Assessing students’ ability in performing scientific inquiry: instruments for measuring science skills in primary education

References

• Abrahams, I., and M. J. Reiss. 2015. “The Assessment of Practical Skills.” School Science Review 96 (357): 40–44.
   Google Scholar
• Ahlbrand, W., W. Green, J. Grogg, O. Gould, and D. A. Winnett. 1993. Science Performance Assessment Handbook. Edwardsville, IL: Science Teachers Association.
   Google Scholar
• Alonzo, A. C., and P. R. Aschbacher. 2004, April. “Value-added? Long Assessment of Students’ Scientific Inquiry Skills.” In Proceedings of Assessment for Reform-based Science Teaching and Learning. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the AERA. San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Bartels, M., M. J. H. Rietveld, G. C. M. Van Baal, and D. I. Boomsma. 2002. “Heritability of Educational Achievement in 12-year-olds and the Overlap with Cognitive Ability.” Twin Research and Human Genetics 5 (6): 544–553.10.1375/136905202762342017
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, G. P., R. J. Shavelson, S. R. Goldman, and J. Pine. 1992. “Evaluation of Procedure-Based Scoring for Hands-On Science Assessment.” Journal of Educational Measurement 29 (1): 1–17.10.1111/jedm.1992.29.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, G. P., and R. J. Shavelson. 1994. “Science Performance Assessments: Benchmarks and Surrogates.” International Journal of Educational Research 21 (3): 279–298.10.1016/S0883-0355(06)80020-0
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S., ed. 1956. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Handbook 1, Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay.
   Google Scholar
• Clauser, B. E. 2000. “Recurrent Issues and Recent Advances in Scoring Performance Assessments.” Applied Psychological Measurement 24 (4): 310–324.10.1177/01466210022031778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Davey, T., S. Ferrara, R. Shavelson, P. Holland, N. Webb, and L. Wise. 2015. Psychometric Considerations for the Next Generation of Performance Assessment. Washington, DC: Center for K-12 Assessment & Performance Management, Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Donovan, M. S., J. D. Bransford, and J. W. Pellegrino. 1999. How People Learn: Bridging Research and Practice. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duschl, R. A., H. A. Schweingruber, and A. W. Shouse. 2007. Taking Science to School: Learning and Teaching Science in Grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eberbach, C., and K. Crowley. 2009. “From Every Day to Scientific Observation: How Children Learn to Observe the Biologist’s World.” Review of Educational Research 79 (1): 39–68.10.3102/0034654308325899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ennis, R. H. 1993. “Critical Thinking Assessment.” Theory Into Practice 32 (3): 179–186.10.1080/00405849309543594
   Google Scholar
• Flavell, J. H., P. H. Miller, and S. A. Miller. 1993. Cognitive Development. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, B. J. 1979. Test of Enquiry Skills [and] Handbook. Hawthorn: Australian Council for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, B. J. 1980. “Development and Validation of a Test of Enquiry Skills.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 17 (1): 7–16.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Google Scholar
• Gobert, J. D., and K. R. Koedinger. 2011, September. “Using Model-tracing to Conduct Performance Assessment of Students’ Inquiry Skills Within a Microworld.” Paper presented at the Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Goodson, L. A. 2000. “Teaching and Learning, Strategies for Complex Thinking Skills.” In Annual Proceedings of Selected Research and Development Papers 1 (2): 164–172.
   Google Scholar
• Gott, R., and S. Duggan. 1995. Investigative Work in the Science Curriculum. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gott, R., and S. Duggan. 2002. “Problems with the Assessment of Performance in Practical Science: Which way now?” Cambridge journal of education 32 (2): 183–201.10.1080/03057640220147540
   Google Scholar
• Gott, R., and P. Murphy. 1987. Assessing Investigation at Ages 13 and 15: Assessment of Performance Unit Science Report for Teachers: 9. London: Department of Education and Science.
   Google Scholar
• Hammann, M., T. T. H. Phan, M. Ehmer, and T. Grimm. 2008. “Assessing Pupils’ Skills in Experimentation.” Journal of Biological Education 42 (2): 66–72.10.1080/00219266.2008.9656113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlen, W. 1986. Science at age 11: Assessment of Performance Unit Science Report for Teachers: 1. London: Department of Education and Science.
   Google Scholar
• Harlen, W. 1991. “Pupil Assessment in Science at the Primary Level.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 17 (2–3): 323–340.10.1016/S0191-491X(05)80088-4
   Google Scholar
• Harlen, W., and A. Qualter. 2009. The Teaching of Science in Primary Schools. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harmon, M., T. A. Smith, M. O. Martin, D. L. Kelly, A. E. Beaton, I. Mullis, E. J. Gonzalez, and G. Orpwood. 1997. Performance Assessment: IEA’s Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS and PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstein, A., and V. N. Lunetta. 2004. “The laboratory in Science Education: Foundations for the Twenty-First Century.” Science Education 88 (1): 28–54.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, J. N., D. Verhelst, R. J. H. Engelen, and F. Scheltens. 2010. Wetenschappelijke verantwoording van de toetsen LOVS Rekenen-Wiskunde voor groep 3 tot en met 8 [Scientific Justification of Tests Arithmetic-Math for Grades 1 to 6]. Arnhem: Cito.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, L. R., G. Wheeler, and V. A. S. Centurino. 2013. “TIMSS 2011 Science Framework.” In TIMSS 2015 Assessment Frameworks, edited by I. V. S. Mullis and M. O. Martin, 49–90. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
   Google Scholar
• de Jong, P. F., and E. A. Das-Smaal. 1995. “Attention and Intelligence: The Validity of the Star Counting Test.” Journal of Educational Psychology 87 (1): 80–92.10.1037/0022-0663.87.1.80
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, M., T. Crooks, and A. Cohen. 1999. “Validating Measures of Performance.” Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 18 (2): 5–17.
   Google Scholar
• Kind, P. M. 1999. “Performance Assessment in Science - What are We Measuring?” Studies in Educational Evaluation 25 (3): 179–194.10.1016/S0191-491X(99)00021-8
   Google Scholar
• Kind, P. M. 2013. “Establishing Assessment Scales Using a Novel Disciplinary Rationale for Scientific Reasoning.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 50 (5): 530–560.10.1002/tea.21086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. 1989. “Children and Adults as Intuitive Scientists.” Psychological Review 96 (4): 674–689.10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.674
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. 1999. “A Developmental Model of Critical Thinking.” Educational Researcher 28 (2): 16–46.10.3102/0013189X028002016
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., and D. Dean Jr. 2004. “Metacognition: A Bridge Between Cognitive Psychology and Educational Practice.” Theory Into Practice 43 (4): 268–273.10.1207/s15430421tip4304_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrenz, F., D. Huffman, and W. Welch. 2001. “The Science Achievement of Various Subgroups on Alternative Assessment Formats.” Science Education 85 (3): 279–290.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, A. E. 1989. “Research on Advanced Reasoning, Concept Acquisition and a Theory of Science Instruction.” In Adolescent Development and School Science, edited by P. Adey, 11–36. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, N., and J. Lederman. 2014. “Research on Teaching and Learning of Nature of Science.” In Handbook of Research on Science Education, 2, edited by S. K. Abell and N. G. Lederman, 600–620. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, A., and D. Smith. 1993. “Defining Higher Order Thinking.” Theory Into Practice 32 (3): 131–137.10.1080/00405849309543588
   Google Scholar
• Martin, M. O., I. V. Mullis, A. E. Beaton, E. J. Gonzalez, T. A. Smith, and D. L. Kelly. 1997. Science Achievement in the Primary School Years IEA’s Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
   Google Scholar
• van Merriënboer, J. J. G., R. E. Clark, and M. B. M. de Croock. 2002. “Blueprints for Complex Learning: The 4C/ID-model.” Educational Technology Research and Development 50 (2): 39–61.10.1007/BF02504993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messick, S. 1994. “The Interplay of Evidence and Consequences in the Validation of Performance Assessments.” Educational Researcher 23 (2): 13–23.10.3102/0013189X023002013
   Google Scholar
• Millar, R., and R. Driver. 1987. “Beyond Processes.” Studies in Science Education 14 (1): 33–62.10.1080/03057268708559938
   Google Scholar
• Mislevy, R. J., and G. D. Haertel. 2006. “Implications of Evidence-centered Design for Educational Testing.” Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 25 (4): 6–20.
   Google Scholar
• Moseley, D., V. Baumfield, J. Elliott, M. Gregson, S. Higgins, J. Miller, and D. P. Newton. 2005. Frameworks for Thinking: A Handbook for Teaching and Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511489914
   Google Scholar
• Newmann, F. M. 1990. “Higher Order Thinking in Teaching Social Studies: A Rationale for the Assessment of Classroom Thoughtfulness.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 22 (1): 41–56.10.1080/0022027900220103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• te Nijenhuis, J., E. Tolboom, W. Resing, and N. Bleichrodt. 2004. “Does Cultural Background Influence the Intellectual Performance of Children from Immigrant Groups?: Validity of the RAKIT Intelligence Test for Immigrant Children.” European Journal of Psychological Assessment 20 (1): 10–26.10.1027/1015-5759.20.1.10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2012. A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2017. PISA for Development Assessment and Analytical Framework. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. 2014. “Teaching Scientific Practices: Meeting the Challenge of Change.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 25 (2): 177–196.10.1007/s10972-014-9384-1
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. 2015. “Practical Work in Science: Misunderstood and Badly Used?” School Science Review 96 (357): 16–24.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., and J. Dillon. 2008. Science Education in Europe: Critical Reflections. vol. 13. London: The Nuffield Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Pine, J., P. Aschbacher, E. Roth, M. Jones, C. McPhee, C. Martin, S. Phelps, T. Kyle, and B. Foley. 2006. “Fifth Graders’ Science Inquiry Abilities: A Comparative Study of Students in Hands-on and Textbook Curricula.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 43 (5): 467–484.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. 2002. “The Role of Metacognitive Knowledge in Learning, Teaching, and Assessing.” Theory Into Practice 41 (4): 219–225.10.1207/s15430421tip4104_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, R., and R. Gott. 2006. “Assessment of Performance in Practical Science and Pupil Attributes.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 13 (1): 45–67.10.1080/09695940600563652
   Google Scholar
• Roth, K. J. 2014. “Elementary Science Teaching.” In Handbook of Research on Science Education. vol. 2, edited by N. G. Ledermann and S. K. Abell, 361–393. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Primo, M. A., G. P. Baxter, and R. J. Shavelson. 1993. “On the Stability of Performance Assessments.” Journal of Educational Measurement 30 (1): 41–53.10.1111/jedm.1993.30.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilling, M., L. Hargreaves, W. Harlen, and T. Russell. 1990. Assessing Science in the Primary Classroom: Written Tasks. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Schraw, G., K. J. Crippen, and K. Hartley. 2006. “Promoting Self-Regulation in Science Education: Metacognition as Part of a Broader Perspective on Learning.” Research in Science Education 36 (1–2): 111–139.10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schraw, G., and D. Moshman. 1995. “Metacognitive Theories.” Educational Psychology Review 7 (4): 351–371.10.1007/BF02212307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shavelson, R. J., G. P. Baxter, and J. Pine. 1991. “Performance Assessment in Science.” Applied Measurement in Education 4 (4): 347–362.10.1207/s15324818ame0404_7
   Google Scholar
• Shavelson, R. J., N. B. Carey, and N. M. Webb. 1990. “Indicators of Science Achievement: Options for a Powerful Policy Instrument.” Phi Delta Kappan 71 (9): 692–697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shavelson, R. J., G. Solano-Flores, and M. A. Ruiz-Primo. 1998. “Toward a Science Performance Assessment Technology.” Evaluation and Program Planning 21 (2): 171–184.10.1016/S0149-7189(98)00005-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solano-Flores, G., J. Javanovic, R. J. Shavelson, and M. Bachman. 1999. “On the Development and Evaluation of a Shell for Generating Science Performance Assessments.” International Journal of Science Education 21 (3): 293–315.10.1080/095006999290714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, J., and P. J. Black. 1992. “The Effects of Concept Requirements and Task Contexts on Pupils’ Performance in Control of Variables.” International Journal of Science Education 14 (1): 83–93.10.1080/0950069920140108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sperling, R. A., B. C. Howard, L. A. Miller, and C. Murphy. 2002. “Measures of Children’s Knowledge and Regulation of Cognition.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 27 (1): 51–79.10.1006/ceps.2001.1091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiger, J. H. 1980. “Tests for Comparing Elements of a Correlation Matrix.” Psychological Bulletin 87: 245–251.10.1037/0033-2909.87.2.245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. 1985. Beyond IQ: A Triarchic Theory of Human Intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tamir, P. 1988. “Science Practical Process Skills of Ninth Grade Students in Israel.” Research in Science & Technological Education 6 (2): 117–131.10.1080/0263514880060203
   Google Scholar
• Veenman, M. V. J., B. H. Van Hout-Wolters, and P. Afflerbach. 2006. “Metacognition and Learning: Conceptual and Methodological Considerations.” Metacognition and Learning 1 (1): 3–14.10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0
   Google Scholar
• Veenman, M. V. J., P. Wilhelm, and J. J. Beishuizen. 2004. “The Relation Between Intellectual and Metacognitive Skills from a Developmental Perspective.” Learning and Instruction 14 (1): 89–109.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2003.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weekers, A., I. Groenen, F. G. M. Kleintjes, and H. Feenstra. 2011. Wetenschappelijke verantwoording papieren toetsen begrijpend lezen voor groep 7 en 8 [Scientific Justification Paper-and-Pencil Tests Reading Comprehension for Grades 5 and 6]. Arnhem: Cito.
   Google Scholar
• White, B. Y., and J. R. Frederiksen. 1998. “Inquiry, Modeling, and Metacognition: Making Science Accessible to All Students.” Cognition and Instruction 16 (1): 3–118.10.1207/s1532690xci1601_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, B. Y., and J. R. Frederiksen. 2000. “Metacognitive Facilitation: An Approach to Making Scientific Inquiry Accessible to All.” In Inquiring into Inquiry Learning and Teaching in Science, edited by J. Minstrell and E. van Zee, 331–370. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
   Google Scholar
• Zohar, A., and S. Barzilai. 2013. “A Review of Research on Metacognition in Science Education: Current and Future Directions.” Studies in Science Education 49 (2): 121–169.10.1080/03057267.2013.847261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohar, A., and Y. J. Dori. 2003. “Higher Order Thinking Skills and Low-Achieving Students: Are They Mutually Exclusive?” Journal of the Learning Sciences 12 (2): 145–181.10.1207/S15327809JLS1202_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar