Reliability of EMG normalisation methods for upper-limb muscles

References

• Albertus-Kajee, Y., Tucker, R., Derman, W., & Lambert, M. (2010). Alternative methods of normalising EMG during cycling. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 20, 1036–1043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albertus-Kajee, Y., Tucker, R., Derman, W., Lambert, M., & Lamberts, R.P, Lambert, M. (2011). Alternative methods of normalising EMG during running. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 21, 579–586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, D.B., & Nevill, A.M. (1998). Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Medicine, 26, 217–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, N., & Scurr, J. (2010). An assessment of the reliability and standardisation of tests used to elicit reference muscular actions for electromyographical normalisation. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 20, 81–88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balshaw, T.G., & Hunter, A.M. (2012). Evaluation of electromyography normalisation methods for the back squat. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 22, 308–319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boettcher, C.E., Ginn, K.A., & Cathers, I. (2008). Standard maximum isometric voluntary contraction tests for normalizing shoulder muscle EMG. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 26, 1591–1597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruton, A., Conway, J.H., & Holgate, S.T. (2000). Reliability: what is it, and how is it measured? Physiotherapy, 86, 94–99.
   Google Scholar
• Burden, A. (2010). How should we normalize electromyograms obtained from healthy participants? What we have learned from over 25 years of research. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 20, 1023–1035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burden, A.M., & Bartlett, R.M. (1999). Normalisation of EMG amplitude: An evaluation and comparison of old and new methods. Medical Engineering and Physics, 21, 247–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, A.R., Vicenzino, B., Blanch, P., Knox, J.J., & Hodges, P.W. (2010). Intramuscular fine-wire electromyography during cycling: repeatability, normalisation and a comparison to surface electromyography. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 20, 108–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chopp, J., Fischer, S. L., & Dickerson, C.R. (2009). On the feasibility of obtaining multiple muscular voluntary excitation levels from test exertions: A shoulder example. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 20, 896–902
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cogley, R.M., Archambault, T.A., Fibeger, J.F., Koverman, M.M., Youdas, J.W., & Hollman, J.H. (2005). Comparison of muscle activation using various hand positions during the push-up exercise. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 19, 628–633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Luca, C. (1997). The use of surface electromyography in biomechanics. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 13, 135–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekstrom, R.A., Osborn, R.W., Goehner, H.M., Moen, A.C., Ommen, B.M., Mefferd, M. J. et al. (2012). Electromyographic normalization procedures for determining exercise intensity of closed chain exercises for strengthening the quadriceps femoris muscles. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 26, 766–771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farina, D., Merletti, R., & Enoka, R.M. (2004). The extraction of neural strategies from the surface EMG. Journal of Applied Physiology, 96, 1486–1495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Pena, E., Lucertini, F., & Ditroilo, M. (2009). A maximal isokinetic pedalling exercise for EMG normalization in cycling. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 19, 162–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, S.L., Belbeck, A.L, & Dickerson, C.R. (2010). The influence of providing feedback on force production and within-participant reproducibility during maximal voluntary exertions for the anterior deltoid, middle deltoid, and infraspinatus. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 20, 68–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermens, H.J., Freriks, B., Disselhorst-Klug, C., & Rau, G. (2000). Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 10, 361–374
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, W-L., Krishnamoorthy, V., & Scholz, J. P. (2006). An alternative test of electromyographic normalization in patients. Muscle Nerve, 33, 232–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hug, F. (2011). Can muscle coordination be precisely studied by surface electromyography? Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 21, 1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, B.T., Kadrmas, W.R., Kirkendall, D.T., & Speer, K.P. (1996). Optimal normalization tests for shoulder muscle activation: an electromyographic study. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 14, 647–653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kibler, W.B., Chandler, T.J., Shapiro, R., & Conuel, M. (2007). Muscle activation in coupled scapulohumeral motions in the high performance tennis serve. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 41, 745–749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaChance, P.F., & Hortobagyi, T. (1994). Influence of cadence on muscular performance during push-up and pull-up exercise. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 8, 76–79.
   Google Scholar
• Linnamo, V. T., Moritani, T., Nicol, C., & Komi, P. V. (2003). Motor unit activation patterns during isometric, concentric and eccentric actions at different force levels. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 13, 93–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishijima, Y., Kato, T., Yoshizawa, M., Miyashita, M., & Iida, H. (2010). Application of the segment weight dynamic movement method to the normalization of gait EMG amplitude. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 20, 550–557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norcross, M.F., Blackburn, J.T., & Goerger, B.M. (2010). Reliability and interpretation of single leg stance and maximum voluntary isometric contraction methods of electromyography normalization. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 20, 420–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouffet, D.M., & Hautier, C.A. (2008). EMG normalization to study muscle activation in cycling. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 18, 866–878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sleivert, G.G., & Wenger, H.A. (1994). Reliability of measuring isometric and isokinetic peak torque, rate of torque development, integrated electromyography and tibial nerve conduction velocity. Archives Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, 75, 1315–1321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soderberg, G.L., & Knutson, L.M. (2000). A guide for use and interpretation of kinesiologic electromyographic data. Physical Therapy, 80, 485–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stratford, P.W., & Goldsmith, C.H. (1997). Use of the standard error as a reliability index of interest: an applied example using elbow flexor strength. Physical Therapy, 77, 745–750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youdas, J.W., Amundson, C.L., Cicero, K.S., Hahn, J.J., Harezlak, D.T., & Hollman, J.H. (2010a). Surface electromyographic activation patterns and elbow joint motion during a pull-up, chin-up, or perfect-pullup Rotational Exercise. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 24, 3404–3414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youdas, J.W., Budach, B.D., Ellerbusch, J.V., Stucky, C.M., Wait, K.R., & Hollman, J.H. (2010b). Comparison of muscle-activation patterns during the conventional push-up and perfect pushup exercises. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 24, 3352–3362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weir, J.P. (2005). Quantifying test–retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 19, 231–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar