394
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Figures of speech in the physics classroom: a process of conceptual change

, , &

References

  • Alexander, R. 2006. Towards Dialogic Teaching: Rethinking Classroom Talk . Cambridge: Dialogos.
  • Amin, T. 2009. “Conceptual Metaphor Meets Conceptual Change.” Human Development 52: 165–197.10.1159/000213891
  • Amin, T. , F. Jeppsson , J. Haglund , and H. Strömdahl . 2012. “Arrow of Time: Metaphorical Construals of Entropy and the Second Law of Thermodynamics.” Science Education 96 (5): 818–848.10.1002/sce.v96.5
  • Anderson, C. W. 2007. “Perspectives on Science Learning.” In S. Abell and N. Ledermann (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Education (pp. 3–30). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Anderson, R. D. , and J. V. Helms . 2001. “The Ideal of Standards and the Reality of Schools: Needed Research.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 38: 3–16.10.1002/1098-2736(200101)38:1<>1.0.CO;2-F
  • Aubusson, P. J. , A. G. Harrison , and S. M. Ritchie . 2006. Metaphor and Analogy in Science Education . Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/1-4020-3830-5
  • Bowley, R. , and M. Sanchez . 1999. Introductory Statistical Mechanics . 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Brookes, D. T. , and E. Etkina . 2007. “Using Conceptual Metaphor and Functional Grammar to Explore How Language Used in Physics Affects Student Learning.” Physical Review Special Topics – Physics Education Research 3 (010109): 1–16.
  • Brosseau, C. , and J. Viard . 1992. “Quelques reflexions sur le concept d’entropie issues d’un enseignement de thermodynamique.” Ensenanzas de las Ciencias 10 (1): 13–16.
  • Cameron, L. 2002. “Metaphors in the Learning of Science: A Discourse Focus.” British Educational Research Journal 28 (5): 673–688.10.1080/0141192022000015534
  • Canty-Mitchell, J. , and G. D. Zimet . 2000. “Psychometric Properties of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support in Urban Adolescents.” American Journal of Community Psychology 28: 391–400.10.1023/A:1005109522457
  • Carey, S. 2000. “Science Education as Conceptual Change.” Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 21 (1): 13–19.10.1016/S0193-3973(99)00046-5
  • Chang, L. 1994. “A Psychometric Evaluation of 4-Point and 6-Point Likert-Type Scales in Relation to Reliability and Validity.” Applied Psychological Measurement 18 (3): 113–206.
  • Chi, M. T. H . 1993. “Barriers to Conceptual Change in Learning Science Concepts: A Theoretical Conjecture.” Proceedings of the fifteenth annual cognitive science society conference, boulder. University of California, San Diego.
  • Christensen, W. M. , D. E. Melzer , and C. A. Ogilvie . 2009. “Student Ideas regarding Entropy and the Second Law of Thermodynamics in an Introductory Physics Course.” American Journal of Physics 74 (8): 734–741.
  • Clement, J. 2009. Creative Model Construction in Scientists and Students: The Role of Imagery, Analogy and Mental Simulation . Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Cohen, L. , L. Manion , and K. Morrison . 2007. Research Methods in Education . 6th ed. London: Routledge.
  • Duit, R. 2007. STCSE – Bibliography: Students’ and Teachers’ Conceptions and Science Education . Kiel: IPN – Leibniz Institute for Science Education. http://www.ipn.uni-kiel.de/aktuell/stcse/stcse.html.
  • Duit, R. , and D. F. Treagust . 2003. “Conceptual Change: A Powerful Framework for Improving Science Teaching and Learning.” International Journal of Science Education 25 (6): 671–688.10.1080/09500690305016
  • Duit, R. , A. Widodo , and C. T. Wodzinski . 2007. “Conceptual Change Ideas – Teachers’ Views and Their Instructional Practice.” In Reframing the Problem of Conceptual Change in Learning and Instruction , edited by S. Vosniadou , A. Baltas and X. Vamvokoussi , 197–217. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Gallant, R. A. 1981. “Pitfalls of Personification.” Science and Children 19 (20): 16–17.
  • Hutchison, C. B. , and B. L. Padgett II . 2010. “How to Create and Use Analogies Effectively in the Teaching of Science Concepts.” Science Activities 44 (2): 69–74.
  • Jeppson, F. , J. Haglund , T. G. Amin , and H. Stromdahl . 2012. “Exploring the Use of Conceptual Metaphors in Solving Problems on Entropy.” The Journal of the Learning Science 22 (1): 70–120.
  • Kallery, M. , and D. Psillos . 2004. “Anthropomorphism and Animism in Early Years Science: Why Teachers Use Them, How They Conceptualize Them and What Are Their Views on Their Use.” Research in Science Education 34: 291–311.10.1023/B:RISE.0000044613.64634.03
  • Kipnis, N. 2005. “Scientific Analogies and Their Use in Teaching Science.” Science and Education 14 (3–5): 199–233.10.1007/s11191-004-6406-y
  • Lemke, J. L. 1990. Talking Science: Language, Learning and Values . Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Levin, T. , and T. Wagner . 2006. “In Their Own Words: Understanding Student Conceptions of Writing through Their Spontaneous Metaphors in the Science Classroom.” Instructional Science 34: 227–278.10.1007/s11251-005-6929-x
  • McCandless, B. 2012. “The Use and Misuse of Metaphor in Education and Education Reform.” Education 132 (3): 538–547.
  • Mercer, N. 2008. “Changing Our Minds: A Commentary on ‘Conceptual Change: A Discussion of Theoretical, Methodological and Practical Challenges for Science Education’.” Cultural Studies of Science Education 3: 351–362.10.1007/s11422-008-9099-8
  • Merriam, Sh . 2009. Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation . San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
  • Mertler, C. A. 2009. Action Research: Teachers as Researchers in the Classroom . 2nd ed. London: Sage.
  • Mortimer, E. F. , and P. H. Scott . 2003. Meaning Making in Science Classroom . Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
  • Niebert, K. , S. Marsch , and D. F. Treagust . 2012. “Understanding Needs Embodiment: A Theory Guided Reanalysis of the Role of Metaphors and Analogies in Understanding Science.” Science Education 96 (5): 849–877.10.1002/sce.v96.5
  • Padilla, M. J. , I. Miaoulis , and M. Cyr . 2009. Prentice Hall Science Explorer: Electricity and Magnetism . Hoboken, NJ: Pearson.
  • Schon, D. 1987. Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Towards a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Profession . San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
  • Schweingruber, H. A. , R. A. Duschl , and A. W. Shouse . 2007. Taking Science to School: Learning and Teaching Science in Grades K-8 . Washington, DC: National Academics Press.
  • Shulman, L. 1986. “Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching.” Educational Researcher 15 (2): 4–14.10.3102/0013189X015002004
  • Slobin, D. 1996. “From ‘Thought and Language’ to ‘Thinking for Speaking’.” In J. Gumperz and S. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking Linguistic Relativity (pp. 70–96). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Thagard, P. 1992. Conceptual Revolutions . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Treagust, D. F. , and R. Duit . 2014. “Conceptual Change: A Discussion of Theoretical, Methodological, and Practical Challenges in Science Education.” Cultural Studies of Science Education 3 (2): 297–328.
  • Treagust, D. F. , G. J. Venville , A. G. Harrison , and L. Tyson 1997. “Diagnosing Changes in Conceptual Status Based on Transcripts of Students’ Interviews.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), Chicago, IL.
  • Venville, G. J. , and D. F. Treagust . 1996. “The Role of Analogies in Promoting Conceptual Change in Biology.” Instructional Science 24: 295–320.10.1007/BF00118053
  • Vosniadou, S. 1987. “Children and Metaphors.” Child Development , 58, 870–885. 10.2307/1130223
  • Vosniadou, S. 1999. “Conceptual Change Research: State of the Art and Future Directions.” In New Perspectives on Conceptual Change , edited by W. Schnotz , S. Vosniadou and M. Carretero , 3–13. New York: Pergamon.
  • Vosniadou, S. , C. Ioannides , A. Dimitrakopoulou , and E. Papademetriou . 2001. “Designing Learning Environments to Promote Conceptual Change in Science.” Learning and Instruction 11: 381–419.10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00038-4
  • Wales, R. , and G. Coffey . 1986. “On Children’s Comprehension of Metaphor.” In Research Issues in Child Development , edited by C. Pratt , A. Garton , W. Tunmer and A. Nesdale , 81–94. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
  • Wellington, J. , and J. Osbourne . 2001. Language and Literacy in Science Education . Philadelphia, PA : Open University Press.
  • West, L. , and F. C. Staub . 2003. Content-Focused Coaching: Transforming Mathematics Lessons . Portsmouth: University of Pittsburgh.
  • Wiser, M. , and T. Amin . 2001. “‘Is Heat Hot?’ Inducing Conceptual Change by Integrating Everyday and Scientific Perspectives on Thermal Phenomena.” Learning and Instruction 11 (4–5): 331–355.10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00036-0
  • Young, H. D. , and R. A. Freedman . 2003. Sears and Zemansky’s University Physics: With Modern Physics . San Francisco, CA: Pearson Education.
  • Zembylas, M. 2005. “Three Perspectives on Linking the Cognitive and the Emotional in Science Learning: Conceptual Change, Socio-Constructivism and Poststructuralism.” Studies in Science Education 41: 91–115.10.1080/03057260508560215
  • Zumdahl, S. S. 1998. Chemical Principles . Boston, MA : Houghton Mifflin.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.