An exploration of the determinants of middle school students’ argument quality by classroom discourse analysis

References

• Andersen, H. M., and B. L. Nielsen. 2013. “Video-based Analyses of Motivation and Interaction in Science Classrooms.” International Journal of Science Education 35 (6): 906–928. doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.627954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, D. 2010. “Why Talk Is Important.” English Teaching: Practice and Critique 9 (2): 7–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berland, L. K., and D. Hammer. 2012. “Framing for Scientific Argumentation.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 49 (1): 68–94. doi:10.1002/tea.20446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, M., and D. Rubin. 2006. “How Contingent Questioning Promotes Extended Student Talk: A Function of Display Questions.” Journal of Literacy Research 38 (2): 141–169. doi:10.1207/s15548430jlr3802_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsen, W. S. 1991. “Questioning in Classrooms: A Sociolinguistic Perspective.” Review of Educational Research 61 (2): 157–178. doi:10.3102/00346543061002157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavagnetto, A., and B. M. Hand. 2012. “The Importance of Embedding Argument within Science Classrooms.” In Perspectives on Scientific Argumentation, edited by M. S. Khine, 39–53. Netherlands: Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
   Google Scholar
• Chapin, S. H., C. O’Connor, and N. C. Anderson. 2003. Classroom Discussions: Using Math Talk to Help Students Learn. Sausalito, CA: Math Solutions Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, C. 2006. “Classroom Interaction in Science: Teacher Questioning and Feedback to Students’ Responses.” International Journal of Science Education 28 (11): 1315–1346. doi:10.1080/09500690600621100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, C. 2007. “Teacher Questioning in Science Classrooms: Approaches that Stimulate Productive Thinking.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 44 (6): 815–843. doi:10.1002/tea.20171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickinson, D. K., and M. V. Porche. 2011. “Relation between Language Experiences in Preschool Classrooms and Children’s Kindergarten and Fourth-grade Language and Reading Abilities.” Child Development 82 (3): 870–886. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01576.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duit, R., and D. F. Treagust. 2012. “How Can Conceptual Change Contribute to Theory and Practice in Science Education?” In Second International Handbook of Science Education, edited by Fraser, Barry J., Tobin, Kenneth G. and McRobbie, Campbell J. 1:107–118. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards-Groves, C., and R. L. Hoare. 2012. “Talking to Learn: Focusing Teacher Education on Dialogue as a Core Practice for Teaching and Learning.” Australian Journal of Teacher Education 37 (8): 81–100. doi:10.14221/ajte.2012v37n8.8.
   Google Scholar
• Erduran, S., S. Simon, and J. Osborne. 2004. “TAPping into Argumentation: Developments in the Application of Toulmin’s Argument Pattern for Studying Science Discourse.” Science Education 88 (6): 915–933. doi:10.1002/sce.20012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, H., and M. A. Rea-Ramirez. 2002. “Keeping the Inquiry in Curriculum Designed to Help Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Cellular Respiration.” In Proceedings of the 2002 International conference of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science. ( ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED465 602). Charlotte, NC.
   Google Scholar
• Gurel, D. K., A. Eryılmaz, and L. C. McDermott. 2015. “A Review and Comparison of Diagnostic Instruments to Identify Students’ Misconceptions in Science.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education 11 (5): 989–1008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardman, F. C. 2008. “Teachers’ Use of Feedback in Whole-class and Group-based Talk.” In Exploring Talk in Schools: Inspired by the Work of Douglas Barnes, edited by M. Neil and H. Steve, 131–150. Heslington, York, UK: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kawalkar, A., and J. Vijapurkar. 2013. “Scaffolding Science Talk: The Role of Teachers’ Questions in the Inquiry Classroom.” International Journal of Science Education 35 (12): 2004–2027. doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.604684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayima, F., and A. Jakobsen. 2018. “Exploring the Situational Adequacy of Teacher Questions in Science Classrooms.” Research in Science Education 1–31. doi:10.1007/s11165-018-9696-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A., J. Sweller, and R. E. Clark. 2006. “Why Minimal Guidance during Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-based, Experiential, and Inquiry-based Teaching.” Educational Psychologist 41 (2): 75–86. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krathwohl, D. R. 2002. “A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview.”Theory into practice 41 (40): 212–218. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, J. T., and P. H. Scott. 2002. “Designing and Evaluating Science Teaching Sequences: An Approach Drawing upon the Concept of Learning Demand and a Social Constructivist Perspective on Learning.” Studies in Science Education 38 (1): 115–142. doi:10.1080/03057260208560189.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, J. T., and P. H. Scott. 2003. “Individual and Sociocultural Views of Learning in Science Education.” Science & Education 12 (1): 91–113. doi:10.1023/A:1022665519862.
   Google Scholar
• Lefstein, A., J. Snell, and M. Israeli. 2015. “From Moves to Sequences: Expanding the Unit of Analysis in the Study of Classroom Discourse.” British Educational Research Journal 41 (5): 866–885. doi:10.1002/berj.3164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littleton, K., N. Mercer, L. Dawes, R. Wegerif, D. Rowe, and C. Sams. 2005. “Thinking Together at Key Stage 1.” Early Years: An International Journal of Research and Development 25 (2): 165–180. doi:10.1080/09575140500128129.
   Google Scholar
• Louca, L. T., Z. C. Zacharia, and D. Tzialli. 2012. “Identification, Interpretation-evaluation, Response: An Alternative Framework for Analyzing Teacher Discourse in Science.” International Journal of Science Education 34 (12): 1823–1856. doi:10.1080/09500693.2012.671971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loxley, P., L. Dawes, L. Nicholls, and B. Dore. 2017. Teaching Primary Science: Promoting Enjoyment and Developing Understanding. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, A. M., and B. Hand. 2009. “Factors Affecting the Implementation of Argument in the Elementary Science Classroom. A Longitudinal Case Study.” Research in Science Education 39 (1): 17–38. doi:10.1007/s11165-007-9072-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L., and D. S. Pimentel. 2010. “Scientific Discourse in Three Urban Classrooms: The Role of the Teacher in Engaging High School Students in Argumentation.” Science Education 94: 203–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., and K. Littleton. 2007. Dialogue and the Development of Children’s Thinking: A Sociocultural Approach. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., and L. Dawes. 2014. “The Study of Talk between Teachers and Students, from the 1970s until the 2010s.” Oxford Review of Education 40 (4): 430–445. doi:10.1080/03054985.2014.934087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaels, S., and C. O’Connor. 2015. “Conceptualizing Talk Moves as Tools: Professional Development Approaches for Academically Productive Discussion.” In Socializing Intelligence through Talk and Dialogue, edited by L. B. Resnick, C. Asterhan, and S. N. Clarke, 347–362. Washington, DC: AERA.
   Google Scholar
• Molinari, L., C. Mameli, and A. Gnisci. 2013. “A Sequential Analysis of Classroom Discourse in Italian Primary Schools: The Many Faces of the IRF Pattern.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 83 (3): 414–430. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02071.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morge, L. 2005. “Teacher-pupil Interaction: A Study of Hidden Beliefs in Conclusion Phases. Research Report.” International Journal of Science Education 27 (8): 9–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortimer, E., and P. Scott. 2003. Meaning Making in Secondary Science Classrooms. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, A. W. 2010. “Improving Teacher Questioning in Science Inquiry Discussions through Professional Development.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47 (4): 422–453. doi:10.1002/tea.20345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pehmer, A.-K., A. Gröschner, and T. Seidel. 2015. “How Teacher Professional Development regarding Classroom Dialogue Affects Students’ Higher-order Learning.” Teaching and Teacher Education 47: 108–119. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2014.12.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pimentel, D. S., and K. L. McNeill. 2013. “Conducting Talk in Science Classrooms: Investigating Instructional Moves and Teachers’ Beliefs.” Science Education 97 (3): 367–394. doi:10.1002/sce.21061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, W. 1996. “Teacher Questioning in an Open‐inquiry Learning Environment: Interactions of Context, Content, and Student Responses.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 33 (7): 709–736. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199609)33:7<709::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-R.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, S., S. Erduran, and J. Osborne. 2006. “Learning to Teach Argumentation: Research and Development in the Science Classroom.” International Journal of Science Education 27: 137–162.
   Google Scholar
• Smart, J. B., and J. C. Marshall. 2013. “Interactions between Classroom Discourse, Teacher Questioning, and Student Cognitive Engagement in Middle School Science.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 24 (2): 249–267. doi:10.1007/s10972-012-9297-9.
   Google Scholar
• Soysal, Y. 2019a. “Investigating Discursive Functions and Potential Cognitive Demands of Teacher Questioning in the Science Classroom.” Learning: Research and Practice. doi:10.1080/23735082.2019.1575458.
   Google Scholar
• Soysal, Y. 2019b. “Meanings and Formats of Classroom Discourse in the Context of Teacher Discursive Moves.” Elementary Education Online 18 (2): 600–620.
   Google Scholar
• Tofade, T., J. Elsner, and S. T. Haines. 2013. “Best Practice Strategies for Effective Use of Questions as a Teaching Tool.” American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 77 (7): 155–168. doi:10.5688/ajpe777155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Eemeren, F. H., and R. Grootendorst. 2004. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-dialectical Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar