Unpacking challenges of data commentary writing in master’s thesis projects: an insider perspective from chemical engineering

References

• Anson, C. M., D. P. Dannels, P. Flash, and A. L. Housley Gaffney. 2012. “Big Rubrics and Weird Genres: The Futility of Using Generic Assessment Tools across Diverse Instructional Contexts.” The Journal of Writing Assessment 5 (1).
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. 1990. Vol. 4 of Class, Codes and Control. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203011263
   Google Scholar
• Blåsjö, M. 2011. “From Percentage to Prediction: University Students Meeting a Parallel Language of Visuals and Numerals.” Ibérica 22: 123–140.
   Google Scholar
• Curry, M. J. 2014. “Graphics and Invention in Academic Engineers’ Writing for Publication.” In Language, Literacy, and Learning in STEM Education: Research Methods and Perspectives from Applied Linguistics, edited by M. J. Curry and D. I. Hanauer, 87–106. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/lsse
   Google Scholar
• Dowd, J. E., C. P. Roy, R. J. Thompson Jr, and J. A. Reynolds. 2015. “‘On Course’ for Supporting Expanded Participation and Improving Scientific Reasoning in Undergraduate Thesis Writing.” Journal of Chemical Education 92 (1): 39–45.10.1021/ed500298r
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dysthe, O. 2002. “Professors as Mediators of Academic Text Cultures: An Interview Study with Advisors and Master’s Degree Students in Three Disciplines in a Norwegian University.” Written Communication 19 (4): 493–544.10.1177/074108802238010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dysthe, O., A. Samara, and K. Westrheim. 2006. “Multivoiced Supervision of Master’s Students: A Case Study of Alternative Supervision Practices in Higher Education.” Studies in Higher Education 31 (3): 299–318.10.1080/03075070600680562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geisler, C. 1994. “Literacy and Expertise in the Academy.” Language and Learning across the Disciplines 1: 35–57.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, M., and C. Jacobs. 2013. “Editorial: Student Learning and ICLHE–Frameworks and Contexts.” Journal of Academic Writing 3 (1).
   Google Scholar
• Harwood, N., and B. Petrić. 2017. Vol. 25 of Experiencing Master’s Supervision: Perspectives of International Students and Their Supervisors. London/New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, C. 2007. “Towards a Critical Understanding of the Teaching of Discipline-Specific Academic Literacies: Making the Tacit Explicit.” (Kenton Special Issue). Journal of Education 41: 59–81.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, C. 2010. “Collaboration as Pedagogy: Consequences and Implications for Partnerships between Communication and Disciplinary Specialists.” Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 28 (3): 227–237.10.2989/16073614.2010.545025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns, A. M., A. Bawarshi, R. M. Coe, K. Hyland, B. Paltridge, M. J. Reiff, and C. Tardy. 2006. “Crossing the Boundaries of Genre Studies: Commentaries by Experts.” Journal of Second Language Writing 15 (3): 234–249.10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanoksilapatham, B. 2005. “Rhetorical Structure of Biochemistry Research Articles.” English for Specific Purposes 24 (3): 269–292.10.1016/j.esp.2004.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Kleijn, R. A., M. T. Mainhard, P. C. Meijer, M. Brekelmans, and A. Pilot. 2013. “Master’s Thesis Projects: Student Perceptions of Supervisor Feedback.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (8): 1012–1026.10.1080/02602938.2013.777690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Kleijn, R. A., P. C. Meijer, A. Pilot, and M. Brekelmans. 2014. “The Relation between Feedback Perceptions and the Supervisor–Student Relationship in Master’s Thesis Projects.” Teaching in Higher Education 19 (4): 336–349.10.1080/13562517.2013.860109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuteeva, M., and L. McGrath. 2015. “The Theoretical Research Article as a Reflection of Disciplinary Practices: The Case of Pure Mathematics.” Applied Linguistics 36 (2): 215–235.10.1093/applin/amt042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvale, S. 2007. Doing Interviews. London: Sage.10.4135/9781849208963
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldaña. 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, T., and J. Morton. 2017. “The Myth of Job Readiness? Written Communication, Employability, and the ‘Skills Gap’ in Higher Education.” Studies in Higher Education 42 (3): 591–609.10.1080/03075079.2015.1067602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nixon, R. S., T. J. Godfrey, N. T. Mayhew, and C. C. Wiegert. 2016. “Undergraduate Student Construction and Interpretation of Graphs in Physics Lab Activities.” Physical Review Physics Education Research 12 (1): 010104.10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.010104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordrum, L., and A. Eriksson. 2015. “Data Commentary in Science Writing: Using a Small, Specialized Corpus for Formative Self-Assessment Practices.” In Learner Corpora in Language Testing and Assessment, edited by M. Callies and S. Götz, 59–83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, M. 2009. “The UAM Corpus Tool: Software for Corpus Annotation and Exploration.” In Applied Linguistics Now: Understanding Language and Mind [La lingüística aplicada hoy: Comprendiendo el lenguaje y la mente], edited by C. M Bretones Callejas, J. F. Fernández Sánchez, J. R. Ibáñez Ibáñez, M. E. García Sánchez, M. E. Cortés de los Ríos, M. S. Salaberri Ramiro, M. S. Cruz Marines, N. Perdu Honeyman, and B. Cantizano Márquez, 1433–1447. Almería: Universidad de Almería.
   Google Scholar
• Odell, L., D. Goswami, and A. Herrington. 1983. “The Discourse-Based Interview: A Procedure for Exploring the Tacit Knowledge of Writers in Non-Academic Settings.” In Research on Writing: Principles and Methods, edited by P. Mosenthal, L. Tamor and S. Walmsley, 221–236. New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Pelger, S., and A. Sigrell. 2016. “Rhetorical Meta-Language to Promote the Development of Students’ Writing Skills and Subject Matter Understanding.” Research in Science & Technological Education 34 (1): 15–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poe, M., N. Lerner, and J. Craig. 2010. Learning to Communicate in Science and Engineering: Case Studies from MIT. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Posteguillo, S. 1999. “The Schematic Structure of Computer Science Research Articles.” English for Specific Purposes 18 (2): 139–160.10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00001-5
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, J. A., C. Thaiss, W. Katkin, and R. J. Thompson. 2012. “Writing-to-Learn in Undergraduate Science Education: A Community-Based, Conceptually Driven Approach.” CBE-Life Sciences Education 11 (1): 17–25.10.1187/cbe.11-08-0064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, J. A., and R. J. Thompson. 2011. “Want to Improve Undergraduate Thesis Writing? Engage Students and Their Faculty Readers in Scientific Peer Review.” CBE-Life Sciences Education 10 (2): 209–215.10.1187/cbe.10-10-0127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, M. S., and F. L. Stoller. 2007. “A Read–Analyze–Write Approach to Research-Related Literacy Skills for Upper-Division Chemistry Majors.” In Designing, Implementing, and Sustaining a Research-Supportive Undergraduate Curriculum: A Compendium of Successful Curricular Practices from Faculty and Institutions Engaged in Undergraduate Research, edited by K. K. Katukstis and T. Elgren, 175–190. Washington, DC: Council on Undergraduate Research.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, M. S., F. L. Stoller, M. S. Costanza-Robinson, and J. K. Jones. 2008. Write like a Chemist. A Guide and Resource. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, M. S., F. L. Stoller, and J. K. Jones. 2008. “Using the ACS Journals Search to Validate Assumptions about Writing in Chemistry and Improve Chemistry Writing Instruction.” Journal of Chemical Education 85 (5): 650–654.10.1021/ed085p650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sancho Guinda, C. 2012. “Variation in Students’ Accounts of Graphic Data: Context and Context Factors in a Polytechnic Setting.” In Insights into Academic Genres, edited by C. Berkenkotter, V. K. Bhatia and M. Gotti, 355–376. Bern: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Stoller, F. L., B. Horn, W. Grabe, and M. S. Robinson. 2005. “Creating and Validating Assessment Instruments for a Discipline-Specific Writing Course: An Interdisciplinary Approach.” Journal of Applied Linguistics 2 (1): 75–104.
   Google Scholar
• Stoller, F. L., B. Horn, W. Grabe, and M. S. Robinson. 2006. “Evaluative Review in Materials Development.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 5 (3): 174–192.10.1016/j.jeap.2006.07.003
   Google Scholar
• Stoller, F. L., and M. S. Robinson. 2013. “Chemistry Journal Articles: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Move Analysis with Pedagogical Aims.” English for Specific Purposes 32 (1): 45–57.10.1016/j.esp.2012.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swales, J. M. 1990. Genre Analysis. English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swales, J. M., and C. B, Feak. 2012. Academic Writing for Graduate Students. Essential Tasks and Skill. 3rd ed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.2173936
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. 2015. “Teaching Students to Focus on the Data in Data Visualization.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication 29 (3): 344–359.10.1177/1050651915573944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar