Teaching aspects of the interrelationship between science and technology: a research report on the design, enactment and evaluation of a teaching proposal

References

• AAAS. 1989. Science for All Americans. Project 2061. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Akerson, V. L., F. Abd-El-Khalick, and N. Lederman. 2000. “Influence of a Reflective Explicit Activity-Based Approach on Elementary Teachers’ Conceptions of Nature of Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37 (4): 295–317. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akerson, V. L., and M. L. Volrich. 2006. “Teaching Nature of Science Explicitly in a First-Grade Internship Setting.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 43: 377–394. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arageorgis, A., and A. Baltas. 1989. “Demarcating Technology from Science: Problems and Problem Solving in Technology.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science 20: 212–229.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, R. L. 2008. Teaching the Nature of Science through Process Skills: Activities for Grades 3–8. Boston: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, R. L., J. J. Matkins, and B. M. Gansneder 1. 2011. “Impacts of Contextual and Explicit Instruction on Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Understandings of the Nature of Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 48: 414–436. doi:10.1002/tea.v48.4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beveridge, W. I. B. 1961. The Art of Scientific Investigation. Rev ed. London: Mercury.
   Google Scholar
• Boone, W. J., and K. Scantlebury. 2006. “The Role of Rasch Analysis When Conducting Science Education Research Utilizing Multiple-Choice Tests.” Science Education 90 (2): 253–269. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. W. 2011. “Scientific and Engineering Practices in K-12 Classrooms.” Science Teacher 78: 34–40.
   Google Scholar
• Clough, M. P. 2006. “Learners’ Responses to the Demands of Conceptual Change: Considerations for Effective Nature of Science Instruction.” Science & Education 15: 463–494. doi:10.1007/s11191-005-4846-7.
   Google Scholar
• Clough, M. P. 2011. “The Story behind the Science: Bringing Science and Scientists to Life in Post-Secondary Science Education.” Science & Education 20: 701–717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constantinou, C., R. Hadjilouca, and N. Papadouris. 2010. “Students’ Epistemological Awareness Concerning The Distinction between Science and Technology.” International Journal of Science Education 32 (2): 143–172. doi:10.1080/09500690903229296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constantinou, C. P., and N. Papadouris. 2004. “Potential contribution of digital video to the analysis of the learning process in physics: A case Study in the context of electric circuits.” Educational Research and Evaluation 10 (1): 21–39. doi:10.1076/edre.10.1.21.26300.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, M. J. 2006. “Two Decades of Technology Education in Retrospect.” In International Handbook of Technology Education: Reviewing the past Twenty Years, edited by M. J. De Vries and I. Mottier, 3–11. Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, M. J. 2009. “The Developing Field of Technology Education: An Introduction.” In International Handbook of Research and Development in Technology Education, edited by A. T. Jones and M. J. de Vries, 1–9. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Driver, R., J. Leach, R. Millar, and P. Scot. 1996. Young People’s Images of Science. London: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duggan, S., and R. Gott. 1995. “The Place of Investigations in Practical Work in the UK National Curriculum for Science.” International Journal of Science Education 17: 137–147. doi:10.1080/0950069950170201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gago, J. M., P. Caro, C. P. Constantinou, G. Davies, I. Parchmann, M. Rannikmae, and S. Sjøberg. 2004. Europe needs more scientists: Increasing human resources for science and technology in Europe. Report of the High Level Group on Human Resources for Science and Technology in Europe. Brussels: European Commission, DG Research.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, P. L. 1994. “The Relationship between Technology and Science: Some Historical and Philosophical Reflections. Part I.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 4: 123–153. doi:10.1007/BF01204544.
   Google Scholar
• Gyllenpalm, J., and P. O. Wickman. 2011. “’Experiments’ and the Inquiry Emphasis Conflation in Science Teacher Education.” Science Education 95: 908–926. doi:10.1002/sce.20446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadjilouca, R., C. P. Constantinou, and N. Papadouris. 2011. “Developing the Rationale for a Teaching Innovation about The Interrelationship between Science and Technology.” Science & Education 20 (10): 981–1005. doi:10.1007/s11191-010-9332-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ITEA. 2007. Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the Study of Technology. 3rd ed. Virginia: International Technology Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, A. 2006. “The Role and Place of Technological Literacy in Elementary Science Teacher Education: International Perspectives on Contemporary Issues and Practice.” In Elementary Science Teacher Education, edited by K. Appleton, 198–217. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, A., and C. Buntting. 2015. “Technology Education and Science Education.” In Springer Encyclopedia in Science Education, edited by R. Gunstone, 1049–1053. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, S., L. C. Scharmann, and T. Noh. 2005. “Examining Students’ Views on the Nature of Science: Results from Korean 6th, 8th, and 10th Graders.” Science Education 89: 314–334. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khishfe, R., and N. Lederman. 2006. “Teaching Nature of Science within a Controversial Topic: Integrated versus Non-Integrated.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 43: 395–418. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S. Y., and K. E. Irving. 2010. “History of Science as an Instructional Context: Student Learning in Genetics and Nature of Science.” Science & Education 19: 187–215. doi:10.1007/s11191-009-9191-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolstø, S. 2008. “Science Education for Democratic Citizenship through the Use of the History of Science.” Science & Education 17: 977–997. doi:10.1007/s11191-007-9084-8.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, N., and F. Abd-El-Khalick. 2000. “Avoiding De-Natured Science: Activities that Promote Understandings of the Nature of Science.” In The Nature of Science in Science Education, edited by W. F. McComas, 83–126. Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, N., F. Abd-El-Khalick, P. Bell, and R. Schwartz. 2002. “’View of Nature of Science Questionnaire’: Toward Valid and Meaningful Assessment of Learners’ Conceptions of Nature of Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39: 497–521. doi:10.1002/tea.10034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G. 2007. “Nature of Science: Past, Present, and Future.” In Handbook of Research on Science Education, edited by S. K. Abell and N. G. Lederman, 831–879. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, T. 2006. “Design and Inquiry: Bases for an Accommodation between Science and Technology Education in the Curriculum?” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 43: 255–281. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, F., and S. Booth. 1997. Learning and Awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• McComas, W. 2008. “Seeking Historical Examples to Illustrate Key Aspects of the Nature of Science.” Science & Education 17: 249–263. doi:10.1007/s11191-007-9081-y.
   Google Scholar
• McComas, W. F., and J. K. Olson. 2002. “The Nature of Science in International Science Education Standards Documents.” In The Nature of Science in Science Education: Rationales and Strategies, edited by W. F. McComas, 41–52. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, L. C., and the Physics Education Group. 1996. Physics by Inquiry. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolaou, C. T., and C. P. Constantinou. 2014. “Assessment of the modeling competence.” A systematic review and synthesis of empirical research.” Educational Research Review 13: 52–73. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2014.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NRC (National Research Council). 1996. National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• NRC (National Research Council). 2011. A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, DC: Committee on a Conceptual Frame-work for New K-12 Science Education Standards.
   Google Scholar
• NRC (National Research Council). 2012. A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• NSF (National Science Foundation). 2003. “The Science and Engineering Workforce: Realizing America’s Potential.” Accessed 25 January 2017. http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/documents/2003/nsb0369/nsb0369.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2006. Women in Scientific Careers: Unleashing the Potential. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, A. W., V. L. Akerson, H. Colak, K. Pongsanon, and A. Genel. 2012. “The Implicit Communication of Nature of Science and Epistemology during Inquiry Discussion.” Science Education 96 (4): 652–684. doi:10.1002/sce.v96.4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., S. Collins, M. Ratcliffe, R. Millar, and R. Duschl. 2003. “What “Ideas-About-Science” Should Be Taught in School Science? A Delphi Study of the Expert Community.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 40: 692–720. doi:10.1002/tea.10105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Østergaard, Ε., B. Dahlin, and A. Hugo. 2008. “Doing Phenomenology in Science Education: A Research Review.” Studies in Science Education 44 (2): 93–121. doi:10.1080/03057260802264081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadouris, N., and C. P. Constantinou. 2009. “A methodology for integrating computer-based learning tools in science curricula.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 41 (4): 521–538. doi:10.1080/00220270802123946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadouris, N., and C. P. Constantinou. 2017. “Integrating the epistemic and ontological aspects of content knowledge in science teaching and learning.” International Journal of Science Education 39 (6): 663–682. doi:10.1080/09500693.2017.1299950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, E. E. 2012. “Developing Content Knowledge in Students through Explicit Teaching of the Nature of Science: Influences of Goal Setting and Self-Monitoring.” Science & Education 21: 881–898. doi:10.1007/s11191-009-9219-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudge, D., and E. Howe. 2009. “An Explicit and Reflective Approach to the Use of History to Promote Understanding of the Nature of Science.” Science & Education 18: 561–580. doi:10.1007/s11191-007-9088-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W. A. 2003. “The Inquiry Paradox: Why Doing Science Doesn’t Necessarily Change Ideas about Science.” In The Proceedings of the Sixth International Computer-Based Learning in Science Conference, edited by C. P. Constantinou and Z. C. Zacharia, 825–834. Nicosia, Cyprus.
   Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W. A. 2005. “Understanding Students’ Practical Epistemologies and Their Influence on Learning through Inquiry.” Science Education 89: 634–656. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W. A., and K. Morrison. 2003. “High School Students’ Ideas about Theories and Theory Change after a Biological Inquiry Unit.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 40: 369–392. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, J., J. Duveen, L. Scot, and S. McCarthy. 1992. “Teaching about the Nature of Science through History: Action Research in the Classroom.” Journal of Research in Science Education 29: 409–421.
   Google Scholar
• Taber, K. S. 2008. “Towards a Curricular Model of the Nature of Science.” Science & Education 17: 179–218. doi:10.1007/s11191-006-9056-4.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, K. A., and D. L. Zeidler. 2003. “Students’ Understanding of the Nature of Science and Their Reasoning on Socioscientific Issues: A Web-Based Learning Inquiry.” Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L., K. A. Walker, W. A. Ackett, and M. L. Simmons. 2002. “Tangled up in Views: Beliefs in the Nature of Science and Responses to Socioscientific Dilemmas..” Science Education 86: 343–367. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L., T. D. Sadler, M. L. Simmons, and E. V. Howes. 2005. “Beyond STS: A Research-Based Framework for Socioscientific Issues Education.” Science Education 89 (3): 357–377. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar