Studying the affordances of a technology-based nanoscience module to promote student engagement in learning novel nanoscience and nanotechnology concepts at the middle school level

References

• Anderson, T., and H. Kanuka (1999). Using constructivism in technology-mediated learning: Constructing order out of the chaos in the literature.
   Google Scholar
• Bayda, S., M. Adeel, T. Tuccinardi, M. Cordani, and F. Rizzolio. 2019. “The History of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology: From Chemical–Physical Applications to Nanomedicine.” Molecules 25 (1): 112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biological Sciences Curriculum Study (BSCS). 2006. BSCS Science: An Inquiry Approach. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Blonder, R. 2010. “The Influence of a Teaching Model in Nanotechnology on Chemistry Teachers’ Knowledge and Their Teaching Attitudes.” Journal of Nano Education 2: 67–75.
   Google Scholar
• Bonder, R., and S. Sakhnini. 2017. “Finding the Connections between a High-school Chemistry Curriculum and Nano-scale Science and Technology.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 18 (4): 903–922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2012. “Thematic Analysis.” In APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology, Vol 2: Research designs: Qualitative, quantitative, neuropsychological, and biological, edited by H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, and K. J. Sher, 57–71. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Caruth, G. D. 2013. “Demystifying Mixed Methods Research Design: A Review of the Literature.” Melvana International Journal of Education 3 (2): 112–122‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. 2009. “Editorial: Mapping the Field of Mixed Methods Research.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 3 (2): 95–108‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duit, R. 1991. “On the Role of Analogies and Metaphors in Learning Science.” Science Education 75: 649–672. doi:10.1002/sce.3730750606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duit, R., H. Gropengiesser, U. Kattmann, M. Komorek, and I. Parchmann. 2012. “The Model of Educational reconstruction–A Framework for Improving Teaching and Learning Science.” In The world handbook of science education- Handbook of research in Europe, edited by J. Dillon, and D. Jorde, 13–37. Taipei: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Flood, V. J., F. G. Amar, R. Nemirovsky, B. W. Harrer, M. R. M. Bruce, and M. C. Wittmann. 2014. “Paying Attention to Gesture When Students Talk Chemistry: Interactional Resources for Responsive Teaching.” Journal of Chemical Education 92 (1): 11–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friday Institute for Educational Innovation. 2012. Student Attitudes toward STEM Survey- Middle and High School Students, Raleigh. NC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Furlan, P. Y. 2009. “Engaging Students in Early Exploration of Nanoscience Topics Using Hands- on Activities and Scanning Tunneling Microscopy.” Journal of Chemical Education 86 (6): 705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, A. 2009. “Integrating Nanoscience into the Classroom: Perspectives on Nanoscience Education Projects.” ACS Nano 3 (4): 762–769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochella, M. F, Jr. 2002. “Nanoscience and Technology: The Next Revolution in the Earth Sciences.” Earth and Planetary Science Letters 203 (2): 593–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huffman, D., J. Ristvey, A. Tweed, and E. Palmer. 2015. “Integrating Nanoscience and Technology in the High School Science Classroom.” Nanotechnology Reviews 4 (1): 81–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. G., T. Andre, R. Superfine, and R. Taylor. 2003. “Learning at the Nanoscale: The Impact of Students’ Use of Remote Microscopy on Concepts of Viruses, Scale, and Microscopy.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 40 (3): 303–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kafai, Y., and I. Harel. 1991. “Learning through Design and Teaching: Exploring Social and Collaborative Aspects of Constructionism.” In Constructionism, edited by I. Harel, and S. Papert, 85–106. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Korwin, A. R., and R. E. Jones. 1990. “Do Hands-on, Technology-based Activities Enhance Learning by Reinforcing Cognitive Knowledge and Retention?” Journal of Technology Education 1 (2): 26–33.
   Google Scholar
• Lati, W., D. Triampo, and S. Yodyingyong. 2019. “Exposure to Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Using Guided-Inquiry-Based Activities with Silica Aerogel to Promote High School Students’ Motivation.” Journal of Chemical Education 96 (6): 1109–1116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misra, R., S. Acharya, and S. K. Sahoo. 2010. “Cancer Nanotechnology: Application of Nanotechnology in Cancer Therapy.” Drug Discovery Today 15 (19–20): 842–850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. 2013. Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States
   Google Scholar
• Papert, S. 1980. Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Papert, S, and I Harel. 1991. “Situating Constructionism.” Constructionism 36 (2): 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Roco, M. C., and W. S. Bainbridge. 2005. “Societal Implications of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology: Maximizing Human Benefit.” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 7 (1): 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakhnini, S., and R. Blonder. 2018. “Insertion Points of the Essential Nanoscale Science and Technology (NST) Concepts in the Israeli Middle School Science and Technology Curriculum.” Nanotechnology Reviews 7 (5): 373–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, L.S. 1987. “Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform.” Harvard Educational Review 57 (1): 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stavrou, D., E. Michailidi, G. Sgouros, and K. Dimitriadi. 2015. “Teaching High-school Students Nanoscience and Nanotechnology.” LUMAT 3 (4): 501–511.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, S. Y., L. M. Sutherland, and J. S. Krajcik. 2009. The Big Ideas of Nanoscale Science and Engineering. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Associated press.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, K. S., C. Delgado, and E. B. Moje. 2014. “An Integrative Framework for the Analysis of Multiple and Multimodal Representations for Meaning‐making in Science Education.” Science Education 98 (2): 305–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zach, M., C. Hagglund, D. Chakarov, and B. Kasemo. 2006. “Nanoscience and Nanotechnology for Advanced Energy Systems.” Current Opinion in Solid State & Materials Science 10 (3–4): 132–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar