Compound headedness in the mental lexicon: An event-related potential study

References

• Andrews, S. (1986). Morphological influences on lexical access: Lexical or nonlexical effects? Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 726–740. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(86)90046-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, S., Miller, B., & Rayner, K. (2004). Eye movements and morphological segmentation of compound words: There is a mouse in mousetrap. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 285–311.
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory & Language, 59, 390–412. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 57, 289–300.
   Google Scholar
• Bertram, R., & Hyönä, J. (2003). The length of a complex word modifies the role of morphological structure: Evidence from eye movements when reading short and long Finnish compounds. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 615–634. doi: 10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00539-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertram, R., & Hyönä, J. (2012). The role of hyphens at the constituent boundary in compound word identification. Experimental Psychology, 60, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Bisetto, A., & Scalise, S. (2005). The classification of compounds. Lingue e linguaggio, 2, 319–332.
   Google Scholar
• Butterworth, B. (1983). Lexical representation. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production: Vol. 2 (pp. 257–294). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coulson, S., King, J. W., & Kutas, M. (1998). Expect the unexpected: Event-related brain response to morphosyntactic violations. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13, 21–58. doi: 10.1080/016909698386582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Sciullo, A. M., & Williams, E. (1987). On the definition of word (Vol. 14). Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Dressler, W. U. (2006). Compound types. In G. Libben & G. Jarema (Eds.), The representation and processing of compound words (pp. 23–44). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duñabeita, J. A., Laka, I., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2009). Is Milkman a superhero like Batman? Constituent morphological priming in compound words. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21, 615–640. doi: 10.1080/09541440802079835
   Google Scholar
• Duñabeitia, J. A., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2007). The role of the frequency of constituents in compound words: Evidence from Basque and Spanish. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(6), 1171–1176. doi: 10.3758/BF03193108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Yagoubi, R., Chiarelli, V., Mondini, S., Perrone, G., Danieli, M., & Semenza, C. (2008). Neural correlates of Italian nominal compounds and potential impact of headedness effect: An ERP study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25, 559–581. doi: 10.1080/02643290801900941
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorentino, R., & Poeppel, D. (2007). Processing of compound words: An MEG study. Brain and Language, 103, 1819. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2007.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friederici, A. (2004). Event-related brain potential studies in language. Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, 4, 466–470. doi: 10.1007/s11910-004-0070-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Friederici, A. D. (1995). The time-course of syntactic activation during language processing - A model-based on neuropsychological and neurophysiological data. Brain and Language, 50, 259–281. doi: 10.1006/brln.1995.1048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friederici, A. D., Hahne, A., & Mecklinger, A. (1996). Temporal structure of syntactic parsing: Early and late event-related brain potential effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1219–1248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisson, S., Niswander-Klement, E., & Pollatsek, A. (2008). The role of semantic transparency in the processing of English compound words. British Journal of Psychology, 99, 87–107. doi: 10.1348/000712607X181304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L. (2006). Conceptual combination: Implication for the mental lexicon. In G. Libben, G. Jarema (Eds.), The representation and processing of compound words (pp. 145–168). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geisser, S., & Greenhouse, S. (1959). On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika, 24, 95–112. doi: 10.1007/BF02289823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J. (2001). Priming complex words: Evidence for supralexical representation of morphology. Psychonomic Bullettin & Review, 8, 127–131. doi: 10.3758/BF03196148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holle, H., Gunter, T. C., & Koester, D. (2010). The time course of lexical access in morphologically complex words. Neuroreport, 21, 319–23. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328335b3e0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inhoff, A. W., Radach, R., & Heller, D. (2000). Complex compounds in German: Interword spaces facilitate segmentation but hinder assignment of meaning. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 23–50. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1999.2666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarema, G., Busson, C., Nikolova, R., Tsapkini, K., & Libben, G. (1999). Processing compounds: A cross-linguistic study. Brain and Language, 68, 362–369. doi: 10.1006/brln.1999.2088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluender, R., & Kutas, M. (1993). Bridging the gap: Evidence from ERPs on the processing of unbounded dependencies. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5(2), 196–214. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1993.5.2.196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koester, D., Gunter, T. C., & Wagner, S. (2007a). The morphosyntactic decomposition and semantic composition of German compound words investigated by ERPs. Brain and Language, 102, 64–79. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2006.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koester, D., Gunter, T., & Wagner, S. (2007b). The morphosyntactic decomposition and semantic composition of German compound words investigated by ERPs. Brain and Language, 16, 1647–1668.
   Google Scholar
• Koester, D., Gunter, T. C., Wagner, S., & Friederici, a D. (2004). Morphosyntax, prosody, and linking elements: The auditory processing of German nominal compounds. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1647–1668. doi: 10.1162/0898929042568541
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koester, D., Holle, H., & Gunter, T. C. (2009). Electrophysiological evidence for incremental lexical-semantic integration in auditory compound comprehension. Neuropsychologia, 47, 1854–1864. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.02.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krott, A., Baayen, R. H., & Hagoort, P. (2006). The nature of anterior negativities caused by misapplications of morphological rules. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1616–1630. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.10.1616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperman, V., Bertram, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2008). Morphological dynamics in compound processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 1089–1132. doi: 10.1080/01690960802193688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperman, V., Schreuder, R., Bertram, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2009). Reading polymorphemic Dutch compounds: Toward a multiple route model of lexical processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 876–895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Federmeir, K. D. (2000). Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 463–470. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01560-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Event-related brain potentials to semantically inappropriate and surprisingly large words. Biological Psychology, 11, 99–116. doi: 10.1016/0301-0511(80)90046-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, M. A. (2011). ez: Easy analysis and visualization of factorial experiments. R package version 3.0-0. Retrieved December 22, 2011, from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ez
   Google Scholar
• Lemhöfer, K., Koester, D., & Schreuder, R. (2011). When bicycle pump is harder to read than bicycle bell: Effects of parsing cues in first and second language compound reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 364–370. doi: 10.3758/s13423-010-0044-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libben, G. (2006). Why Study Compound Processing? An overview of the issues. In G. Libben & G. Jarema (Eds.), The representation and processing of compound words (pp. 1–22). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Libben, G., Gibson, M., Yoon, Y. B., & Sandra, D. (2003). Compound fracture: The role of semantic transparency and morphological headedness. Brain and Language, 84, 50–64. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00520-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luck, S. J. (2005). Ten simple rules for designing ERP experiments. In T. C. Handy (Ed.), Event-Related potentials: A methods handbook (pp. 17–32). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marelli, M., Crepaldi, D., & Luzzatti, C. (2009). Head position and the mental representation of nominal compounds. A constituent priming in Italian. The Mental Lexicon, 4, 430–454. doi: 10.1075/ml.4.3.05mar
   Google Scholar
• Marelli, M., & Luzzatti, C. (2012). Frequency effects in the processing of Italian nominal compounds: Modulation of headedness and semantic transparency. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 644–664. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polich, J. (2007). Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118, 2128–2148.
   Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. (2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., & New, B. (2004). The broth in my brother's brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1090–1098. doi: 10.3758/BF03196742
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatini, F., & Coletti, V. (2008). Il Sabatini Coletti. Dizionario della Lingua Italiana. Milano: Sansoni.
   Google Scholar
• Scalise, S. (1994). Morfologia. Bologna: Il Mulino.
   Google Scholar
• Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (1995). Modeling morphological processing. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 131–154). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarze, C. (2005). Grammatical and Paragrammatical word formation. Lingue e Linguaggio, 2, 137–162.
   Google Scholar
• Semenza, C., Arcara, G., Facchini, S., Meneghello, F., Ferraro, M., Passarini, L., … Mondini, S. (2011). Reading compounds in neglect dyslexia: The headedness effect. Neuropsychologia, 49, 3116–3120.
   Google Scholar
• Semlitsch, H. V., Anderer, P., Schuster, P., & Presslich, O. (1986). A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiology, 23, 695–703. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1986.tb00696.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1976). Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 607–620. doi: 10.1016/0022-5371(76)90054-2
   Google Scholar
• Vergara-Martínez, M., Duñabeitia, J. A., Laka, I., & Carreiras, M. (2009). ERP correlates of inhibitory and facilitative effects of constituent frequency in compound word reading. Brain Research, 1257, 53–64. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.12.040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar