290
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The nature of technology and engineering (NOTE) as perceived by science and technology teachers in Korea

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., and N. G. Lederman. 2000. “Improving Science Teachers’ Conceptions of Nature of Science: A Critical Review of the Literature.” International Journal of Science Education 22 (7): 665–701. doi:10.1080/09500690050044044.
  • Abd‐El‐Khalick, F., R. L. Bell, and N. G. Lederman. 1998. “The Nature of Science and Instructional Practice: Making the Unnatural Natural.” Science Education 32 (4): 417–436. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199807)82:4<417::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-E.
  • Akerson, V. L., T.A. Cullen, and D. L. Hanson. 2009. “Fostering a Community of Practice through a Professional Development Program to Improve Elementary Teachers’ Views of Nature of Science and Teaching Practice.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching 46 (10): 1090–1113. doi:10.1002/tea.20303.
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). 1990. Project 2061: Science for All Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Bell, R. L., and N. G. Lederman. 2003. “Understandings of the Nature of Science and Decision Making on Science and Technology Based Issues.” Science Education 87 (3): 352–377. doi:10.1002/sce.10063.
  • Bybee, R. W. 2000. “Achieving Technological Literacy: A National Imperative.” The Technology Teacher 60 (1): 23. https://search.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/achieving-technological-literacy-national/docview/235287301/se-2?accountid=6802
  • Bybee, R.W. 2010. “Advancing STEM Education: A 2020 Vision.” Technology and Engineering Teacher 70 (1): 30–35. https://search.proquest.com/docview/853062675?accountid=6802
  • Case, J. M., and G. Light. 2011. “Emerging Research Methodologies in Engineering Education Research.” Journal of Engineering Education 100 (1): 186–210. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00008.x.
  • de Vries, M. J. 2018. “Philosophy of Technology: Themes and Topics.” In Handbook of Technology Education,edited by M.J. de Vries, 7–16. Springer International. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-44687-5_1.
  • Department for Education. 2013a. The national curriculum in England Framework document. Retrieved from http://www.education.gov.uk/.
  • Department for Education. 2013b. Reform of the national curriculum in England. Retrieved from http://www.education.gov.uk/.
  • DiGironimo, N. 2011. “What Is Technology? Investigating Student Conceptions about the Nature of Technology.” International Journal of Science Education 33 (10): 1337–1352. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.495400.
  • Driver, R., J. Leach, R. Millar, and P. Scott. 1996. Young People’s Images of Science. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
  • Harding, P., and W. Hare. 2000. “Portraying Science Accurately in Classrooms: Emphasizing Openmindedness Rather than Relativism.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching 37 (3): 225–236. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200003)37:3<225::AID-TEA1>3.0.CO;2-G.
  • Hashweh, M. Z. 1996. “Effects of Science Teachers’ Epistemological Beliefs in Teaching.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching 33 (1): 47–63. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199601)33:1<47::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-P.
  • Ihde, D. 2004. “Has the Philosophy of Technology Arrived? A State-of-the-art Review.” Philosophy of Science 71 (1): 117–131. doi:10.1086/381417.
  • International Technology Education Association (ITEA). 2000. Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the Study of Technology. Virginia: ITEA Press. Retrieved from https://www.iteea.org/42511.aspx 
  • Karatas, F. O., A. Micklos, and G. M. Bodner. 2011. “Sixth-grade Students’ Views of the Nature of Engineering and Images of Engineers.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 20 (2): 123–135. doi:10.1007/s10956-010-9239-2.
  • Lederman, N. G. 1992. “Students’ and Teachers’ Conceptions of the Nature of Science: A Review of the Research.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 29 (4): 331–359. doi:10.1002/tea.3660290404.
  • Lederman, N. G. 1999. “Teachers’ Understandings of the Nature of Science and Classroom Practice: Factors that Facilitate or Impede the Relationship.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 36 (8): 916–929. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199910)36:8<916::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-A.
  • Lederman, N. G. 2007. “Nature of Science: Past, Present, and Future.” In Handbook on Science Education, edited by S. K. Abell and N. G. Lederman, 831–879. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Lederman, N. G., and D. L. Zeidler. 1987. “Science Teachers’ Conceptions of the Nature of Science: Do They Really Influence Teaching Behavior?” Science Education 71 (5): 721–734. doi:10.1002/sce.3730710509.
  • Lee, H. 2015. “Construction of nature of technology framework and its utilization for investigation of changes in college students’ perception of nature of technology through SSI-based program.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee, Y. H. 2018. “Suggesting the Conceptual Framework of the Nature of Technology (NOT) and Examining the Conceptions of Experts of Science, Technology, and Engineering Fields regarding the NOT.” Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 38 (1): 27–42. doi:10.14697/jkase.2018.38.1.27.
  • Liou, P. Y. 2015. “Developing an Instrument for Assessing Students’ Concepts of the Nature of Technology.” Research in Science & Technological Education 33 (2): 162–181. doi:10.1080/02635143.2014.996542.
  • Luft, J. A., and G. H. Roehrig. 2007. “Capturing Science Teachers’ Epistemological Beliefs: The Development of the Teacher Beliefs Interview.” The Electronic Journal for Research in Science & Mathematics Education 11 (2): 38–63. http://ejse.southwestern.edu
  • Marton, F. 1981. “Phenomenography—describing Conceptions of the World around Us.” Instructional Science 10 (2): 177–200. doi:10.1007/BF00132516.
  • Marton, F. 1986. “Phenomenography—a Research Approach to Investigating Different Understandings of Reality.” Journal of Thought 21 (3): 28–49. www.jstor.org/stable/42589189
  • McComas, W. F., H. Almazroa, and M. P. Clough. 1998. “The Nature of Science in Science Education: An Introduction.” Science & Education 7 (6): 511–532. doi:10.1023/A:1008642510402.
  • McComas, W. F., M. P. Clough, and H. Almazroa. 1998. “The Role and Character of the Nature of Science in Science Education.” In The Nature of Science in Science Education: Rationales and Strategies, edited by McComas W. F., 41–52. Dordrecht: Kluwer. doi:10.1007/0-306-47215-5_1.
  • Merriam, S. B. 1998. Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. Revised and Expanded from Case Study Research in Education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  • Millar, Robin, and Brian Wynne. 1988. “Public Understanding of Science: From Contents to Processes.” International Journal of Science Education 10 (4): 388–398. doi:10.1080/0950069880100406.
  • Ministry of Education (MOE). 2015. 과학과 교육과정 [Science Curriculum]. https://ceri.knue.ac.kr/pds/2015_05_science.pdf
  • Mitcham, C. 1998. “The Importance of Philosophy to Engineering.Teorema: Revista Internacional De Filosofía 17(3): 27–47. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43047298.
  • Moore, T. J., A. W. Glancy, K. M. Tank, J. A. Kersten, K. A. Smith, and M. S. Stohlmann. 2014. “A Framework for Quality K-12 Engineering Education: Research and Development.” Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research 4 (1): 2. doi:10.7771/2157-9288.1069.
  • National Research Council (NRC). 2009. Engineering in K-12 Education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • National Research Council (NRC). 2011. Successful K-12 STEM Education: Identifying Effective Approaches in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • National Research Council (NRC). 2012. A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • National Research Council (NRC). 2013. Next Generation Science Standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • Pajares, M. F. 1992. “Teachers’ Beliefs and Educational Research: Cleaning up a Messy Construct.” Review of Educational Research 62 (3): 307–332. doi:10.3102/00346543062003307.
  • Säljö, R. 1997. “Talk as Data and Practice—a Critical Look at Phenomenographic Inquiry and the Appeal to Experience.” Higher Education Research & Development 16 (2): 173–190. doi:10.1080/0729436970160205.
  • Sanders, M., H. Kwon, K. Park, and H. Lee. 2011. “Integrative STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) Education: Contemporary Trends and Issues.” Secondary Education Research 59 (3): 729–762. doi:10.25152/ser.2011.59.3.729.
  • Shamos, M. H. 1995. The Myth of Scientific Literacy. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.
  • Waight, N. 2014. “Technology Knowledge: High School Science Teachers’conceptions of the Nature of Technology.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 12 (5): 1143–1168. doi:10.1007/s10763-013-9452-6.
  • Waight, N., and F. Abd-El-Khalick. 2012. “Nature of Technology: Implications for Design, Development, and Enactment of Technological Tools in School Science Classrooms.” International Journal of Science Education 34 (18): 2875–2905. doi:10.1080/09500693.2012.698763.
  • Wallace, C. S., and N. Kang. 2004. “An Investigation of Experienced Secondary Science Teachers’ Beliefs about Inquiry: An Examination of Competing Belief Sets.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 41 (9): 936–960. doi:10.1002/tea.20032.
  • Wulf, W. A. 1999. “The Image of Engineering.” Issues in Science and Technology 15 (2). https://issues.org/wulf-2/
  • Young, A. T., J. R. Cole, and D. Denton. 2002. “Improving Technological Literacy.” Issues in Science and Technology 18 (4). https://issues.org/young/

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.