2,586
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The role of inquiry-based self-efficacy, achievement goal orientation, and learning strategies on secondary-school students’ inquiry skills

ORCID Icon

References

  • Abd‐El‐Khalick, F., and V. L. Akerson. 2004. “Learning as Conceptual Change: Factors Mediating the Development of Pre-Service Elementary Teachers’ Views of Nature of Science.” Science Education 88 (5): 785–810. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X.
  • Ames, C. 1992. “Achievement Goals and the Classroom Motivational Climate.” In Student Perceptions in the Classroom, edited by D. H. Schunk and J. L. Meece, 327–348. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Ames, C., and J. Archer. 1988. “Achievement Goals in the Classroom: Students’ Learning Strategies and Motivation Processes.” Journal of Educational Psychology 80 (3): 260–267. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.260.
  • Avsec, S., and S. Kocijancic. 2014. Effectiveness Of Inquiry-based Learning: How do Middle School Students Learn to Maximise the Efficacy of a Water Turbine. International Journal of Engineering Education 30 (6), 1436–1449. Avsec & Kocijancic, 2014.
  • Avsec, S., and S. Kocijancic. 2016. “A Path Model of Effective Technology-Intensive Inquiry-Based Learning.” Journal of Educational Technology & Society 19 (1): 308–320.
  • Aydoğdu, B., N. Tatar, E. Yıldız, and S. Buldur. 2012. “The Science Process Skills Scale Development for Elementary School Students.” Journal of Theoretical Educational Science 5 (3): 292–311.
  • Bandura, A. 1993. “Perceived Self-Efficacy in Cognitive Development and Functioning.” Educational Psychologist 28: 117–148. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3.
  • Bandura, A. 1997. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
  • Bandura, A. 2001. “Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective.” Annual Review of Psychology 52: 1–26. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1.
  • Bandura, A., and D. H. Schunk. 1981. “Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest through Proximal Self-Motivation.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 41: 586–598. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.41.3.586.
  • Booth, G. 2001. “Is Inquiry the Answer?.” Science Teacher 68 (7): 57–59.
  • Buck, L. B., S. L. Bretz, and M. H. Towns. 2008. “Characterizing the Level of Inquiry in the Undergraduate Laboratory.” Journal of College Science Teaching 38 (1): 52–58.
  • Buyruk, H. 2014. “Standardized Examinations as a Teacher Performance Indicator and Performance Evaluation in Education.” Trakya University Journal of Education 4 (2): 28–42. http://dergipark.ulakbim.gov.tr/trkefd/article/view/5000082757.
  • Chen, S., C. Huang, and T. Te-Lien Chou. 2016. “The Effect of Metacognitive Scaffolds on Low Achievers’ Laboratory Learning.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 14 (2): 281–296. doi:10.1007/s10763-015-9691-9.
  • Cheung, D. 2009. “Students’ Attitudes toward Chemistry Lessons: The Interaction Effect between Grade Level and Gender.” Research in Science Education 39: 75–91. doi:10.1007/s11165-007-9075-4.
  • Demir, T. 2011. “Study of the Relationship between the Creative Writing Skills of Primary School Students and Their Self-Efficacy Perception and Types of Achievement Goal Orientation.” PhD thesis, Gazi University, Institute of Educational Science, Ankara. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
  • Elliot, A. J. 1999. “Approach and Avoidance Motivation and Achievement Goals.” Educational Psychologist 34: 169–189. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3403_3.
  • Elliot, A. J., and H. A. McGregor. 2001. “A 2 · 2 Achievement Goal Framework.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 30: 957–971. doi:10.1177/0146167203262024.
  • Gormally, C., P. Brickman, B. Hallar, and N. Armstrong. 2009. “Effects of Inquiry-Based Learning on Students’ Science Literacy Skills and Confidence.” International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 3 (2): 16. doi:10.20429/ijsotl.2009.030216.
  • Hacieminoglu, E. 2016. “Elementary School Students’ Attitude toward Science and Related Variables.” International Journal of Environmental & Science Education 11 (2): 35–52.
  • İsrael, E. 2007. “Self Regulation Instruction, Science Achievement and Self Efficacy.” PhD Thesis, Dokuz Eylül University, Institute of Educational Science, Izmir. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
  • Jagacinski, C., and J. L. Duda. 2001. “A Comparative Analysis of Contemporary Achievement Goal Orientation Measures.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 61 (6): 1013–1039. doi:10.1177/00131640121971626.
  • Jussim, L., and D. K. Harber. 2005. “Teacher Expectations and Self-Fulfilling Prophecies: Knowns and Unknowns, Resolved and Unresolved Controversies.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 9 (2): 131–155. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0902_3.
  • Kadıoğlu, C. 2014. “Implementation of Self-Regulatory Instruction Based on Guided Inquiry Approach to Promote Students’ Achievement in Solubility Equilibrium and Acids and Bases, Motivation, and Learning Strategies.” A Thesis Submitted To The Graduate School Of Natural And Applied Sciences Of Middle East Technical University, Ankara. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
  • Kaplan, A., and M. L. Maehr. 2007. “The Contributions and Prospects of Goal Orientation Theory.” Educational Psychology Review 19: 141–184. doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9012-5.
  • Karapınar, A. 2016. “The Impact of Inquiry-Based Learning Environment on Scientific Process Skills, Inquiry Skills and Scientifik Reasoning Skills of Pre-Service Teachers.” A Thesis Submitted To The Graduate School Of Celal Bayar University, Manisa. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
  • Kingir, S., Y. Tas, G. Gok, and S. S. Vural. 2013. “Relationships among Constructivist Learning Environment Perceptions, Motivational Beliefs, Self-Regulation and Science Achievement.” Research in Science & Technological Education 31 (3): 205–226. doi:10.1080/02635143.2013.825594.
  • Koslowski, B. 1996. Theory and Evidence: The Development of Scientific Reasoning. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Kuhn, D., and M. Pease. 2008. “What Needs to Develop in the Development of Inquiry Skills?” Cognition and Instruction 26 (4): 512–559. doi:10.1080/07370000802391745.
  • Kuhn, D., and S. Franklin. 2006. “The Second Decade: What Develops (And How).” In Handbook of Child Psychology: Cognition, Perception and Language, Vol. 2 6th ed. W. Doman, R. M. Lerner, (Series Eds.), D. Kuhn & R. S. Siegler (Vol. Eds.), 953–993. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley& Sons.
  • Lederman, J. S., N. G. Lederman, S. A. Bartos, S. L. Bartels, A. A. Meyer, and R. S. Schwartz. 2014. “Meaningful Assessment of Learners’ Understandings about Scientific Inquiry—The Views about Scientific Inquiry (VASI) Questionnaire.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 51 (1): 65–83. doi:10.1002/tea.21125.
  • Liem, A. D., S. Lau, and Y. Nie. 2008. “The Role of Self-Efficacy, Task Value, and Achievement Goals in Predicting Learning Strategies, Task Disengagement, Peer Relationship, and Achievement Outcome.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 33: 486–512. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.08.001.
  • Linnenbrink, E. A., and P. R. Pintrich. 2000. “Multiple Pathways to Learning and Achievement: The Role of Goal Orientation in Fostering Adaptive Motivation, Affect, and Cognition.” In Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: The Search for Optimal Motivation and Performance, edited by C. Sansone and J. M. Harackiewicz, 195–227. San Diego: Academic Press.
  • MacIsaac, D., and K. Falconer. 2002. “Reforming Physics Instruction via RTOP.” The Physics Teacher 40 (8): 479–485. doi:10.1119/1.1526620.
  • Marshall, J. C., and R. M. Horton. 2011. “The Relationship of Teacher‐Facilitated, Inquiry‐Based Instruction to Student Higher Order Thinking.” School Science and Mathematics 111 (3): 93–101. doi:10.1111/ssm.2011.111.issue-3.
  • Marton, F., and R. Saaljö. 1976. “On Qualitative Differences in Learning- II Outcome as a Function of the Learner’s Conception of the Task.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 46: 115–127. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02304.x.
  • Midgley, C., A. Kaplan, M. Middleton, M. L. Maehr, T. Urdan, L. Anderman, E. Anderman, and R. Roeser. 1998. “The Development and Validation of Scales Assessing Students’ Achievement Goal Orientations.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 23: 113–131. doi:10.1006/ceps.1998.0965.
  • Miller, R. B., and S. A. Brickman. 2004. “A Model of Future Oriented Motivation and Self-Regulation.” Educational Psychology Review 16: 9–33. doi:10.1023/B:EDPR.0000012343.96370.39.
  • Muthén, B., and A. Satorra. 1995. “Complex Sample Data in Structural Equation Modeling.” Sociological Methodology 25: 267–316. doi:10.2307/271070.
  • National Research Council (NRC). 2000. Inquiry and the National Science Standarts. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 2015. “The Role of Education and Skills in Today’s World.” Skills for Social Progress: The Power of Social and Emotional Skills, 13–31. OECD Skills Studies, OECD Publishing. https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/skills-for-social-progress_9789264226159-en#page31.
  • Oğuz-Ünver, A. 2015. “Bilimin Doğası ve Bilimsel Sorgulama İlişkisi.” In Bilimin Doğası, Gelişimi ve Öğretimi, edited by N. Yenice, 217–256. Ankara: Anı yayıncılık.
  • Osborne, J., S. Collins, M. Ratcliffe, R. Millar, and R. Duschl. 2003. “What “Ideas About Science” Should Be Taught in School Science? A Delphi Study of the Expert Community.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 40 (7): 692–720. doi:10.1002/tea.10105.
  • Pajares, F. 1996. “Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Academic Settings.” Review of Educational Research 66 (4): 543–578. doi:10.3102/00346543066004543.
  • Pajares, F., and D. Schunk. 2005. “Self-Efficacy and Self-Concept Beliefs.” In New Frontiers for Self-Research, edited by Marsh H, Craven R, McInerney D, 2: 95–121. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
  • Pellegrino, J. W. 2009. “The Design of an Assessment System for the Race to the Top: A Learning Sciences Perspective on Issues of Growth and Measurement.” Center for K–12 Assessment & Performance Management, Educational Testing Service. http://www. k12center. org/rsc/pdf/PellegrinoPresenter-Session1. pdf.
  • Pintrich, P. R. 2000. “An Achievement Goal Theory Perspective on Issues in Motivation Terminology, Theory, and Research.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 25: 92–104. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1017.
  • Reed, J., and J. Hallgarten. 2003. Time to Say Goodbye? the Future of School Performance Tables. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.
  • Schunk, D. H., and B. J. Zimmerman. 2006. “Competence and Control Beliefs: Distinguishing the Means and Ends.” In Handbook of Educational Psychlogy, edited by P. A. Alexander and P. H. Winne, 349–367. 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Schunk, D. H. 2012. Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective. 6th ed. Boston: Pearson Education.
  • Schunk, D. H., P. R. Pintrich, and J. L. Meece. 2008. Motivation in Education: Theory, Research and Applications. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill-Prentice Hall.
  • Schwartz, R. S., N. G. Lederman, and J. S. Lederman. 2008. 1 An Instrument To Assess Views Of Scientific Inquiry: The VOSI Questionnaire.
  • Smith, P. L., and N. A. Fouad. 1999. “Subject-Matter Specificity of Self-Efficacy, Outcome Expectancies, Interests, and Goals; Implications for the Social-Cognitive Model.” Journal of Counseling Psychology 46: 461–471. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.46.4.461.
  • Somech, A., and A. Drach-Zahavy. 2000. “Understanding Extra-Role Behavior in Schools: The Relationships between Job Satisfaction, Sense of Efficacy, and Teachers’ Extra-Role Behavior.” Teaching and Teacher Education 16 (5–6): 649–659. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00012-3.
  • Strippel, C. G., and K. Sommer. 2015. “Teaching Nature of Scientific Inquiry in Chemistry: How Do German Chemistry Teachers Use Labwork to Teach NOSI?” International Journal of Science Education 37 (18): 2965–2986. doi:10.1080/09500693.2015.1119330.
  • Sungur, S., and S. Güngören. 2009. “The Role of Classroom Environment Perceptions in Self-Regulated Learning and Science Achievement.” Elementary Education Online 8 (3): 883–900.
  • Velayutham, S., and J. M. Aldridge. 2013. “Influence of Psychosocial Classroom Environment on Students’ Motivation and Self-Regulation in Science Learning: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach.” Research in Science Education 43 (2): 507–527. doi:10.1007/s11165-011-9273-y.
  • Wigfield, A., and J. S. Eccles. 2000. “Expectancy-Value Theory of Achievement Motivation.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 25: 68–81. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1015.
  • Wolters, C. 2004. “Advancing Achievement Goal Theory: Using Goal Structures and Goal Orientations to Predict Students’ Motivation, Cognition, and Achievement.” Journal of Educational Psychology 96: 236–250. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.236.
  • Yıldız, E. 2008. “The Effects of Metacognition during the Instruction Based on Conceptual Change Used with 5E Model: An Application regarding the Force and Motion Subject in the 7th Grade.” PhD Thesis, Dokuz Eylül University, Institute of Educational Science, Izmir. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
  • Zimmerman, C. 2007. “The Development of Scientific Thinking Skills in Elementary and Middle School.” Developmental Review 27: 172–223. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2006.12.001.
  • Zusho, A., and P. R. Pintrich. 2003. “A Process-Oriented Approach to Culture.” In Teaching, Learning, and Motivation in a Multicultural Context edited by Salili F, Hoosain R, 33–65. Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.