1,569
Views
25
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Attitudes towards science and views of nature of science among elementary school students in terms of gender, cultural background and grade level variables

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., and N. G. Lederman. 2000. “The Influence of History of Science Courses on Students’ Views of Nature of Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37 (10): 1057–1095. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736.
  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., H. Masters, and V. L. Akerson. 2015. “Using History of Science to Teach Nature of Science to Elementary Students.” Science and Education 24 (9–10): 1103–1140. doi:10.1007/s11191-015-9783-5.
  • Akerson, V., and L. A. Donnely. 2010. “Teaching Nature of Science to K2 Students: What Understandings Can They Attain?.” International Journal of Science Education 32 (1): 97–124. doi:10.1080/09500690902717283.
  • Akerson, V. L., V. Nargund-Joshi, I. Weiland, K. Pongsanon, and B. Avsar. 2014. “What Third-Grade Students of Differing Ability Levels Learn about Nature of Science after a Year of Instruction.” International Journal of Science Education 36 (2): 244–276. doi:10.1080/09500693.2012.761365.
  • Akpinar, E., E. Yildiz, N. Tatar, and Ö. Ergin. 2009. “Students’ Attitudes toward Science and Technology: An Investigation of Gender, Grade Level, and Academic Achievement.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 1 (1): 2804–2808. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.498.
  • Ali, M. M., R. Yager, E. Hacieminoglu, and I. Caliskan. 2013. “Changes in Student Attitudes regarding Science When Taught by Teachers without Experiences with a Model Professional Development Program.” School Science and Mathematics 113 (3): 109–119. doi:10.1111/ssm.12008.
  • Atran, S., D. Medin, and N. Ross. 2005. “The Cultural Mind: Environmental Decision Making and Cultural Modeling within and across Populations.” Psychological Review 112 (49): 744–776. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.744.
  • Baker, D. 2013. “What Works: Using Curriculum and Pedagogy to Increase Girls’ Interest and Participation in Science.” Theory into Practice 52: 14–20. doi:10.1080/07351690.2013.743760.
  • Bennet, C. I. 1990. Comprehensive Multicultural Education: Theory and Practice. Boston: Allya & Bacon.
  • Brotman, J. S., and F. M. Moore. 2008. “Girls and Science: A Review of Four Themes in the Science Education Literature.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 45 (9): 961–1002. doi:10.1002/tea.20241.
  • Cadaret, M. C., P. J. Hartung, L. M. Subich, and I. K. Weigold. 2017. “Stereotype Threat as a Barrier to Woman Entering Engineering Careers.” Journal of Vocational Behavior 99: 40–51. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2016.12.002.
  • Cakici, Y., and E. Bayir. 2012. “Developing Children’s Views of the Nature of Science through Role Play.” International Journal of Science Education 34 (7): 1075–1091. doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.647109.
  • Caleon, I. S., and R. Subramaniam. 2008. “Attitudes Towards Science of Intellectually Gifted and Mainstream Upper Primary Students in Singapore.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 45 (8): 940–954. doi:10.1002/tea.20250.
  • Cavallo, A. M. L., and T. A. Laubach. 2001. “Students’ Science Perceptions and Enrollment Decisions in Differing Learning Cycle Classrooms.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 38 (9): 1029–1062. doi:10.1002/tea.1046.
  • Chai, C. C., F. Deng, Y. Y. Qian, and B. Wong. 2010. “South China Education Major’s Epistemological Beliefs and Their Conceptions of Nature of Science.” The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher 19 (1): 111–125.
  • Chetcuti, D. 2009. “Identifying a Gender Inclusive Pedagogy from Maltese Teachers’ Personal Practical Knowledge.” International Journal of Science Education 31 (1): 81–99. doi:10.1080/09500690701647996.
  • De Pro Bueno, A., and A. Pérez Manzano. 2014. “Actitudes de los alumnos de Primaria y Secundaria ante la visión dicotómica de la ciencia.” Enseñanza de Las Ciencias 32 (3): 111–132. doi:10.5565/rev/ensciencias.1015.
  • Demirel, M., and M. Dağyar. 2016. “Effects of Problem-Based Learning on Attitude: A Meta-Analysis Study.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education 12 (8): 2115–2137. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2016.1293a.
  • Denessen, E., N. Vos, F. Hasselman, and M. Louws. 2015. “The Relationship between Primary School Teacher and Student Attitudes Towards Science and Technology.” Education Research International 2015: 1–7. doi:10.1155/2015/534690.
  • Deng, F., D.-T. Chen, -C.-C. Tsai, and C. S. Chai. 2011. “Students’ Views of the Nature of Science: A Critical Review of Research.” Science Education 95 (6): 961–999. doi:10.1002/sce.20460.
  • DeWitt, J., and L. Archer. 2015. “Who Aspires to A Science Career? A Comparison of Survey Responses from Primary and Secondary School Students.” International Journal of Science Education 37 (13): 2170–2192. doi:10.1080/09500693.2015.1071899.
  • EC (European Commission). 2008. Green Paper. Migration & Mobility: Challenges and Opportunities for EU Education Systems. Brussels: Commision of the European Communities.
  • EDUCACNIIE. 2014. “Boletín de Educación, Número 3.” MECD. http://educalab.es/documents/10180/62610/Boletin3_Febrero2014.pdf/96a096d2-6b3d-4bab-805f-9465e9df6025
  • Elwood, J. 2005. “Gender and Achievement: What Have Exams Got to Do with It?” Oxford Review of Education 31 (3): 373–393. doi:10.1080/03054980500222031.
  • ERTF (European Roma and Travellers Forum). 2016. Ficha Informativa Sobre La Situación De Los Romá/Gitanos En España [Information Sheet on the Situation of Roma/Gypsies in Spain]. Accessed: http://presenciagitana.org/160131_SituacionRoma_ERTF_ES.pdf
  • FRA (Agency for Fundamental Rights). 2012. The Situation of Roma in 11 EU Member States Survey Results at a Glance. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  • Fraser, B. J. 1978. “Development of a Test of Science-Related Attitudes.” Science Education 62 (4): 509–515. doi:10.1002/sce.3730620411.
  • Fraser, B. J. 1981. Test of Science-Related Attitudes. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
  • García-Carmona, A., and J. A. Acevedo Díaz. 2016. “Concepciones de estudiantes de profesorado de educación primaria sobre la Naturaleza de la Ciencia.” Revista Mexicana De Investigación Educativa 21 (69): 583–610.
  • George, R. 2006. “A Cross-Domain Analysis of Change in Students’ Attitudes toward Science and Attitudes about the Utility of Science.” International Journal of Science Education 28 (6): 571–589. doi:10.1080/09500690500338755.
  • Gil, F. 2014. “Metodologías didácticas empleadas en las clases de ciencias y su contribución a la explicación del rendimiento.” Revista de Educación 366: 190–214. doi:10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2014-366-271.
  • Gómez-Quintero, J. D., and C. Fernández-Romero. 2014. “Familias inmigrantes en España: Estructura socio demográfica, roles de género y pautas culturales de los hijos adolescentes.” Papeles de Población 20 (80): 87–118.
  • Hacıeminoğlu, E. 2016. “Elementary School Students’ Attitude toward Science and Related Variables.” International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 11 (2): 35–52. doi:10.12973/ijese.2016.288a.
  • Hacıeminoğlu, E., H. Ertepinar, Ö. Yilmaz-Tüzün, and H. Çakir. 2015. “Students and School Characteristics Related to Elementary School Students’ Views of the Nature of Science.” Education 3-13 (43): 700–721. doi:10.1080/03004279.2013.865655.
  • Hacıeminoğlu, E., Ö. Yılmaz-Tüzün, and H. Ertepınar. 2012. “Development and Validation of Nature of Science Instrument for Elementary School Students.” Education 3-13 42 (3): 258–283. doi:10.1080/03004279.2012.671840.
  • Hellgren, J. M., and S. Lindberg. 2017. “Motivating Students with Authentic Science Experiences: Changes in Motivation for School Science.” Research in Science & Technological Education 35 (4): 409–426. doi:10.1080/02635143.2017.1322572.
  • Hsieh, H.-F., and S. E. Shannon. 2005. “Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis.” Qualitative Health Research 15 (9): 1277–1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687.
  • INE (Instituto Nacional de Estadística). (2017). Principales series de población desde 1998 [Main population series since 1998]. http://www.ine.es/
  • Jones, M. G., L. Brader-Araje, L. W. Carboni, G. Carter, M. J. Rua, E. Banilower, and H. Hatch. 2000. “Tool Time: Gender and Student’s Use of Tools, Control, and Authority.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37 (8): 760–783. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736.
  • Kalman, C. 2010. “Enabling Students to Develop a Scientific Mindset.” Science & Education 19: 147–163. doi:10.1007/s11191-009-9186-6.
  • Kang, S., L. C. Scharmann, and T. Noh. 2005. “Examining Students’ Views on the Nature of Science: Results from Korean 6th, 8th, and 10th Graders.” Science Education 89 (2): 314–334. doi:10.1002/sce.20053.
  • Khishfe, R. 2008. “The Development of Seventh Graders’ Views of Nature of Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 45 (4): 470–496. doi:10.1002/tea.20230.
  • Khishfe, R., and F. Abd-El-Khalick. 2002. “Influence of Explicit and Reflective versus Implicit Inquiry-Oriented Instruction on Sixth Graders’ Views of Nature of Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39 (7): 551–578. doi:10.1002/tea.10036.
  • Khishfe, R., and S. Boujaoude. 2014. “Lebanese Students’ Conceptions of and Attitudes toward Science and Related Careers Based on Their Gender and Religious Affiliations.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 14 (1): 145–167. doi:10.1007/s10763-014-9587-0.
  • Khishfe, R., and N. G. Lederman. 2007. “Relationship between Instructional Context and Views of Nature of Science.”.” International Journal of Science Education 29 (8): 939–961. doi:10.1080/09500690601110947.
  • Lederman, N. G., F. Abd-El-Khalick, R. L. Bell, and R. S. Schwartz. 2002. “Views of Nature of Science Questionnaire: Toward Valid and Meaningful Assessment of Learners’ Conceptions of Nature of Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39 (6): 497–521. doi:10.1002/tea.10034.
  • LOE (Ley Orgánica de educación). Ley Orgánica 2/2006, de 3 de mayo. Boletín Oficial del Estado, núm. 106, 2006, 4 de mayo.
  • LOGSE (Ley Orgánica de Ordenación General del Sistema Educativo). Ley Orgánica 1/1990, de 3 de octubre. Boletín Oficial del Estado, núm. 238, 4 de octubre de 1990.
  • LOMCE (Ley Orgánica para la mejora de la calidad educativa). Ley Orgánica 8/2013, 9 de diciembre. Boletín Oficial del Estado, núm. 295, 2013, 10 de diciembre.
  • McComas, W. F. 2015. “The Nature of Science and the Next Generation of Biology Education.” The American Biology Teacher 77 (7): 485–491. doi:10.1525/abt.2015.77.7.2.
  • McComas, W. F., and J. K. Olson. 1998. “The Nature of Science in International Science Education Standards Documents.” In The Nature of Science in Science Education: Rationales and Strategies,edited by W. F. McComas, 41–52. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • McHugh, M. L. 2012. “Interrater Reliability: The Kappa Statistic.” Biochemia Medica 22 (3): 276–282. doi:10.11613/issn.1846-7482.
  • MECD (Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte). 2017. Datos Y Cifras. E5. El Alumnado Extranjero [Facts and Figures. E5. Foreign Students]. http://www.mecd.gob.es/dms/mecd/servicios-al-ciudadano-mecd/estadisticas/educacion/indicadores-publicaciones-sintesis/cifras-educacion-espana/2014-15/e5-pdf.pdf
  • Metin, D., and G. Leblebicioğlu. 2015. “Development of Elementary 6th and 7th Grade Students’ Views about Scientific Model and Modeling Throughout a Summer Science Camp.”.” Education and Science 40 (177): 1–18. doi:10.15390/EB.2015.1507.
  • Nunnally, J. C. 1978. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Osborne, J., S. Simon, and S. Collins. 2003. “Attitudes Towards Science: A Review of the Literature and Its Implications.” International Journal of Science Education 25 (9): 1049–1079. doi:10.1080/0950069032000032199.
  • Parker, L. H., and J. L. Rennie. 2002. “Teachers’ Implementation of Gender-Inclusive Instructional Strategies in Single-Sex and Mixed-Sex Science Classrooms.” International Journal of Science Education 24 (9): 881–897. doi:10.1080/09500690110078860.
  • Patton, M. Q. 2002. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Porlán, R., R. Martín Del Pozo, A. Rivero, J. Harres, P. Azcárate, and M. Pizzato. 2010. “El cambio del profesorado de Ciencias I: Marco teórico y formativo.” Enseñanza de las ciencias 28 (1): 31–46.
  • Portes, A., R. Aparicio Gómez, and W. Haller. 2013. La Segunda Generación En Madrid: Un Estudio Longitudinal. Avance De Resultados [The Second Generation in Madrid: A Longitudinal Study. Preview of Results]. Madrid: Real Instituto Elcano.
  • Quigley, C., K. Pongsanon, and V. L. Akerson. 2010. “If We Teach Them, They Can Learn: Young Students Views of Nature of Science Aspects to Early Elementary Students during an Informal Science Education Program.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 21 (7): 887–907. doi:10.1007/s10972-009-9164-5.
  • RAE (Real Academia Española). 2014. Diccionario de la lengua española [Dictionary of the Spanish language]. http://dle.rae.es/
  • Rumbaut, R. G., and A. Portes. 2011. Ethnicities.Children of Immigrants in America. London and New York: University of California Press and Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Said, Z., R. Summers, F. Abd-El-Khalick, and S. Wang. 2016. “Attitudes toward Science among Grades 3 through 12 Arab Students in Qatar: Findings from a Cross-Sectional National Study.” International Journal of Science Education 38 (4): 621–643. doi:10.1080/09500693.2016.1156184.
  • Scutt, H. I., S. K. Gilmartin, S. Sheppard, and S. Brunhaver. 2013. “Research-Informed Practices for Inclusive Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) Classrooms: Strategies for Educators to Close the Gender Gap.” Paper presented at the 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. https://web.stanford.edu/group/design_education/wikiupload/4/46/ASEE_2013_Scutt.pdf
  • Tai, R. H., C. Q. Liu, A. V. Maltese, and X. Fan. 2006. “Planning Early for Fareers in Science.”.” Science 312 (5777): 1143–1144. doi:10.1126/science.1128690.
  • Toma, R. B., and I. M. Greca. 2018. “The Effect of Integrative STEM Instruction on Elementary Students’ Attitudes toward Science.” EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education 14 (4): 1383–1395. doi:10.29333/ejmste/83676.
  • Toma, R. B., I. M. Greca, and J. Á. Meneses Villagrá. 2017. “Dificultades de maestros en formación inicial para diseñar unidades didácticas usando la metodología de indagación.” Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias 14 (2): 442–457. doi:10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2017.v14.i2.11.
  • Vázquez Alonso, A., and A. Manassero-Mas. 2008. “El declive de las actitudes hacia la ciencia de los estudiantes: Un indicador inquietante para la educación científica.” Revista Eureka Sobre Enseñanza Y Divulgación de Las Ciencias 5 (3): 274–292. doi:10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2008.v5.i3.03.
  • Vázquez-Alonso, Á., M. A. Manassero-Mas, A. García-Carmona, and A. Bennássar-Roig. 2014. “Teachers’ Beliefs on Science-Technology-Society (STS) and Nature of Science (NOS): Strengths, Weaknesses, and Teaching Practices.” In Topics and Trends in Current Science Education: 9th ESERA Conference Selected Contributions, edited by C. Bruguiére, A. Tiberghien, and P. Clément, 117–135. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Walls, L. 2012. “Third Grade African American Students’ Views of the Nature of Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 49 (1): 1–37. doi:10.1002/tea.20450.
  • Walls, L. 2016. “Awakening A Dialogue: A Critical Race Theory Analysis of U. S. Nature of Science Research from 1967 to 2013.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 53 (10): 1546–1570. doi:10.1002/tea.21266.
  • Yoon, J., K. J. Kim, and L. A. Martin. 2016. “Culturally Inclusive Science Teaching (CIST) Mode for Teachers of Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Students.” Journal for Multicultural Education 10 (3): 322–338. doi:10.1108/JME-01-2016-0012.
  • Yoon, S. Y., J. K. Suh, and S. Park. 2014. “Korean Students’ Perceptions of Scientific Practices and Understanding of Nature of Science.” International Journal of Science Education 36 (16): 2666–2693. doi:10.1080/09500693.2014.928834.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.