1,166
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

What has happened to teacher assessment of science in English primary schools? Revisiting evidence from the Primary Science Quality Mark

&

References

  • BERA. 2018. Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research. 4th ed. London: BERA.
  • Black, P., and C. Harrison. 2010. “Formative Assessment in Science.” In Good Practice in Science Teaching: What Research Has to Say, edited by J. Osborne and J. Dillon, 183−210. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
  • Black, P., and D. Wiliam. 1998. Inside the Black Box. London: GL Assessment.
  • Boyle, B., and J. Bragg. 2005. “No Science Today – The Demise of Primary Science.” The Curriculum Journal 16 (4): 423–437. doi:10.1080/09585170500384115.
  • Bryman, A. 2012. Social Research Methods. Maidenhead: OUP.
  • Campbell, T. 2015. “Stereotyped at Seven? Biases in Teacher Judgement of Pupils’ Ability and Attainment.” Journal of Social Policy 44 (3): 517–547. doi:10.1017/S0047279415000227.
  • CBI. 2015. Tomorrow’s World: Inspiring Primary Scientists. London: Confederation of British Industry.
  • CFE Research. 2017. State of the nation’ report of UK primary science education: baseline research for the Wellcome Trust Primary Science Campaign. Leicester: CFE Research.
  • Coe, R. 2012. “Conducting Your Research.” In Research Methods and Methodologies in Education, edited by J. Arthur, M. Waring, R. Coe, and L. Hedges, 41−52. London: Sage.
  • Collins, S., M. Reiss, and G. Stobart. 2010. “What Happens When High-stakes Testing Stops? Teachers’ Perception of the Impact of Compulsory National Testing in Science of 11 Year-olds in England and Its Abolition in Wales.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 17 (3): 273–286.
  • Commission on Assessment without Levels. 2015. Final report of the Commission on Assessment without Levels. London: DfE.
  • Davies, D., S. Earle, K. McMahon, A. Howe, and C. Collier. 2017. “Development and Exemplification of a Model for Teacher Assessment in Primary Science.” International Journal of Science Education 39 (14): 1869–1890. doi:10.1080/09500693.2017.1356942.
  • DeLuca, C., and S. Johnson. 2017. “Developing Assessment Capable Teachers in This Age of Accountability.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 24 (2): 121–126.
  • Department for Education (DfE). 2017. Primary Assessment in England: Government Consultation. London: DfE.
  • Department for Education and Employment (DfEE)/QCA. 1998 Qualifications and Curriculum Authority Schemes of Work. London: DfEE/QCA.
  • Department of Education and Science. 1988. National Curriculum Task Group on Assessment and Testing (TGAT): A report. London: Department of Education and Science and the Welsh Office.
  • Department for Education (DfE). 2013. National Curriculum in England: Science Programmes of Study. London: DfE.
  • Eady, S. 2008. “What Is the Purpose of Learning Science? An Analysis of Policy and Practice in the Primary School.” British Journal of Educational Studies 56 (1): 4–19. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8527.2007.00391.x.
  • Earle, S. 2014. “Formative and Summative Assessment of Science in English Primary Schools: Evidence from the Primary Science Quality Mark.” Research in Science and Technological Education 32 (2): 216–228. doi:10.1080/02635143.2014.913129.
  • Earle, S. 2017. “The Challenge of Balancing Key Principles in Teacher Assessment.” Journal of Emergent Science 12: 41–47.
  • Earle, S. 2018. The relationship between formative and summative teacher assessment of primary science in England. PhD thesis, Bath Spa University.
  • Earle, S., K. McMahon, C. Collier, A. Howe, and D. Davies. 2017. The Teacher Assessment in Primary Science (TAPS) school self-evaluation tool. Bristol: Primary Science Teaching Trust.
  • Gardner, J., W. Harlen, L. Hayward, G. Stobart, and M. Montgomery. 2010. Developing Teacher Assessment. Maidenhead: OUP.
  • Harlen, W. 2007. Assessment of Learning. London: Sage.
  • Harlen, W. 2009. “Improving Assessment of Learning and for Learning.” Education 3–13, 37 (3): 247–257.
  • James, M., R. McCormick, P. Black, P. Carmichael, M. Drummond, A. Fox, J. MacBeath, et al. 2007. Improving Learning How to Learn. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Johnson, S. 2013. “On the Reliability of High Stakes Teacher Assessment.” Research Papers in Education 28 (1): 91–105. doi:10.1080/02671522.2012.754229.
  • Klenowski, V. 2009. “Assessment for Learning Revisited: An Asia-Pacific Perspective.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 16 (3): 263–268.
  • Mansell, W., and M. James. the Assessment Reform Group. 2009. Assessment in Schools: Fit for Purpose? London: Teaching and Learning Research Programme.
  • Newby, P. 2010. Research Methods for Education. Harlow: Pearson.
  • Nuffield Foundation. 2012. Developing Policy, Principles and Practice in Primary School Science Assessment. London: Nuffield Foundation.
  • Ofsted. 2013. “Maintaining Curiosity: A Survey into Science Education in Schools.” Report No. 130135.” Manchester: Ofsted.
  • Peacock, A. 2016. Assessment for Learning without Limits. London: McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Roberts-Holmes, G., and A. Bradbury. 2016. “Governance, Accountability and the Datafication of Early Years Education in England.” British Educational Research Journal 42 (4): 600–613. doi:10.1002/berj.3221.
  • Robson, C. 2011. Real World Research. 3rd ed. Chichester: Wiley.
  • Silverman, D. 2011. Interpreting Qualitative Data: A Guide to Principles of Qualitative Research. 4th ed. London: Sage.
  • Simons, H. 2009. Case Study Research in Practice. London: Sage.
  • Standards and Testing Agency (2016) 2016 teacher assessment exemplification: end of key stage 2 Science. London: STA.
  • Standards and Testing Agency. 2017a. Teacher assessment frameworks at the end of key stage 2: For use in the 2017 to 2018 academic year. London: STA.
  • Standards and Testing Agency. 2017b. Key Stage 2 Science Sampling 2016: Methodology Note and Outcomes. London: STA.
  • Stobart, G. 2009. “Determining Validity in National Curriculum Assessments.” Educational Research 51 (2): 161–179. doi:10.1080/00131880902891305.
  • “Teacher Assessment in Primary Science (TAPS) Project.” Accessed 9 September 2019. https://pstt.org.uk/resources/curriculum-materials/assessment
  • Turner, J., S. Marshall, A. Farley, and L. Harriss. 2013. Primary Science Quality Mark: Learning from Good Practice in Primary Science. London: Wellcome Trust.
  • University of Hertfordshire. 2017. Primary Science Quality Mark Handbook. Hatfield: University of Hertfordshire.
  • Webb, M., and J. Jones. 2009. “Exploring Tensions in Developing Assessment for Learning.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 16 (2): 165–184.
  • Wellcome Trust. 2011. Primary Science Survey Report. London: Wellcome Trust.
  • Wellcome Trust. 2014. Primary Science: Is Ii Missing Out? Recommendations for Reviving Primary Science. London: Wellcome Trust.
  • Whetton, C. 2009. “‘A Brief History of a Testing Time: National Curriculum Assessment in England 1989–2008ʹ.” Educational Research 51 (2): 137–159. doi:10.1080/00131880902891222.
  • White, E., C. Dickerson, J. Mackintosh, and R. Levy. 2016. Evaluation of the Primary Science Quality Mark Programme - 2013-15. Hatfield: University of Hertfordshire.
  • Wiliam, D. 2003. “National Curriculum Assessment: How to Make It Better.” Research Papers in Education 18 (2): 129–136. doi:10.1080/0267152032000081896.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.