Science teachers’ views of creating and teaching Big Ideas of science education: experiences from Chile

References

• Ahumada, L., S. Galdames, A. Gonzalez, and P. Herrera. 2009. “El funcionamiento del equipo directivo durante un proceso de autoevaluación institucional en el marco de políticas de aseguramiento de la calidad de la gestión escolar en Chile.” Universitas Psychologica 8 (2): 353–370.
   Google Scholar
• Barmby, P., P. Kind, and K. Jones. 2008. “Examining Changing Attitudes in Secondary School Science.” International Journal of Science Education 30 (8): 1075–1093. doi:10.1080/09500690701344966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. W. 2014. “NGSS and the next generation of science teachers.” Journal of science teacher education 25 (2): 211–221.
   Google Scholar
• Cartier, J. L., and S. L. Pellathy. 2009. “Integration with Big Ideas in Mind.” Science and Children 46 (8): 44–47.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, C., M. L. Carter, T. Cooper, and R. Nason. 2017. “Implementing “Big Ideas” to Advance the Teaching and Learning of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM).” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 15 (1): 25–43. doi:10.1007/s10763-017-9799-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, K., H. Lee, N. Shin, S.-W. Kim, and J. Krajcik. 2011. “Re-conceptualization of Scientific Literacy in South Korea for the 21st Century.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 48 (6): 670–697. doi:10.1002/tea.20424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, V., and V. Braun. 2014. “Thematic analysis.” Encyclopedia of critical psychology 1947–1952. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, R. 2015. “Teaching the Big Ideas of Biology with Operon Models.” The American Biology Teacher 77 (1): 30–39. doi:10.1525/abt.2015.77.1.5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, C. 2012. “Política y políticas educacionales en Chile 1990–2010.” Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política 21: 13–43.
   Google Scholar
• Devick-Fry, J., and T. LeSage. 2010. “Science Literacy Circles: Big Ideas about Science.” Science Activities: Classroom Projects and Curriculum Ideas 47 (2): 35–40. doi:10.1080/00368120903383133.
   Google Scholar
• Donoso, S. 2005. “Reforma y politica educacional en chile 1990–2004: El neoliberalismo en crisis.” Estudios Pedagógicos 31 (1): 113–135.
   Google Scholar
• Duschl, R., S. Maeng, and A. Sezen. 2011. “Learning Progressions and Teaching Sequences: A Review and Analysis.” Studies in Science Education 47 (2): 123–182. doi:10.1080/03057267.2011.604476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gysling, J. 2004. “Reforma Curricular: Itinerario de una transformación cultural.” In Políticas educacionales en el cambio de siglo. La reforma del sistema escolar de Chile, edited by C. Cox, 213–252. Santiago, Chile: Editorial Universitaria.
   Google Scholar
• Harlen, W. 2010. “Principles and Big Ideas of Science Education.” Duns. https://www.ase.org.uk/bigideas
   Google Scholar
• Harlen, W. 2015a. “Towards Big Ideas of Science Education.” School Science Review 97 (359): 97–107.
   Google Scholar
• Harlen, W. 2015b. “Working with Big Ideas of Science Education.” Trieste: InterAcademy Partnership. https://www.ase.org.uk/bigideas
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. 2008. Visible Learning: A Synthesis of over 800 Meta-analyses Relating to Achievement. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holbrook, J., and M. Rannikmae. 2009. “The Meaning of Scientific Literacy.” International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 4 (3): 275–288.
   Google Scholar
• Hollins, M., and M. J. Reiss. 2016. “A review of the school science curricula in eleven high achieving jurisdictions„. The Curriculum Journal 27 (1): 80–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joffe, H. 2012. “Thematic Analysis.” In Qualitative Research Methods in Mental Health and Psychotherapy: A Guide for Students and Practitioners, edited by D. Harper and A. R. Thompson, Vol. 1, 209–223. Oxford: JohnWiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Juan, A., V. Reddy, T. Zuze, C. Namome, and S. Hannan. 2016. “Does It Matter whether Students Enjoy Learning Science? Exploring Student Attitudes Towards Science in South Africa.” Policy Brief 08. Cape Town: HSRC.
   Google Scholar
• Khine, M. S., ed. 2015. Attitude Measurements in Science Education: Classic and Contemporary Approaches. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lelliott, A., and M. Rollnick. 2010. “Big Ideas: A Review of Astronomy Education Research 1974–2008.” International Journal of Science Education 32 (13): 1771–1799. doi:10.1080/09500690903214546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, R. 2018. “Realising the School Science Curriculum.” The Curriculum Journal 29 (4): 522–537. doi:10.1080/09585176.2018.1504314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, E., and A. Kiddle. 2016. “What Do We Really Mean When We Talk about Big Ideas in Mathematics?” Mathematics Teaching 252: 30–31.
   Google Scholar
• Loughran, J., A. Berry, and P. Mulhall. 2012. Understanding and Developing Science Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge. 2nd ed. Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield, J. and M. J. Reiss. 2020.The place of values in the aims of school science education. In: Values in Science Education, edited by Corrigan D., Buntting C., Fitzgerald A. & Jones A, 191–209. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Metz, S. 2012. “Big Ideas.” The Science Teacher 79 (5): 6.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerio de Educación de Chile. 2012. Bases curriculares primero a sexto básico. Santiago: Unidad Curriculum y Evaluación.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerio de Educación de Chile. 2015. Nuevas Bases Curriculares y Programas de Estudio 7° y 8° año de Educación Básica/1° y 2° año de Educación Media. Santiago: Unidad Curriculum y Evaluación.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerio de Educación de Chile. 2019. Bases curriculares 3° y 4° medio. Santiago: Unidad Curriculum y Evaluación.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, I., S. Keast, D. Panizzon, and J. Mitchell. 2016. “Using ‘Big Ideas’ to Enhance Teaching and Student Learning.” Teachers and Teaching 23 (5): 596–610. doi:10.1080/13540602.2016.1218328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutvei, A., and J.-E. Mattsson. 2015. “Big Ideas in Science Education in Teacher Training Program.” Procedia, Social and Behavioral Sciences 167: 190–197. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.661.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2020. “Results from TALIS 2018, Volume II, Country Note: Chile.” http://www.oecd.org/education/talis/TALIS2018_CN_CHL_Vol_II.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ogborn, J. 2002. “Ownership and Transformation: Teachers Using Curriculum Innovations.” Physics Education 37 (2): 142–146. doi:10.1088/0031-9120/37/2/307.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, J. K. 2008. “Concept-focused Teaching: Using Big Ideas to Guide Instruction in Science.” Science and Children 46 (4): 45–49.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. 2007. “Science Education for the Twenty First Century.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education 3 (3): 173–184. doi:10.12973/ejmste/75396.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., S. Collins, M. Ratcliffe, R. Millar, and R. Duschl. 2003b. “What ‘Ideas-about-science’ Should Be Taught in School Science? – A Delphi Study of the Expert Community.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 40 (7): 692–720. doi:10.1002/tea.10105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., S. Simon, and S. Collins. 2003a. “Attitudes Towards Science: A Review of the Literature and Its Implications.” International Journal of Science Education 25 (9): 1049–1079. doi:10.1080/0950069032000032199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plummer, J. D., and J. Krajcik. 2010. “Building a Learning Progression for Celestial Motion: Elementary Levels from an Earth-based Perspective.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47 (7): 768–787. doi:10.1002/tea.20355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiss, M. 2014. “What place does science have in an aims-based curriculum?„ School Science Review 95 (352): 9–14.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. P., III, and M. Girod. 2003. “John Dewey and Psychologizing the Subject-matter: Big Ideas, Ambitious Teaching, and Teacher Education.” Teaching and Teacher Education 19 (3): 295–307. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(03)00016-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taber, K. S. 2017. “Knowledge, Beliefs and Pedagogy: How the Nature of Science Should Inform the Aims of Science Education (And Not Just When Teaching Evolution).” Cultural Studies of Science Education 12 (1): 81–91. doi:10.1007/s11422-016-9750-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M., J. Thompson, M. Braaten, and D. Stroupe. 2012. “Proposing a Core Set of Instructional Practices and Tools for Teachers of Science.” Science Education 96 (5): 878–903. doi:10.1002/sce.21027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wintersgill, B., A. Brine, D. Cush, D. Francis, R. Freathy, F. Henchley, J. Holt, et al. 2017. “Big Ideas for Religious Education.” Exeter: University of Exeter. http://socialsciences.exeter.ac.uk/media/universityofexeter/collegeofsocialsciencesandinternationalstudies/education/research/groupsandnetworks/reandspiritualitynetwork/Big_Ideas_for_RE_E-Book.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. F. D. 2008. Bringing Knowledge Back In: From Social Constructivism to Social Realism in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar