The scientific thinking and reasoning framework and its applicability to manufacturing and services firms in natural sciences

References

• Ananiadou, K., and M. Claro. 2009. “21st Century Skills and Competences for New Millennium Larners in OECD Countries.” doi:10.1787/218525261154.
   Google Scholar
• Archer-Bradshaw, R. E. 2014. “Demystifying Scientific Literacy: Charting the Path for the 21st Century.” Journal of Educational and Social Research 4 (3): 165. doi:10.5901/jesr.2014.v4n3p165.
   Google Scholar
• Bao, L., T. Cai, K. Koenig, K. Fang, J. Han, J. Wang, Q. Liu, et al. 2009. “Learning and Scientific Reasoning.” Science 323 (5914): 586–587. doi:10.1126/science.1167740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, J., and F. Lubben. 2006. “Context-based Chemistry: The Salters Approach.” International Journal of Science Education 28 (9): 999–1015. doi:10.1080/09500690600702496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolte, C., J. Holbrook, and F. Rauch, Eds. 2012. “Inquiry-Based Science Education in Europe: Reflection from the PROFILES Projects.” Book of Invited presenters of the 1st International PROFILES Conference 24th – 26th September 2012, Berlin, Germany. 232.
   Google Scholar
• Boyles, T. 2012. “21st Century Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities and Entrepreneurial Competencies: A Model for Undergraduate Entrepreneurship Education.” Journal of Entrepreneurship Education 15: 41–55.
   Google Scholar
• Burrus, J., T. Jackson, N. Xi, and J. H. Steinberg. 2013. “Identifying the Most Important 21st Century Workforce Competencies: An Analysis of the Occupational Information Network (O* NET).” ETS Research Report Series 2013 (2): i–55.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, B. A. 2000. “Embracing the Essence of Inquiry: New Roles for Science Teachers.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37 (9): 916–937. doi:10.1002/1098-2736(200011)37:93.3.CO;2-U.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobbins, M., and K. Martens. 2012. “Towards an Education Approach À La Finlandaise? French Education Policy after PISA.” Journal of Education Policy 27 (1): 23–43. doi:10.1080/02680939.2011.622413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunbar, K. 2002. “Understanding the Role of Cognition in Science: The Science as Category Framework.” In The Cognitive Basis of Science, edited by P. Carruthers, S. Stich, and M. Siegal, 154–170. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunbar, K., and J. Fugelsang. 2005. “Scientific Thinking and Reasoning.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning, edited by K. J. Holyoak and G. R. Morrison, 705–725. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734689.013.0035.
   Google Scholar
• Faye, J. 2016. The Nature of Scientific Thinking: On Interpretation, Explanation and Understanding. London: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9781137389831.
   Google Scholar
• Finegold, D., and A. S. Notabartolo. 2010. 21st Century Competencies and Their Impact: An Interdisciplinary Literature Review. Washington, District of Columbia: Board on Training and Assessment. https://hewlett.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/21st_Century_Competencies_Impact.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., I. Kollar, S. Ufer, B. Sodian, H. Hussmann, R. Pekrun, B. J. Heuhaus, et al. 2014. “Scientific Reasoning and Argumentation: Advancing an Interdisciplinary Research Agenda in Education.” Frontline Learning Research 2 (3): 28–45. doi:10.14786/flr.v2i2.96.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, J. J., M. Johnston, C. Robertson, L. Glidewell, V. Entwistle, M. P. Eccles, and J. M. Grimshaw. 2010. “What Is an Adequate Sample Size? Operationalising Data Saturation for Theory-Based Interview Studies.” Psychology and Health 25 (10): 1229–1245. doi:10.1080/08870440903194015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatsby Science Enhancement Programme. 2019. Accessed 3 May 2021. https://www.stem.org.uk/elibrary/collection/3623
   Google Scholar
• Greiff, S., Ch. Niepel, and S. Wüstenberg. 2015. “21st Century Skills: International Advancements and Recent Developments.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 18: 1–3. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2015.04.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickey, D.T., A. C. H. Kindfeld, P. Horwitz, and M. A. Christie. 1999. “Advancing Educational Theory by Enhancing Practice in a Technology-Supported Genetics Learning Environment.” Journal of Education 181 (2): 25–55.
   Google Scholar
• Holyoak, K. J., and G. R. Morrison, Eds. 2005. The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning. Vol. 137. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klahr, D., C. Zimmerman, and B. Matlen. 2019. “Improving Students’ Scientific Thinking.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Cognition and Education, edited by J. Dunlosky and K. Rawson, 67–99. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klahr, D., and K. Dunbar. 1988. “Dual Space Search During Scientific Reasoning.” Cognitive Science 12 (1): 1–48. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1201_1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koslowski, B. 1996. Theory and Evidence: The Development of Scientific Reasoning. London: MIT Press
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. 1993. “Science as Argument: Implications for Teaching and Learning Scientific Thinking.” Science Education 77 (3): 319–337. doi:10.1002/sce.3730770306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. 2002. “What Is Scientific Thinking, and How Does It Develop?” In Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology. Blackwell Handbook of Childhood Cognitive Development, edited by U. Goswami, 371–393. Malden: Blackwell Publishing. doi:10.1002/9780470996652.ch17.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, A. E. 1978. “The Development and Validation of a Classroom Test of Formal Reasoning.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 15 (1): 11–24. doi:10.1002/tea.3660150103.
   Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R., and L. Schauble. 2007. “Scientific Thinking and Science Literacy.” Handbook of Child Psychology 4. doi:10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0405.
   Google Scholar
• Maaβ, K., K. Reitz-Koncebovski, and G. Billy, Eds. 2013. Prismas: Promoting Inquiry in Mathematics and Science Education across Europe. Accessed 3 May 2021. https://primas-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/sites/323/2017/11/primas_final_publication.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Marx, R.W., P. C. Blumenfeld, J. S. Krajcik, B. Fishman, E. Soloway, R. Geier, and V. V. Revital. 2004. “Inquiry-Based Science in the Middle Grades: Assessment of Learning in Urban Systemic Reform.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 41 (10): 1063–1080. doi:10.1002/tea.20039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mergendoller, J. R., N. L. Maxwell, and Y. Bellisimo. 2006. “The Effectiveness of Problem-Based Instruction: A Comparative Study of Instructional Method and Student Characteristics.” Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning 1 (2): 49–69. doi:10.7771/1541-5015.1026.
   Google Scholar
• Murtonen, M., and K. Balloo, Eds. 2019. Redefining Scientific Thinking for Higher Education: Higher-Order Thinking, Evidence-Based Reasoning and Research Skills. London: Palgrave Macmillan
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2012. Education for Life and Work: Developing Transferable Knowledge and Skills in the 21st Century. National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/13398.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, J. 2017. “Using Conceptual Depth Criteria: Addressing the Challenge of Reaching Saturation in Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Research 17 (5): 554–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton, E., and M. Roberts, Eds. 2004. Methods of Thought: Individual Differences in Reasoning Strategies. East Sussex: Psychology Press
   Google Scholar
• Niaz, M. 1994. “Enhancing Thinking Skills: Domain Specific/Domain General Strategies.” Instructional Science 22 (6): 413–422. doi:10.1007/BF00897976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NSP (Národní soustava povolání). 2019. “National System of Occupations.” Accessed 3 May 2021 https://www.nsp.cz/
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2000. Measuring Student Knowledge and Skills: The PISA 2000 Assessment of Reading, Mathematical and Scientific Literacy. Paris: OECD. doi:10.1787/9789264181564-en.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2016. PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Science, Reading, Mathematic, Financial Literacy and Collaborative Problem Solving, Revised Edition. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264281820-en.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2019. PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/b25efab8-en.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2007. PISA 2006: Science Competencies for Tomorrow’s World. Paris: OECD. doi:10.1787/9789264040014-en.
   Google Scholar
• Opitz, A., M. Heene, and F. Fischer. 2017. “Measuring Scientific Reasoning – A Review of Test Instruments.” Educational Research and Evaluation 23 (3–4): 78–101. doi:10.1080/13803611.2017.1338586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. 2013. “The 21st Century Challenge for Science Education: Assessing Scientific Reasoning.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 10: 265–279. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2013.07.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, R., and L. Elder. 2012. The Thinker’s Guide to Scientific Thinking: Based on Critical Thinking Concepts and Principles. Tomales: Thinker’s Guide Library.
   Google Scholar
• Rocard, M., P. Csermely, D. Jorde, D. Lenzen, and H. Wallberg–Henriksson. 2007. Science Education Now: A Renewed Pedagogy for the Future Europe. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Schafersman, S. D. 1997. “An Introduction to Science: Scientific Thinking and the Scientific Method.” Accessed 3 May 2021 http://www.geo.sunysb.edu/esp/files/scientific-method.html
   Google Scholar
• Schleicher, A., K. Zimmer, J. Evans, and N. Clements. 2009. “PISA 2009 Assessment Framework: Key Competencies in Reading, Mathematics and Science.” OECD Publishing (NJ1). doi:10.1787/9789264062658-en.
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, K. 2016. The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
   Google Scholar
• Sjøberg, S. 2015. “OECD, PISA, and Globalization: The Influence of the International Assessment Regime.” In Education Policy Perils, edited by C. H. Tienken and C. A. Mullen, 114–145. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315708713.
   Google Scholar
• Turiman, P., J. Omar, A. M. Daud, and K. Osman. 2012. “Fostering the 21st Century Skills through Scientific Literacy and Science Process Skills.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 59: 110–116. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.253.
   Google Scholar
• Winterton, J., F. Delamare-Le Deist, and E. Stringfellow. 2006. Typology of Knowledge, Skills and Competences: Clarification of the Concept and Prototype. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Yasar, O., J. Maliekal, P. Veronesi, and L. Little. 2017. “The Essence of Scientific and Engineering Thinking and Tools to Promote It.” Paper presented at the annual conference for American Society for Engineering Education, June. doi:10.18260/1-2-28966.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, C. 2000. “The Development of Scientific Reasoning Skills.” Developmental Review 20 (1): 99–149. doi:10.1006/drev.1999.0497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar