Students’ integration of textbook representations into their understanding of photomicrographs: epistemic network analysis

References

• Ainsworth, S. 1999. “The Functions of Multiple Representations.” Computers & Education 33 (2–3): 131–152. doi:10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00029-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ainsworth, S. 2006. “DeFT: A Conceptual Framework for considering Learning with Multiple Representations.” Learning and Instruction 16 (3): 183–198. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ainsworth, S., and A. T. Loizou. 2003. “The Effects of Self-explaining When Learning with Text or Diagrams.” Cognitive Science 27 (4): 669–681. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2704_5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alesandrini, K. L. 1981. “Pictorial–verbal and Analytic–holistic Learning Strategies in Science Learning.” Journal of Educational Psychology 73 (3): 358–368. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.73.3.358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alesandrini, K. L., M. C. Wittrock, and J. J. Langstaff. 2014. “Visual-Verbal and Analytic-Holistic Strategies, Abilities, and Styles.” The Journal of Educational Research 77 (3): 151–157. doi:10.1080/00220671.1984.10885516.
   Google Scholar
• Butcher, K. R. 2006. “Learning from Text with Diagrams: Promoting Mental Model Development and Inference Generation.” Journal of Educational Psychology 98 (1): 182–197. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catley, K. M., and L. R. Novick. 2008. “Seeing the Wood for the Trees: An Analysis of Evolutionary Diagrams in Biology Textbooks.” BioScience 58 (10): 976–987. doi:10.1641/B581011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CGP. 2016. GCSE AQA Biology: For the Grade 9-1 Course. Cumbria, UK: Coordination Group Publications Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, H. Y. 2018. “Students’ Representational Competence with Drawing Technology across Two Domains of Science.” Science Education 102 (5): 1129–1149. doi:10.1002/sce.21457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, H. Y., and S. F. Tzeng. 2018. “Investigating Taiwanese students’ visualization competence of matter at the particulate level.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 16 (7): 1207–1226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, M. M. W., and J. K. Gilbert. 2013. “Students’ Visualization of Metallic Bonding and the Malleability of Metals.” International Journal of Science Education 36 (8): 1373–1407. doi:10.1080/09500693.2013.867089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, M. M. W., and J. K. Gilbert. 2015. “Students’ Visualization of Diagrams Representing the Human Circulatory System: The Use of Spatial Isomorphism and Representational Conventions.” International Journal of Science Education 37 (1): 136–161. doi:10.1080/09500693.2014.969359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, K. K. C. and M. Winterbottom. under major revision. Students' visualization competence for photomicrographs.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, K. K. C. 2020. “Exploring the Inclusion of Nature of Science in Biology Curriculum and High-stakes Assessments in Hong Kong.” Science & Education 29 (3): 491–512. doi:10.1007/s11191-020-00113-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H., N. De Leeuwa, M. H. Chiu, and C. Lavancher. 1994. “Eliciting Self-explanations Improves Understanding.” Cognitive Science 18 (3): 439–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiappetta, E. L., and D. A. Fillman. 2007. “Analysis of Five High School Biology Textbooks Used in the United States for Inclusion of the Nature of Science.” International Journal of Science Education 29 (15): 1847–1868. doi:10.1080/09500690601159407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, H. H., J. B. Kahle, and F. H. Nordland. 1985. “An Investigation of High School Biology Textbooks as Sources of Misconceptions and Difficulties in Genetics and Some Suggestions for Teaching Genetics.” Science Education 69 (5): 707–719. doi:10.1002/sce.3730690512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devetak, I., J. Vogrinc, and S. A. Glazar. 2010. “States of Matter Explanations in Slovenian Textbooks for Students Aged 6 to 14.” International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 5 (2): 217–235.
   Google Scholar
• Dinolfo, J., B. Heifferon, and L. A. Temesvari. 2007. “Seeing Cells: Teaching the Visual/Verbal Rhetoric of Biology.” Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 37 (4): 395–417. doi:10.2190/6261-4915-6LK8-11L8.
   Google Scholar
• Eilam, B. 2013. “Possible Constraints of Visualization in Biology: Challenges in Learning with Multiple Representations.” In D. F. Treagust, & C. Y. Tsui, (Eds.), Multiple Representations in Biological Education, 55-73. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. K. 2004. “Models and Modelling: Routes to More Authentic Science Education.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 2 (2): 115–130. doi:10.1007/s10763-004-3186-4.
   Google Scholar
• Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. K.(2002). Models and modelling in chemical education. In J. G. Gilbert, O. De Jong, R. Justi, D. F. Treagust, & J. H. van Driel (Eds.). Chemical education: Towards research based practice (pp. 47–68). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Kozma, R., and J. Russell. 2005. “Students Becoming Chemists: Developing Representationl Competence.” In Visualization in Science Education, edited by J. K. Gilbert, 121–145. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Leivas Pozzer, L., and W. M. Roth. 2003. “Prevalence, Function, and Structure of Photographs in High School Biology Textbooks.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 40 (10): 1089–1114. doi:10.1002/tea.10122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., and R. Moreno. 2003. “Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning.” Educational Psychologist 38 (1): 43–52. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, C. J., J. De Houwer, and P. F. Lovibond. 2009. “The Propositional Nature of Human Associative Learning.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (2): 183–198. doi:10.1017/S0140525X09000855.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paivio, A. 2013. Imagery and Verbal Processes. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pintó, R., and J. Ametller. 2002. “Students’ Difficulties in Reading Images. Comparing Results from Four National Research Groups.” International Journal of Science Education 24 (3): 333–341. doi:10.1080/09500690110078932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postigo, Y., and A. López-Manjón. 2012. “Students’ Conceptions of Biological Images as Representational Devices.” Revista Colombiana De Psicología 21 (2): 265–284.
   Google Scholar
• Postigo, Y., and A. López-Manjón. 2018. “Images in Biology: Are Instructional Criteria Used in Textbook Image Design?” International Journal of Science Education 41 (2): 210–229. doi:10.1080/09500693.2018.1548043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pozzer‐Ardenghi, L., and W. M. Roth. 2005. “Making Sense of Photographs.” Science Education 89 (2): 219–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pun, J. K. H., and K. K. C. Cheung. 2021. “Meaning Making in Collaborative Practical Work: A Case Study of Multimodal Challenges in a Year 10 Chemistry Classroom.” Research in Science & Technological Education: 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, D. 1990a. “The Role of Pictures in Learning Biology: Part 1, Perception and Observation.” Journal of Biological Education 24 (3): 161–172. doi:10.1080/00219266.1990.9655135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, D. 1990b. “The Role of Pictures in Learning Biology: Part 2, Picture—text Processing.” Journal of Biological Education 24 (4): 251–258. doi:10.1080/00219266.1990.9655153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savasci-Acikalin, F. 2019. “How Middle School Students Represent Phase Change and Interpret Textbook Representations: A Comparison of Student and Textbook Representations.” Research in Science Education: 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnotz, W. 2002. “Towards an Integrated View of Learning from Text and Visual Displays.” Educational Psychology Review 14 (1): 101–120. doi:10.1023/A:1013136727916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnotz, W., and M. Bannert. 2003. “Construction and Interference in Learning from Multiple Representation.” Learning and Instruction 13 (2): 141–156. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00017-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer, D. W. 2017. Quantitative Ethnography. Madison, WI: Cathcart Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shaffer, D. W., W. Collie, and A. R. Ruis. 2016. “A Tutorial on Epistemic Network Analysis: Analyzing the Structure of Connections in Cognitive, Social, and Interaction Data.” Journal of Learning Analytics 3 (3): 9–45. doi:10.18608/jla.2016.33.3.
   Google Scholar
• Tsui, C. Y., & Treagust, D. F. (2013). Introduction to multiple representations: Their importance in biology and biological education. In C. Y. Tsui & D. F. Treagust (Eds.), Multiple representations in biological education (pp. 3–18). The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Vojíř, K., and M. Rusek. 2019. “Science Education Textbook Research Trends: A Systematic Literature Review.” International Journal of Science Education 41 (11): 1496–1516. doi:10.1080/09500693.2019.1613584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Won, M., H. Yoon, and D. F. Treagust. 2014. “Students’ Learning Strategies with Multiple Representations: Explanations of the Human Breathing Mechanism.” Science Education 98 (5): 840–866. doi:10.1002/sce.21128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar