Barriers and levers driving change in a STEM science subject in the Australian higher education sector: a focused study

References

• Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering. 2013. “Advancing STEM Education.” Accessed 8 February 2018. https://www.atse.org.au/Documents/policy/advancing-stem-education.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government, Department of Industry, Innovation and Science. 2017. “Australia’s National Science Statement 2017.” Accessed 8 February 2018. http://www.science.gov.au/scienceGov/NationalScienceStatement/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Barr, R. B., and J. Tagg. 1995. “From Teaching to Learning - A New Paradigm for Undergraduate Education.” Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning 27 (6): 12–26. doi:10.1080/00091383.1995.10544672.
   Google Scholar
• Baumert, J., M. Kunter, W. Blum, M. Brunner, T. Voss, A. Jordan, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss, M. Neubrand, and Y. M. Tsai. 2010. “Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge, Cognitive Activation in the Classroom, and Student Progress.” American Educational Research Journal 47 (1): 133–180. doi:10.3102/0002831209345157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becher, T., and P. Trowler. 2001. Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Culture of Disciplines. 2nd ed. Buckingham, England: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, K., and K. Park. 2011. “Effects of Integrative Approaches among Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Subjects on Students’ Learning: A Preliminary Meta-analysis.” Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research 12 (5/6): 23–37.
   Google Scholar
• Bereiter, C. 1994. “Implications of Postmodernism for Science, Or, Science as Progressive Discourse.” Educational Technology 29 (1): 3–12. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2901_1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackley, S., and J. Howell. 2015. “A STEM Narrative: 15 Years in the Making.” Australian Journal of Teacher Education 40 (7): 102–112. doi:10.14221/ajte.2015v40n7.8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boaler, J. 2002. “Learning from Teaching: Exploring the Relationship between ‘Reform’ Curriculum and Equity.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 33 (4): 239–258. doi:10.2307/749740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boaler, J. 2008. “Promoting ‘Relational Equity’ and High Mathematics Achievement through an Innovative Mixed‐ability Approach.” British Educational Research Journal 34 (2): 167–194. doi:10.1080/01411920701532145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. 2012. “The Current Status of STEM Education Research.” Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research 13 (5): 7–11.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R. A. J. 2017. “Using Collective Argumentation to Engage Students in a Primary Mathematics Classroom.” Mathematics Education Research Journal 29 (2): 183–199. doi:10.1007/s13394-017-0198-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caelli, K., L. Ray, and J. Mill. 2003. “Clear as Mud: Toward Greater Clarity in Ceneric Qualitative Research.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 2 (2): 1–13. doi:10.1177/160940690300200201.
   Google Scholar
• Chasteen, S. V., B. Wilcox, M. D. Caballero, K. K. Perkins, S. J. Pollock, and C. E. Wieman. 2015. “Educational Transformation in Upper-division Physics: The Science Education Initiative Model, Outcomes, and Lessons Learned.” Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research 11 (2). doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.11.020110.
   Google Scholar
• Cordiner, M., S. Thomas, and W. Green. 2018. “Do Labels Matter When Implementing Change? Implications of Labelling an Academic as a Champion - Results from a Case Study.” Studies in Higher Education 43 (3): 484–499. doi:10.1080/03075079.2016.1180674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2008. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Dancy, M., and C. Henderson. 2010. “Pedagogical Practices and Instructional Change of Physics Faculty.” American Journal of Physics 78 (10): 1056–1063. doi:10.1119/1.3446763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidovitch, N., and D. Soen. 2006. “Using Students’ Assessments to Improve Instructors’ Quality of Teaching.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 30 (4): 351–376. doi:10.1080/03098770600965375.
   Google Scholar
• Dawes, L., W. A. Loughlin, H. Whitehouse, P. Adams, C. Diezmann, M. Nugent, M. C. Whiteford, and J. Mascadri. 2017. Transforming the Nature and Delivery of Mathematics and Science Secondary Teacher Education in Queensland. Final Report. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Education and Training.
   Google Scholar
• Eckman, E. W., M. A. Williams, and M. B. Silver-Thorn. 2016. “An Integrated Model for STEM Teacher Preparation: The Value of a Teaching Cooperative Educational Experience.” Journal of STEM Teacher Education 51 (1): 71–82. doi:10.30707/JSTE51.1Eckman.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, S., S. L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M. K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt, and M. P. Wenderoth. 2014. “Active Learning Increases Student Performance in Science, Engineering and Mathematics.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (23): 8410–8415. doi:10.1073/pnas.1319030111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. 2001. Leading in a Culture of Change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, T., G. Robert, F. Macfarlane, P. Bate, and O. Kyriakidou. 2004. “Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organizations: Systematic Review and Recommendations.” The Milbank Quarterly 82 (4): 581–629. doi:10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00325.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grek, S. 2009. “Governing by Numbers: The PISA ‘Effect’ in Europe.” Journal of Education Policy 24 (1): 23–37. doi:10.1080/02680930802412669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, P., K. Hammerness, and M. McDonald. 2009. “Redefining Teaching, Re‐imagining Teacher Education.” Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 15 (2): 273–289. doi:10.1080/13540600902875340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G., and Y. S. Lincoln. 1989. Fourth Generation Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, G. E., and S. M. Hord. 2006. Implementing Change: Patterns, Principles, and Potholes. 2nd ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, K.-L., F. Jensz, and G. Baldwin. 2005. “Who’s Teaching Science: Meeting the Demand for Qualified Science Teachers in Australian Secondary Schools.” Accessed 8 February 2018. http://www.acds.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2015/04/teachsci.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, C., A. Beach, and N. Finkelstein. 2011. “Facilitating Change in Undergraduate STEM Instructional Practices: An Analytic Review of the Literature.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 48 (8): 952–984. doi:10.1002/tea.20439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, C., M. Dancy, and M. Niewiadomska-Bugaj. 2012. “Use of Research-based Instructional Strategies in Introductory Physics: Where Do Faculty Leave the Innovation-decision Process?” Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research 8 (2): 020104 1–15. doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.020104.
   Google Scholar
• Hennessy, S., J. Wishart, D. Whitelock, R. Deaney, R. Brawn, L. La Velle, A. McFarlane, K. Ruthven, and M. Winterbottom. 2007. “Pedagogical Approaches for Technology-integrated Science Teaching.” Computers & Education 48 (1): 137–152. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiatt, J. M. 2006. ADKAR: A Model for Change in Business, Government, and Our Community. Loveland, CO: Procsi.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, H. C., S. G. Schilling, and D. L. Ball. 2004. “Developing Measures of Teachers’ Mathematics Knowledge for Teaching.” The Elementary School Journal 105 (1): 11–30. doi:10.1086/428763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrook, J. B. 2013. “What Is Interdisciplinary Communication? Reflections on the Very Idea of Disciplinary Integration.” Synthese 190 (11): 1865–1879. doi:10.1007/s11229-012-0179-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John-Steiner, V., W. Wardekker, and H. Mahn. 1998. “Concepts, Contexts and Transformation: Scientific and Everyday Concepts Revisited.” Mind Culture and Activity 5 (2): 81–153.
   Google Scholar
• Kahlke, R. M. 2014. “Generic Qualitative Approaches: Pitfalls and Benefits of Methodological Mixology.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 13 (1): 37–52. doi:10.1177/160940691401300119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, J. P., T. Lyons, and F. Quinn. 2014. “The Continuing Decline of Science and Mathematics Enrolments in Australian High Schools.” Teaching Science 60 (2): 34–46.
   Google Scholar
• Kezar, A. 2001. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report: Understanding and Facilitating Organizational Change in the 21st Century. 28 (4). San Francisco CA: Jossey-Bass. Accessed 3 June 2014. www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jissue/89016384
   Google Scholar
• Klein, J. T. 2013. “Communication and Collaboration in Interdisciplinary Research.” In Enhancing Communication and Collaboration in Cross Disciplinary Research, edited by M. O’Rourke, S. Crowley, S. D. Eigenbrode, and J. D. Wulfhorst, 11–30. California: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kotter, J. P. 1996. Leading Change. Brighton, MA: Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krishnan, A. 2009. NCRM Working Paper 03/09: What are Academic Disciplines? Some Observations on the Disciplinarity vs. Interdisciplinarity Debate. National Centre for Research Methods. Accessed 8 February 2018. http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/783/1/what_are_academic_disciplines.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lane, I. F. 2007. “Change in Higher Education: Understanding and Responding to Individual and Organizational Resistance.” Journal of Veterinary Medical Education 34 (2): 85–92. doi:10.3138/jvme.34.2.85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, E., and J. A. Luft. 2008. “Experienced Secondary Science Teachers’ Representation of Pedagogical Content Knowledge.” International Journal of Science Education 30 (10): 1343–1363. doi:10.1080/09500690802187058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loughran, J., P. Mulhall, and A. Berry. 2008. “Exploring Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Science Teacher Education.” International Journal of Science Education 30 (10): 1301–1320. doi:10.1080/09500690802187009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lueddeke, G. R. 1999. “Toward a Constructivist Framework for Guiding Change and Innovation in Higher Education.” The Journal of Higher Education 70 (3): 235–260. doi:10.2307/2649196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marginson, S., R. Tytler, B. Freeman, and K. Roberts. 2013. STEM: Country Comparisons: International Comparisons of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education. Final Report. Melbourne: VIC. Australian Council of Learned Academies. Accessed 29 July 2020. http://dro.deakin.edu.au/eserv/DU:30059041/tytler-stemcountry-2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McShannon, J., P. Hynes, N. Nirmalakhandan, G. Venkataramana, C. Ricketts, A. Ulery, and R. Steiner. 2006. “Gaining Retention and Achievement for Students Program: A Faculty Development Program.” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice 132 (3): 204–208. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2006)132:3(204).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menzies, H., and J. Newson. 2007. “No Time to Think: Academics’ Life in the Globally Wired University.” Time and Society 16 (1): 83–98. doi:10.1177/0961463X07074103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B., and E. J. Tisdell. 2015. Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. 4th ed. San Franciso: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, E. B., J. M. Chamberlain, R. Parson, and K. K. Perkins. 2014. “PhET Interactive Simulations: Transformative Tools for Teaching Chemistry.” Journal of Chemical Education 91 (8): 1191–1197. doi:10.1021/ed4005084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, J. 2001. Interdisciplinarity: The New Critical Idiom. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Munby, H., T. Russell, and A. K. Martin. 2001. “Teachers’ Knowledge and How It Develops.” Handbook of Research on Teaching 4: 877–904.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council of the National Academies. 2011. Successful K-12 STEM Education: Identifying Effective Approaches in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Washington, D.C: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Chief Scientist. 2013. Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics in the National Interest: A Strategic Approach. Canberra: Australian Government. Accessed 8 February 2018. http://www.chiefscientist.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/STEMstrategy290713FINALweb.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Prinsley, R., and E. Johnston. 2015. “Transforming STEM Teaching in Australian Primary Schools: Everybody’s Business.” Australian Government: Office of the Chief Scientist. Accessed 8 February 2018. http://www.chiefscientist.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/Transforming-STEM-teaching_FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pucciarelli, F., and A. Kaplan. 2016. “Competition and Strategy in Higher Education: Managing Complexity and Uncertainty.” Business Horizons 59 (3): 311–320. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2016.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinholz, D. L., J. C. Corbo, M. H. Dancy, N. Finkelstein, and S. Deetz. 2014. “Towards a Model of Systemic Change in University STEM Education.” Accessed 8 February 2018. h ttps:// arXiv: 1412.30 37v2[p hysics .ed-ph].https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1412/1412.3037.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Renshaw, P., and R. A. J. Brown. 2007. “Formats of Classroom Talk for Integrating Everyday and Scientific Discourse: Replacement, Interweaving, Contextual Privileging and Pastiche.” Language and Education 21 (6): 531–549. doi:10.2167/le710.0.
   Google Scholar
• Rinke, C. R., W. Gladstone‐Brown, C. R. Kinlaw, and J. Cappiello. 2016. “Characterizing STEM Teacher Education: Affordances and Constraints of Explicit STEM Preparation for Elementary Teachers.” School Science and Mathematics 116 (6): 300–309. doi:10.1111/ssm.12185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, W. M., and A. Calabrese Barton. 2004. Rethinking Scientific Literacy. New York: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Shenton, A. K. 2004. “Strategies for Ensuring Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research Projects.” Education for Information 22 (2): 63–75. doi:10.3233/EFI-2004-22201.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. 1987. “Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform.” Harvard Educational Review 57 (1): 1–23. doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoddart, P. 2015. “Using Educational Technology as an Institutional Teaching and Learning Improvement Strategy?” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 37 (5): 586–596. doi:10.1080/1360080X.2015.1079401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tal, T., and Y. Kedmi. 2006. “Teaching Socioscientific Issues: Classroom Culture and Students’ Performances.” Cultural Studies of Science Education 1 (4): 615–644. doi:10.1007/s11422-006-9026-9.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, S., L. De Bortoli, and C. Underwood. 2017. “PISA 2015: Reporting Australia’s Results.” Accessed 8 February 2018 https://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1023&context=ozpisa
   Google Scholar
• Van Driel, J. H., D. Beijaard, and N. Verloop. 2001. “Professional Development and Reform in Science Education: The Role of Teachers’ Practical Knowledge.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 38 (2): 137–158. doi:10.1002/1098-2736(200102)38:2%3C137::AID-TEA1001/3E3.0.CO;2-U.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. 1987. “Thinking and Speech.” In The Collected Works of L.S. Vygotsky, Volume 1: Problems of General Psychology, edited by W. Rieber Robert and A. S. Carton, 39–285. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walczyk, J. J., and L. L. Ramsey. 2003. “Use of Learner‐centered Instruction in College Science and Mathematics Classrooms.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 40 (6): 566–584. doi:10.1002/tea.10098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver, G. C., W. D. Burgess, A. L. Childress, and L. Slakey. 2015. Transforming Institutions: Undergraduate STEM Education for the 21st Century. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wieman, C., K. Perkins, and S. Gilbert. 2010. “Transforming Science Education at Large Research Universities: A Case Study in Progresses.” Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning 42 (2): 6–14. doi:10.1080/00091380903563035.
   Google Scholar
• Wienk, M. 2017. Discipline Profile of the Mathematical Sciences 2017. Victoria, Australia: University of Melbourne on Behalf of the Australian Mathematical Sciences Institute. Accessed 8 February 2018. http://amsi.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/discipline-profile-2017-web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, R., and J. Mack. 2014. “Declines in High School Mathematics and Science Participation: Evidence of Students’ and Future Teachers’ Disengagement with Maths.” International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education 22 (7): 35–48.
   Google Scholar