Gender difference in students’ performance in chemistry – can computer simulation bridge the gap?

References

• Abdulwahab, N., O. S. Oyeleka, and A. S. Olorundare. 2016. “Effects of Cooperative Instructional Strategy on Senior School Students’ Achievement in Electrochemistry.” International Journal of Physics & Chemistry Education 8 (2): 37–48. doi:10.12973/ejpce.2016.00005a.
   Google Scholar
• Ademola, I. A. 2020. “Nuclear Chemistry as a Difficult Topic for Secondary School Students: Harnessing the Power of Indigenous (Cultural) Knowledge for Its Understanding.” In Breaking Barriers to Learning of Science: The CTC Approach, 167–181. Slough,UK: Sterling Press.
   Google Scholar
• African Union Commission. 2015. “Agenda2063 Report of the Commission on the African Union Agenda 2063 the Africa We Want in 2063.” Final ed. https://au.int/en/agenda2063/overview
   Google Scholar
• Ajayi, O. A. 2020. “Variation and Evolution in Biology as Difficult Topics for Secondary School Students: Harnessing the Power of Indigenous (Cultural) Knowledge for Their Understanding.” In Breaking Barriers to Learning of Science: The CTC Approach, 193–204. Slough,UK: Sterling Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ajayi, V. O., and J. Ogbeba. 2017. “Effect of Gender on Senior Secondary Chemistry Students’ Achievement in Stoichiometry Using Hands-on Activities.” American Journal of Educational Research 5 (8): 839–842. doi:10.12691/education-5-8-1.
   Google Scholar
• Akinola, V. O. 2014. “Learning Style, Information and Communication Technology – Activities and Achievement in Biology” PhD thesis, Lagos State University.
   Google Scholar
• Akinola, V. O., and A. I. Oladejo. 2020. “Virtual Laboratory: A Viable and Sustainable Alternative to Traditional Physical Laboratory.” Journal of Educational Research and Development 16 (2): 1–7. [Academia.edu].
   Google Scholar
• Akpan, J. P., and T. Andre. 2000. “Using a Computer Simulation before Dissection to Help Students Learn Anatomy.” Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching 19 (3): 297–313. [Google Scholar].
   Google Scholar
• Ayodotun, B. 2015. “Participation in Science, Technology and Innovation: Where are the African Women?” https://africaupclose.wilsoncenter.org/category/blog-columns/southern-voices/
   Google Scholar
• Barnea, N., and Y. J. Dori. 1999. “High-school Chemistry Students’ Performance and Gender Differences in a Computerized Molecular Modeling Learning Environment.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 8 (4): 257–271. doi:10.1023/A:1009436509753.
   Google Scholar
• Ben Ouahi, M., M. Ait Hou, A. Bliya, T. Hassouni, A. Ibrahmi, and E. Mehdi. 2021. “The Effect of Using Computer Simulation on Students’ Performance in Teaching and Learning Physics: Are There Any Gender and Area Gaps?” Education Research International 2021. doi:10.1155/2021/6646017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clary, R. M., and J. H. Wandersee. 2010. “Virtual Field Exercises in the Online Classroom: Practicing Science Teachers’ Perceptions of Effectiveness, Best Practices, and Implementation.” Journal of College Science Teaching 39 (4): 50-58. [Google Scholar].
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly, D., J. O’Reilly, and O. McGarr. 2013. “Enhancing the Student Experiment Experience: Visible Scientific Inquiry through a Virtual Chemistry Laboratory.” Research in Science Education 43 (4): 1571–1592. doi:10.1007/s11165-012-9322-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eskrootchi, R., and G. R. Oskrochi. 2010. “A Study of the Efficacy of Project-based Learning Integrated with Computer-based simulation-STELLA.” Journal of Educational Technology Society 13 (1): 236–245. [Google Scholar].
   Google Scholar
• Eugene, U. Okorie, and D. N. Ezeh. 2016. “Influence of Gender and Location on Students’ Achievement in Chemical Bonding.” Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences 7 (3): 309. doi:10.5901/mjss.2016.v7n3p309.
   Google Scholar
• Ezibe, A. B. C., A. N. Diogu, J. U. Eze, and J. T. Uzoamaka. 2013. “Developing the Active Participation of African Women in Science, Technology and Innovation: The Entrepreneurial Approach.” European Journal of Business and Management 5 (13): 55–62. [Google Scholar].
   Google Scholar
• Federal Republic of Nigeria. 2014. National Policy on Education. 6th ed. Yaba Lagos: NERDC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gongden, E. J. 2016. “The Effects of Analogy on Male and Female Chemistry Students’. Problem-Solving Ability in Electrolysis.” International Journal of Scientific Research in Education 9 (1): 1–6. [Google Scholar].
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. 2017. “Enhancing Students’ Performance in Organic Chemistry Through Context-Based Learning and Micro Activities - A Case Study.” European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences 5 (6): 7–20.
   Google Scholar
• Ifeakor, A. C. 2005. “Effects of Commercially Produced Computer-assisted Instruction Package on Students’ Achievement and Interest in Secondary School Chemistry.” Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Nigeria, Nsukka. [Google Scholar].
   Google Scholar
• Landriscina, F. 2013. Simulation and Learning. Springer. doi:10.1007%2F978-1-4614-1954-9.
   Google Scholar
• Lindberg, S. M., J. S. Hyde, J. L. Petersen, and M. C. Linn. 2010. “New Trends in Gender and Mathematics Performance: A Meta-analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 136 (6): 1123. doi:10.1037/a0021276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez, A. J. G. 2020. “ACE 812-912: Science Education: A Sociocultural View.” LASU-ACEITSE, MP4. From Africa Center of Excellence for Innovative and Transformative STEM Education. YouTube, 53: 36. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VIVT6xclRuY
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. 2005. “Cognitive theory of multimedia learning.” The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning 41: 31–48.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. and R. Moreno. 2003. “Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning.” Educational psychologist 38 (1): 43–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, P. H., J. S. Blessing, and S. Schwartz. 2006. “Gender Differences in High‐school Students’ Views about Science.” International Journal of Science Education 28 (4): 363–381. doi:10.1080/09500690500277664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohajan, H. K. 2017. “Two Criteria for Good Measurements in Research: Validity and Reliability.” Annals of Spiru Haret University. Economic Series 17 (4): 59–82. doi:10.26458/1746.
   Google Scholar
• Mohr, S. D. 2014. “The Effect of Computer Simulations on the Conceptual Understanding in General Chemistry Lab.” 1–59. https://scholarworks.montana.edu/xmlui/handle/1/3581
   Google Scholar
• Najoli, E. K. 2019. “The Effectiveness of Wited Programme on Enrollment of Women in Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET).” EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 15 (3): em1682. doi:10.29333/ejmste/103034.
   Google Scholar
• Nakayiwa, Florence. 2017. “Developing Higher Education Systems in Africa-Selected Country Views.” African Journal of Rural Development 1 (2): 205–217. [Scholarworks].
   Google Scholar
• Nicia, G., and S. Luisa. 2020. “A Gender-based Assessment of Science, Technology and Innovation Ecosystem in Mozambique.” African Journal of Rural Development 5 (1): 79–95. http://afjrd.org/jos/index.php/afjrd/article/view/2060
   Google Scholar
• Nwachukwu, J. N., and A. A. Nwosu. 2007. “Effects of Demonstration Method on Different Levels of Students’ Cognitive Achievement in Senior Secondary Biology.” JSTAN 42 (2): 50–59. [Google Scholar].
   Google Scholar
• Nzewi, U. M. 2020. “ACE 812-912: Recent Developments in Gender Issues in STEM Education.” LASU-ACEITSE, MP4. From Africa Center of Excellence for Innovative and Transformative STEM Education. YouTube, 58: 43. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcbpmMgjis4&t=765s
   Google Scholar
• Ogunkola, J. B., and Bilesanmi-Awoderu. 2000. “Effects of Laboratory and Lecture Methods on Students’ Achievement in Biology.” African Journal of Education 5 (2): 247–260. [Google Scholar].
   Google Scholar
• Okebukola, P. A. 2015. 20 golden rules for writing multiple-choice questions. YouTube channel. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ysDZfXPJono
   Google Scholar
• Okebukola, P. A., A. I. Oladejo, F. Onowugbeda, F. Awaah, I. Ademola, T. Odekeye, M. Adewusi, et al. 2020. “Deeper Probe of African Students’ Perceived Difficult Concepts in Secondary School Chemistry.” Unpublished.
   Google Scholar
• Oladejo, A. I. 2018. “Computer Simulation and Cognitive Achievement in Senior Secondary School Chemistry.” Master’s thesis, Lagos State University, Ojo, Nigeria.
   Google Scholar
• Oladejo, A. I. 2020. “Nuclear Chemistry as a Difficult Topic for Secondary School Students: Harnessing the Power of Indigenous (Cultural) Knowledge in Its Understanding.” In Breaking Barriers to Learning of Science: The CTC Approach, 230–238. Slough, UK: Sterling Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olakanmi, E. E. 2015. “The Effects of a Web-based Computer Simulation on Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Rate of Reaction and Attitude Towards Chemistry.” Journal of Baltic Science Education 14 (5): 627–640. doi:10.33225/jbse/15.14.627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olakanmi, E. E., and M. T. Gumbo. 2017. “The Effects of Self-regulated Learning Training on Students’ Metacognition and Achievement in Chemistry.” International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education 25 (2): 34–48. [Google Scholar].
   Google Scholar
• Onekutu, P. O., and P. O. Onekutu. 2002. “Gender Differences in Achievements in Junior Secondary School Examination in Integrated Science: Implications for National Development.” Review of Gender Studies in Nigeria 1 (3): 4–12. [Google Scholar].
   Google Scholar
• Onowugbeda, F. U. 2020. “Variation and Genetics as Difficult Topics for Secondary School Students in Biology: Exploring the Impact of Indigenous (Cultural) Knowledge for Better Understanding.” In Breaking Barriers to Learning of Science: The CTC Approach, 140–154. Slough, UK: Sterling Press.
   Google Scholar
• Onyekwelu, B. A. 2019. “Comparative Empirical Analysis of Female University Enrolment in STEM Courses in the Geopolitical Zones in Nigeria.” International Journal of Modern Education & Computer Science 11 (1): 24–32. doi:10.5815/ijmecs.2019.01.03.
   Google Scholar
• Onyewuchi, F. A. 2020. “Refractive Index as a Difficult Topic in Senior Secondary Physics: Harnessing the Power of Indigenous (Cultural) Knowledge for Its Understanding.” In Breaking Barriers to Learning of Science: The CTC Approach, 155–166. Slough, UK: Sterling Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osagie, R. O., and A. N. Alutu. 2016. “Factors Affecting Gender Equity in the Choice of Science and Technology Careers among Secondary School Students in Edo State, Nigeria.” International Education Studies 9 (10): 231–236. doi:10.5539/ies.v9n10p231.
   Google Scholar
• Özmen, H., G. DemİrcİoĞlu, and R. K. Coll. 2009. “A Comparative Study of the Effects of A Concept Mapping Enhanced Laboratory Experience on Turkish High School Students’ Understanding of Acid-base Chemistry.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 7 (1): 1–24. doi:10.1007/s10763-007-9087-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. 2007. Digital game-based learning. St. Paul, MN: Paragon House Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Rutten, N., W. R. Van Joolingen, and J. T. Van Der Veen. 2012. “The Learning Effects of Computer Simulations in Science Education.” Computers & Education 58 (1): 136–153. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tambaya, S. I., M. A. Sabitu, and Y. M. Matazu. 2016. “Comparative Analysis of Gender Performances in Biology, Chemistry and Physics among Pre-degree Students of Federal University, Dutsinma.” Benchmark Journals International Journal of Educational Benchmark (IJEB) 5 (1): 108–118. [ResearchGate].
   Google Scholar
• Trundle, K. C., and R. L. Bell. 2010. “The Use of a Computer Simulation to Promote Conceptual Change: A Quasi-experimental Study.” Computers & Education 54 (4): 1078–1088. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.10.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udo, M. E., and R. U. Etiubon. 2011. “Computer-based Science Simulations, Guided-discovery and Students’ Performance in Chemistry.” Modern Applied Science 5 (6): 211–217. doi:10.5539/mas.v5n6p211.
   Google Scholar
• Uzezi, J. G., and G. D. Deya. 2020. “Effect of Computer Simulation on Secondary School Students’ Academic Achievement in Acid-Base Reactions.” ATBU Journal of Science, Technology and Education 8 (1): 286–295. [Google Scholar].
   Google Scholar
• Uzezi, J. G., and S. Zainab. 2017. “Effectiveness of Guided-inquiry Laboratory Experiments on Senior Secondary School Students’ Academic Achievement in Volumetric Analysis.” American Journal of Educational Research 5 (7): 717–724. [Google Scholar].
   Google Scholar
• West Africa Examinations Council. 2017. “Chief Examiners’ Reports WASSCE 2017: Resume of Sciences Subject”. https://www.waecgh.org/uploads/examinersReport/2017/Science17.pdf
   Google Scholar
• West Africa Examinations Council. 2018. “Chief Examiners’ Reports WASSCE 2018: Resume of Sciences Subject”. https://www.waecgh.org/uploads/examinersReport/2018/Science18.pdf
   Google Scholar
• West Africa Examinations Council. 2019. “Chief Examiners’ Reports WASSCE 2019: Resume of Sciences Subject”. https://www.waecgh.org/uploads/examinersReport/2019/Science19.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Willingham, D. T. 2007. “Critical Thinking: Why It Is so Hard to Teach?” American Federation of Teachers’ Summer 2007: 8–19. [Google Scholar].
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, L. O. 2016. “Anderson and Krathwohl–Bloom’s taxonomy revised.”Understanding the New Version of Bloom's Taxonomy. https://pdfslide.net/documents/anderson-and-krathwohl-blooms-taxonomy-revised-anderson-and-krathwohl-blooms.html
   Google Scholar
• Zavale, N. C. 2018. “Expansion versus Contribution of Higher Education in Africa: University-industry Linkages in Mozambique from Companies’ Perspective.” Science & Public Policy 45 (5): 645–660. doi:10.1093/scipol/scx089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar