The honey bees game: engaging and inspiring the community with STEM

References

• Aagaard, J., and N. Matthiesen. 2016. “Methods of Materiality: Participant Observation and Qualitative Research in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 13 (1): 33–46. doi:10.1080/14780887.2015.1090510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler, P. A., and P. Adler. 1994. “Observational Techniques.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, 377–392. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, L., J. DeWitt, J. Osborne, J. Dillon, B. Willis, and B. Wong. 2012b. “Science Aspirations, Capital, and Family Habitus: How Families Shape Children’s Engagement and Identification with Science.” American Educational Research Journal 49: 881–908. doi:10.3102/0002831211433290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballantyne, R., S. Connell, and J. Fien. 1998. “Students as Catalysts of Environmental Change: A Framework for Researching Intergenerational Influence through Environmental Education.” Environmental Department Research 4 (3): 285–298. doi:10.1080/1350462980040304.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, E., T. Hainey, T. Connolly, G. Gray, J. Earp, M. Ott, T. Lim, et al. 2016. “An Update to the Systematic Literature Review of Empirical Evidence of the Impacts and Outcomes of Computer Games and Serious Games.” Computers & Education 94: 178–192. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J., and B. Cowie. 2013. “Engaging Primary Students in Learning about New Zealand Birds: A Socially Relevant Context.” International Journal of Science Education 35 (8): 1344–1366. doi:10.1080/09500693.2012.763194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, D., E. Tanner-Smith, and S. Killingsworth. 2016. “MitDigital Games, Design, and Learning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Computers & Education 94: 178–192.
   Google Scholar
• Coil, D., C. Ettinger, and J. Eisen. 2017. “Gut Check: The Evolution of an Educational Board Game.” PLoS Biology 15 (4): e2001984. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2001984.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowie, B., J. Moreland, and K. Otrel-Cass. 2013. Expanding Notions of Assessment for Learning. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., and D. L. Miller. 2000. “Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry.” Theory into Practice 39 (3): 124–130. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dare, E., J. Ellis, and G. Roehrig. 2018. “Understanding Science Teachers’ Implementations of Integrated STEM Curricular Units through a Phenomenological Multiple Case Study.” International Journal of STEM Education 5 (4). doi:10.1186/s40594-018-0101-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, J. 2009. “Exhibitions: Connecting Classroom Assessment with Culminating Demonstrations of Mastery.” Theory into Practice 48: 36–43. doi:10.1080/00405840802577585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Freitas, S., and M. Griffiths. 2008. “The Convergence of Gaming Practices with Other Media Forms: What Potential for Learning? A Review of the Literature.” Learning, Media and Technology Education 33 (1): 11–20. doi:10.1080/17439880701868796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Education Department. 2018. Curriculum Resource Module, Year 3, the Long Walk (Vs 2.4, May 201). http://stemlearning.org.au/project-materials/
   Google Scholar
• Engle, R. A. 2006. “Framing Interactions to Foster Generative Learning: A Situative Explanation of Transfer in A Community of Learners Classroom.” The Journal of the Learning Sciences 15 (4): 451–498. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1504_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• English, L., and D. King. 2015. “STEM Learning through Engineering Design: Fourth-grade Students’ Investigations in Aerospace.” International Journal of STEM Education 2 (14). doi:10.1186/s40594-015-0027-7.
   Google Scholar
• English, L., D. King, and J. Smeed. 2017. “Advancing Integrated STEM Learning through Engineering Design: Sixth-grade Students’ Design and Construction of Earthquake Resistant Buildings.” The Journal of Educational Research 110 (3): 255–271. doi:10.1080/00220671.2016.1264053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson, F. 2006. “Definition and Analysis of Data from Videotape: Some Research Procedures and Their Rationales.” In Handbook of Complementary Methods in Education Research, edited by J. Green, G. Camilli, and P. Elmore, 177–191. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, J. H., L. D. Dierking, J. Osborne, M. Wenger, E. Dawson, and B. Wong. 2015. “Analyzing Science Education in the United Kingdom: Taking a System-Wide Approach.” Science Education 99 (1): 145–173. doi:10.1002/sce.21140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, S., R. Capraro, and M. Capraro. 2015. “How Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Project-based Learning (PBL) Affects High, Middle, and Low Achievers Differently: The Impact of Student Factors on Achievement.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 13 (5): 1089–1113. doi:10.1007/s10763-014-9526-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hersh, M., and B. Leporini. 2018. “Editorial: Serious Games, Education and Inclusion for Disabled People.” British Journal of Educational Technology 49 (4): 587–595. doi:10.1111/bjet.2018.49.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hom, E. 2014. “What is STEM Education?” Live Science Contributor, Accessed August 2015. http://www.livescience.com/43296 what is stem education.html
   Google Scholar
• Kafai, Y., and Q. Burke. 2015. “Constructionist Gaming: Understanding the Benefits of Making Games for Learning.” Educational Psychologist 50 (4): 313–334. doi:10.1080/00461520.2015.1124022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kangas, M., A. Koskinen, and L. Krokfors. 2016. “A Qualitative Literature Review of Educational Games in the Classroom: The Teacher’s Pedagogical Activities.” Teacher and Teaching 23 (4): 451–470.
   Google Scholar
• King, D., and L. English. 2016. “Engineering Design in the Primary School: Applying STEM Concepts to Build an Optical Instrument.” International Journal of Science Education 38 (18): 2762–2794. doi:10.1080/09500693.2016.1262567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krajcik, J., and I. Delen. 2017. “How to Support Learners in Developing Usable and Lasting Knowledge of STEM.” International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology 5 (1): 22–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minichiello, A., J. Hood, and D. Harkness. 2018. “Bringing User Experience Design to Bear on STEM Education: A Narrative Literature Review.” Journal for STEM Education Research 1: 7–33. doi:10.1007/s41979-018-0005-3.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno-Ger, P., D. Burgos, I. Martınez-Ortiz, J. L. Sierra, and B. Fernandez-Manjon. 2008. “Educational Game Design for Online Education.” Computers in Human Behaviour 24: 2530–2540. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.03.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mostowfi, S., N. Mamaghani, and M. Khorramar. 2016. “Designing Playful Learning by Using Educational Board Game for Children in the Age Range of 7–12: (A Case Study: Recycling and Waste Separation Education Board game).” International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 11 (12): 5453–5476.
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A., and N. Leech. 2007. “Validity and Qualitative Research: An Oxymoron?” Quality & Quantity 41 (2): 233–249. doi:10.1007/s11135-006-9000-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rennie, L., G. Venville, and J. Wallace. 2012. Knowledge that Counts in a Global Community: Exploring the Contribution of Integrated Curriculum. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rheingold, A., and J. Seaman. 2017. “The Use-value of Real-world Projects: Children and Local Experts Connecting through School Work.” Journal of Dialogic Pedagogy 5. doi:10.5195/dpj.2017.165.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, W., and S. Lee. 2004. “Science Education as/for Participation in the Community.” Science Education 88 (2): 263–291. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seakins, A., and M. Hobson. 2017. Public Understanding of Science. In Science Education, 443–452. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. doi:10.1007/978-94-6300-749-8_32.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E.. (2006). Multiple Case Study Analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, Robert. (2018). Case study research and applications. Design and methods. Los Angeles.
   Google Scholar