Technology-based activities at home and STEM school achievement: the moderating effects of student gender and parental education

References

• Ahn, J. 2011. “The Effect of Social Network Sites on Adolescents Social and Academic Development: Current Theories and Controversies.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 62 (8): 1435–1445. doi:10.1002/asi.21540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, A., E. Dawson, J. DeWitt, A. Seakins, and B. Wong. 2015. “´science Capital´: A Conceptual, Methodological, and Empirical Argument for Extending Bourdieusian Notions of Capital beyond the Arts.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 52 (7): 922–948. doi:10.1002/tea.21227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, L., J. Dewitt, and B. Willis. 2014. “Adolescent Boys’ Science Aspirations: Masculinity, Capital and Power.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 51 (1): 1–30. doi:10.1002/tea.21122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, L., J. DeWitt, J. Osborne, J. Dillon, B. Willis, and B. Wong. 2012. “Balancing Acts Elementary School Girls’ Negotiations of Femininity, Achievement, and Science.” Science Education 96 (6): 967–989. doi:10.1002/sce.21031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arroyo, I., W. Burleson, M. Tai, K. Muldner, and B. P. Woolf. 2013. “Gender Differences in the Use and Benefit of Advanced Learning Technologies for Mathematics.” Journal of Educational Psychology 105 (4): 957–969. doi:10.1037/a0032748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attewell, P., and J. Battle. 1999. “Home Computers and School Performance.” The Information Society 15: 1–10. doi:10.1080/019722499128628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attewell, P., J. Battle, and B. Suazo-Garcia. 2003. “Computers and Young Children: Social Benefit or Social Problem?” Social Forces 82 (1): 277–296. doi:10.1353/sof.2003.0075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, S., and K. Maton. 2010. “Beyond the ‘digital Natives’ Debate: Towards a More Nuanced Understanding of Students Technology Experiences.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 26 (5): 321–331. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00360.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhanot, R. T., and J. Jovanovic. 2009. “The Links between Parent Behaviors and Boys and Girls Science Achievement Beliefs.” Applied Developmental Science 13 (1): 42–59. doi:10.1080/10888690802606784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleeker, M. M., and J. E. Jacobs. 2004. “Achievement in Math and Science: Do Mothers Beliefs Matter 12 Years Later?” Journal of Educational Psychology 96 (1): 97–109. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borzekowski, D. L., and T. N. Robinson. 2005. “The Remote, the Mouse, and the No. 2 Pencil: The Household Media Environment and Academic Achievement among Third Grade Students.” Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine 159 (7): 607–613. doi:10.1001/archpedi.159.7.607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, D. 2008. Taken Out of Context: American Teen Sociality in Networked Publics. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Breiner, J. M., C. C. Johnson, S. Sheats Harkness, and C. M. Koehler. 2012. “What Is STEM? A Discussion about Conceptions of STEM in Education and Partnerships.” School Science and Mathematics 112 (1): 3–11. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00109.x.
   Google Scholar
• Chaudron, S. 2015. “Young Children (0–8) and Digital Technology: A Qualitative Exploratory Study across Seven Countries”. Technical Report by the Joint Research Centre of the European Commission, Luxembourg. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, S. Y., and Y. C. Fu. 2009. “Internet Use and Academic Achievement: Gender Differences in Early Adolescence.” Adolescence 44 (176): 797–812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis-Kean, P. E. 2005. “The Influence of Parent Education and Family Income on Child Achievement: The Indirect Role of Parental Expectations and the Home Environment.” Journal of Family Psychology 19: 294–304. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.19.2.294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeWitt, J., and L. Archer. 2017. “Participation in Informal Science Learning Experiences: The Rich Get Richer?” International Journal of Science Education, Part B 7 (4): 356–373. doi:10.1080/21548455.2017.1360531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drain, T. S., L. E. Grier, and W. Sun. 2012. “Is the Growing Use of Electronic Devices Beneficial to Academic Performance? Results from Archival Data and a Survey.” Issues in Information Systems 13 (1): 225–231.
   Google Scholar
• Dubow, E. F., P. Boxer, and L. R. Huesmann. 2009. “Long-Term Effects of Parents Education on Children’s Educational and Occupational Success: Mediation by Family Interactions, Child Aggression, and Teenage Aspirations.” Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 55 (3): 224–249. doi:10.1353/mpq.0.0030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dugger, E. W. 2010. “Evolution of STEM in the United States.” Paper presented at the 6th Biennial International Conference on Technology Education Research in Australia, Queensland, December.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, J., A. Wigfield, R. D. Harold, and P. Blumenfeld. 1993. “Age and Gender Differences in Children’s Self‐ and Task Perceptions during Elementary School.” Child Development 64 (3): 830–847. doi:10.2307/1131221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S. 2005. “influences of Parents’ Education on Their Children’s Educational Attainments: The Role of Parent and Child Perceptions.” London Review of Education 3 (3): 20–191. doi:10.1080/14748460500372309.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S., and A. Wigfield. 2002. “Motivational Beliefs, Values and Goals.” Annual Review of Psychology 53: 109–132. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frome, P. M., and J. S. Eccles. 1998. “Parents’ Influence on Children’s Achievement-Related Perceptions.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74 (2): 435–452. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasnović G. D., T. Babarović, I. Dević, and J. Burušić. 2018. “Development and Validation Of New Objective School Achievement Tests in The Stem Field for Primary School Students.” Croatian Journal Of Education 20 (3): 789–824. doi: org/10.15516/cje.v20i3.2791.
   Google Scholar
• Gorard, S., and B. H. See. 2009. “The Impact of Socio-Economic Status on Participation and Attainment in Science.” Studies in Science Education 45 (1): 93–129. doi:10.1080/03057260802681821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, C. S., and D. Bavelier. 2007. “Action-Video-Game Experience Alters the Spatial Resolution of Vision.” Psychological Science 18 (1): 88–94. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01853.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenfield, P. M. 2009. “Technology and Informal Education: What Is Taught, What Is Learned.” Science 323 (5910): 69–71. doi:10.1126/science.1167190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, E. F. 2004. “Adolescent Internet Use: What We Expect, What Teens Report.” Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 25 (6): 633–649. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2004.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güzeller, C. O., and A. Akin. 2014. “Relationship between ICT Variables and Mathematics Achievement Based on PISA 2006 Database: International Evidence.” Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 13 (1): 184–192.
   Google Scholar
• Halpern, D. F., C. P. Benbow, D. C. Geary, R. C. Gur, J. S. Hyde, and M. A. Gernsbacher. 2007. “The Science of Sex Differences in Science and Mathematics.” Psychological Science in the Public Interest 8 (1): 1–51. doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2007.00032.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hasebrink, U., S. Livingstone, L. Haddon, and K. Olafsson. 2009. Comparing Children’s Online Opportunities and Risks across Europe: Cross-National Comparisons for EU Kids Online. London: EU Kids Online. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/21656
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. 2012. “PROCESS: A Versatile Computational Tool for Observed Variable Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Modelling [white Paper].” http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf .
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. 2013. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis. A Regression-Based Approach. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F., and J. Matthes. 2009. “Computational Procedures for Probing Interactions in OLS and Logistic Regression: SPSS and SAS Implementation.” Behavior Research Methods 41: 924–936. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.3.924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, C., C. Corbett, and A. St. Rose. 2010. Why so Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Washington, DC: AAUW.
   Google Scholar
• Hofferth, S. L. 2010. “Home Media and Children’s Achievement and Behavior.” Child Development 81 (5): 1598–1619. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01494.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofferth, S. L., and U. J. Moon. 2012. “Electronic Play, Study, Communication, and Adolescent Achievement, 2003–2008.” Journal of Research on Adolescence 22 (2): 215–224. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2011.00770.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, P. N., L. Rainie, and S. Jones. 2001. “Days and Nights on the Internet: The Impact of Diffusing Technology.” American Behavioral Scientist 45 (3): 383–404. doi:10.1177/0002764201045003003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, C. 2018. “Social Network Site Use and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis.” Computers & Education 119: 76–83. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.12.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, L. A., Y. Zhao, A. Kolenic, H. E. Fitzgerald, R. Harold, and A. Von Eye. 2008. “Race, Gender, and Information Technology Use: The New Digital Divide.” CyberPsychology & Behavior 11 (4): 437–442. doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.0157.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jacobs, J. E., and M. M. Bleeker. 2004. “Girls’ and Boys’ Developing Interests in Math and Science: Do Parents Matter?” New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 106: 5–21. doi:10.1002/cd.113.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jarman, J., R. M. Blackburn, and G. Racko. 2012. “The Dimensions of Occupational Gender Segregation in Industrial Countries.” Sociology 46 (6): 1003–1019. doi:10.1177/0038038511435063.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, G. M. 2011. “Internet Activities and Developmental Predictors: Gender Differences among Digital Natives.” Journal of Interactive Online Learning 10 (2): 64–76.
   Google Scholar
• Junco, R. 2011. “Too Much Face and Not Enough Books: The Relationship between Multiple Indices of Facebook Use and Academic Performance.” Computers in Human Behavior 28 (1): 187–198. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpinski, A. C., and A. Duberstein. 2009. “A Description of Facebook Use and Academic Performance among Undergraduate and Graduate Students.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, April.
   Google Scholar
• Koivusilta, L. K., T. P. Lintonen, and A. H. Rimpelä. 2007. “Orientations in Adolescent Use of Information and Communication Technology: A Digital Divide by Sociodemographic Background, Educational Career, and Health.” Scandinavian Journal of Social Medicine 35 (1): 95–103. doi:10.1080/14034940600868721.
   Google Scholar
• Kryst, E. L., S. Kotok, and K. Bodovski. 2015. “Rural/Urban Disparities in Science Achievement in Post-Socialist Countries: The Evolving Influence of Socioeconomic Status.” Global Education Review 2 (4): 60–77.
   Google Scholar
• Large, A., J. Beheshti, and T. Rahman. 2002. “Gender Differences in Collaborative Web Searching Behavior: An Elementary School Study.” Information Processing & Management 38 (3): 427–443. doi:10.1016/s0306-4573(01)00034-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. J., and Y. G. Chae. 2007. “Children’s Internet Use in a Family Context: Influence on Family Relationships and Parental Mediation.” CyberPsychology & Behavior 10 (5): 640–644. doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.9975.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lei, J. 2010. “Quantity versus Quality: A New Approach to Examine the Relationship between Technology Use and Student Outcomes.” British Journal of Educational Technology 41 (3): 455–472. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00961.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei, J., and Y. Zhao. 2007. “Technology Uses and Student Achievement: A Longitudinal Study.” Computers and Education 49 (2): 284–296. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.06.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linebarger, D. L., S. Royer, and A. R. Ghernin. 2004. “Young Children, Parents, Computers, and the Internet.” IT & Society 1 (6): 68–86.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S., and E. J. Helsper. 2008. “Parental Mediation of Children’s Internet Use.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 52 (4): 581–599. doi:10.1080/08838150802437396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins, L., and P. Veiga. 2010. “Do Inequalities in Parents’ Education Play an Important Role in PISA Students’ Mathematics Achievement Test Score Disparities?” Economics of Education Review 29 (6): 1016–1033. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meltzoff, A. N., P. K. Kuhl, J. Movellan, and T. J. Sejnowski. 2009. “Foundations for a New Science of Learning.” Science 325 (5938): 284–288. doi:10.1126/science.1175626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2009. Learning Science in Informal Environments: People, Places, and Pursuits. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Notten, N., and G. Kraaykamp. 2009. “Home Media and Science Performance: A Cross-National Study.” Educational Research and Evaluation 15 (4): 367–384. doi:10.1080/13803610903087045.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2007. PISA 2006 Science Competencies for Tomorrow’s World, Volume 1: Analysis. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Penner, A. M., and M. Paret. 2008. “Gender Differences in Mathematics Achievement: Exploring the Early Grades and the Extremes.” Social Science Research 37 (1): 239–253. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2007.06.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, L. B., and A. McConney. 2010. “Does the SES of the School Matter? an Examination of Socioeconomic Status and Student Achievement Using PISA 2003.” Teachers College Record 112 (4): 1137–1162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peter, J., and P. M. Valkenburg. 2006. “Adolescents’ Internet Use: Testing The ´Disappearing Digital Divide´ Versus The ´Emerging Digital Differentiation´ Approach.” Poetics 34 (4–5): 293–305. doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2006.05.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rideout, V., and E. Hamel. 2006. The Media Family: Electronic Media in the Lives of Infants, Toddlers, Preschoolers and Their Parents. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Rideout, V. J., U. G. Foehr, and D. F. Roberts. 2010. Generation M2: Media in the Lives of 8-to 18-year-olds. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, M., and M. T. H. Chi. 2003. “Gender Differences in Patterns of Searching the Web.” Journal of Educational Computing Research 29 (3): 335–348. doi:10.2190/7br8-vxa0-07a7-8avn.
   Google Scholar
• Salomon, A., and Y. Ben-David Kolikant. 2016. “High-School Students’ Perceptions of the Effects of Non-Academic Usage of ICT on Their Academic Achievements.” Computers in Human Behavior 64: 143–151. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Severiens, S. E., and G. T. M. Ten Dam. 1994. “Gender Differences in Learning Styles: A Narrative Review and Quantitative Meta-analysis.” Higher Education 27 (4): 487–501. doi:10.1007/bf01384906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• She, H. C. 2001. “Different Gender Students’ Participation in the High-And Low-Achieving Middle School Questioning-Orientated Biology Classrooms in Taiwan.” Research in Science & Technological Education 19 (2): 147–158. doi:10.1080/02635140120087696.
   Google Scholar
• Simpkins, S. D., P. E. Davis-Kean, and J. S. Eccles. 2006. “Math and Science Motivation: A Longitudinal Examination of the Links between Choices and Beliefs.” Developmental Psychology 42 (1): 70–83. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E., C. Lake, and C. Groff. 2009. “Effective Programs in Middle and High School Mathematics: A Best-Evidence Synthesis.” Review of Educational Research 79 (2): 839–911. doi:10.3102/0034654308330968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, E. 2011. “Women into Science and Engineering? Gendered Participation in Higher Education STEM Subjects.” British Educational Research Journal 37 (6): 993–1014. doi:10.1080/01411926.2010.515019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subrahmanyam, K., and P. Greenfield. 2008. “Online Communication and Adolescent Relationships.” The Future of Children 18 (1): 119–146. doi:10.1353/foc.0.0006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, L., K. D. Bradley, and K. Akers. 2012. “A Multilevel Modelling Approach to Investigating Factors Impacting Science Achievement for Secondary School Students: PISA Hong Kong Sample.” International Journal of Science Education 34 (14): 2107–2125. doi:10.1080/09500693.2012.708063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiedemann, J. 2002. “Teachers’ Gender Stereotypes as Determinants of Teacher Perceptions in Elementary School Mathematics.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 50: 49–62. doi:10.1023/A:102051810.
   Google Scholar
• Trickett, S. B., and J. G. Trafton. 2007. “´what if … ´: The Use of Conceptual Simulations in Scientific Reasoning.” Cognitive Science 31: 843–875. doi:10.1080/03640210701530771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vekiri, I. 2010. “Socioeconomic Differences in Elementary Students’ ICT Beliefs and Out-of-School Experiences.” Computers & Education 54 (4): 941–950. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigdor, J. L., H. F. Ladd, and E. Martinez. 2014. “Scaling the Digital Divide: Home Computer Technology and Student Achievement.” Economic Inquiry 52 (3): 1103–1119. doi:10.3386/w16078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warschauer, M., and T. Matuchniak. 2010. “New Technology and Digital Worlds: Analyzing Evidence of Equity in Access, Use, and Outcomes.” Review of Research in Education 34 (1): 179–225. doi:10.3102/0091732X09349791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watt, H. M. 2004. “Development of Adolescents’ Self‐Perceptions, Values, and Task Perceptions according to Gender and Domain in 7th‐through 11th‐grade Australian Students.” Child Development 75 (5): 1556–1574. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00757.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, R., M. D. Lubinski, and C. P. Benbow. 2007. “Spatial Ability: A Neglected Dimension in Talent Searches for Intellectually Precocious Youth.” Journal of Educational Psychology 99 (2): 397–420. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witt, E. A., A. J. Massman, and L. A. Jackson. 2011. “Trends in Youth’s Videogame Playing, Overall Computer Use, and Communication Technology Use: The Impact of Self-esteem and the Big Five Personality Factors.” Computers in Human Behavior 27 (2): 763–769. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.10.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar