Investigating the effectiveness of STEAM education on students’ conceptual understanding of force and energy topics

References

• Abed, O. H. 2016. “Drama-Based Science Teaching and Its Effect on Students’ Understanding of Scientific Concepts and Their Attitudes Towards Science Learning.” International Education Studies 9 (10): 163–173.
   Google Scholar
• Baek, Y., H. Park, Y. Kim, S. Noh, J. Park, J. Lee, J. S. Jeong, Y. Choi, and H. Han. 2011. “STEAM Education in Korea.” Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction 11 (4): 149–171.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, S., and R. Watson. 1998. “Establishing Basic Ecological Understanding in Younger Pupils: A Pilot Evaluation of a Strategy Based on Drama/Role Play.” International Journal of Science Education 20 (2): 139–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beane, J. A. 1995. “Curriculum Integration and the Disciplines of Knowledge.” The Phi Delta Kappan 76 (8): 616–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bequette, J., and M. B. Bequette. 2012. “A Place for Art and Design Education in the STEM Conversation.” Art Education 65 (2): 40–47.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, G. J., and G. M. Brooks. 1993. In Search of Understanding: The Case for Constructivism Classroom. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Burnard, P. 2015. “Positioning Creativities in Relation to Effective Arts Pedagogy.” In How Arts Education Makes a Difference: Research Examining Successful Classroom Practice and Pedagogy, edited by J. Fleming, R. Gibson, and M. Anderson, 249–263. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Buyukozturk, Ş. 2010. Data Analysis Hand Book. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. W. 2010. “What Is STEM Education?” Science 329 (5995): 996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceylan, S., and Z. Ozdilek. 2015. “Improving a Sample Lesson Plan for Secondary Science Courses within the STEM Education.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 177: 223–228.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, Y., Y. Lim, and D. Son. 2017. “A Semantic Network Analysis on the Recognition of STEAM by Middle School Students in South Korea.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education 13 (10): 6457–6469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çorlu, M. S., R. M. Capraro, and M. M. Capraro. 2014. “Introducing STEM Education: Implications for Educating Our Teachers for the Age of Innovation.” Education and Science 39 (171): 74–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coştu, B., and A. Ayas. 2005. “Evaporation in Different Liquids: Secondary Students’ Conceptions.” Research in Science and Technological Education 23 (1): 75–97.
   Google Scholar
• Diakidoy, I. A. N., P. Kendeou, and C. Ioannides. 2003. “Reading about Energy: The Effects of Texts Structure in Science Learning and Conceptual Change.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 28 (3): 335–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson, N. L. 2004. “The Effectiveness of the Constructing Physics Understanding (CPU) Pedagogy on Middle School Students’ Learning of Force and Motion Concepts.” (Order No. 3126277). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (305160064). Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/305160064?accountid=10527
   Google Scholar
• Drake, S., and R. Burns. 2004. Meeting Standards through Integrated Curriculum. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Virginia: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Dyrberg, N. R., and H. T. Holmegaard. 2018. “Motivational Patterns in STEM Education: A Self-Determination Perspective on First-Year Courses.” Research in Science and Technological Education 37 (1): 90–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• English, L. D. 2016. “STEM Education K-12: Perspectives on STEM Integration.” International Journal of STEM Education 4 (3): 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Escalada, L. 2016. “Physical Science Content and Inquiry.” In STEM Learning with Young Children: Inquiry Teaching with Ramps and Pathways, edited by S. Counsell, L. Escalada, R. Geiken, M. Sander, J. Uhlenberg, B. Van Meeteren, S. Yoshizawa, and B. Zan, 52–71. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flick, L. B. 1993. “The Meanings of Hands-on Science.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 4 (1): 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Fosnot, C. 2005. Constructivism: Theory, Perspectives, and Practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fraenkel, J. R., N. E. Wallen, and H. H. Hyun. 2012. How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, K., and S. Gross. 2016. “Transformation: Constructivism, Design Thinking, and Elementary STEAM.” Art Education 69 (6): 36–43.
   Google Scholar
• Guzey, S. S., M. Harwell, M. Moreno, Y. Peralta, and T. J. Moore. 2017. “The Impact of Design-Based STEM Integration Curricula on Student Achievement in Engineering, Science, and Mathematics.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 26 (2): 207–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holstermann, N., D. Grube, and S. Bögeholz. 2010. “Hands-on Activities and Their Influence on Students’ Interest.” Research in Science Education 40 (5): 743–757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong, S., and H. Kim. 2014. “The Effect of a Climate Change Monitoring Program on Students’ Knowledge and Perceptions of STEAM Education in Korea.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education 11 (6): 1321–1338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jho, H., O. Hong, and J. Song. 2016. “An Analysis of STEM/STEAM Teacher Education in Korea with a Case Study of Two Schools from a Community of Practice Perspective.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education 12 (7): 1843–1862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolly, A. 2014. “STEM Vs. STEAM: Do the Arts Belong? Education Week: Teacher.” http://www.edweek.org/tm/articles/2014/11/18/ctq-jolly-stem-vs-steam.html
   Google Scholar
• Kim, B. H., and J. Kim. 2016. “Development and Validation of Evaluation Indicators for Teaching Competency in STEAM Education in Korea.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education 12 (7): 1909–1924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, D., and M. Bolger. 2017. “Analysis of Korean Elementary Pre-service Teachers’ Changing Attitudes about Integrated STEAM Pedagogy through Developing Lesson Plans.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 15 (4): 587–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuenzi, J. J. 2008. Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education: Background, Federal Policy, and Legislative Action. Nebraska: Digital Commons, University of Nebraska – Lincoln.
   Google Scholar
• Liao, C. 2016. “From Interdisciplinary to Transdisciplinary: An Arts-Integrated Approach to STEAM Education.” Art Education 69 (6): 44–49.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Y. S. 2011. “Fostering Creativity through Education - A Conceptual Framework of Creative Pedagogy.” Creative Education 2 (3): 149–155.
   Google Scholar
• McMillan, J. H., and S. Schumacher. 2001. Research in Education: A Conceptual Introduction. New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, R. J. A., S. Abbott, P. Bray, J. Exley, and D. Wisnia. 1984. “Teaching Science through Drama: An Empirical Investigation.” Research in Science & Technological Education 2 (1): 77–81.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, T. J., M. S. Stohlmann, H. H. Wang, K. M. Tank, and G. H. Roehrig. 2014. “Implementation and Integration of Engineering in K-12 STEM Education.” In Engineering in Precollege Settings: Research into Practice, edited by J. Strobel, S. Purzer, and M. Cardella, 35–60. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Nami, Y., H. Marsooli, and M. Ashouri. 2014. “The Relationship between Creativity and Academic Achievement.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 114: 36–39.
   Google Scholar
• National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council (NAE and NRC). 2009. Engineering in K–12 Education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects. Washington, DC: NAP.
   Google Scholar
• Nordine, J., J. Krajcik, and D. Fortus. 2011. “Transforming Energy Instruction in Middle School to Support Integrated Understanding and Future Learning.” Science Education 95 (4): 670–699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh, J., J. Lee, and J. Kim. 2013. “Development and Application of STEAM Based Education Program Using Scratch: Focus on 6th Graders’ Science in Elementary School.” In Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering, Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, edited by J. Park, S.-C. Chen, J.-M. Gil, and N. Y. Yen, 493–501. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Plano-Clark, V. L., K. Schumacher, C. West, J. Edrington, L. B. Dunn, A. Harzstark, M. Melisko, M. W. Rabow, P. S. Swift, and C. Miaskowski. 2013. “Practices for Embedding an Interpretive Qualitative Approach within a Randomized Clinical Trial.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 7 (3): 219–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Punch, K. F. 1998. Introduction to Social Research: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Quigley, C. F., D. Herro, and F. M. Jamil. 2017. “Developing a Conceptual Model of STEAM Teaching Practices.” School Science and Mathematics 117 (1–2): 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, M. E. 2008. “Stem, Stem Education, Stemmania.” The Technology Teacher 68 (4): 20–26.
   Google Scholar
• Sousa, D. A., and T. Pilecki. 2013. From STEM to STEAM: Using Brain-Compatible Strategies to Integrate the Arts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stagg, B. C. 2019. “Meeting Linnaeus: Improving Comprehension of Biological Classification and Attitudes to Plants Using Drama in Primary Science Education.” Research in Science & Technological Education: 1–19. (online first). https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2019.1605347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stagg, B. C., and M. F. Verde. 2019. “Story of a Seed: Educational Theatre Improves Students’ Comprehension of Plant Reproduction and Attitudes to Plants in Primary Science Education.” Research in Science & Technological Education 37 (1): 15–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, A., and E. L. Ashworth. 2018. “Emotionality and STEAM Integrations in Teacher Education.” Journal of Teaching and Learning 11 (2): 11–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaby, K., and J. V. Ernst. 2016. “STEM Education Fiscal Year 2015: An Analysis of Educational Investments and Expectations.” Journal of STEM Teacher Education 51 (1): 17–31.
   Google Scholar
• TMNE. 2016. Turkish Ministry of National Education 7th Grade Science Textbook. Istanbul: Sonuc Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Treagust, D. F., and A. L. Chandrasegaran. 2007. “The Taiwan National Science Concept Learning Study in an International Perspective.” International Journal of Science Education 29 (4): 391–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkish Ministry of National Education. 2013. Science Curriculum. Ankara: Board of Education and Training.
   Google Scholar
• Vande Zande, R. 2010. “Teaching Design Education for Cultural, Pedagogical, and Economic Aims.” Studies in Art Education 5 (3): 248–261.
   Google Scholar
• Vasquez, J. A., M. Sneider, and M. Comer. 2013. STEM Lesson Essentials: Grades 3 –8: Integrating Science, Technology, Mathematics, and Education. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, C. D., and C. Andersen. 2004. “Snails are Science: Creating Context for Science Inquiry and Writing through Process Drama.” Youth Theatre Journal 18 (1): 68–86.
   Google Scholar
• Wynn, T., and J. Harris. 2012. “Toward a STEM + Arts Curriculum: Creating the Teacher Team.” Art Education 65 (5): 42–47.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. V., A. House, H. Wang, C. Singleton, and K. Klopfenstein. 2011. “Inclusive STEM Schools: Early Promise in Texas and Unanswered Questions.” In National Academies Board on Science Education and Board on Testing and Assessment for “Highly Successful STEM Schools or Programs for K-12 STEM Education: A Workshop”. Washington D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Yürümezoğlu, K., S. Ayaz, and A. Çökelez. 2009. “Grade 7–9 Students’ Perceptions of Energy and Related Concepts.” Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 3 (2): 52–73.
   Google Scholar
• Zan, B. 2016. “Why STEM? Why Early Childhood? Why Now.” In STEM Learning with Young Children: Inquiry Teaching with Ramps and Pathways, edited by S. Counsell, L. Escalada, R. Geiken, M. Sander, J. Uhlenberg, B. Van Meeteren, S. Yoshizawa, and B. Zan, 1–9. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar