Integrated STEM in high school science courses: an analysis of 23 science textbooks in China

References

• Aguilera, D., and F. J. P. Palacios. 2018. “Textbooks, Illustrations and Student Attitudes Towards Science: Teacher Perceptions, Experiences and Opinions.” Ensenanza De Las Ciencias 36 (3): 41–58. doi:10.5565/rev/ensciencias.2423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artaud, J. P., and F. Loget. 2014. “A Revolution through Images: Looking at French Science Textbooks (Third Republic 1870-1940).” History of Education & Childrens Literature 9 (1): 59–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baptista, G. C. S., R. D. Santos, and W. W. Cobern. 2016. “Perspectives on the Origins of Life in Science Textbooks from a Christian Publisher: Implications for Teaching Science.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 14 (2): S309–S326. doi:10.1007/s10763-015-9641-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beane, J. A. 1995. “Curriculum Integration and the Disciplines of Knowledge.” Phi Delta Kappan 76 (8): 616-616. doi:10.2307/20405413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergqvist, A., M. Drechsler, O. De Jong, and S. N. C. Rundgren. 2013. “Representations of Chemical Bonding Models in School Textbooks - Help or Hindrance for Understanding?” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 14 (4): 589–606. doi:10.1039/c3rp20159g.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. W. 2010. “Advancing STEM Education: A2020 Vision.” Technology and Engineering Teacher 70 (1): 30–35.
   Google Scholar
• Calado, F. M., F. J. Scharfenberg, and F. X. Bogner. 2015. “To What Extent Do Biology Textbooks Contribute to Scientific Literacy? Criteria for Analysing Science-technology-society-environment Issues.” Education Sciences 5 (4): 255–280. doi:10.3390/educsci5040255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czerniak, C. M., W. B. Weber, A. Sandmann, and J. Ahern. 2010. “A Literature Review of Science and Mathematics Integration.” School Science & Mathematics 99 (8): 421–430. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.1999.tb17504.x.
   Google Scholar
• Donna, J. 2012. “A Model for Professional Development to Promote Engineering Design as an Integrative Pedagogy within STEM Education.” Journal of Pre College Engineering Education Research 2 (2): 1–8. doi:10.5703/1288284314866.
   Google Scholar
• Furner, J., and D. Kumar. 2007. “The Mathematics and Science Integration Argument: A Stand for Teacher Education.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology 3 (3): 185–189. doi:10.12973/ejmste/75397.
   Google Scholar
• Gegios, T., K. Salta, and S. Koinis. 2017. “Investigating High-School Chemical Kinetics: The Greek Chemistry Textbook and Students’ Difficulties.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 18 (1): 151–168. doi:10.1039/c6rp00192k.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, L. C. 1991. “Science-Centered Curriculum in Elementary School.” Educational Leadership 49: 42–51. doi:10.1016/0307-4412(91)90111-K.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honey, M., G. Pearson, and H. Schweingruber. 2014. STEM Integration in K-12 Education: Status, Prospects, and an Agenda for Research. Washington: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, M. A., and J. Y. Park. 2014. “An Analysis of STEAM Activities in the Middle School Science Textbooks Published Based on the 2009 Revised National Curriculum.” Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction 18 (4): 1033–1055. doi:10.22251/jlcci.2020.20.23.803.
   Google Scholar
• Hrast, S., and V. F. Savec. 2017. “The Integration of Submicroscopic Representations Used in Chemistry Textbook Sets into Curriculum Topics.” Acta Chimica Slovenica 64 (4): 959–967. doi:10.17344/acsi.2017.3657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEA (International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement). 2008. “TIMSS 2007 International Science Report.” Accessed December 9 2008. https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/TIMSS2007/PDF/TIMSS2007_InternationalScienceReport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. C., E. E. Peters-Burton, and T. J. Moore. 2015. STEM Roadmap: A Framework for Integration. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, T. R., and J. G. Knowles. 2016. “A Conceptual Framework for Integrated STEM Education.” International Journal of STEM Education 3. doi:10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, N. H., and K. C. Shim. 2012. “An Analysis of STEAM Contents Included in the ‘Energy and Environment’ Unit of High School Science Textbooks.” Journal of Energy and Climate Change Education 2 (2): 177–186. http://hfhybb581fe8a0208441fs5pnovcobcc6k69b9.fcfg.libproxy.ruc.edu.cn/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002017910&SID=5AyYJu9RmaPzYbkahdx
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, A. 2008. “A Comparative Study of Six Decades of General Science Textbooks: Evaluating the Evolution of Science Content.” Izvestiis Akademii Nauk Ssssr Seriia Biologic Heskaia 3: 197–211. doi:10.1288/00005537-194507000-00005.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., and M. S. Khine. 2016. “Content Analysis of the Diagrammatic Representations of Primary Science Textbooks.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science & Technology Education 12: 8. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2016.1288a.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lou, S. J., R. C. Shih, R. C. Diez, and K. H. Tseng. 2011. “The Impact of Problem-Based Learning Strategies on STEM Knowledge Integration and Attitudes: An Exploratory Study among Female Taiwanese Senior High School Students.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 21 (2): 195–215. doi:10.1007/s10798-010-9114-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McComas, W. R., and H. A. Wang. 1998. “Blended Science: The Rewards and Challenges of Integrating the Science Disciplines for Instruction.” School Science and Mathematics 98 (6): 340–348. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.1998.tb17430.x.
   Google Scholar
• Merrill, C., and J. Daugherty. 2009. “The Future of TE Master’s Degrees: STEM.” Poster Presented at the Meeting of the International Technology Education Association, Louisville, KY.
   Google Scholar
• MoE (Ministry of Education). 2001. “Outline of Basic Education Reform (Provisional).” Accessed March 8 2021. http://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2002/content_61386.htm
   Google Scholar
• MoE (Ministry of Education). 2020. “General Office of the Ministry of Education on the Issuance of the 2020 Primary and Secondary School Circular on the Catalogue of Textbooks.” Accessed March 8 2021. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A26/moe_714/202004/t20200417_444236.html
   Google Scholar
• Moore, T., M. Stohlmann, H. Wang, K. Tank, A. Glancy, and G. Roehrig. 2014. “Implementation and Integration of Engineering in K-12 STEM Education.” In Engineering in Pre-College Settings: Synthesizing Research, Policy, and Practices, edited by S. Purzer, J. Strobel, and M. Cardella, 35–60. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morin, E. 1999. Complexity Theory and Educational Problems. Translated and edited by Yizhuang Chen. Beijing: Peking University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mustafa, N., Z. Ismail, Z. Tasir, and M. N. H. Mohamad Said. 2016. “A Meta-Analysis On Effective Strategies For Integrated STEM Education.” Advanced Science Letters 22 (12): 4225–4228. doi:10.1166/asl.2016.8111.
   Google Scholar
• Nadelson, L. S., and A. L. Seifert. 2017. “Integrated STEM Defined: Contexts, Challenges, and the Future.” Journal of Educational Research 110 (3): 221–223. doi:10.1080/00220671.2017.1289775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NSF (National Science Foundation). 1986. “Undergraduate Science Mathematics and Engineering Education.” Accessed 24 September, 2021. http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/publications/1986/nsb0386.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Osterlund, L. L., A. Berg, and M. Ekborg. 2010. “Redox Models in Chemistry Textbooks for the Upper Secondary School: Friend or Foe?”.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 11 (3): 182–192. doi:10.1039/c005467b.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paoletti, T. H. Y., Lee, Z. Rahman, M. Vishnubhotla, and D. Basu. 2020. “Comparing Graphical Representations in Mathematics, Science, and Engineering Textbooks and Practitioner Journals.” International Journal of Mathematical Education, no. 1: 1–20. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2020.1847336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramnarain, U., and K. Padayachee. 2015. “A Comparative Analysis of South African Life Sciences and Biology Textbooks for Inclusion of the Nature of Science.” South African Journal of Education 35 (1): 1–8. doi:10.15700/201503062358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramnarain, U. D., and T. Chanetsa. 2016. “An Analysis of South African Grade 9 Natural Sciences Textbooks for Their Representation of Nature of Science.” International Journal of Science Education 38 (6): 922–933. doi:10.1080/09500693.2016.1167985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, M. 2009. “STEM, STEM Education, STEM Mania.” Accessed 31 July, 2021. http://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/bitstream/handle/10919/51616/STEMmania.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
   Google Scholar
• Schnittka, C. 2017. “STEM Road Map: A Framework for Integrated STEM Education.” Journal of Educational Research 10 (3): 1. doi:10.1080/00220671.2016.1253949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simsek, C. L. 2011. “Investigation of Environmental Topics in the Science and Technology Curriculum and Textbooks in Terms of Environmental Ethics and Aesthetics.” Kuram Ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri 111 (4): 2252–2257. doi:10.1007/s11412-011-9108-x.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, C., and J. Carr. 1993. Integrated Studies in the Middle Grades: Dancing through Walls. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Valverde, G. A., L. J. Bianchi, R. G. Wolfe, W. H. Schmidt, and R. T. Houng. 2003. “According to the Book: Using TIMSS to Investigate the Translation of Policy into Practice through the World of Textbooks.” British Journal of Educational Studies 51 (4): 437–438. doi:10.1046/j.1467-8527.2003.00247.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Eijck, M., M. J. Goedhart, and T. Ellermeijer. 2011. “Polysemy in the Domain-Specific Pedago- Gical Use of Graphs in Science Textbooks: The Case of an Electrocardiogram.” Research in Science Education 41 (1): 1–18. doi:10.1007/s11165-009-9143-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vars, G. R. 1991. “Integrated Curriculum in Historical Perspective.” Educational Leadership 49: 14–15. doi:10.1016/0307-4412(91)90111-K.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vojíř, K, and M. Rusek. 2019. “Science Education Textbook Research Trends: A Systematic Literature Review.” International Journal of Science Education 41 (11): 1496–1516. doi:10.1080/09500693.2019.1613584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yakman, G. 2008. “ST∑@M Education: An Overview of Creating a Model of Integrative Education.” Accessed 20 May, 2021. http://steamedu.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/2008-PATT-Publication-STEAM.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Yakman, G. 2011. “Introducing Teaching STEAM as an Educational Framework in Korea.” Accessed 24 September, 2021. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327449065
   Google Scholar
• Yalvac, B., C. C. Loving, and M. M. Alpaslan. 2015. “Curriculum Reform Movements and Science Textbooks: A Retrospective Examination of 6th Grade Science Textbooks.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science & Technology Education 11 (3): 207–216. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2015.1316a.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., B. S. Dun, C. Xu, and M. Li. 2016. “A Comparative Study of Chinese and American Science Textbooks Based on STEM Framework—A Case Study of US FOSS K-5 Edition and China’s People’s Education Grade Five Edition.” Journal of Primary and Secondary Education in Foreign Countries 35 (6): 48–57.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, P., X. Chang, Z. Yun, and M. Li. 2016. “An Analysis Study of American Science Textbooks from STEM Perspective——Taking the FOSS K-5 Edition as an Example.” China Educational Technology 352 (5): 25–32.
   Google Scholar