Pedagogy Analysis Framework: a video-based tool for combining teacher, pupil & researcher perspectives

References

• Alexander, R. 2004. “Still No Pedagogy? Principle, Pragmatism and Compliance in Primary Education.” Cambridge Journal of Education 34 (1): 7–33. doi:10.1080/0305764042000183106.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, Robin. 2008. Essays on Pedagogy. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Archibald, Mandy M. 2016. Investigator Triangulation: A Collaborative Strategy with Potential for Mixed Methods Research, vols. 10. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications Sage CA.
   Google Scholar
• Berlyne, D. E., W. Edgar Vinacke, and Robert J. Sternberg. 2008. “Thought.” Encyclopaedia Britannica.
   Google Scholar
• Bindis, M. P. 2013. “Students’ misconceptions about intermolecular forces as investigated through paper chromatography experiments and the Molecular Attractions Concept Inventory.” Doctoral dissertation, Miami University.
   Google Scholar
• Birks, M., and J. Mills. 2011. Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Black, Paul, and Dylan Wiliam. 2018. “Classroom Assessment and Pedagogy.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 25 (6): 551–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaikie, Norman, and Jan Priest. 2019. Designing Social Research: The Logic of Anticipation. 3rd ed. Cambridge: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Bloor, M., and F. Wood. 2006. Keywords in Qualitative Methods: A Vocabulary of Research Concepts. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brannen, Julia. 2005. “Mixing Methods: The Entry of Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches into the Research Process.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 8 (3): 173–184. doi:10.1080/13645570500154642.
   Google Scholar
• British Educational Research Association. 2018. Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research. 4th ed. London: BERA.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, Antony, and Kathy Charmaz. 2019. The SAGE Handbook of Current Developments in Grounded Theory. London: SAGE Publications Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, Nancy, Denise Bryant-Lukosius, Alba DiCenso, Jennifer Blythe, and Alan J. Neville. 2014. “The Use of Triangulation in Qualitative Research.” Oncology Nursing Forum 41: 545–547. doi:10.1188/14.ONF.545-547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, Christine. 2007. “Teacher Questioning in Science Classrooms: Approaches that Stimulate Productive Thinking.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching 44 (6): 815–843. doi:10.1002/tea.20171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, A. E. 2003. “Situational Analyses: Grounded Theory Mapping after the Postmodern Turn.” Symbolic Interaction 26 (4): 553–576. doi:10.1525/si.2003.26.4.553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., and A. Strauss. 2008. Basics of Qualitative Research. 3rd ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, Janet E., Robert J. Sternberg, and Robert Jeffrey Sternberg. 2003. The Psychology of Problem Solving. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, Norman. 1970. “Strategies of Multiple Triangulation.” The Research Act in Sociology: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Method 297 (1970): 313.
   Google Scholar
• Duit, R., D. Treagust, and A. Widodo. 2013. “Teaching Science for Conceptual Change: Theory and Practice.” In International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change, edited by S. Vosniadou, 487–503. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, A. D., and K. Lee. 2011. “Verbal Deception from Late Childhood to Middle Adolescence and Its Relation to Executive Functioning Skills.” Developmental Psychology 47 (4): 1108–1116. doi:10.1037/a0023425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flick, Uwe. 2018. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publications Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, L. 2013. Strategy: A History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., and A. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Hallam, Susan, and Judith Ireson. 1999. “Pedagogy in the Secondary School.” In Understanding Pedagogy and Its Impact on Learning, edited by Peter Mortimore, 68–97. London: Paul Chapman.
   Google Scholar
• Hardman, M., Riordan, J. and Hetherington, L. (in press) A material-dialogic perspective on powerful knowledge and matter within a science classroom. in: Hudson, B., Stolare, M., Gericke, N. and Olin-Scheller, C. (ed.) Powerful knowledge and epistemic quality across school subjects, London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Hinchliffe, Geoffrey. 2000. “Education or Pedagogy?” Journal of Philosophy of Education 35 (1): 31–45. doi:10.1111/1467-9752.00208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Illeris, K. 2007. How We Learn: Learning and Non-Learning in School and Beyond. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. 1993. “Major Metaphors of Communication and Some Constructivist Reflections on Their Use.” Cybernetics & Human Knowing 2 (1): 3–25.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford university press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewins, A., and C. Silver. 2007. Using Software in Qualitative Research: A Step-by-Step Guide. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Jing-Wen, Miao-Hsuan Yen, Jia-Chi Liang, Mei-Hung Chiu, and Chorng-Jee Guo. 2016. “Examining the Factors that Influence Students’ Science Learning Processes and Their Learning Outcomes: 30 Years of Conceptual Change Research.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education 12 (9): 2617–2646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y., and E. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pressley, M. 2000. “Development of Grounded Theories of Complex Cognitive Processing: Exhaustive Within- and between Study Analyses of Thinking-Aloud Data.” In Issues in the Measurement of Metacognition, edited by G. Schraw and J. Impara, 262–296. Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
   Google Scholar
• Pretz, Jean E., Adam J. Naples, and Robert J. Sternberg. 2003. “Recognizing, Defining, and Representing Problems.” In The Psychology of Problem Solving, edited by J. Davidson and R. Sternberg, 3–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, Stephen K. 2016. “The Structure of Ill-Structured (And Well-Structured) Problems Revisited.” Educational Psychology Review 28 (4): 691–716. doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9343-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riordan, J. P. 2020. “A Method and Framework for Video-Based Pedagogy Analysis.” Research in Science & Technological Education. doi:10.1080/02635143.2020.1776243
   Google Scholar
• Saltman, K. J., and D. A. Gabbard. 2010. Education as Enforcement: The Militarization and Corporatization of Schools. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sherin, Miriam Gamoran, and Elizabeth A. Van Es. 2005. “Using Video to Support Teachers’ Ability to Notice Classroom Interactions.” Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 13 (3): 475.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, Brian. 1981. “Why No Pedagogy in England?” In Teaching and Learning in the Secondary School, edited by Brian Simon, J. Leach, and B. Moon, 11–22. London: Routledge/Falmer in association with the Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, Herbert A. 1973. “The Structure of Ill Structured Problems.” Artificial Intelligence 4 (3–4): 181–201. doi:10.1016/0004-3702(73)90011-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, L., and J. P. Dionne. 2000. “Accessing Problem-Solving Strategy Knowledge: The Complementary Use of Concurrent Verbal Protocols and Retrospective Debriefing.” Journal of Educational Psychology 92 (3): 413–425. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.92.3.413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurmond, V.A. (2001), The Point of Triangulation. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33 (3): 253–258. doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.2001.00253.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, Teun A. 1998. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, Chris, and Peter Mortimore. 1999. “Pedagogy: What Do We Know.” In Understanding Pedagogy and Its Impact on Learning, 1–19. London: Paul Chapman.
   Google Scholar
• Wellington, Jerry. 2012. “Searching for ‘Doctorateness’.” Studies in Higher Education 38 (10): 1490–1503. doi:10.1080/03075079.2011.634901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whaley, B. 1982. “Toward a General Theory of Deception.” In Military Deception and Strategic Surprise, edited by J. Gooch and A. Perlmutter, 178–192. London: Frank Cass.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, A., M. Smith, and H. Ross. 2003. “The Nature and Effects of Young Children’s Lies.” Social Development 12 (1): 21–45. doi:10.1111/1467-9507.00220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar