612
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Meaning making in collaborative practical work: a case study of multimodal challenges in a Year 10 chemistry classroom

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Abrahams, I., and R. Millar. 2008. “Does Practical Work Really Work? A Study of the Effectiveness of Practical Work as A Teaching and Learning Method in School Science.” International Journal of Science Education 30 (14): 1945–1969. doi:10.1080/09500690701749305.
  • Ainsworth, S. 2006. “DeFT: A Conceptual Framework for considering Learning with Multiple Representations.” Learning and Instruction 16 (3): 183–198. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001.
  • Axelsson, M., and B. Jakobson. 2020. “Negotiating Science-building Thematic Patterns of the Scientific Concept Sound in a Swedish Multilingual Lower Secondary Classroom.” Language and Education, 34 (4), 291–310.
  • British Educational Research Association [BERA]. 2018. Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research. Fourth ed. London. https://www.bera.ac.uk/researchers-resources/publications/ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-2018
  • Brown, B. A., and E. Spang. 2008. “Double Talk: Synthesizing Everyday and Science Language in the Classroom.” Science Education 92 (4): 708–732. doi:10.1002/sce.20251.
  • Cheng, M. M. W., and J. K. Gilbert. 2015. “Students’ Visualization of Diagrams Representing the Human Circulatory System: The Use of Spatial Isomorphism and Representational Conventions.” International Journal of Science Education 37 (1): 136–161. doi:10.1080/09500693.2014.969359.
  • Cheung, K. K. C. (2020). Exploring the inclusion of nature of science in biology curriculum and high-stakes assessments in Hong Kong. Science & Education, 29 (3): 491–512.
  • Cullinane, A., S. Erduran, and S. J. Wooding. 2019. “Investigating the Diversity of Scientific Methods in High-stakes Chemistry Examinations in England.” International Journal of Science Education 41 (16): 2201–2217. doi:10.1080/09500693.2019.1666216.
  • Erduran, S., Y. E. Masri, A. Cullinane, and Y. P. D. Ng. 2020. “Assessment of Practical Science in High Stakes Examinations: A Qualitative Analysis of High Performing English-speaking Countries.” International Journal of Science Education 42 (9): 1544–1567. doi:10.1080/09500693.2020.1769876.
  • Erduran, S., and Z. R. Dagher. 2014. “Reconceptualizing Nature of Science for Science Education.” In Reconceptualizing the Nature of Science for Science Education, 1–18. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Hodson, D. 1993. Re-thinking Old Ways: Towards a More Critical Approach to Practical Work in School Science. Studies in Science Education, 22, 85–142.
  • Jaipal, K. 2010. “Meaning Making through Multiple Modalities in A Biology Classroom: A Multimodal Semiotics Discourse Analysis.” Science Education 94 (1): 48–72. doi:10.1002/sce.20359.
  • Jewitt, C., G. Kress, J. Ogborn, and C. Tsatsarelis. 2001. “Exploring Learning through Visual, Actional and Linguistic Communication: The Multimodal Environment of a Science Classroom.” Educational Review 53 (1): 5–18. doi:10.1080/00131910123753.
  • Kress, G., J. Ogborn, and I. Martins. 1998. “A Satellite View of Language: Some Lessons from Science Classrooms.” Language Awareness 7 (2–3): 69–89. doi:10.1080/09658419808667102.
  • Kress, G., T. Charalampos, C. Jewitt, and J. Ogborn. 2006. Multimodal Teaching and Learning: The Rhetorics of the Science Classroom. London and New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  • Krystyniak, R. A., & Heikkinen, H. W. (2007). Analysis of verbal interactions during an extended, open‐inquiry general chemistry laboratory investigation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching 44 (8), 1160–1186.
  • Lemke, J. L. 1990. Talking Science: Language, Learning, and Values. 355 Chestnut Street, Norwood, NJ 07648: Ablex Publishing Corporation. hardback: ISBN-0-89391-565-3; paperback: ISBN-0-89391-566-1.
  • Leonard, W. H., and W. A. Leonard. 1991. “A Recipe for Uncookbooking Laboratory Investigations.” Journal of College Science Teaching 21: 84–87.
  • Lin, A. M. Y., and Y. Y. Lo. 2017. “Trans/languaging and the Triadic Dialogue in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Classrooms.” Language and Education 31 (1): 26–45. doi:10.1080/09500782.2016.1230125.
  • McNeill, D., S. D. Duncan, J. Cole, S. Gallagher, and B. Bertenthal. 2010. “Growth Points from the Very Beginning.” The Emergence of Protolanguage: Holophrasis Vs Compositionality 24: 117.
  • Millar, R., F. Lubben, R. Got, and S. Duggan. 1994. “Investigating in the School Science Laboratory: Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge and Their Influence on Performance.” Research Papers in Education 9 (2): 207–248. doi:10.1080/0267152940090205.
  • Millar, R., and I. Abrahams. 2009. “Practical Work: Making It More Effective.” School Science Review 91 (334): 59–64.
  • National Research Council. 2006. America’s Lab Report: Investigations in High School Science. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
  • Prain, V., and B. Waldrip. 2006. “An Exploratory Study of Teachers’ and Students’ Use of Multi‐modal Representations of Concepts in Primary Science.” International Journal of Science Education 28 (15): 1843–1866. doi:10.1080/09500690600718294.
  • Tang, K., S. C. Tan, and J. Yeo. 2011. “Students’ Multimodal Construction of the Work–energy Concept.” International Journal of Science Education 33 (13): 1775–1804. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.508899.
  • Tang, K.-S. 2013. “Instantiation of Multimodal Semiotic Systems in Science Classroom Discourse.” Language Sciences 37: 22–35. doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2012.08.003.
  • Toplis, R., and M. Allen. 2012. “‘I Do and I understand?’Practical Work and Laboratory Use in United Kingdom Schools.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 8 (1): 3–9. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2012.812a.
  • Williams, M. 2020. “Fifth Graders’ Use of Gesture and Models When Translanguaging during a Content and Language Integrated Science Class in Hong Kong.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 1–20. doi:10.1080/13670050.2020.1754752.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.