References
- Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
- Bryan, B. 2010. Between Two Grammars: Research and Practice for Language and Teaching in a Creole-speaking Environment. Kingston: Ian Randle.
- Cassels, J. R. T., and A. H. Johnstone. 1985. Words that Matter in Science. London: Royal Society of Chemistry.
- Cuevas, J. A., R. L. Russell, and M. A. Irving. 2012. “An Examination of the Effect of Customized Reading Modules on Diverse Secondary Students’ Reading Comprehension and Motivation.” Educational Technology Research and Development 60 (3): 445–467. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-012-9244-7.
- Cummins, J. 1994. “Knowledge, Power, and Identity in Teaching English as a Second Language.” In Educating Second Language Children: The Whole Child, The Whole Curriculum, The Whole Community, edited by F. Genesee, 33–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Evans, H. 2001. Inside Jamaican Schools. Kingston: University of the West Indies Press.
- Fang, Z. 2006. “The Language Demand of Science Reading in Middle School.” International Journals of Science Education 28 (5): 491–520. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500339092.
- Ferguson, C. 1959. “Diglossia.” Word 15 (1): 325–340. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1959.11659702.
- Fry, E. 1968. “A Readability Formula that Saves Time.” Journal of Reading 11 (7): 513–578.
- García, O. 2009. Bilingual Education in the 21st Century: A Global Perspective. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell.
- Gardner, P. L. 1972. “Difficulties with Non-technical Vocabulary Amongst Junior Secondary School Students: The Words in Science Project.” Research in Science Education 2 (1): 58–81.
- Gellert, A., and C. Elbro. 2013. “Cloze Tests Maybe Quick, but are They Dirty? Development and Preliminary Validation of a Cloze Test of Reading Comprehension.” Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment 31 (1): 16–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282912451971.
- Graves, M. F., and B. Graves. 2003. Scaffolding Reading Experiences: Designs for Student Success. Norwood: Christopher-Gordon.
- Groves, F. H. 2016. “A Longitudinal Study of Middle and Secondary Level Science Textbook Vocabulary Loads.” School Science and Mathematics 116 (6): 320–325. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12183.
- Halliday, M. A. K. 1978. Language as Social Semiotic. London: Arnold.
- Halliday, M. A. K., and R. Hasan. 1989. Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Halliday, M. A. K., and J. R. Martin. 2003. Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
- Jasien, P. G. 2010. “You Said “Neutral”, but What Do You Mean?” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 87 (1). 33–34.doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/ed8000182.
- Lee, O., H. Quinn, and G. Valdés. 2013. “Science and Language for English Language Learners in Relation to Next Generation Science Standards and with Implications for Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts and Mathematics.” Educational Researcher 42 (4): 223–233. doi:10.3102%2F0013189X13480524.
- Lodge, W. 2018. “The Accessibility of Science Instructions to Jamaican Students.” PhD diss., Institute of Education, University College London.
- Lodge, W. G. 2002. “The Readability of Biology Textbook to Jamaican Students.” MA diss., University of London.
- Martinez-Alvarez, P. 2017. “Special Ways of Knowing in Science: Expansive Learning Opportunities with Bilingual Children with Learning Disabilities.” Cultural Studies of Science Education 12 (3): 521–553. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-016-9732-x.
- Ministry of Education, Youth and Culture. 2017. Statistics. Kingston: Government Printer.
- Mitchelmore, J. 2009. Investigating Science for Jamaica, Book 1. Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes.
- Mortimer, E. F., and P. H. Scott. 2003. Meaning Making in Secondary Science Classrooms. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
- Nellist, J., and B. Nicholl. 1986. The Association for Science Education Science Teachers’ Handbook. London: Hutchinson Radius.
- Oates, T. 2014. “Why Textbooks Count?” http://www.cambridgeassessment.org.uk/Images/181744-why-textbooks-count-tim-oates.pdf .http://www.cambridgeassessment
- Otero, J., J. Leon, and A. C. Graesser. 2014. The Psychology of Science Text Comprehension. New York: Routledge.
- Pickersgill, S., and R. Lock. 1991. “Student Understanding of Selected Non-technical Words in Science.” Research in Science &technological Education 9 (1): 71–79. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514910090107.
- Pikulski, J. J., and A. W. Tobin. 1982. “The Cloze Procedure as an Informal Assessment Technique.” In Approaches to the Informal Evaluation of Reading, edited by J. J. Pikulski and T. Shanahan, 42–62. Newmark: International Reading Association.
- Poza, L. 2018. “The Language of “Ciencia”: Translanguaging and Learning in a Bilingual Science Classroom.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 21 (1): 1–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13760050.2015.1125849.
- Scott, M. 2008. “A Case for the Sentence in Reading Comprehension.” Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools 40 (2): 184–191. doi:https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2008/08/08-0042).
- Song, Y., and S. Carheden. 2014. “Dual Meaning Vocabulary (DMV) Words in Learning Chemistry.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 15 (2): 128–141. doi:https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RP00128H.
- Soyibo, K. 1996. “A Comparison of Caribbean High School Biology Textbooks.” Journal of Biological Education 30 (3): 190–194. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1996.965502.
- Thomas, D. R. 2006. “A General Inductive Approach for Analysing Qualitative Evaluation Data.” American Journal of Evaluation 27 (2): 237–246. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748.
- Webb, J., and A. Karatjas. 2018. “Grade Perceptions of Students in Chemistry Coursework at All Levels.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 19 (1): 491–499. doi:https://doi.org/10.1039/c7rp00168a.
- Wellington, J., and J. Osborne. 2001. Language and Literacy in Science Education. Buckingham: Open Press.