Electrophysiological evidence for the morpheme-based combinatoric processing of English compounds

REFERENCES

• Andrews, S. (1986). Morphological influences on lexical access: Lexical or nonlexical effects? Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 726–740. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(86)90046-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai, C., Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., Wang, L., Hung, Y.-C., Schlesewsky, M., & Burkhardt, P. (2008). Semantic composition engenders an N400: Evidence from Chinese compounds. Neuroreport, 19, 696–699. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3282fc1eb7
   Google Scholar
• Bien, H., Levelt, W., & Baayen, R. H. (2005). Frequency effects in compound production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 102, 17876–17881. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0508431102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butterworth, B. (1983). Lexical representation. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production: Vol. 2 (pp. 257–294). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, J. (1995). Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 425–455. doi: 10.1080/01690969508407111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clahsen, H. (1999). Lexical entries and rules of language: A multidisciplinary study of German inflection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 991–1060. doi:10.1017/S0140525X99002228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coolen, R., van Jaarsveld, H. J., & Schreuder, R. (1991). The interpretation of isolated novel nominal compounds. Memory and Cognition, 19, 341–352. doi: 10.3758/BF03197138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duñabeitia, J. A., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2007). The role of the frequency of constituents in compound words: Evidence from Basque and Spanish. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 1171–1176. doi: 10.3758/BF03193108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Yagoubi, R., Chiarelli, V., Mondini, S., Perrone, G., Danieli, M., & Semenza, C. (2008). Neural correlates of Italian nominal compounds and potential impact of headedness effect: An ERP study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25, 559–581. doi: 10.1080/02643290801900941
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorentino, R., & Fund-Reznicek, E. (2008). Effects of constituency on the processing of lexicalized and novel compound words. In B. C. Love, K. McRae, & V. M. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 2154). Austin: Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorentino, R., & Fund-Reznicek, E. (2009). Masked morphological priming of compound constituents. The Mental Lexicon, 4, 159–193. doi: 10.1075/ml.4.2.01fio
   Google Scholar
• Fiorentino, R., & Poeppel, D. (2007). Compound words and structure in the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22, 953–1000. doi: 10.1080/01690960701190215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friederici, A. D. (1995). The time course of syntactic activation during language processing: A model based on neuropsychological and neurophysiological data. Brain and Language, 50, 259–281. doi: 10.1006/brln.1995.1048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedrich, M., & Friederici, A. D. (2005). Phonotactic knowledge and lexical–semantic processing in one-year-olds: Brain responses to words and nonsense words in picture contexts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1785–1802. doi: 10.1162/089892905774589172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisson, S., Niswander-Klement, E., & Pollatsek, A. (2008). The role of semantic transparency in the processing of English compound words. British Journal of Psychology, 99, 87–107. doi: 10.1348/000712607X181304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L. (2009). Constituent integration during the processing of compound words: Does it involve the use of relational structures? Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 20–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2008.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holle, H., Gunter, T. C., & Koester, D. (2010). The time course of lexical access in morphologically complex words. Neuroreport, 21, 319–323. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328335b3e0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyönä, J. (2012). The role of visual acuity and segmentation cues in compound word identification. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 188. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isel, F., Gunter, T. C., & Friederici, A. D. (2003). Prosody-assisted head-driven access to spoken German compounds. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 277–288. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.29.2.277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, U., Wiese, R., & Schlesewsky, M. (2006). Electrophysiological responses to violations of morphosyntactic and prosodic features in derived German nouns. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 19, 466–482. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2006.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji, H., Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L. (2011). Benefits and costs of lexical decomposition and semantic integration during the processing of transparent and opaque English compounds. Journal of Memory and Language, 65, 406–430. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia, X., Wang, S., Zhang, B., & Zhang, J. X. (2013). Electrophysiological evidence for relation information activation in Chinese compound word comprehension. Neuropsychologia, 51, 1296–1301. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.03.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juhasz, B. J., Starr, M. S., Inhoff, A. W., & Placke, L. (2003). The effects of morphology on the processing of compound words: Evidence from naming, lexical decisions and eye fixations. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 223–244. doi: 10.1348/000712603321661903
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluender, R., & Kutas, M. (1993). Subjacency as a processing phenomenon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 573–633. doi: 10.1080/01690969308407588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koester, D., Gunter, T. C., & Wagner, S. (2007). The morphosyntactic decomposition and semantic composition of German compound words investigated by ERPs. Brain and Language, 102, 64–79. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2006.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koester, D., Gunter, T. C., Wagner, S., & Friederici, A. D. (2004). Morphosyntax, prosody, and linking elements: The auditory processing of German nominal compounds. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1647–1668. doi: 10.1162/0898929042568541
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koester, D., Holle, H., & Gunter, T. C. (2009). Electrophysiological evidence for incremental lexical-semantic integration in auditory compound comprehension. Neuropsychologia, 47, 1857–1864. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.02.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krott, A., Baayen, R. H., & Hagoort, P. (2006). The nature of anterior negativities caused by misapplications of morphological rules. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1616–1630. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.10.1616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperman, V. (2013). Accentuate the positive: Semantic access in English compounds. Frontiers in Language Sciences, 4, 203, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. (2000). Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 463–470. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01560-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Reviews in Psychology, 62, 621–647. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, E. F., Phillips, C., & Poeppel, D. (2008). A cortical network for semantics: (De)constructing the N400. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9, 920–933. doi: 10.1038/nrn2532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavric, A., Clapp, A., & Rastle, K. (2007). ERP evidence of morphological analysis from orthography: A masked priming study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 866–877. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.5.866
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavric, A., Elchlepp, H., & Rastle, K. (2012). Tracking hierarchical processing in morphological decomposition with brain potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 811–816. doi:10.1037/a0028960 ; 10.1037/a00289 60.supp (Supplemental)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavric, A., Rastle, K., & Clapp, A. (2011). What do fully visible primes and brain potentials reveal about morphological decomposition? Psychophysiology, 48, 676–686. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01125.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libben, G. (2006). Why study compound processing? An overview of the issues. In G. Libben & G. Jarema (Eds.), The representation and processing of compound words (pp. 1–22). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Libben, G., Gibson, M., Yoon, Y. B., & Sandra, D. (2003). Compound fracture: The role of semantic transparency and morphological headedness. Brain and Language, 84, 50–64. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00520-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGregor, L. J., & Shtyrov, Y. (2013). Multiple routes for compound word processing in the brain: Evidence from EEG. Brain and Language, 126, 217–229. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marelli, M., Crepaldi, D., & Luzzatti, C. G. (2009). Head position and the mental representation of Italian nominal compounds. The Mental Lexicon, 4, 430–455. doi: 10.1075/ml.4.3.05mar
   Google Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson, W., & Tyler, L. K. (2007). Morphology, language and the brain: The decompositional substrate for language comprehension. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 362, 823–836. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland, J. L., & Patterson, K. (2002). Rules or connections in past tense inflections: What does the evidence rule out? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 465–472. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01993-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinnon, R., Allen, M., & Osterhout, L. (2003). Morphological decomposition involving non-productive morphemes: ERP evidence. Neuroreport, 14, 883–886. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200305060-00022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medler, D. A., & Binder, J. R. (2005). MCWord: An on-line orthographic database of the english language. http://www.neuro.mcw.edu/mcword/
   Google Scholar
• Morris, J., Frank, T., Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2007). Semantic transparency and masked morphological priming: An ERP investigation. Psychophysiology, 44, 506–521. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00538.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinker, S. (1999). Words and rules: The ingredients of language. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pinker, S., & Ullman, M. T. (2002). The past and future of the past tense. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 456–463. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01990-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollatsek, A., & Hyönä, J. (2005). The role of semantic transparency in the processing of Finnish compound words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 261–290. doi: 10.1080/01690960444000098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratarelli, M. E. (1995). Modulation of semantic processing using word length and complexity: An ERP study. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 19, 233–246. doi: 10.1016/0167-8760(95)00015-K
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2008). Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language & Cognitive Processes, 23, 942–971. doi: 10.1080/01690960802069730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., & New, B. (2004). The broth in my brother's brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, 1090–1098. doi: 10.3758/BF03196742
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi, S., Jürgenson, I. B., Hanulíková, A., Telkemeyer, S., Wartenburger, I. & Obrig, H. (2011). Implicit processing of phonotactic cues: Evidence from electrophysiological and vascular responses. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 1752–1764. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21547
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royle, P., Drury, J. E., Bourguignon, N., & Steinhauer, K. (2012). The temporal dynamics of inflected word recognition: A masked ERP priming study of French verbs. Neuropsychologia, 50, 3542–3553. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.09.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1986). On learning past tenses of English verbs. In D.E. Rumelhart & J.L. McClelland (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Vol 2: Psychological and biological models (pp. 216–271). Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (1995). Modeling morphological processing. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 131–154). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, M. S., & Gonnerman, L. M. (2000). Explaining derivational morphology as the convergence of codes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 353–361. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01515-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semenza, C., & Mondini, S. (2010). Compound words in neuropsychology. Linguistiche Berichte, 17, 331–348.
   Google Scholar
• Shoolman, N., & Andrews, S. (2003). Racehorses, reindeer, and sparrows: Using masked priming to investigate morphological influences on compound word identification. In S. Kinoshita & S. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: The state of the art (pp. 241–278). New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stockall, L., & Marantz, A. (2006). A single-route, full-decomposition model of morphological complexity: MEG evidence. The Mental Lexicon, 1, 85–123. doi: 10.1075/ml.1.1.07sto
   Google Scholar
• Taft, M. (2004). Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 745–765. doi: 10.1080/02724980343000477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1975). Lexical storage and the retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 17–26. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80051-X
   Google Scholar
• Tagliaferri, B. (2005). Paradigm. Perception Research Systems, Inc. www.perceptionresearchsystems.com.
   Google Scholar
• Vergara-Martínez, M., Duñabeitia, J. A., Laka, I., & Carreiras, M. (2009). ERP correlates of inhibitory and facilitative effects of constituent frequency in compound word reading. Brain Research, 1257, 53–64. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.12.040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vos, S. H., Gunter, T. C., Herman, H., Kolk, H. J., & Mulder, G. (2001). Working memory constraints on syntactic processing: An electrophysiological investigation. Psychophysiology, 38, 41–63. doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.3810041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwitserlood, P. (1994). The role of semantic transparency in the processing and representation of Dutch compounds. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 341–368. doi: 10.1080/01690969408402123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar