Teachers’ and principals’ reflections on student participation in a school science and technology competition

References

• Abernathy, T. V., and R. N. Vineyard. 2001. “Academic Competitions in Science.” Clearing House 74 (5): 269–277.10.1080/00098650109599206
   Google Scholar
• Bell, S. 2010. “Project-Based Learning for the 21st Century: Skills for the Future.” The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas 83 (2): 39–43. doi:10.1080/00098650903505415.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., A. Collins, and P. Duguid. 1989. “Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning.” Educational Researcher 18 (1): 32–42.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., L. Manion, and K. Morrison. 2011. Research Methods in Education. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission) 2007. Science Education Now: A Renewed Pedagogy for the Future of Europe. Brussels: EC: Report by a High Level Group on Science Education.
   Google Scholar
• Fisanick, L. 2010. “A Descriptive Study of the Middle School Science Teacher Behavior for Required Student Participation in Science Fair Competitions.” Dissertation, Indiana University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, A., V. Dawson, and M. Hackling. 2013. “Examining the Beliefs and Practices of Four Effective Australian Primary Science Teachers.” Research in Science Education 43 (3): 981–1003.10.1007/s11165-012-9297-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulton, K., and T. Britton. 2011. “STEM Teachers in Professional Learning Communities: From Good Teachers to Great Teaching.” National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future: 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Gess-Newsome, J. 1999. “Pedagogical Content Knowledge: An Introduction and Orientation.” In Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge, edited by J. Gess-Newsome and N. Lederman, 3–17. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Gess-Newsome, J. 2015. “A Model of Teacher Professional Knowledge and Skill including PCK.” In Re-Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Science Education, edited by A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen and J. Loughran, 28–42. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hannafin, M. J., and S. M. Land. 1997. “The Foundations and Assumptions of Technology-Enhanced Student-Centered Learning Environments.” Instructional Science 25 (3): 167–202.10.1023/A:1002997414652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. A. C. 2008. Visible Learning: A Synthesis of over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstein, A., I. Eilks, and R. Bybee. 2011. “Societal Issues and Their Importance for Contemporary Science Education: A Pedagogical Justification and the State of the Art in Israel, Germany and the USA.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 9: 1459–1483.10.1007/s10763-010-9273-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrook, J. 2003. “Increasing Relevance of Science Education: The Way Forward.” Science Education International 14 (1): 5–13.
   Google Scholar
• Holdren, J. P., E. S. Lander, and H. Varmus. 2010. “Prepare and Inspire: K-12 Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) for America’s Future.” Executive Report. Washington, DC: President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, N. T. N., L. J. Chiu, and J. C. Hong. 2016. “Relationship among Students’ Problem-Solving Attitude, Perceived Value, Behavioral Attitude, and Intention to Participate in a Science and Technology Contest.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 14 (8): 1419–1435.10.1007/s10763-015-9665-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerald, C. D. 2009. Defining a 21st Century Education. Accessed February 1, 2017. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0252/e811a5dee8948eb052a1281bbc3486087503.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Karp, T., and P. Maloney. 2013. “‘Exciting Young Students’ in Grades K-8 about STEM through an Afterschool Robotics Challenge.” American Journal of Engineering Education 4 (1): 39–54.
   Google Scholar
• Kind, V. 2009. “Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Science Education: Perspectives and Potential for Progress.” Studies in Science Education 45 (2): 169–204.10.1080/03057260903142285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, K. M., V. C. Lee, and Y. T. Yu. 2010. “Learning Motivation in E-Learning Facilitated Computer Programming Courses.” Computers & Education 55 (1): 218–228.10.1016/j.compedu.2010.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lochmiller, C. R. 2016. “Examining Administrators’ Instructional Feedback to High School Math and Science Teachers.” Educational Administration Quarterly 52 (1): 75–109.10.1177/0013161X15616660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, T. 2006. “Different Countries, Same Science Classes: Students’ Experiences of School Science in Their Own Words.” International Journal of Science Education 28 (6): 591–613.10.1080/09500690500339621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson, S., L. Krajcik, and H. Borko. 1999. “Nature, Sources and Development of Pedagogical Content Knowledge.” In Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge, edited by J. Gess-Newsome and N. G. Lederman, 95–132. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, P. 2014. “When Teaching Makes a Difference: Developing Science Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge through Learning Study.” International Journal of Science Education 36 (11): 1794–1814.10.1080/09500693.2013.879621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., and J. Dillon. 2008. Science Education in Europe: Critical Reflections. London: The Nuffield Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Sahin, A. 2013. “STEM Clubs and Science Fair Competitions: Effects on Post-Secondary Matriculation.” Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research 14 (1): 5–11.
   Google Scholar
• Sahin, A., O. Gulacar, and C. Stuessy. 2015. “High School Students’ Perceptions of the Effects of International Science Olympiad on Their STEM Career Aspirations and Twenty-First Century Skill Development.” Research in Science Education 45 (6): 785–805.10.1007/s11165-014-9439-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreiner, C., and S. Sjøberg. 2004. “ROSE: The Relevance of Science Education. Sowing the Seeds of ROSE.” Acta Didactica 4: 1–126.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. 1986. “Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching.” Educational Researcher 15 (2): 4–14.10.3102/0013189X015002004
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. 1987. “Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform.” Harvard Educational Review 57 (1): 1–22.10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teknikåttan. 2015. Accessed June 14, 2016. http://www.teknikattan.se/
   Google Scholar
• Teknikdelegationen. 2010. Vändpunkt Sverige – ett ökat intresse för matematik, naturvetenskap, teknik och IKT. SOU 2010:28 [Turning Point Sweden – an Increased Interest for Mathematics, Science, Technology and Information Communication Technology]. Accessed June 14, 2016. http://www.regeringen.se/rattsdokument/statens-offentliga-utredningar/2010/04/sou-201028/
   Google Scholar
• Tytler, R. 2014. “Attitudes, Identity, and Aspirations towards Science.” In Handbook of Research in Science Education, Vol. 2, edited by N. G. Lederman and S. K. Abell, 82–103. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Verhoeff, T. 1997. “The Role of Competitions in Education”. In Proceedings of Future World – Educating for the 21st Century, Conference and Exhibition, Cape Town, December 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Woolnough, B. E., Y. Guo, M. S. Leite, M. J. de Almeida, T. Ryu, Z. Wang, and D. Young. 1997. “Factors Affecting Student Choice of Career in Science and Engineering: Parallel Studies in Australia, Canada, China, England, Japan and Portugal.” Research in Science & Technological Education 15 (1): 105–121.10.1080/0263514970150108
   Google Scholar