert, S., and S. Bögeholz. 2010. “Students’ Use of Decision-Making Strategies with Regard to Socioscientific Issues: An Application of the Rasch Partial Credit Model.” Science Education 94 (2): 230–258. doi:10.1002/sce.20358.
  • Erdogan, M. N. 2005. İlköğretim 7. sınıf öğrencilerinin atomun yapısı konusundaki başarılarına, kavramsal değişimlerine, bilimsel süreç becerilerine ve fene karşı tutumlarına sorgulayıcı-araştırma (Inquiry) yönteminin etkisi [The Effects of Inquiry Method on Middle School (Level 7) Students’ Achievement, Conceptual Change, Scientific Process Skills and Attitude Toward Science About the Atomic Structure], Unpublished masters thesis, Gazi University, Ankara.
  • Eylon, B., and M. C. Linn. 2013. Learning and Instruction : An Examination of Four Research Perspectives in Science Education 58 (3): 251–301.
  • Fitzgerald, M., D. H. McKinnon, L. Danaia, and J. Deehan. 2015. “A Large-Scale Inquiry-Based Astronomy Intervention Project: Impact on Students’ Content Knowledge Performance and Views of Their High School Science Classroom.” Research in Science Education 46 (6): 901–916. doi:10.1007/s11165-015-9486-6.
  • Forbes, C. T. 2013. “Curriculum-Dependent and Curriculum-Independent Factors in Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Adaptation of Science Curriculum Materials for Inquiry-Based Science.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 24 (1): 179–197. doi:10.1007/s10972-011-9245-0.
  • Gerard, L. F., M. Spitulnik, and M. C. Linn. 2010. “Teacher Use of Evidence to Customize Inquiry Science Instruction.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47 (9): 1037–1063. doi:10.1002/tea.20367.
  • Groves, F. H., and A. F. Pugh. 2002. “Cognitive Illusions as Hindrances to Learning Complex Environmental Issues.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 11 (4): 381–390.10.1023/A:1020694319071
  • Hestness, E., J. Randy McGinnis, K. Riedinger, and G. Marbach-Ad. 2011. “A Study of Teacher Candidates’ Experiences Investigating Global Climate Change within an Elementary Science Methods Course.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 22 (4): 351–369. doi:10.1007/s10972-011-9234-3.
  • Hogan, K. 2002. “Small Groups’ Ecological Reasoning While Making an Environmental Management Decision.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39 (4): 341–368. doi:10.1002/tea.10025.
  • Karplus, R. 1977. “Science Teaching and the Development of Reasoning.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 14 (2): 169–175. doi:10.1002/tea.3660140212.
  • Kilinc, A., M. Stanisstreet, and E. Boyes. 2008. “Turkish Students’ Ideas about Global Warming.” International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 3 (2): 89–98.
  • Kişoǧlu, M., H. Gürbüz, M. Erkol, M. S. Akar, and M. Akilli. 2010. “Prospective Turkish Elementary Science Teachers’ Knowledge Level about the Greenhouse Effect and Their Views on Environmental Education in University.” International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education 2 (2): 217–236.
  • Klosterman, M. L., and T. D. Sadler. 2010. “Multi‐Level Assessment of Scientific Content Knowledge Gains Associated with Socioscientific Issues‐Based Instruction.” International Journal of Science Education 32 (8): 1017–1043. doi:10.1080/09500690902894512.
  • Kutluca, A. Y. 2012. Fen ve teknoloji öğretmen adaylarının klonlamaya ilişkin bilimsel ve sosyobilimsel argümantasyon kalitelerinin alan bilgisi yönünden incelenmesi [Investigating of Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Socioscientific and Scientific Argumentation Quality in Terms of Content Knowledge Level]. Unpublished masters thesis, Abant İzzet Baysal University, Bolu.
  • Lambert, J. L., and R. E. Bleicher. 2013. “Climate Change in the Preservice Teacher’s Mind.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 24 (6): 999–1022. doi:10.1007/s10972-013-9344-1.
  • Lambert, J. L., J. Lindgren, and R. Bleicher. 2011. “Climate Change Assessing Elementary Science Methods Students ‘ Understanding about Global Climate Change.” International Journal of Science Education 34 (8): 1167–1187.
  • Lambert, J. L., J. Lindgren, and R. Bleicher. 2012. “Assessing Elementary Science Methods Students’ Understanding about Global Climate Change.” International Journal of Science Education 34 (8): 1167–1187. doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.633938.
  • Landis, J., and G. Koch. 1977. “The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data.” Biometrics 33: 159–174.10.2307/2529310
  • Linn, M. C. 2006. The Knowledge Integration Perspective on Learning and Instruction. In The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, edited by R. Keith Sawyer, 243–264. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Linn, M. C., and B. S. Eylon. 2006. “Science Education: Integrating Views of Learning and Instruction.” In Handbook of Educational Psychology. 2nd ed, edited by P. A. Alexander and P. H. Winne. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ.
  • Linn, M. C., and B. S. Eylon. 2011. Science Learning and İnstruction: Taking Advantage of Technology to Promote Knowledge İntegration, 336. New York: Routledge.
  • Linn, M. C., D. Clark, and J. D. Slotta. 2003. “WISE Design for Knowledge Integration.” Science Education 87 (4): 517–538. doi:10.1002/sce.10086.
  • Linn, M. C., and S. Hsi. 2000. Computers, Teachers, Peers: Science Learning Partners. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Linn, M. C., H. Lee, R. Tinker, F. Husic, and J. L. Chiu. 2006. “Teaching and Assessing Knowledge İntegration in Science.” Science 313 (5790): 1049–1050. doi:10.1126/sciencce.1131408.
  • Lombardi, D., and G. M. Sinatra. 2012. “College Students’ Perceptions about the Plausibility of Human-Induced Climate Change.” Research in Science Education 42 (2): 201–217. doi:10.1007/s11165-010-9196-z.
  • Lotter, C., W. S. Harwood, and J. J. Bonner. 2006. “Overcoming a Learning Bottleneck: Inquiry Professional Development for Secondary Science Teachers.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 17 (3): 185–216. doi:10.1007/s10972-005-9002-3.
  • Luft, J. A. 2001. “Changing Inquiry Practices and Beliefs: The Impact of an Inquiry-Based Professional Development Programme on Beginning and Experienced Secondary Science Teachers.” International Journal of Science Education 23 (5): 517–534. doi:10.1080/095006901750162874.
  • McBride, J. W., M. I. Bhatti, M. A. Hannan, and M. Feinberg. 2004. “Using an Inquiry Approach to Teach Science to Secondary School Science Teachers.” Physics Education 39 (5): 434–439. doi:10.1088/0031-9120/39/5/007.
  • McGinnis, J. R., and P. Simmons. 1999. “Teachers’ Perspectives of Teaching Science–Technology– Society in Local Cultures: A Sociocultural Analysis.” Science Education 83 (2): 179–211. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199903)83.
  • Means, M. L., and J. F. Voss. 1996. “Who Reasons Well? Two Studies of Informal Reasoning among Children of Different Grade, Ability, and Knowledge Levels.” Cognition and Instruction 14 (2): 139–178. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1402_1.
  • Ministry of National Education. 2013a. İlköğretim kurumları fen bilimleri dersi öğretim programı [Primary Education Institutions Science Instruction Program]. Ankara: Talim Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı.
  • Ministry of National Education. 2013b. İlköğretim kurumları matematik dersi öğretim programı [Primary education Institutions Mathematics İnstruction Program]. Ankara: Talim Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı.
  • Minner, D. D., A. J. Levy, and J. Century. 2010. “Inquiry-Based Science Instruction-What is It and Does It Matter? Results from a Research Synthesis Years 1984 to 2002.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47: 474–496.10.1002/tea.v47:4
  • National Research Council. 1996. National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • National Research Council. 2000. Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A Guide for Teaching and Learning. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • National Research Council. 2012. A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Committee on Conceptual Framework for the New K-12 Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • Nelson, B. C., and D. J. Ketelhut. 2007. “Scientific Inquiry in Educational Multi-User Virtual Environments.” Educational Psychology Review 19 (3): 265–283. doi:10.1007/s10648-007-9048-1.
  • Niebert, K., and H. Gropengiesser. 2012. “Understanding and Communicating Climate Change in Metaphors.” Environmental Education Research 19 (2): 282–302. doi:10.1080/13504622.2012.690855.
  • Niebert, K., and H. Gropengießer. 2014. “Understanding the Greenhouse Effect by Embodiment – Analysing and Using Students' and Scientists' Conceptual Resources.” International Journal of Science Education 36 (2): 277–303. doi:10.1080/09500693.2013.763298.
  • Ocal, A., M. Kisoglu, A. Alas, and H. Gurbuz. 2011. “Turkish Prospective Teachers’ Understanding and Misunderstanding on Global Warming.” International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education 20 (3): 215–226. doi:10.1080/10382046.2011.588504.
  • Ottander, C., and M. Ekborg. 2011. “Students’ Experience of Working with Socioscientific Issues – a Quantitative Study in Secondary School.” Research in Science Education 42 (6): 1147–1163. doi:10.1007/s11165-011-9238-1.
  • Pallant, A., and H.-S. Lee. 2015. “Constructing Scientific Arguments Using Evidence from Dynamic Computational Climate Models.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 24 (2): 378–395. doi:10.1007/s10956-014-9499-3.
  • Papadimitriou, V. 2004. “Prospective Primary Teachers' Understanding of Climate Change, Greenhouse Effect, and Ozone Layer Depletion.” Journal of Science Education & Technology 13 (2): 299–307. doi:10.1023/B:JOST.0000031268.72848.6d.
  • Patrick, H., P. Mantzicopoulos, and A. Samarapungavan. 2009. “Motivation for Learning Science in Kindergarten: Is There a Gender Gap and Does Integrated Inquiry and Literacy Instruction Make a Difference.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 46 (2): 166–191. doi:10.1002/tea.20276.
  • Patton, M. Q. 2002. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Roberts, D. A. 2007. “Scientific Literacy/Science Literacy.” In Handbook of Research on Science Education, edited by S. K. Abell and N. G. Lederman, 729–780. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Roth, W.-M., M. K. McGinn, and G. M. Bowen. 1998. “How Prepared Are Preservice Teachers to Teach Scientific Inquiry? Levels of Performance in Scientific Representation Practices.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 9 (1): 25–48. doi:10.1023/A:1009465505918.
  • Ryoo, K., and M. C. Linn. 2012. “Can Dynamic Visualizations Improve Middle School Students’ Understanding of Energy in Photosynthesis?” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 49 (2): 218–243. doi:10.1002/tea.21003.
  • Sadler, T. D. 2004. “Informal Reasoning regarding Socioscientific Issues: A Critical Review of Research.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 41 (5): 513–536. doi:10.1002/tea.20009.
  • Sadler, T. D., and L. A. Donnelly. 2006. “Socioscientific Argumentation: The Effects of Content Knowledge and Morality.” International Journal of Science Education 28 (12): 1463–1488. doi:10.1080/09500690600708717.
  • Sadler, T. D., and D. L. Zeidler. 2005. “The Significance of Content Knowledge for Informal Reasoning regarding Socioscientific Issues: Applying Genetics Knowledge to Genetic Engineering Issues.” Science Education 89 (1): 71–93. doi:10.1002/sce.20023.
  • Sakschewski, M., Eggert, S., Schneider, S., and S. Bögeholz. 2014. “Students’ Socioscientific Reasoning and Decision-Making on Energy-Related Issues – Development of a Measurement Instrument.” International Journal of Science Education 36 (14): 2291–2313. doi:10.1080/09500693.2014.920550.
  • Simmons, P. E., A. Emory, T. Carter, T. Coker, B. Finnegan, D. Crockett, L. Richardson, et al. 1999. “Beginning Teachers: Beliefs and Classroom Actions.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 36 (8): 930–954. doi:10.1002/(sici)1098-2736(199910)36:8<930::aid-tea3>3.0.co;2-n.
  • Simonsen, L., J. Luebeck, and L. Bice. 2009. “The Effectiveness of Online Paired Mentoring for Beginning Science and Mathematics Teachers.” Journal of Distance Education 23 (2): 51–68.
  • Soysal, Y. 2012. Sosyobilimsel argümantasyon kalitesine alan bilgisi düzeyinin etkisi: genetiği değiştirilmiş organizmalar [Influence of Content Knowledge Level to Socioscientific Argumentation Quality: Genetically Modified Organisms]. Unpublished masters thesis, Abant İzzet Baysal University, Bolu.
  • Sürmeli, H., and F. Şahin. 2012. “Preservice Teachers’ Opinions and Ethical Perceptions in Relation to Cloning Studies.” Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal 41 (2): 76–86.
  • Svihla, V., and M. C. Linn. 2012. “A Design-Based Approach to Fostering Understanding of Global Climate Change.” International Journal of Science Education 34 (5): 651–676. doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.597453.
  • Varma, K., and M. C. Linn. 2012. “Using Interactive Technology to Support Students’ Understanding of the Greenhouse Effect and Global Warming.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 21 (4): 453–464. doi:10.1007/s10956-011-9337-9.
  • Visintainer, T., and M. C. Linn. 2015. “Sixth-Grade Students’ Progress in Understanding the Mechanisms of Global Climate Change.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 24 (2): 287–310. doi:10.1007/s10956-014-9538-0.
  • Vitale, J. M., E. McBride, and M. C. Linn. 2016. “Distinguishing Complex Ideas about Climate Change: Knowledge Integration vs. Specific Guidance.” International Journal of Science Education 38 (9): 1548–1569. doi:10.1080/09500693.2016.1198969.
  • Weiland, I. S., and J. A. Morrison. 2013. “The Integration of Environmental Education into Two Elementary Preservice Science Methods Courses: A Content-Based and a Method-Based Approach.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 24 (6): 1023–1047. doi:10.1007/s10972-013-9336-1.
  • White, R., and R. Gunstone. 1992. Probing Understanding. London: Flamer.
  • Yeşildağ-Hasançebi, F., and M. Günel. 2013. “Argümantasyon tabanlı bilim öğrenme yaklaşımının dezavantajlı öğrencilerin fen bilgisi başarılarına etkisi.” [Effects of Argumentation Based Inquiry Approach on Disadvantaged Students’ Science Achievement.] İlköğretim Online Online 12 (4): 1056–1073.
  • Zeidler, D. L., T. D. Sadler, S. Applebaum, and B. E. Callahan. 2009. “Advancing Reflective Judgment through Socioscientific Issues.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 46 (1): 74–101. doi:10.1002/tea.20281.
  • Zohar, A., and F. Nemet. 2002. “Fostering Students’ Knowledge and Argumentation Skills through Dilemmas in Human Genetics.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39 (1): 35–62. doi:10.1002/tea.10008.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.