Students’ interest towards STEM: a longitudinal study

References

• Ainey, M., and J. Ainey. 2011. “A Cultural Perspective on the Structure of Student Interest in Science.” International Journal of Science Education 33 (1): 51–71. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.518640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderman, E. M., and M. L. Maehr. 1994. “Motivation and Schooling in the Middle Grades.” Review of Educational Research 64 (2): 287–309. doi:10.3102/00346543064002287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, J., and D. Hodson. 2001. “Pedagogical Context Knowledge: Toward a Fuller Understanding of What Good Science Teachers Know.” Science Education 85 (4): 426–453. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beane, J. 1995. “Curriculum Integration and the Disciplines of Knowledge.” Phi Delta Kappan 76: 616–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, K., and K. Park. 2011. “Effect of Integrative Approaches among Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Subjects on Students’ Learning: A Preliminary Meta-Analysis.” Journal of STEM Education 12: 23–37.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J., and S. Hogarth. 2009. “Would You Want to Talk to a Scientist at a Party? High School Students’ Attitudes to School Science and to Science.” International Journal of Science Education 31: 975–1998. doi:10.1080/09500690802425581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergin, D. A. 1999. “Influences on Classroom Interest.” Educational Psychologist 34 (2): 87–98. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3402_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumenfeld, P. C., T. M. Kempler, and J. S. Krajcik. 2006. “Motivation and Cognitive Engagement in Learning Environment.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Learning Sciences, ed R. K. Sawyer, 475–488. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, G. J., and G. M. Brooks. 1993. In Search of Understanding: The Case for Constructivism Classroom. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Cantrell, P., G. Pekcan, A. Itani, and N. Velasquez-Bryant. 2006. “The Effect of Engineering Modules on Student Learning in Middle School Science Classroom.” Journal of Engineering Education 95 (4): 301–309. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00905.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capraro, R. M., and S. W. Slough. 2008. Project-Based Learning: An Integrated Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Approach. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Childress, V. W. 1996. “Does Integration Technology, Science, and Mathematics Improve Technological Problem Solving?: A Quasi-Experiment.” Journal of Technology Education 8 (1): 16–26. doi:10.21061/jte.v8i1.a.2.
   Google Scholar
• DeBacker, T. K., and R. M. Nelson. 1999. “Variations on an Expectancy-Value Model of Motivation in Science.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 24 (2): 71–94. doi:10.1006/ceps.1998.0984.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• English, L. D., and D. T. King. 2015. “STEM Learning through Engineering Design: Fourth-Grade Students’ Investigations in Aerospace.” International Journal of STEM Education 2 (14): 1–18. doi:10.1186/s40594-015-0027-7.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, B. J. 1981. Test of Science-Related Attitudes (TOSRA) Handbook. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Frykholm, J., and G. Glasson. 2005. “Connecting Science and Mathematics Instruction: Pedagogical Context Knowledge for Teachers.” School Science and Mathematics 105 (3): 127–141. doi:10.1111/ssm.2005.105.issue-3.
   Google Scholar
• Griethuijsen, R. A. L. F., M. W. Eijck, P. J. Brok, H. Haste, N. C. Skinner, N. Mansour, A. S. Gencer, and S. BouJaoude. 2015. “Global Patterns in Students’ Views of Science and Interest in Science.” Research in Science Education 45 (4): 581–603. doi:10.1007/s11165-014-9438-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halim, L., and T. S. M. Meerah. 2016. “Science Education Research and Practice in Malaysia.” In Science Education Research and Practice in Asia, ed M. H. Chiu, 71–93. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hampden-Thompson, G., and J. Bennett. 2013. “Science Teaching and Learning Activities and Students’ Engagement in Science.” International Journal of Science Education 35 (8): 1325–1343. doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.608093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbert, J., and D. Stipek. 2005. “The Emergence of Gender Differences in Children’s Perceptions of Their Academic Competence.” Journal of Applied Development Psychology 26 (3): 276–295. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2005.02.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstein, A., and V. N. Lunetta. 2003. “The Laboratory in Science Education: Foundations for the Twenty-First Century.” Science Education 88: 28–54. doi:10.1002/sce.10106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmegaard, H. T., L. M. Madsen, and L. Ulriksen. 2014. “To Choose or Not to Choose Science: Constructions of Desirable Identities among Young People considering a STEM Higher Educa-tion Programme.” International Journal of Science Education 36 (2): 186–215. doi:10.1080/09500693.2012.749362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holstermann, N., D. Grube, and S. Bögeholz. 2010. “Hands-On Activities and Their Influence on Students’ Interest.” In Research in Science Education 40 (5): 743–757. doi:10.1007/s11165-009-9142-0.
   Google Scholar
• Ismail, M. E., M. S. Samsudin, and A. N. M. Zain. 2014. “A Multilevel Study on Trends in Malaysian Secondary School Students’ Science Attitude: Evidence from TIMSS 2011.” International Journal of Asian Social Science 4 (5): 572–584.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, H. H. 1989. Interdisciplinary Curriculum: Design and Implementation. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, D. 2006. What Community College Management Practices Are Effective in Promoting Student Success? A Study of High- and Low-Impact Institutions. New York: Community College Research Centre, Institute on Education and the Economy, Teachers College, Columbia University. http://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/Publication.asp?UID=419.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, T. R., and J. G. Knowles. 2016. “A Conceptual Framework for Integrated STEM Education.” International Journal of STEM Education 3 (11): 1–11. doi:10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, A. 1988. Getting the GIST: A Quantitative Study of the Effects of the Girls into Science and Technology Project. Manchester: University of Manchester.
   Google Scholar
• Kier, M. W., M. R. Blanchard, J. W. Osborne, and J. L. Albert. 2014. “The Development of the STEM Career Interest Survey (STEM-CIS).” Research in Science Education 44 (3): 461–481. doi:10.1007/s11165-013-9389-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krajcik, J. S., C. M. Czerniak, and C. F. Berger. 2003. Teaching Science in Elementary and Middle School Classrooms: A Project-Based Approach. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Krapp, A. 2005. “Basic Needs and the Development of Interest and Intrinsic Motivational Orientations.” Learning and Instruction 15: 381–395. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maltese, A. V., and R. H. Tai. 2010. “Eyeballs in the Fridge: Sources of Early Interest in Science.” International Journal of Science Education 32 (5): 669–685. doi:10.1080/09500690902792385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marasco, E. A., and L. Behjat. 2013. Developing a Cross-Disciplinary Curriculum for the Integration of Engineering and Design in Elementary Education. Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June, in Atlanta, United States.
   Google Scholar
• McBride, J. W., and F. L. Silverman. 1991. “Integrating Elementary/Middle School Science and Mathematics.” School Science and Mathematics 91 (7): 285–292. doi:10.1111/ssm.1991.91.issue-7.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education Malaysia (MOE). 2013. Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013–2025. Putrajaya: MOE.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education Malaysia (MOE). 2016. Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013–2025: Annual Report 2015. Putrajaya: MOE.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MOSTI). 2012. Science and Technology Human Capital Roadmap: Towards 2020. Putrajaya: Malaysian Science and Technology Information Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, M. 1993. “Situational Interest: Its Multifaceted Structure in the Secondary School Mathematics Classroom.” Journal of Educational Psychology 85 (3): 424–436. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.3.424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, T. J., A. W. Glancy, K. M. Tank, J. A. Kersten, M. Stohlmann, F. D. Ntow, and K. A. Smith. 2013. A Framework for Implementing Engineering Standards in K-12. Paper presented at The International Conference of Association for Science Teacher Education (ASTE), January 9–12, in Charleston, SC.
   Google Scholar
• Museum of Science Boston. 2009. Engineering Is Elementary Engineering Design Process. http://www.mos.org/eie/engineering_design.php.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC). 2009. Engineering in K–12 Education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nugent, G., B. Barker, G. Welch, N. Grandgenett, C. Wu, and C. Nelson. 2015. “A Model of Factors Contributing to STEM Learning and Career Orientation.” International Journal of Science Education 37, No 7: 1067–1088. doi:10.1080/09500693.2015.1017863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, R. V., M. Prenzel, and R. Martin. 2011. “Interest in Science: A Many-Faceted Pictures Painted by Data from the OECD PISA Study.” International Journal of Science Education 33 (1): 1–6. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.518639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., S. Simon, and S. Collins. 2003. “Attitudes towards Science: A Review of the Literature and Its Implications.” International Journal of Science Education 25: 1049–1079. doi:10.1080/0950069032000032199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, D. H. 2009. “Student Interest Generated during an Inquiry Skills Lesson.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 46 (2): 147–165. doi:10.1002/tea.v46:2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekrun, R., T. Goetz, W. Titz, and R. P. Perry. 2002. “Academic Emotions in Students’ Self-Regulated Learning and Achievement: A Program of Qualitative and Quantitative Research.” Educational Psychologist 37: 91–105. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3702_4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan, E., and J. DeWitt. 2015. “Attitudes, Interest and Factors Influencing STEM Enrolment Behaviour: An Overview of Relevant Literature.” In Understanding Student Participation and Choice in Science and Technology Education, ed E. K. Henriksen, J. Dillon, and J. Ryder, 63–88. Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7793-4_5.
   Google Scholar
• Riskowski, J., C. D. Todd, B. Wee, M. Dark, and J. Harbor. 2009. “Exploring the Effectiveness of an Interdisciplinary Water Resources Engineering Module in an Eighth Grade Science Course.” International Journal of Engineering Education 25 (1): 181–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, M. 2009. “STEM, STEM Education, STEMmania.” Technology Teacher 68 (4:): 20–26.
   Google Scholar
• Schiefele, U. 1991. “Interest, Learning, and Motivation.” Educational Psychologist 26: 299–323. doi:10.1080/00461520.1991.9653136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheppard, S. D., K. Macantangay, A. Colby, and W. M. Sullivan. 2009. Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Stohlmann, M. S., T. J. Moore, and K. Cramer. 2013. “Pre-Service Elementary Teachers’ Mathematical Content Knowledge from an Integrated STEM Modelling Activity.” Journal of Mathematical and Application 1 (8): 18–31.
   Google Scholar
• Subotnik, R. F., R. H. Tai, R. Rickoff, and J. Almarode. 2010. “Specialized Public High Schools of Science, Mathematics, and Technology and the STEM Pipeline: What Do We Know Now and What Will We Know in 5 Years.” Roeper Review 32: 7–16. doi:10.1080/02783190903386553.
   Google Scholar
• Swarat, S., A. Ortony, and W. Revelle. 2012. “Activity Matters: Understanding Student Interest in School Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 49, No 4: 515–537. doi:10.1002/tea.21010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. 1989. “Cognitive Technology: Some Procedures for Facilitating Learning and Problem Solving in Mathematics and Science.” Journal of Education Psychology 81 (4): 457–466. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.81.4.457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tai, R., C. Liu, A. Maltese, and X. Fan. 2006. “Planning Early for Careers in Science.” Science 312 (5777): 1143–1144. doi:10.1126/science.1128690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, R., and J. Osborne. 2012. “Student Attitudes and Aspirations towards Science.” In Second International Handbook of Science Education, ed B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, and C. J. McRobbie, 597–625. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• VanMeter-Adams, A., C. L. Frankenfeld, J. Bases, V. Espina, and L. A. Liotta. 2014. “Students Who Demonstrate Strong Talent and Interest in STEM are Initially Attracted to STEM through Extracurricular Experiences.” CBE Life Sciences Education 13 (4): 687–697. doi:10.1187/cbe.13-11-0213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar