Designing teaching and reflection experiences to develop candidates’ science teaching self-efficacy

References

• Abell, S. K., K. Appleton, and D. L. Hanuscin. 2010. Designing and Teaching the Elementary Science Methods Course. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Alessandri, G., L. Borgogni, W. B. Schaufeli, G. V. Caprara, and C. Consiglio. 2015. “From Positive Orientation to Job Performance: The Role of Work Engagement and Self-Efficacy Beliefs.” Journal of Happiness Studies 16 (3): 767–788. doi:10.1007/s10902-014-9533-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Association for the Advancement of Science. 1993. Benchmarks for Science Literacy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Avery, L. M., and D. Z. Meyer. 2012. “Teaching Science as Science Is Practiced: Opportunities and Limits for Enhancing Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Self-Efficacy for Science and Science Teaching.” School Mathematics and Science 112 (7): 395–409. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2012.00159.x.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1977. “Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change.” Psychological Review 84: 191–215. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1986. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1994. “Self-Efficacy.” In Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, edited by V. S. Ramachaudran, 71–81. Vol. 4. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1997. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A., C. Barbaranelli, G. V. Caprara, and C. Pastorelli. 2001. “Self-Efficacy Beliefs as Shapers of Children’s Aspirations and Career Trajectories.” Child Development 72 (1): 187–206. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banilower, E. R., S. E. Boyd, J. D. Pasley, and A. H. Weiss. 2013. Report of the 2012 National Survey of Science and Mathematics Education. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.
   Google Scholar
• Bleicher, R. W. 2007. “Nurturing Confidence in Preservice Elementary Science Teachers.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 18: 841–860. doi:10.1007/s10972-007-9067-2.
   Google Scholar
• Bleicher, R. W., and J. Lindgren. 2005. “Success in Science Learning and Preservice Science Teaching Self-Efficacy.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 16: 205–225. doi:10.1007/s10972-005-4861-1.
   Google Scholar
• Borman, G. D., G. M. Hewes, L. T. Overman, and S. Brown. 2003. “Comprehensive School Reform and Achievement: A Meta-Analysis.” Review of Educational Research 73: 125–230. doi:10.3102/00346543073002125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bursal, M. 2012. “Changes in American Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Efficacy Beliefs and Anxieties during a Science Methods Course.” Science Education International 23 (1): 40–55.
   Google Scholar
• Cañal, P. 2000. “El Conocimiento Profesional Sobre Las Ciencias y la Alfabetización Científica en Primaria.” Alambique 24: 46–56.
   Google Scholar
• Cantrell, P., S. Young, and A. Moore. 2003. “Factors Affecting Science Teaching Efficacy of Preservice Elementary Teachers.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 14: 205–225. doi:10.1023/A:1025974417256.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, S., and Y. H. Lee. 2015. “Enhancing Preservice Teachers’ Science Self-Efficacy Beliefs and Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) through Scientific Investigations.” Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education 34 (4): 406–418. doi:10.15267/keses.2015.34.4.406.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Coll, R. K., and N. Taylor. 2019. Science Education in Context. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill | Sense. doi:10.1163/9789087902490.
   Google Scholar
• Cone, N. 2009. “A Bridge to Developing Efficacious Science Teachers of All Students: Community-Based Service-Learning Supplemented with Explicit Discussions and Activities about Diversity.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 20: 365–383. doi:10.1007/s10972-009-9137-8.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 1999. “Mixed Method Research: Introduction and Application.” In Handbook of Educational Policy, edited by T. Cijek, 455–472. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., and V. L. Plano Clark. 2006. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dever, R., and S. Clement. 2015. “Middle School Pre-Service Teachers’ Sense of Self-Efficacy in Relation to Authentic Learning Experiences.” Electronic Journal of Science Education 20 (5): 39–52.
   Google Scholar
• Enochs, L., and I. Riggs. 1990. “Further Development of an Elementary Science Teaching Efficacy Belief Instrument: A Preservice Elementary Scale.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Atlanta, GA, April.
   Google Scholar
• Flores, I. 2015. “Developing Preservice Teachers’ Self-Efficacy through Field-Based Science Teaching Practices with Elementary Students.” Research in Higher Education Journal 27: 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Fraenkel, J. R., and N. E. Wallen. 2006. How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. 6th ed. Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Hackling, M., S. Peers, and V. Prain. 2007. “Primary Connections: Reforming Science Teaching in Australian Primary Schools.” Teaching Science 53 (3): 12–16.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, M. 2020. “Science Education in England: Exploring the Evidence for and Evidence of Reform.” PhD diss., University of Sussex.
   Google Scholar
• Haney, J. J., A. J. Lumpe, C. M. Czerniak, and V. Egan. 2002. „From beliefs to actions: The beliefs and actions of teachers implementing change.„ Journal of science teacher education 13 (3): 171–187.
   Google Scholar
• He, C., and C. Yan. 2011. “Exploring Authenticity of Microteaching in Pre-Service Teacher Education Programmes.” Teaching Education 22: 291–302. doi:10.1080/10476210.2011.590588.
   Google Scholar
• Hechter, R. 2011. “Changes in Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Personal Science Teaching Efficacy and Science Teaching Outcome Expectancies: The Influence of Context.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 22: 187–202. doi:10.1007/s10972-010-9199-7.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H. F., and S. E. Shannon. 2005. “Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis.” Qualitative Health Research 15 (9): 1277–1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarrett, O. S. 1999. “Science Interest and Confidence among Preservice Teachers.” Journal of Elementary Science Education 11: 49–59. doi:10.1007/BF03173790.
   Google Scholar
• Kazempour, M., and T. D. Sadler. 2015. “Pre-Service Teachers’ Science Beliefs, Attitudes, and Self-Efficacy: A Multi-Case Study.” Teaching Education 26: 247–271. doi:10.1080/10476210.2014.996743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C. A., and A. Houseal. 2003. “Self-Efficacy, Standards, and Benchmarks as Factors in Teaching Elementary School Science.” Journal of Elementary Science Education 15 (1): 37–55. doi:10.1007/BF03174743.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, J., J. Barnes-Johnson, S. J. Dantley, and C. Kimber. 2011. “Teaching Science Inquiry in Urban Contexts: The Role of Elementary Preservice Teachers’ Beliefs.” The Urban Review 43 (1): 124–150. doi:10.1007/s11256-010-0173-7.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., and E. G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, L. C. 1990. “A Perspective on Teacher Preparation in Physics and Other Sciences: The Need for Special Science Courses for Teachers.” American Journal of Physics 58 (8): 734–742. doi:10.1119/1.16395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon, D. 2020. “Influences of the Sources of Science Teaching Self-Efficacy in Preservice Teachers’ Identity Development.” The Journal of Science Teacher Education 31 (4): 460–481. doi:10.1080/1046560X.2020.1718863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naidoo, K., and S. K. Kirch. (2016) “Candidates use a new teacher development process, transformative reflection, to identify and address teaching and learning problems in their work with children.” Journal of Teacher Education 67 (5): 379–391
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Research. 2008. “Percentage Distribution of School Teachers by Age, Category, Average and Median Age of Teachers, and Percentage Distribution of Teachers, by Sex, School Type, and Selected School Characteristics: 2007–08.” Accessed 11 April 2010. http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2009/2009324/tables/sass0708_2009324_t12n_03.asp
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 1996. National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2012. A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts and Core Ideas. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) Lead States. 2013. Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. Washington, DC: National Academics Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, G., K. Sparrow, J. Morales, and J. Clayborn. 2015. “Re-Orienting A Science Methods Course to Prepare Sustainability Literate K-6 Preservice Teachers: A Mixed Method Investigation.” In Educating Science Teachers for Sustainability, 205–243. Springer, Cham.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, D. H. 2004. “Situational Interest and the Attitudes Towards Science of Primary Teacher Education Students.” International Journal of Science Education 26: 895–908. doi:10.1080/0950069032000177262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rennie, L. J., D. Goodrum, and M. Hacking. 2001. “Science Teaching and Learning in Australian Schools: Results of a National Study.” Research in Science Education 31: 455–498. doi:10.1023/A:1013171905815.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, M., C. Abraham, and R. Bond. 2012. “Psychological Correlates of University Students’ Academic Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 138: 353–387. doi:10.1037/a0026838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocard, M. 2007. Science Education NOW: A Renewed Pedagogy for the Future of Europe. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Said, Z. 2016. “Science Education Reform in Qatar: Progress and Challenges.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 12 (8): 2253–2265. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2016.1301a.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H. 1991. “Self-Efficacy and Academic Motivation.” Educational Psychologist 26: 207–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tosun, T. 2000. “The Beliefs of Preservice Elementary Teachers toward Science and Science Teaching.” School Science and Mathematics 100 (7): 374–380. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2000.tb18179.x.
   Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M., and A. Woolfolk Hoy. 2001. “Teacher Efficacy: Capturing an Elusive Construct.” Teaching and Teacher Education 17 (1): 783–805. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M., A. Woolfolk Hoy, and W. K. Hoy. 1998. “Teacher Efficacy: Its Meaning and Measure.” Review of Educational Research 86 (2): 202–248. doi:10.3102/00346543068002202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velthius, C., P. Fisser, and J. Pieters. 2014. “Teacher Training and Preservice Primary Teachers’ Self-Efficacy for Science Teaching.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 25: 445–464. doi:10.1007/s10972-013-9363-y.
   Google Scholar
• Wingfield, M. E., L. Freeman, and J. Ramsey. 2000. “Science Teaching Self-Efficacy of First Year Elementary Teachers Trained in a Site-Based Program.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA, April. ERIC data base. (ED 439956).
   Google Scholar