Tell me a story, professor! The effect of historical science stories on academic achievement and motivation in a physics class

References

• Abd-El-Khalick, F., and N. G. Lederman. 2000. “The Influence of History of Science Courses on Students’ Views of Nature of Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37 (10): 1057–1095. doi:10.1002/1098-2736(200012)37:10<1057::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-C.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Açışlı, S., S. A. Yalçın, and Ü. Turgut. 2011. “Effects of the 5E Learning Model on Students’ Academic Achievements in Movement and Force Issues.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 15: 2459–2462. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.128.
   Google Scholar
• Allchin, D. 2000. “How Not to Teach Historical Cases in Science.” Journal of College Science Teaching 30 (1): 33–37.
   Google Scholar
• Angell, C., P. M. Kind, E. K. Henriksen, and Ø. Guttersrud. 2008. “An empirical-mathematical modelling approach to upper secondary physics.” Physics Education 43 (3): 256.
   Google Scholar
• Atkin, J. M., and R. Karplus. 1962. “Discovery or Invention?” The Science Teacher 29 (5): 45–51.
   Google Scholar
• Balci, S., J. Cakiroglu, and C. Tekkaya. 2006. “Engagement, Exploration, Explanation, Extension, and Evaluation (5E) Learning Cycle and Conceptual Change Text as Learning Tools.” Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 34 (3): 199–203. doi:10.1002/bmb.2006.49403403199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BBC. 2014. “Brian Cox Visits the World’s Biggest Vacuum.” YouTube Video, October. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E43-CfukEgs&ab_channel=BBC
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J., and F. Lubben. 2006. “Context-based Chemistry: The Salters Approach.” International Journal of Science Education 28 (9): 999–1015. doi:10.1080/09500690600702496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevins, S., and G. Price. 2016. “Reconceptualising Inquiry in Science Education.” International Journal of Science Education 38 (1): 17–29. doi:10.1080/09500693.2015.1124300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadbent, J., and W. L. Poon. 2015. “Self-regulated Learning Strategies & Academic Achievement in Online Higher Education Learning Environments: A Systematic Review.” The Internet and Higher Education 27: 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bybee, R., and N. M. Landes. 1990. “Science for Life & Living: An Elementary School Science Program from Biological Sciences Improvement Study (BSCS).” The American Biology Teacher 52 (2): 92–98. doi:10.2307/4449042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carin, A., and J. Bass. 2005. Teaching Science as Inquiry. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Cetin-Dindar, A., and O. Geban. 2017. “Conceptual Understanding of Acids and Bases Concepts and Motivation to Learn Chemistry.” The Journal of Educational Research 110 (1): 85–97. doi:10.1080/00220671.2015.1039422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhry, A. Q., and H. Javed. 2012. “Impact of Transactional and Laissez Faire Leadership Style on Motivation.” International Journal of Business and Social Science 3 (7): 258–264.
   Google Scholar
• Clough, M. P. 2011. “The Story behind the Science: Bringing Science and Scientists to Life in Post-secondary Science Education.” Science & Education 20 (7–8): 701–717. doi:10.1007/s11191-010-9310-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Collaço, C. M. 2017. “Increasing Student Engagement in Higher Education.” Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice 17 (4): 40–47.
   Google Scholar
• Dede, Y., and S. Yaman. 2007. “Examination of Motivation Level of Students Towards Science and Mathematics by Some Variables.” Educational Administration: Theory and Practice 13 (4): 615–638.
   Google Scholar
• Demircioğlu, H., G. Demircioğlu, and M. Çalik. 2009. “Investigating the Effectiveness of Storylines Embedded within a Context-based Approach: The Case for the Periodic Table.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 10 (3): 241–249. doi:10.1039/B914505M.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan, K. 1986. Teaching as Story Telling. London, Ontario: Althouse Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engel, A., K. Lucido, and K. Cook. 2018. “Rethinking Narrative: Leveraging Storytelling for Science Learning.” Childhood Education 94 (6): 4–12. doi:10.1080/00094056.2018.1540189.
   Google Scholar
• Ergin, I., U. Kanli, and Y. Ünsal. 2008. “An Example for the Effect of 5E Model on the Academic Success and Attitude Levels of Students’: “Inclined Projectile Motion”.” Journal of Turkish Science Education 5 (3): 47–59.
   Google Scholar
• Fadaei, A. S., and C. Mora. 2015. “An Investigation about Misconceptions in Force and Motion in High School.” US-China Education Review 5 (1): 38–45. doi:10.17265/2161-623X/2015.01.004.
   Google Scholar
• Goktas, Y., S. Yildirim, and Z. Yildirim. 2009. “Main Barriers and Possible Enablers of ICTs Integration into Pre-service Teacher Education Programs.” Journal of Educational Technology & Society 12 (1): 193–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gölcük, A. 2017. “The Effect of Science Education that Is Supported by Scientific Stories on Students’ Creativity and Affective Properties.” Master’s Thesis, Hacettepe University, Ankara.
   Google Scholar
• Goldston, M. J., J. B. Day, C. Sundberg, and J. Dantzler. 2010. “Psychometric Analysis of a 5E Learning Cycle Lesson Plan Assessment Instrument.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 8 (4): 633–648. doi:10.1007/s10763-009-9178-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guido, R. M. D. 2013. “Attitude and Motivation Towards Learning Physics.” International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology 2 (11): 2087–2094.
   Google Scholar
• Güler, M. 2017. “The Effect of Goal Orientation on Student Achievement.” In The Factors Effecting Student Achievement, edited by E. Karadağ, 291–307. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Güler, M. 2019. “A Model Proposal for Developing Teaching Knowledge of Novice Middle-school Mathematics Teachers: Mentoring Practice Program.” PhD diss., Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon.
   Google Scholar
• Güler, M., and D. Çelik. 2018. “Uncovering the Relation between CK and PCK: An Investigation of Preservice Elementary Mathematics Teachers’ Algebra Teaching Knowledge.” Journal of Research in Mathematics Education 7 (2): 162–194. doi:10.17583/redimat.2018.2575.
   Google Scholar
• Hadzigeorgiou, Y. 2006. “Humanizing the Teaching of Physics through Storytelling: The Case of Current Electricity.” Physics Education 41 (1): 42–46. doi:10.1088/0031-9120/41/1/003.
   Google Scholar
• Hadzigeorgiou, Y., S. Klassen, and C. F. Klassen. 2012. “Encouraging a “Romantic Understanding” of Science: The Effect of the Nikola Tesla Story.” Science & Education 21 (8): 1111–1138. doi:10.1007/s11191-011-9417-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, C., and L. Baumgartner. 2009. “Stories in Science: The Backbone of Science Learning.” The Science Teacher 76 (4): 60–64.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, P.E., R. Clift, M.L. Veal, M. Johnson, and J. McCarthney. 1992. “Linking Preservice and In-service Supervision through Professional Inquiry.” In Supervision in Transition, edited by C. Glickman, 169–184. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Hung, C. M., G. J. Hwang, and I. Huang. 2012. “A Project-based Digital Storytelling Approach for Improving Students’ Learning Motivation, Problem-solving Competence and Learning Achievement.” Journal of Educational Technology & Society 15 (4): 368–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isabelle, A. D. 2007. “Teaching Science Using Stories: The Storyline Approach.” Science Scope 31 (2): 16–25.
   Google Scholar
• Jimoyiannis, A., and V. Komis. 2001. “Computer Simulations in Physics Teaching and Learning: A Case Study on Students’ Understanding of Trajectory Motion.” Computers & Education 36 (2): 183–204. doi:10.1016/S0360-1315(00)00059-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahraman, Ö. 2013. “The Effect of Using Teaching Materials Prepared by Digital Storytelling Method at the Engagement of Learning Cycle on Physics Course Achievement and Motivation Level.” PhD Dissertation, Balıkesir University, Balıkesir.
   Google Scholar
• Kaynar, D., C. Tekkaya, and J. Çakıroğlu. 2009. “Effectiveness of 5E Learning Cycle Instruction on Students’ Achievement in Cell Concept and Scientific Epistemological Beliefs.” Hacettepe Üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi 37 (37): 96–105.
   Google Scholar
• Kiemer, K., A. Gröschner, A. K. Pehmer, and T. Seidel. 2015. “Effects of a Classroom Discourse Intervention on Teachers’ Practice and Students’ Motivation to Learn Mathematics and Science.” Learning and Instruction 35: 94–103. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S., and K. Irving. 2010. “History of Science as an Instructional Context: Student Learning in Genetics and Nature of Science.” Science & Education 19 (2): 187–215. doi:10.1007/s11191-009-9191-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klassen, S. 2009. “The Construction and Analysis of A Science Story: A Proposed Methodology.” Science & Education 18 (3–4): 401–423. doi:10.1007/s11191-008-9141-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klassen, S., and C. F. Klassen. 2014. “Science Teaching with Historically Based Stories: Theoretical and Practical Perspectives.” In International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching, edited by M. R. Matthews, 1503–1529. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• König, J., S. Blömeke, L. Paine, W. H. Schmidt, and F. J. Hsieh. 2011. “General Pedagogical Knowledge of Future Middle School Teachers: On the Complex Ecology of Teacher Education in the United States, Germany, and Taiwan.” Journal of Teacher Education 62 (2): 188–201. doi:10.1177/0022487110388664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korur, F., and A. Eryilmaz. 2018. “Interaction between Students’ Motivation and Physics Teachers’ Characteristics: Multiple Case Study.” The Qualitative Report 23 (12): 3054–3083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozcu-Cakır, N., and G. Güven. 2019. “Effect of 5E Learning Model on Academic Achievement and Attitude Towards the Science Course: A Meta-analysis Study.” Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal 48 (2): 1111–1140. doi:10.14812/cufej.544825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruse, J. W., and J. Wilcox. 2011. “Using Historical Science Stories to Illuminate Nature of Science Ideas and Reduce Stereotypical Views in a Sixth Grade Classroom.” Paper presented at the Association for Science Teacher Educators International Conference, Minneapolis, January 19–22.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y., and R. M. Lerner. 2013. “Interrelations of Behavioral, Emotional, and Cognitive School Engagement in High School Students.” Journal of Youth and Adolescence 42 (1): 20–32. doi:10.1007/s10964-012-9857-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, O. L., B. Bridgeman, and R. M. Adler. 2012. “Measuring Learning Outcomes in Higher Education: Motivation Matters.” Educational Researcher 41 (9): 352–362. doi:10.3102/0013189X12459679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield, M., and C. O’Sullivan. 2011. Understanding Physics. UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, D. J. 2000. Elementary Science Methods: A Constructivist Approach. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomason Learning.
   Google Scholar
• MoNE (Ministry of National Education). 2018. Fen bilimleri dersi öğretim programı [Science Teaching Program]. Ankara: MEB Yayınları. http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/
   Google Scholar
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Science Literacy: Concepts, Contexts, and Consequences. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Naylor, S., and B. Keogh. 1999. “Constructivism in Classroom: Theory into Practice.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 10 (2): 93–106. doi:10.1023/A:1009419914289.
   Google Scholar
• Ornek, F., W. R. Robinson, and M. P. Haugan. 2008. “What Makes Physics Difficult?” International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 3 (1): 30–34.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, D. 2005. “A Motivational View of Constructivist-informed Teaching.” International Journal of Science Education 27 (15): 1853–1881. doi:10.1080/09500690500339654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilotti, M., S. Anderson, P. Hardy, P. Murphy, and P. Vincent. 2017. “Factors Related to Cognitive, Emotional, and Behavioral Engagement in the Online Asynchronous Classroom.” International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 29 (1): 145–153.
   Google Scholar
• Prins, R., L. Avraamidou, and M. Goedhart. 2017. “Tell Me a Story: The Use of Narrative as a Learning Tool for Natural Selection.” Educational Media International 54 (1): 20–33. doi:10.1080/09523987.2017.1324361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid-Smith, J. A. 2013. “Historical Short Stories as Nature of Science Instruction in Secondary Science Classrooms: Science Teachers’ Implementation and Students’ Reactions.” Doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University.
   Google Scholar
• Roach, L. E., and J. H. Wandersee. 1993. “Short Story Science: Using Historical Vignettes as a Teaching Tool.” The Science Teacher 60 (6): 18–21.
   Google Scholar
• Roach, L. E., and J. H. Wandersee. 1995. “Putting People Back into Science: Using Historical Vignettes.” School Science and Mathematics 95 (7): 365–370. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.1995.tb15802.x.
   Google Scholar
• Rudge, D. W., and E. N. Howe. 2009. “An Explicit and Reflective Approach to the Use of History to Promote Understanding of the Nature of Science.” Science & Education 18 (5): 561–580. doi:10.1007/s11191-007-9088-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeed, S., and D. Zyngier. 2012. “How Motivation Influences Student Engagement: A Qualitative Case Study.” Journal of Education and Learning 1 (2): 252–267. doi:10.5539/jel.v1n2p252.
   Google Scholar
• Salehjee, S. 2020. “Teaching Science through Stories: Mounting Scientific Enquiry.” Early Child Development and Care 190 (1): 79–90. doi:10.1080/03004430.2019.1653554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao, P. K., and R. F. Gunstone. 1999. “A Process of Conceptual Change in Force and Motion during Computer- Supported.” Physics Instruction.Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37: 859–882. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199909)36:7<859::AID-TEA7>3.0.CO;2-J.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsybulsky, D. 2018. “Comparing the Impact of Two Science-as-inquiry Methods on the NOS Understanding of High-school Biology Students.” Science & Education 27 (7–8): 661–683. doi:10.1007/s11191-018-0001-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uğurel, E. 2018. “The Effect of Differentiated Instruction on Learning Processes in Teaching of Electricity Subject.” Doctoral dissertation, Atatürk University.
   Google Scholar
• van Heuvelen, A. 1991. “Learning to Think like a Physicist: A Review of Research Based Instructional Strategies.” American Journal of Physics 59: 891–897. doi:10.1119/1.16667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watters, J. J., and I. S. Ginns. 2000. “Developing Motivation to Teach Elementary Science: Effect of Collaborative and Authentic Learning Practices in Preservice Education.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 11 (4): 301–321. doi:10.1023/A:1009429131064.
   Google Scholar
• Welch, W.W. 1973. “Review of the Research and Evaluation Program of Harvard Project Physics.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 10 (4): 365–378. doi:10.1002/tea.3660100411.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, C. T., and D. W. Rudge. 2019. “Effects of Historical Story Telling on Student Understanding of Nature of Science.” Science & Education 28 (9–10): 1105–1133. doi:10.1007/s11191-019-00073-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yakar, Z., and H. Baykara. 2014. “Inquiry-based Laboratory Practices in a Science Teacher Training Program.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education 10 (2): 173–183. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2014.1058a.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar