Design of a student lab program for nanoscience and technology – an intervention study on students’ perceptions of the Nature of Science, the Nature of Scientists and the Nature of Scientific Inquiry

References

• Abd-El-Khalick, F., and N. G. Lederman. 2000. “The Influence of History of Science Courses on Students’ Views of Nature of Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37 (10): 1057–1095. doi:10.1002/1098-2736(200012)37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, J. 2012. “Schools and Informal Science Settings: Collaborate, Co-Exist, or Assimilate?” Cultural Studies of Science Education 7 (2): 409–416. doi:10.1007/s11422-012-9394-2.
   Google Scholar
• Baum, M., and S. Schwarzer. 2013. “Wie dünn ist eine Seifenblase? Ein experimenteller Zugang zu Mikro- und Nanoschichten.” CHEMKON 20 (1): 25–28. doi:10.1002/ckon.201210193.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, R., L. Blair, B. Crawford, and N. G. Lederman. 2003. “Just Do It? Impact of a Science Apprenticeship Programm on High School Students’ Understandings of the Nature of Science and Scientific Inquiry.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 40 (5): 487–509. doi:10.1002/tea.10086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, R. L., N. G. Lederman, and F. Abd-El-Khalick. 2000. “Developing and Acting upon One’s Conception of the Nature of Science: A Follow-Up Study.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37 (6): 563–581. doi:10.1002/1098-2736(200008)37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blonder, R., E. Joselevich, and S. R. Cohen. 2010. “Atomic Force Microscopy: Opening the Teaching Laboratory to the Nanoworld.” Journal of Chemical Education 87 (12): 1290–1293. doi:10.1021/ed100963z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braund, M., and M. Reiss. 2006. “Towards a More Authentic Science Curriculum: The Contribution of Out-Of-School Learning.” International Journal of Science Education 28 (12): 1373–1388. doi:10.1080/09500690500498419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castellini, O., G. Welejko, C. Holladay, T. Theim, G. Zenner, and W. Crone. 2007. “Nanotechnology and the Public: Effectively Communicating Nanoscale Science and Engineering Concepts.” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 9 (2): 183–189. doi:10.1007/s11051-006-9160-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chittleborough, G. D., D. F. Treagust, T. L. Mamiala, and M. Mocerino. 2007. “Students´ Perceptions of the Role of Models in the Process of Science and in the Process of Learning.” Research in Science and Technological Education 23 (2): 195–212. doi:10.1080/02635140500266484.
   Google Scholar
• Clough, M. 2006. “Learners´ Responses to the Demands of Conceptual Change: Considerations for Effective Nature of Science Instruction.” Science Education 15 (5): 463–494. doi:10.1007/s11191-005-4846-7.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1992. “A Power Primer.” Psychological Bulletin 112 (1): 155–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, F., and D.-T. Chen. 2011. “Students´ Views of the Nature of Science: A Critical Review of Research.” Science Education 95 (6): 961–999. doi:10.1002/sce.20460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driver, R., J. Leach, R. Millar, and P. Scott. 1996. Young People´S Images of Science. Buckingham: Marston Lindsay Ross International Ltd. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Duit, R., H. Gropengiesser, and U. Kattman. 2005. “Towards Science Education Research that Is Relevant for Improving Practice: The Model of Educational Reconstruction.” In Developing Standards in Research on Science Education, edited by H. Fischer, 1–10. London: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Duit, R., H. Gropengießer, U. Kattmann, M. Komorek, and I. Parchmann. 2012. “The Model of Educational Reconstruction. A Framework for Improving Teaching and Learning Science.” In Science Education Research and Practice in Europe: Retrospective and Prospective, 5 vols. edited by D. Jorde and J. Dillon, 13–38. Rotterdam: Sense Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Eastwood, J., T. Sadler, D. Zeidler, A. Lewis, L. Amiri, and S. Applebaum. 2003. “Contextualizing Nature of Science Instruction in Socioscientific Issues.” International Journal of Science Education 34 (15): 2289–2315. doi:10.1080/09500693.2012.667582.
   Google Scholar
• Edelson, D. C. 1998. “Realizing Authentic Science Learning through the Adaptation of Scientific Practice.” In International Handbook of Science Education, edited by B. J. Fraser and K. G. Tobin, 317–331. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Elby, A., and D. Hammer. 2001. “On the Substance of a Sophisticated Epistemology.” Science Education 85 (5): 554–567. doi:10.1002/sce.1023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, A., P. Taskinen, and K. Schütte, eds. 2006. PISA 2006 Skalenhandbuch: Dokumentation der Erhebungsinstrumente. Münster: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Ghattas, N. I., and J. S. Carver. 2012. “Integrating Nanotechnology into School Education: A Review of the Literature.” Research in Science and Technological Education 30 (3): 271–284. doi:10.1080/02635143.2012.732058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glowinski, I., and H. Bayrhuber. 2011. “Student Labs on a University Campus as a Type of Out-Of-School Learning Environment: Assessing the Potential to Promote Students’ Interest in Science.” International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 6 (4): 371–392.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, P., and W. Hare. 2000. “Portraying Science Accurately in Classrooms: Emphasizing Open-Mindedness Rather than Relativism.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37 (3): 225–236. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200003)37:3<225::AID-TEA1>3.0.CO;2-G.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy, N. 2009. “Why Nano Education?” Journal of Nano Education 1 (1): 6–7. doi:10.1166/jne.2009.004.
   Google Scholar
• Herzog, S., O. Finlayson, K. Hickmann, and I. Parchmann. 2015. “Poren nach Maß - Struktur-Eigenschaftsbeziehungen unter der chemiedidaktischen Lupe.” CHEMKON 22 (1): 29–36. doi:10.1002/ckon.201410240.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, E. W., and N. W. Nelson. 2010. “Important but Not for Me: Students´ Attitudes Towards Secondary School Science in England.” Research in Science and Technological Education 23 (1): 41–57. doi:10.1080/02635140500068435.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. G., R. Blonder, G. E. Gardner, V. Albe, M. Falvo, and J. Chevrier. 2013. “Nanotechnology and Nanoscale Science: Educational Challenges.” International Journal of Science Education 35 (9): 1490–1512. doi:10.1080/09500693.2013.771828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. G., T. Andre, R. Superfine, and R. Taylor. 2003. “Learning at the Nanoscale: The Impact of Students’ Use of Remote Microscopy on Concepts of Viruses, Scale, and Microscopy.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 40 (3): 303–322. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, S., L. Scharmann, and T. Noh. 2004. “Examining Students’ Views on the Nature of Science: Results from Korean 6th, 8th, and 10th Graders.” Science Education 89 (2): 314–334. doi:10.1002/sce.20053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khishfe, R., and F. Abd-El-Khalick. 2002. “Influence of Explicit and Reflective versus Implicit Inquiry-Oriented Instruction on Sixth-Graders´ Views of Nature of Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39 (7): 551–578. doi:10.1002/tea.10036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kienhues, D., R. Bromme, and E. Stahl. 2008. “Changing Epistemological Beliefs: The Unexpected Impact Of a Short‐term Intervention.” British Journal Of Educational Psychology 78 (4): 545-565.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laherto, A. 2010. “An Analysis of the Educational Significance of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology in Scientific and Technological Literacy.” Science Education International 21 (3): 160–175.
   Google Scholar
• Laherto, A., F. Tirre, I. Parchmann, L. Kampschulte, and S. Schwarzer. 2018. “Scientists’ Perceptions on the Nature of Nanoscience and Its Public Communication – An Interview Study.” Problems of Education in the 21st Century 76 (1): 43–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laursen, S., C. Liston, H. Thiry, and J. Graf. 2006. “What Good Is a Scientist in the Classroom? Participant Outcomes and Program Design Features for a Short-Duration Science Outreach Intervention in K-12 Classrooms.” Life Sciences Education 6 (1): 49–64. doi:10.1187/cbe.06-05-0165.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G. 2007. “Nature of Science: Past, Present, and Future.” In Handbook of Research on Science Education, edited by S. K. Abell and N. G. Lederman, 831–879. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G., F. Abd-El-Khalick, R. L. Bell, and R. S. Schwartz. 2002. “Views of Nature of Science Questionnaire: Toward Valid and Meaningful Assessment of Learners’ Conceptions of Nature of Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39 (6): 497–521. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H., and N. Butler. 2003. “Making Authentic Science Accessible to Students.” International Journal of Science Education 25 (8): 923–948. doi:10.1080/09500690305023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S. Y., and N. G. Lederman. 2002. “Taiwanese Gifted Students' Views of Nature of Science.” School Science and Mathematics 102 (3): 114–123.
   Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. 2001. “Combination and Integration of Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis.” Forum: Qualitative Social Research 2 (1): 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• McComas, W. 1996. “Ten Myths of Science: Reexamining What We Think We Know about the Nature of Science.” School Science and Mathematics 96 (1): 10–16. doi:10.1111/ssm.1996.96.issue-1.
   Google Scholar
• McComas, W.F., and J.K. Olson. 1998. "The Nature of Science in International Science Education Standards Documents." In The Nature of Science in Science Education, edited by W. F. Comas, 41-52. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Nentwig, P., and S. Schanze. 2007. “Making It Comparable: Standards in Science Education.” In Standards in Science Education, edited by D. Waddington, P. Nentwig, and S. Schanze, 11–19. Münster: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, K., H. E. Fischer, and A. Kauertz. 2010. “From PISA to Educational Standards: The Impact of Large-Scale Assessments on Science Education in Germany.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 8 (3): 545–563. doi:10.1007/s10763-010-9206-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., S. Collins, M. Ratcliffe, R. Millar, and R. Duschl. 2003. “What ‘Ideas-About-Science’ Should Be Taught in School Science? A Delphi Study of the Expert Community.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 40 (7): 692–720. doi:10.1002/tea.10105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. 1990. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., F. W. Chambers, and D. Zeidler. 2004. “Student Conceptualizations of the Nature of Science in Response to a Socioscientific Issue.” International Journal of Science Education 26 (4): 387–409. doi:10.1080/0950069032000119456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharfenberg, F.-J., and F. Bogner. 2011. “A New Two-Step Approach for Hands-On Teaching of Gene Technology: Effects on Students’ Activities during Experimentation in an Outreach Gene Technology Lab.” Research in Science Education 41 (4): 505–523. doi:10.1007/s11165-010-9177-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schummer, J. 2007. “Identifying Ethical Issues of Nanotechnologies.” In Nanotechnologies, Ethics and Politics, edited by H. Ten Have, 79–98. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, R., and N. G. Lederman. 2008. “What Scientists Say: Scientists’ Views of Nature of Science and Relation to Science Context.” International Journal of Science Education 30 (6): 727–771. doi:10.1080/09500690701225801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, R. S., N. G. Lederman, and B. Crawford. 2004. “Developing Views of Nature of Science in an Authentic Context: An Explicit Approach to Bridging the Gap between Nature of Science and Scientific Inquiry.” Science Education 88 (4): 610–645. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarzer, S., and H. Itzek-Greulich. 2015. “Möglichkeiten und Wirkungen von Schülerlaboren - Vor- und Nachbereitung zur Vernetzung mit dem Schulunterricht.” Naturwissenschaften im Unterricht: Chemie 26 (147): 8–13.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarzer, S., J. Rudnik, and I. Parchmann. 2013. “Chemische Schalter als potenzielle Lernschalter – Fachdidaktische Begleitung eines Sonderforschungsbereichs.” CHEMKON 20 (4): 175–181. doi:10.1002/ckon.v20.4.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarzer, S., S. Akaygun, B. Sagun-Gokoz, S. Anderson, and R. Blonder. 2015. “Using Atomic Force Microscopy in Out-Of-School Settings - Two Case Studies Investigating the Knowledge and Understanding of High School Students.” Journal of Nano Education 7 (1): 10–27. doi:10.1166/jne.2015.1079.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, S., L. Sutherland, and J. Krajcik. 2009. The Big Ideas of Nanoscale Science and Engineering. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stocklmayer, S. M., L. J. Rennie, and J. K. Gilbert. 2010. “The Roles of the Formal and Informal Sectors in the Provision of Effective Science Education.” Studies in Science Education 46 (1): 1–44. doi:10.1080/03057260903562284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tala, S., and V.-M. Vesterinen. 2015. “Nature of Science Contextualized: Studying Nature of Science with Scientists.” Science and Education 24 (4): 435–457. doi:10.1007/s11191-014-9738-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tirre, F., Kampschulte, L., & Parchmann, I. 2015. “Ein Science Camp zu Wissenschaft und Wissenschaftskommunikation: Schüler präsentieren (ihre) Nanoforschung. [A Science-Camp on Science and Science Communication: Students present (their) Nano research.]” ChemKon 22 (4): 179–186.
   Google Scholar
• Urhahne, D., K. Kremer, and J. Mayer. 2011. “Conceptions of the Nature of Science: Are They General or Context Specific?” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 9 (3): 707–730. doi:10.1007/s10763-010-9233-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wentorf, W., T. N. HöFfler, and I. Parchmann. 2015. “Schülerkonzepte über das Tätigkeitsspektrum von Naturwissenschaftlerinnen und Naturwissenschaftlern: Vorstellungen, Interessen und Selbstwirksamkeitserwartungen.” Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften 21 (1): 207–222. doi:10.1007/s40573-015-0035-7.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, S. L., and D. Hodson. 2009. “From the Horse’s Mouth: What Scientists Say about Scientific Investigation and Scientific Knowledge.” Science Education 93 (1): 109–130. doi:10.1002/sce.v93:1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L., K. A. Walker, W. A. Ackett, and M. L. Simmons. 2002. “Tangled up in Views: Beliefs in the Nature of Science and Responses to Socioscientific Dilemmas.” Science Education 86 (3): 343–367. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar