Responsible research and innovation in science education: insights from evaluating the impact of using digital media and arts-based methods on RRI values

References

• Akpinar, Y., and V. Bal. 2006. “Teachers’ Collaborative Task Authoring to Help Students Learn a Science Unit.” Educational Technology & Society 9 (2): 84–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anastopoulou, S., M. Sharples, and C. Baber. 2011. “An Evaluation of Multimodal Interactions with Technology while Learning Science Concepts.” British Journal of Educational Technology 42 (2): 266–290. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01017.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annetta, L. A., J. Minogue, S. Y. Holmes, and M.-T. Cheng. 2009. “Investigating the Impact of Video Games on High School Students’ Engagement and Learning about Genetics.” Computers & Education 53 (1): 74–85. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.12.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnaldi, S., and G. Gorgoni. 2016. “Turning the Tide or Surfing the Wave? Responsible Research and Innovation, Fundamental Rights and Neoliberal Virtues.” Life Sciences, Society and Policy 12 (1): 6. doi:10.1186/s40504-016-0038-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aubusson, P. J., and S. Fogwill. 2006. “Role Play as Analogical Modelling in Science.” In Methaphor and Analogy in Science Education, edited by P. J. Aubusson, A. G. Harrison, and S. Ritchie, 93–104. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Aubusson, P. J., S. Fogwill, R. Barr, and L. Perkovic. 1997. “What Happens When Students Do Simulation-role-play in Science?” Research in Science Education 27 (4): 565–579. doi:10.1007/BF02461481.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, M. Y. 2011. “Infusing Creativity into Eastern Classrooms: Evaluations from Student Perspectives.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 6 (1): 67–87. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2010.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, D. B., B. C. Nelson, H. Chang, M. Martinez-Garza, K. Slack, and C. M. D’Angelo. 2011. “Exploring Newtonian Mechanics in a Conceptually-integrated Digital Game: Comparison of Learning and Affective Outcomes for Students in Taiwan and the United States.” Computers & Education 57 (3): 2178–2195. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.05.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clary, R. M., and J. H. Wandersee. 2010. “Scientific Caricatures in the Earth Science Classroom: An Alternative Assessment for Meaningful Science Learning.” Science and Education 19 (1): 21–37. doi:10.1007/s11191-008-9178-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeWitt, J., J. Osborne, L. Archer, J. Dillon, B. Willis, and B. Wong. 2013. “Young Children's Aspirations in Science: The Unequivocal, the Uncertain and the Unthinkable.” International Journal of Science Education 35 (6): 1037–1063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorion, K. 2009. “Science through Drama: A Multiple Case Exploration of the Characteristics of Drama Activities Used in Secondary Science Lessons.” International Journal of Science Education 31 (16): 2247–2270. doi:10.1080/09500690802712699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorion, K. 2011. “A Learner’s Tactic: How Secondary Students’ Anthropomorphic Language May Support Learning of Abstract Science Concepts.” Electronic Journal of Science Education 12: 2.
   Google Scholar
• Dwyer, C. P., M. J. Hogan, and I. Stewart. 2014. “An Integrated Critical Thinking Framework for the 21st Century.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 12: 43–52. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2013.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EC. 2012. “Responsible Research and Innovation: Europe’s Ability to Respond to Societal Challenges.” Accessed 26 November 2016 http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/responsible-research-and-innovation-leaflet_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2015. Science Education for Responsible Citizenship. Report to the European Commission of the Expert Group on Science Education. Luxembourg: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Edelson, D. C. 2001. “Learning-for-use: A Framework for the Design of Technology-supported Inquiry Activities.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 38 (3): 355–385. doi:10.1002/1098-2736(200103)38:3<355::AID-TEA1010>3.0.CO;2-M.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, R. A. 2006. “Framing Interactions to Foster Generative Learning: A Situative Explanation of Transfer in A Community of Learners Classroom.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 15 (4): 451–498. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1504_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. 2005. “Learning by Design: Good Video Games as Learning Machines.” E-learning 2 (1): 5–16.
   Google Scholar
• Gijlers, H., and T. De Jong. 2005. “The Relation between Prior Knowledge and Students‘ Collaborative Discovery Learning Processes.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 42 (3): 264–282. doi:10.1002/tea.20056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gobert, J. D., Y. J. Kim, M. A. Sao Pedro, M. Kennedy, and C. G. Betts. 2015. “Using Educational Data Mining to Assess Students’ Skills at Designing and Conducting Experiments within a Complex Systems Microworld.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 18: 81–90. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2015.04.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampden-Thompson, G., and J. Bennett. 2013. “Science Teaching and Learning Activities and Students‘ Engagement in Science.” International Journal of Science Education 35 (8): 1325–1343. doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.608093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding, S., and K. Norberg. 2005. “New Feminist Approaches to Social Science Methodologies: An Introduction.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 30 (4): 2009–2015. doi:10.1086/428420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrower, M., A. MacEachren, and A. L. Griffin. 2000. “Developing a Geographic Visualization Tool to Support Earth Science Learning.” Cartography and Geographic Information Science 27 (4): 279–293. doi:10.1559/152304000783547759.
   Google Scholar
• Heras, M., and I. Ruiz-Mallén. 2017. “Responsible Research and Innovation Indicators for Science Education Assessment: How to Measure the Impact?” International Journal of Science Education 39 (18): 2482–2507. doi:10.1080/09500693.2017.1392643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H.-F., and S. E. Shannon. 2005. “Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis.” Qualitative Health Research 15 (9): 1277–1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurd, P. D. 1998. “Scientific Literacy: New Minds for a Changing World.” Science Education 82 (3): 407–416. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199806)82:3<407::AID-SCE6>3.0.CO;2-G.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, J. 2017. “The PERFORM Project: Using Performing Arts to Increase Engagement and Understanding of Science.” FEMS Microbiology Letters 364(8): fnx076. doi:10.1093/femsle/fnx076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kampschulte, L., and K. Eilert. 2016. ICT Tools in School – A Practical Guide. ICT Tools for Inquiry Based Science Education - Practical Ideas for Tools and Implementation. IRRESISTIBLE Project Report. Germany: University of Kiel. http://www.irresistible-project.eu/data_storage/resources/IRRESISTIBLE_ICT-Tools_Practical_Guide_2016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kaptan, K., and O. Timurlenk. 2012. “Challenges for Science Education.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 51: 763–771. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.237.
   Google Scholar
• Kazmer, M. M. 2011. “Produsage in A/synchronous Learner-led e-learning.” New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia 17 (1): 121–139. doi:10.1080/13614568.2011.552644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearney, M., and S. Schuck. 2005. “Students in the Director’s Seat: Teaching and Learning with Student-generated Video.” In Proceedings of Ed-Media: World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications edited by P. Kommers and G. Richards, 2864–2871. Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computers in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Klaassen, P., F. Kupper, M. Rijnen, S. Vermeulen, and J. Broerse. 2014. “Policy Brief on the State of the Art on RRI and a Working Definition of RRI.” Deliverable 1.1 RRI-Tools. Accessed 21 January 2017: http://www.rri-tools.eu/documents/10184/107098/RRITools_D1.1-RRIPolicyBrief.pdf/c246dc97-802f-4fe7-a230-2501330ba29b
   Google Scholar
• Kolstø, S. D. 2001. “Scientific Literacy for Citizenship: Tools for Dealing with the Science Dimension of Controversial Socioscientific Issues.” Science Education 23 (5): 441–467.
   Google Scholar
• Lamb, R. L., L. Annetta, D. B. Vallett, and T. D. Sadler. 2014. “Cognitive Diagnostic like Approaches Using Neural-network Analysis of serious Educational Videogames.” Computers & Education 70: 92–104. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.08.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, K. C. 2013. “Impacts of a STSE High School Biology Course on the Scientific Literacy of Hong Kong Students.” Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching 14 (1): 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Leaper, C., T. Farkas, and C. S. Brown. 2012. “Adolescent Girls’ Experiences and Gender-related Beliefs in Relation to Their Motivation in Math/science and English.” Journal of Youth and Adolescence 41 (3): 268–282. doi:10.1007/s10964-011-9693-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. W.-Y., -C.-C. Tsai, Y.-T. Wu, M.-J. Tsai, T.-C. Liu, F.-K. Hwang, C.-H. Lai, J.-C. Liang, H.-C. Wu, and C.-Y. Chang. 2011. “Internet-based Science Learning: A Review of Journal Publications.” International Journal of Science Education 33 (14): 1893–1925. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.536998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, R., N. Dsouza, and C. Quigley. 2016. “Viewing Equitable Practices through the Lens of Intersecting Identities.” Cultural Studies of Science Education 11 (4): 941–951. doi:10.1007/s11422-015-9699-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGregor, D. 2012. “Dramatising Science Learning: Findings from a Pilot Study to Re-invigorate Elementary Science Pedagogy for Five- to Seven-year Olds.” International Journal of Science Education 34 (8): 1145–1165. doi:10.1080/09500693.2012.660751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGregor, D. 2014. “Chronicling Innovative Learning in Primary Classrooms: Conceptualizing a Theatrical Pedagogy to Successfully Engage Young Children Learning Science.” Pedagogies: An International Journal 9 (3): 216–232. doi:10.1080/1554480X.2014.899544.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, P., and E. Whitelegg. 2006. Girls in the Physics Classroom: A Review of Research of Participation of Girls in Physics. London: Institute of Physics.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2010. Exploring the Intersection of Science Education and 21st Century Skills: A Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/12771.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson, H. 2005. Applied Drama. Theatre and Performance Practices. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ødegaard, M. 2003. “Dramatic Science. A Critical Review of Drama in Science Education.” Studies in Science Education 39 (1): 75–101. doi:10.1080/03057260308560196.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2016. PISA 2015 Results in Focus. PISA: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Okada, A. 2016. Responsible Research and Innovation in Science Education Report. Milton Keynes: Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., and J. Dillon. 2008. Science education in Europe: Critical reflections. A Report to the Nuffield Foundation. London: Nuffield Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, R., P. Macnaghten, and J. Stilgoe. 2012. “Responsible Research and Innovation: From Science in Society to Science for Society, with Society.” Science & Public Policy 39 (6): 751–760. doi:10.1093/scipol/scs093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashler, H., M. McDaniel, D. Rohrer, and R. Bjork. 2008. “Learning Styles: Concepts and Evidence.” Psychological Science in the Public Interest 9 (3): 106–116. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01038.x.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, S. 2007. “Factors that Influence Pupil Engagement with Science Simulations: The Role of Distraction, Vividness, Logic, Instruction and Prior Knowledge.” Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 8 (1): 1–12. doi:10.1039/B6RP90016J.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, S., S. Naylor, B. Keogh, J. Maloney, and B. Downing. 2008. “Puppets Promoting Engagement and Talk in Science.” International Journal of Science Education 30 (9): 1229–1248. doi:10.1080/09500690701474037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taagepera, M., F. Potter, G. E. Miller, and K. Lakshminarayan. 1997. “Mapping Students’ Thinking Patterns by the Use of the Knowledge Space Theory.” International Journal of Science Education 19 (3): 283–302. doi:10.1080/0950069970190303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takayesu, J. K., S. Farrell, A. J. Evans, J. E. Sullivan, J. B. Pawlowski, and J. A. Gordon. 2006. “How Do Clinical Clerkship Students Experience Simulator-based Teaching? A Qualitative Analysis.” Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare 1 (4): 215–219. doi:10.1097/01.SIH.0000245787.40980.89.
   Google Scholar
• Tveita, J. 1999. “Can Untraditional Learning Methods Used in Physics Help Girls to Be More Interested and Achieve More in This Subject?” In Research in Science Education in Europe, edited by M. Bandiera, S. Caravita, E. Torracca, and M. Vicentini, 133–140. Dordrech: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ulger, K. 2016. “The Relationship between Creative Thinking and Critical Thinking Skills of Students.” H.U. Journal of Education 31 (4): 695–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2015. Rethinking Education. Towards a Global Common Good? Paris: UNES.
   Google Scholar
• Varelas, M., C. C. Pappas, E. Tucker-Raymond, J. Kane, J. Hankes, I. Ortiz, and N. Keblawe-Shamah. 2010. “Drama Activities as Ideational Resources for Primary-grade Children in Urban Science Classrooms.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47 (3): 302–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Schomberg, R. 2011. “Prospects for Technology Assessment in a Framework of Responsible Research and Innovation.” In Technikfolgen abschätzen lehren: Bildungspotenziale transdisziplinärer Methode, edited by M. Dusselforp and R. Beecroft, 39–61. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C., Y. Ke, J.-T. Wu, and W.-H. Hsu. 2012. “Collaborative Action Research on Technology Integration for Science Learning.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 21 (1): 125–132. doi:10.1007/s10956-011-9289-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, M., A. H. DeBarger, B. L. Montgomery, X. Zhou, and E. Tate. 2012. “Exploring Middle School Students‘ Conceptions of the Relationship between Genetic Inheritance and Cell Division.” Science Education 96 (1): 78–103. doi:10.1002/sce.20465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods-McConney, A., M. C. Oliver, A. McConney, R. Schibeci, and D. Maor. 2014. “Science Engagement and Literacy: A Retrospective Analysis for Students in Canada and Australia.” International Journal of Science Education 36 (10): 1588–1608. doi:10.1080/09500693.2013.871658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, H.-K., and Y.-L. Huang. 2007. “Ninth-Grade Student Engagement in Teacher-Centered and Student-Centered Technology-Enhanced Learning Environments.” Science Education 91 (5): 727–749. doi:10.1002/sce.20216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wui, L. S., and R. M. Saat. 2008. “An Evaluation of a Nutrition WebQuest: The Malaysian Experience.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education 4 (2): 99–108.
   Google Scholar