Story of a Seed: educational theatre improves students’ comprehension of plant reproduction and attitudes to plants in primary science education

References

• Van Aalderen-Smeets, S., and J. Walma van der Molen. 2015. “Improving Primary Teachers’ Attitudes toward Science by Attitude-Focused Professional Development.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 52 (5): 710–734.10.1002/tea.21218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abed, O. H. 2016. “Drama-Based Science Teaching and Its Effect on Students’ Understanding of Scientific Concepts and Their Attitudes towards Science Learning.” International Education Studies 9 (10): 163.
   Google Scholar
• Aikenhead, G. 1996. “Science Education: Border Crossing into the Subculture of Science.” Studies in Science Education 27 (1): 1–52.10.1080/03057269608560077
   Google Scholar
• Aikenhead, G. 2006. Science Education for Everyday Life: Evidence-Based Practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aikenhead, G. 2007. “Humanistic Perspectives in the Science Curriculum.” In Handbook of Research on Science Education, edited by S. K. Abell and N. G. Lederman, 881–910. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ainley, M., and J. Ainley. 2011. “Student Engagement with Science in Early Adolescence: The Contribution of Enjoyment to Students’ Continuing Interest in Learning about Science.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 36 (1): 4–12.10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsop, S. 2001. “Seeking Emotional Involvement in Science Education: Food-Chains and Webs.” School Science Review 83 (302): 63–68.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, L., J. DeWitt, J. Osborne, J. Dillon, B. Willis, and B. Wong. 2010. ““Doing” Science Versus “Being” a Scientist: Examining 10/11-Year-Old Schoolchildren’s Constructions of Science Through the Lens of Identity.” Science Education 94 (4): 617–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, S., and R. Watson. 1998. “Establishing Basic Ecological Understanding in Younger Pupils: A Pilot Evaluation of a Strategy Based on Drama/Role Play.” International Journal of Science Education 20 (2): 139–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowker, R. 2004. “Children’s Perceptions of Plants following Their Visit to the Eden Project.” Research in Science & Technological Education 22 (2): 227–243.10.1080/0263514042000290912
   Google Scholar
• Çil, E. 2015. “Integrating Botany with Chemistry & Art to Improve Elementary School Children’s Awareness of Plants.” The American Biology Teacher 77 (5): 348–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, J. M., A. Paivio. 1991. “Dual Coding Theory and Education.” Educational Psychology Review 3 (3): 149–210.10.1007/BF01320076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., L. Manion, K. Morrison. 2007. Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Crowther, G. 2012. “Using Science Songs to Enhance Learning: An Interdisciplinary Approach.” CBE-Life Sciences Education 11 (1): 26–30.10.1187/cbe.11-08-0068
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowther, G. J., and K. Davis. 2013. “Amino Acid Jazz: Amplifying Biochemistry Concepts with Content-Rich Music.” Journal of Chemical Education 90 (11): 1479–1483.10.1021/ed400006h
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeCoster, J., and H. Claypool. 2004. “Data Analysis in SPSS.” Accessed September 7, 2016. http://www.stat-help.com/notes.html
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education. 2017. “Find and Compare Schools in England.” Accessed March 7, 2018. https://www.gov.uk/school-performance-tables
   Google Scholar
• DeWitt, J., J. Osborne, L. Archer, J. Dillon, B. Willis, and B. Wong. 2013. “Young Children’s Aspirations in Science: The Unequivocal, the Uncertain and the Unthinkable.” International Journal of Science Education 35 (6): 1037–1063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorion, K. R. 2009. “Science through Drama: A Multiple Case Exploration of the Characteristics of Drama Activities Used in Secondary Science Lessons.” International Journal of Science Education 31 (16): 2247–2270.10.1080/09500690802712699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drea, S. 2011. “The End of the Botany Degree in the UK.” Bioscience Education 17 (1): 1–7.10.3108/beej.17.2
   Google Scholar
• Fančovičová, J., and P. Prokop. 2010. “Development and Initial Psychometric Assessment of the Plant Attitude Questionnaire.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 19 (5): 415–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garner, R. L. 2006. “Humor in Pedagogy: How Ha-Ha can Lead to Aha!” College Teaching 54 (1): 177–180.
   Google Scholar
• Government Digital Service. 2016. “The National Curriculum.” Accessed September 7, 2016. https://www.gov.uk/national-curriculum/overview
   Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., K. Hauft-Smith, A. D. Cohen, and L. D. Pyles. 1980. “Advanced Outlines, Familiarity, and Text Genre on Retention of Prose.” The Journal of Experimental Education 48 (4): 281–290.10.1080/00220973.1980.11011745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardiman, M. M. 2010. The Creative-Artistic Brain. In Mind, Brain, and Education: Neuroscience Implications for the Classroom, edited by D. Sousa, 226–246. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hardiman, M., L. Rinne, and J. Yarmolinskaya. 2014. “The Effects of Arts Integration on Long-Term Retention of Academic Content.” Mind, Brain and Education 8 (3): 144–148.10.1111/mbe.12053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F., and K. Krippendorff. 2007. “Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data.” Communication Methods and Measures 1 (1): 77–89.10.1080/19312450709336664
   Google Scholar
• Immordino-Yang, M., and A. Damasio. 2007. “We Feel, Therefore We Learn: The Relevance of Affective and Social Neuroscience to Education.” Mind, Brain, and Education 1 (1): 3–10.10.1111/mbe.2007.1.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isen, A., K. Daubman, and G. Nowicki. 1987. “Positive Affect Facilitates Creative Problem Solving.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52 (6): 1122.10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, A. 2002. Learning through Theatre: New Perspectives on Theatre in Education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jansson, J., and M. Aksela. 2013. “Science Theatre in Teaching and Popularizing the History of Chemistry: The Case of a Theatrical Play on Nobel-Laureate AI Virtanen.” Lumat 1 (4): 457–475.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, J., and E. Burkman. 1993. “Motivation Principles.” Instructional Message Design: Principles from the Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences 2: 3–49.
   Google Scholar
• Kerby, H., J. Cantor, M. Weil, C. Babiarz, and A. Kerby. 2010. “Fusion Science Theater Presents the Amazing Chemical Circus: A New Model of Outreach That Uses Theater to Engage Children in Learning.” Journal of Chemical Education 87 (10): 1024–1030.10.1021/ed100143j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klepaker, T., S. F. Almendingen, and J. Tveita. 2012. “Young Norwegian Students’ Preferences for Learning Activities and the Influence of These Activities on the Students’ Attitudes to and Performance in Science.” Nordic Studies in Science Education 3 (1): 45–56.10.5617/nordina.513
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. 2001. “Articulating Communities: Sociocultural Perspectives on Science Education.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 38 (3): 296–316.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerman, Z. 2005. “Chemistry: An Inspiration for Theatre and Dance.” Chemical Education International 6 (1): 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Lesser, L. M. 2015. “American Pi’: The Story of a Song about Pi.” Journal of Mathematics Education 8 (2): 158–168.
   Google Scholar
• Levesley, A., S. Paxton, R. Collins, A. Baker, and C. Knight. 2014. “Engaging Students with Plant Science: The Plant Science TREE.” New Phytologist 203 (4): 1041–1048.10.1111/nph.12905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindemann-Matthies, P. 2006. “Investigating Nature on the Way to School: Responses to an Educational Programme by Teachers and Their Pupils.” International Journal of Science Education 28 (8): 895–918.10.1080/10670560500438396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Link-Pérez, M., and E. Schussler. 2013. “Elementary Botany: How Teachers in One School District Teach about Plants.” Plant Science Bulletin 59 (3): 99–110.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., ed. 2005. The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCurdy, S. M., C. Schmiege, and C. K. Winter. 2008. “Incorporation of Music in a Food Service Food Safety Curriculum for High School Students.” Food Protection Trends 28 (2): 107–114.
   Google Scholar
• McGaugh, J. L. 2004. “The Amygdala Modulates the Consolidation of Memories of Emotionally Arousing Experiences.” Annual Review Neuroscience 27: 1–28.10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, R. J. A., S. Abbott, P. Bray, J. Exley, and D. Wisnia. 1984. “Teaching Science Through Drama: An Empirical Investigation.” Research in Science & Technological Education 2 (1): 77–81.
   Google Scholar
• Millar, R., and J. Osborne. 1998. Beyond 2000: Science Education for the Future: A Report with Ten Recommendations. London: King’s College London, School of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government. 2015. “English Indices of Deprivation.” Accessed March 7, 2018. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/english-indices-of-deprivation-2015
   Google Scholar
• Negrete, A. 2002. “Science via Narratives: Communicating Science through Literary Forms.” Ludus Vitalis 18: 197–204.
   Google Scholar
• Negrete, A., and C. Lartigue. 2004. “Learning from Education to Communicate Science as a Good Story.” Endeavour 28 (3): 120–124.10.1016/j.endeavour.2004.07.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, G. 2010. “Likert Scales, Levels of Measurement and the ‘Laws’ of Statistics.” Advances in Health Sciences Education 15 (5): 625–632.10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ødegaard, M. 2003. “Dramatic Science. a Critical Review of Drama in Science Education.” Studies in Science Education 39 (1): 75–101.10.1080/03057260308560196
   Google Scholar
• Peleg, R., and A. Baram-Tsabari. 2011. “Atom Surprise: Using Theatre in Primary Science Education.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 20 (5): 508–524.10.1007/s10956-011-9299-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelps, E. 2006. “Emotion and Cognition: Insights from Studies of the Human Amygdala.” Annual Review Psychology 57: 27–53.10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prince, M. 2004. “Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research.” Journal of Engineering Education 93 (3): 223–231.10.1002/jee.2004.93.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prokop, P., M. Prokop, and S. D. Tunnicliffe. 2007. “Is Biology Boring? Student Attitudes Toward Biology.” Journal of biological education 42 (1): 36–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pye, C. 2004. “Chemistry and Song: A Novel Way to Educate and Entertain.” Journal of Chemistry Education 81 (4): 507.10.1021/ed081p507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinne, L., E. Gregory, J. Yarmolinskaya, and M. Hardiman. 2011. “Why Arts Integration Improves Long-Term Retention of Content.” Mind, Brain, and Education 5 (2): 89–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roediger, H., and M. Pyc. 2012. “Inexpensive Techniques to Improve Education: Applying Cognitive Psychology to Enhance Educational Practice.” Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 1 (4): 242–248.10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R., and E. Deci. 2000. “Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 25 (1): 54–67.10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, D. 2007. “Making Public the Private Life of Plants: The Contribution of Informal Learning Environments.” International Journal of Science Education 29 (10): 1209–1228.10.1080/09500690600951549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saricayir, H. 2010. “Teaching Electrolysis of Water Through Drama.” Journal of Baltic Science Education 9 (3): 179–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schussler, E., and L. Olzak. 2008. “It’s Not Easy Being Green: Student Recall of Plant and Animal Images.” Journal of Biological Education 42 (3): 112–119.10.1080/00219266.2008.9656123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Science and Plants for Schools. 2016. Primary Teaching Resources. Accessed September 7, 2016. https://www.saps.org.uk/primary/teaching-resources
   Google Scholar
• Sousa, D. A., and T. Pilecki. 2013. From STEM to STEAM: Using Brain-Compatible Strategies to Integrate the Arts. California: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Talmi, D., A. Anderson, L. Riggs, J. Caplan, and M. Moscovitch. 2008. “Immediate Memory Consequences of the Effect of Emotion on Attention to Pictures.” Learning & Memory 15 (3): 172–182.10.1101/lm.722908
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorndyke, P. W. 1977. “Cognitive Structures in Comprehension and Memory of Narrative Discourse.” Cognitive Psychology 9 (1): 77–110.10.1016/0010-0285(77)90005-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, B., C. Ballenger, M. Ogonowski, A. S. Rosebery, and J. Hudicourt-Barnes. 2001. “Rethinking Diversity in Learning Science: The Logic of Everyday Sense-Making.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 38 (5): 529–552.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winston, J. 2008. Mathematics, Science and the Liberating Beauty of Theatre. In Creative Encounters: New Conversations in Science, Education and the Arts, edited by R. Levinson, H. Nicholson, and S. Parry, 30–47. London: The Wellcome Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, D., and K. Pugh. 2001. “Learning Science: A Deweyan Perspective.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 38 (3): 317–336.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, H. G. 2006. “The Nature of Science Drama in Science Education.” In the 9th International Conference on Public Communication of Science and Technology (PCST-9). Seoul, Korea, May 17–19.
   Google Scholar