New aspects of working with scientific data: a study with practicing scientists and science teachers

References

• American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS]. 1990. Science for All Americans. Washington D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Beichner, R. J. 1994. “Testing Student Interpretation of Kinematics Graphs.” American Journal of Physics 62 (8): 750–762. doi:10.1119/1.17449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., and B. A. Malhotra. 2002. “Epistemologically Authentic Inquiry in Schools: A Theoretical Framework for Evaluating Inquiry Tasks.” Science Education 86 (2): 175–218. doi:10.1002/sce.10001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., and W. F. Brewer. 1993. “The Role of Anomalous Data in Knowledge Acquisition: A Theoretical Framework and Implications for Science Instruction.” Review of Educational Research 63 (1): 1–49. doi:10.3102/00346543063001001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., and W. F. Brewer. 1998. “An Empirical Test of a Taxonomy of Responses to Anomalous Data in Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 35 (6): 623–654. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199808)35:6<623::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-O.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furtak, E. M., and W. R. Penuel. 2019. “Coming to Terms: Addressing the Persistence of “Hands‐on” and Other Reform Terminology in the Era of Science as Practice.” Science Education 103 (1): 167–186. doi:10.1002/sce.21488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabel, C. 2006. “Impact of the Reform Efforts on K-12 Science Inquiry: A Paradigm Shift.” The Impact of State and National Standards on K-12 Science Teaching, edited by D. W. Sunal and E. L. Wright, 215–256. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gagné, R. M. 1967. “Science–A Process Approach: Purposes, Accomplishments, Expectations.” Commission on Science Education, American Association for the Advancement of ….
   Google Scholar
• Gobert, J. D., M. Sao Pedro, J. Raziuddin, and R. S. Baker. 2013. “From Log Files to Assessment Metrics: Measuring Students’ Science Inquiry Skills Using Educational Data Mining.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 22 (4): 521–563. doi:10.1080/10508406.2013.837391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, H., Wei, X., Duan, P. R., Guo, Y. Y., & Wang, W. X. (2016). Promoting cognitive and social aspects of inquiry through classroom discourse. International Journal of Science Education, 38 (2): 319–343. doi:10.1080/09500693.2016.1154998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, G. A., C. A. Thornton, C. W. Langrall, E. S. Mooney, B. Perry, and I. J. Putt. 2000. “A Framework for Characterizing Children’s Statistical Thinking.” Mathematical Thinking and Learning 2 (4): 269–307. doi:10.1207/S15327833MTL0204_3.
   Google Scholar
• Kanari, Z., and R. Millar. 2004. “Reasoning from Data: How Students Collect and Interpret Data in Science Investigations.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 41 (7): 748–769. doi:10.1002/tea.20020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keys, C. W. 1994. “The Development of Scientific Reasoning Skills in Conjunction with Collaborative Writing Assignments: An Interpretive Study of Six Ninth‐Grade Students.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 31 (9): 1003–1022. doi:10.1002/tea.3660310912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozhevnikov, M., M. A. Motes, and M. Hegarty. 2007. “Spatial Visualization in Physics Problem Solving.” Cognitive Science 31 (4): 549–579. doi:10.1080/15326900701399897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., and D. Dean. 2005. “Is Developing Scientific Thinking All about Learning to Control Variables?” Psychological Science 16 (11): 866–870. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01628.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., K. Iordanou, M. Pease, and C. Wirkala. 2008. “Beyond Control of Variables: What Needs to Develop to Achieve Skilled Scientific Thinking?” Cognitive Development 23 (4): 435–451. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2008.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., and G. G. Koch. 1977. “The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data.” Biometrics 33 (1): 159–174. doi:10.2307/2529310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooney, E. S. 2002. “A Framework for Characterizing Middle School Students’ Statistical Thinking.” Mathematical Thinking and Learning 4 (1): 23–63. doi:10.1207/S15327833MTL0401_2.
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. 2013. Next Generation Science Standards: For States, by States. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=867791&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=sso&custid=cjrlc016
   Google Scholar
• NRC. 1996. National Science Education Standards: Observe, Interact, Change, Learn. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=1091&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=sso&custid=cjrlc016
   Google Scholar
• NRC. 2000. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eue&AN=69053021&site=ehost-live&scope=site&authtype=sso&custid=cjrlc016
   Google Scholar
• NRC. 2012. A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=457898&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=sso&custid=cjrlc016
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. F. 2019. “Not “Hands On” but “Minds On”: A Response to Furtak and Penuel.” Science Education 103 (5): 1280–1283. doi:10.1002/sce.21543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penuel, W. R., and E. M. Furtak. 2019. “Science‐as‐Practice and the Status of Knowledge: A Response to Osborne.” Science Education 103 (5): 1301–1305. doi:10.1002/sce.21541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Planinic, M., Z. Milin-Sipus, H. Katic, A. Susac, and L. Ivanjek. 2012. “Comparison of Student Understanding of Line Graph Slope in Physics and Mathematics.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 10 (6): 1393–1414. doi:10.1007/s10763-012-9344-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, R., and P. Johnson. 2015. “Understanding the Quality of Data: A Concept Map for ‘The Thinking behind the Doing’ in Scientific Practice.” The Curriculum Journal 26 (3): 345–369. doi:10.1080/09585176.2015.1044459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, W. M., and A. Roychoudhury. 1993. “The Development of Science Process Skills in Authentic Contexts.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 30 (2): 127–152. doi:10.1002/tea.3660300203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaughnessy, J. M., J. Garfield, and B. Greer. 1996. “Data Handling.” In International Handbook of Mathematics Education, edited by A. J. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, and C. Laborde, 205–237. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sunal, D. W., E. L. Wright, and J. Bland. 2006. Reform in undergraduate science teaching for the 21st century. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Tukey, J. W. 1977. Exploratory Data Analysis. Vol. 2. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Tukey, J. W. 1980. “We Need Both Exploratory and Confirmatory.” The American Statistician 34 (1): 23–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varelas, M. 1996. “Between Theory and Data in a Seventh‐Grade Science Class.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 33 (3): 229–263. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199603)33:3<229::AID-TEA1>3.0.CO;2-V.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vellom, R. P., and C. W. Anderson. 1999. “Reasoning about Data in Middle School Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 36 (2): 179–199. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199902)36:2<179::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-T.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, C. 2000. “The Development of Scientific Reasoning Skills.” Developmental Review 20 (1): 99–149. doi:10.1006/drev.1999.0497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar