Teaching about thermal expansion: investigating the effectiveness of a cognitive bridging approach

References

• Abell, N., D. W. Springer, and A. Kamata. 2009. Developing and Validating Rapid Assessment Instruments. Oxford: Oxford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ary, D., L. C. Jacobs, C. Sorensen, and A. Razavieh. 2010. Introduction to Research in Education. Belmont: Wadsworth Cengage.
   Google Scholar
• Aviani, I., N. Erceg, and V. Mešić. 2015. “Drawing and Using Free Body Diagrams: Why It May Be Better Not to Decompose Forces.” Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research 11: 20137. doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.11.020137.
   Google Scholar
• Bowling, A., and S. Ebrahim. 2005. Handbook of Health Research Methods: Investigation, Measurement and Analysis. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, J. V. 1978. “Robustness?” British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 31: 144–152. doi:10.12691/ajams-1-5-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., J. J. Franks, N. J. Vye, and R. D. Sherwood. 1989. “New Approaches to Instruction: Because Wisdom Can’t Be Told.” Similarity and Analogical Reasoning 470: 497.
   Google Scholar
• Bueno, A. C. R., D. A. Prudente, E. C. Machado, and R. V. Ribeiro. 2012. “Temperature Amplitude Affects the Vegetative Growth and Carbon Metabolism of Orange Trees in a Rootstock-Dependent Manner.” Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 31: 309–319. doi:10.1007/s00468-017-1553-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement, J. 1988. “Observed Methods for Generating Analogies in Scientific Problem Solving.” Cognitive Science 12: 563–586. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1204_3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement, J. 1993. “Using Bridging Analogies and Anchoring Intuitions to Deal with Students Preconceptions in Physics.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 30: 1241–1257. doi:10.1002/tea.3660301007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, R. J., and M. Swerdlik. 2009. Psychological Assessment: An Introduction to Tests and Measurements. Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Craik, K. 1943. The Nature of Explanation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• David, H. 2013. Statistical Methods for Psychology. Belmont: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Duit, R. 2015. “Alltagsvorstellungen und Physik lernen.” In Physikdidaktik: Theorie und Praxis, edited by E. Kircher, R. Girwidz, and P. Häußler, 657–680. Heidelberg: Springer Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Ebel, R. 1979. Essentials of Educational Measurement. 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Einstein, A., and L. Infeld. 1938. The Evolution of Physics. London: Scientific Book Club.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, G. L. 1979. “Children’s Conceptions of Heat and Temperature.” Science Education 63 (2): 221–230. doi:10.1088/0031-9120/20/4/309.
   Google Scholar
• Eylon, B.-S., and U. Ganiel. 1990. “Macro-Micro Relationships: The Missing Link between Electrostatics and Electrodynamics in Students’ Reasoning.” International Journal of Science Education 12 (1): 79–94. doi:10.1080/0950069900120107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A. 2009. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Foy, P., and J. F. Olson. 2009. TIMSS 2007 International Database and User Guide. Released Items. Mathematics–Fourth Grade. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, J. J. 2000. “Teaching for Understanding and Application of Science Knowledge.” School Science & Mathematics 100 (6): 310–318. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2000.tb17325.x.
   Google Scholar
• Giancoli, D. 2005. Physics Principles with Applications. 6th ed. UK: Prentice-Hall International.
   Google Scholar
• Glass, G. V., P. D. Peckham, and J. R. Sanders. 1972. “Consequences of Failure to Meet Assumptions Underlying the Fixed Effects Analyses of Variance and Covariance.” Review Of Educational Research 42 (3): 237–288. doi:10.3102/00346543042003237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greca, I. M., and M. A. Moreira. 1997. “The kinds of mental representations–models, propositions and images–used by college physics students regarding the concept of field.” International Journal of Science Education 19: 711–724. doi: 10.1080/0950069970190607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greca, I. M., and M. A. Moreira. 2000. “Mental Models, Conceptual Models, and Modelling.” International Journal of Science Education 22: 1–11. doi:10.1080/095006900289976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hake, R. R. 1998. “Interactive Engagement versus Traditional Methods: A Six-Thousand-Student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses.” American Journal of Physics 66: 64–74. doi:10.1119/1.18809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday, D., R. Resnick, and J. Walker. 2011. Fundamentals of Physics. 9th ed. NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hestenes, D., and I. Halloun. 1995. “Interpreting the Force Concept Inventory: A Response to March 1995. Critique by Huffman and Heller.” The Physics Teacher 33: 502. doi:10.1119/1.2344278.
   Google Scholar
• Jarrett, L., B. Ferry, and G. Takacs. 2012. “Development and Validation of a Concept Inventory for Introductory-Level Climate Change Science.” International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education 20 (2): 25–41.
   Google Scholar
• Kartal, T., N. Öztürk, and H. G. Yalvaç. 2011. “Misconceptions of Science Teacher Candidates about Heat and Temperature.” Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 15: 2758–2763. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.184.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, E., and S. Pak. 2002. “Students Do Not Overcome Conceptual Difficulties after Solving 1000 Traditional Problems.” American Journal of Physics 70: 759–765. doi:10.1119/1.1484151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leinonen, R., M. A. Asikainen, and P. E. Hirvonen. 2013. “Overcoming Students’ Misconceptions Concerning Thermal Physics with the Aid of Hints and Peer Interaction during a Lecture Course.” Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research 9: 20112. doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.9.020112.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, E. L., and M. C. Linn. 1994. “Heat Energy and Temperature Concepts of Adolescents, Adults, and Experts: Implicationsfor Curricular Improvements.” Journal Of Research In Science Teaching 31 (6): 657–677. doi:10.1002/tea.3660310607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liew, C. W., and D. Treagust. 1995. “A Predict-Observe-Explain Teaching Sequence for Learning about Students’ Understanding of Heat and Expansion Liquids.” Australian Science Teachers Journal 41 (1): 68–71.
   Google Scholar
• Luck, S. J., and E. K. Vogel. 1997. “The Capacity of Visual Working Memory for Features and Conjunctions.” Nature 390: 279–281. doi:10.1038/36846.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marušić, M., and J. Sliško. 2012. “Influence of Three Different Methods of Teaching Physics on the Gain in Students’ Development of Reasoning.” International Journal of Science Education 34 (2): 301–326. doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.582522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matijašević, I., J. N. Korolija, and L. M. Mandić. 2016. “Translation of P = kT into a Pictorial External Representation by High School Seniors.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 17 (4): 656–674. doi:10.1039/C6RP00030D.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., and R. Moreno. 2003. “Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning.” Educational Psychologist 38: 43–52. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCloskey, M. 1983. “Intuitive Physics.” Scientific American 248: 122–130. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0483-122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHugh, M., and V. McCauley. 2016. “Getting Hooked on Physics!” The Physics Teacher 54: 548–550. doi:10.1119/1.4967896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKagan, S. B., K. K. Perkins, and C. E. Wieman. 2010. “Design and Validation of the Quantum Mechanics Conceptual Survey.” Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research 6: 20121. doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.6.020121.
   Google Scholar
• Michael, J., and H. I. Modell. 2003. Active Learning in Secondary and College Science Classrooms: A Working Model for Helping the Learner to Learn. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nersessian, N. 1995. “Should Physicists Preach What They Practice? Constructive Modeling in Doing and Learning Physics.” Science & Education 4: 203–226. doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-1921-8_6.
   Google Scholar
• Nersessian, N. 1999. Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Nersessian, N. 2008. Creating Scientific Concepts. Cambridge, MA, and London: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Planinic, M., L. Ivanjek, and A. Susac. 2010. “Rasch Model Based Analysis of the Force Concept Inventory.” Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research 6 (1): 10103. doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.6.010103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podolefsky, N. S., and N. D. Finkelstein. 2006. “Use of Analogy in Learning Physics: The Role of Representations.” Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research 2: 20101. doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.2.020101.
   Google Scholar
• Redish, E. 2003. Teaching Physics with the Physics Suite. Hoboken: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Reiner, M., J. D. Slotta, M. T. H. Chi, and L. B. Resnick. 2000. “Naive Physics Reasoning: A Commitment to Substance Based Conceptions.” Cognition and Instruction 18: 1–34. doi:10.1207/S1532690XCI1801_01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorden, S. D. 2005. “A Cognitive Approach to Instructional Design for Multimedia Learning.” Informing Science Journal 8: 264–279.
   Google Scholar
• Sözbilir, M. 2003. “A Review of Selected Literature on Students’ Misconceptions of Heat and Temperature.” Boğaziçi University Journal of Education 20 (1). doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.02.074.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, A. L., and J. J. Clement. 2009. “Extreme Case Reasoning and Model Based Learning in Experts and Students.” In Proceedings of the NARST 2009 Annual Meeting.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, A. L., and J. J. Clement. 2010. “Documenting the Use of Expert Scientific Reasoning Processes by High School Physics Students.” Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research 6: 20122. doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.6.020122.
   Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. 1994. “Cognitive Load Theory, Learning Difficulty, and Instructional Design.” Learning and Instruction 4: 295–312. doi:10.1016/0959-4752(94)90003-5.
   Google Scholar
• Tipler, P., and G. Mosca. 2008. Physics for Scientists and Engineers. 1 vol. 6th ed. New York: Worth Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Vermunt, J., and N. Verloop. 1999. “Congruence and Friction between Learning and Teaching.” Learning and Instruction 9: 257–280. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(98)00028-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voss, J., D. Perkins, and J. Segal. 1991. Informal Reasoning and Education. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, J. 2017. Physics. 5th ed. USA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, J., and E. Mazur. 2013. “Retaining Students in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Majors.” Journal of College Science Teaching 42 (5): 36–41.
   Google Scholar
• Yalcınkay, E., and Y. Boz. 2015. “The Effect of Case-Based Instruction on 10th Grade Students’ Understanding of Gas Concepts.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 16: 104–120. doi:10.1039/C4RP00156G.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeo, S., and M. Zadnik. 2001. “Introductory Thermal Concept Evaluation: Assessing Students Understanding.” The Physics Teacher 39: 496–504. doi:10.1119/1.1424603.
   Google Scholar
• Zietsman, A., and J. Clement. 1997. “The Role of Extreme Case Reasoning in Instruction for Conceptual Change.” The Journal of the Learning Sciences 6: 61–89. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0601_4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar