Prosody in parsing morphologically complex words: Neurophysiological evidence

REFERENCES

• Baayen, R. H., Dijkstra, T., & Schreuder, R. (1997). Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 94–117. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1997.2509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai, C., Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., Wang, L., Hung, Y., Schlesewsky, M., & Burkhardt, P. (2008). Semantic composition engenders an N400: Evidence from Chinese compounds. NeuroReport, 19, 695–699. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3282fc1eb7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai, C., Cai, S., & Schumacher, P. B. (2011). Reversibility in Chinese word formation influences target identification. Neuroscience Letters, 499, 14–18.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, H., & Carreiras, M. (2005). Grammatical gender and number agreement in Spanish: An ERP comparison. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 137–153. doi: 10.1162/0898929052880101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (1992–2003). Praat (4.0.4.3). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Bölte, J., & Coenen, E. (2002). Is phonological information mapped onto semantic information in a one-to-one manner? Brain and Language, 81, 384–397. doi: 10.1006/brln.2001.2532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butterworth, B. (1983). Lexical representation. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production: Development, writing, and other language processes (Vol. 2, pp. 257–294). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, J. (1995). Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 425–455. doi: 10.1080/01690969508407111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A., & Romani, C. (1988). Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition, 28, 297–332. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(88)90017-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, K., Tong, X., Liu, P., McBride-Chang, C., & Meng, X. (2010). The processing of morphological structure information in Chinese coordinative compounds: An event-related potential study. Brain Research, 1352, 157–166. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.06.069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler, A. (1986). Forbear is a homophone: Lexical prosody does not constrain lexical access. Language and Speech, 29, 201–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler, A., Dahan, D., & Van Donselaar, W. (1997). Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: A literature review. Language and Speech, 40, 141–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler, A., & van Donselaar, W. (2001). Voornaam is not (really) a homophone: Lexical prosody and lexical access in Dutch. Language and Speech, 44, 171–195. doi: 10.1177/00238309010440020301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dayan, E., Censor, N., Buch, E. R., Sandrini, M., & Cohen, L. G. (2013). Noninvasive brain stimulation: From physiology to network dynamics and back. Nature Neuroscience, 16, 838–844. doi: 10.1038/nn.3422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delorme, A. & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134, 9–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duñabeitia, J. A., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2007). The role of the frequency of constituents in compound words: Evidence from Basque and Spanish. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 1171–1176. doi: 10.3758/BF03193108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Yagoubi, R., Chiarelli, V., Mondini, S., Perrone, G., Danieli, M., & Semenza, C. (2008). Neural correlates of Italian nominal compounds and potential impact of headedness effect: An ERP study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25, 559–581. doi: 10.1080/02643290801900941
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorentino, R. & Poeppel, D. (2007). Compound words and structure in the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22, 953–1000. doi: 10.1080/01690960701190215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friederici, A. D. (1998). The neurobiology of language processing. In A. D. Friederici (Ed.), Language comprehension: A biological perspective (pp. 263–301). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Friedrich, C. K., Kotz, S., Friederici, A., & Alter, K. (2004). Pitch modulates lexical identification in spoken word recognition: ERP and behavioral evidence. Cognitive Brain Research, 20, 300–308. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.03.007
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1983). A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 55, 468–484. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(83)90135-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grosjean, F., & Gee, J. P. (1987). Prosodic structure and spoken word recognition. Cognition, 25, 135–155. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(87)90007-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunter, T. C., Friederici, A. D., & Schriefers, H. (2000). Syntactic gender and semantic expectancy: ERPs reveal early autonomy and late interaction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 556–568. doi: 10.1162/089892900562336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagoort, P., Brown, C. M., & Osterhout, L. (1999). The neurocognition of syntactic processing. In C. M. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), The neurocognition of language (pp. 273–316). Oxford: Oxford university press.
   Google Scholar
• Holle, H., Gunter, T. C., & Koester, D. (2010). The time course of lexical access in morphologically complex words. Neuroreport, 21, 319–323. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328335b3e0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isel, F., Gunter, T. C., & Friederici, A. D. (2003). Prosody-assisted head-driven access to spoken German compounds. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 29, 277–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, N., Bi, Y., & Caramazza, A. (2008). A tale of two frequencies: Determining the speed of lexical access for Mandarin Chinese and English compounds. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 1191–1223. doi: 10.1080/01690960802250900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarema, G., Perlak, D., & Semenza, C. (2010). The processing of compounds in bilingual aphasia: A multiple-case study. Aphasiology, 24, 126–140. doi: 10.1080/02687030902958225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemps, R., Wurm, L. H., Ernestus, M., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, H. (2005). Prosodic cues for morphological complexity in Dutch and English. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 43–73. doi: 10.1080/01690960444000223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjelgaard, M. M., & Speer, S. R. (1999). Prosodic facilitation and interference in the resolution of temporary syntactic closure ambiguity. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 153–194. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1998.2620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koester, D., Gunter, T. C., & Wagner, S. (2007). The morphosyntactic decomposition and semantic composition of German compound words investigated by ERPs. Brain and Language, 102, 64–79. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2006.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koester, D., Gunter, T. C., Wagner, S., & Friederici, A. D. (2004). Morphosyntax, prosody, and linking elements: The auditory processing of German nominal compounds. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1647–1668. doi: 10.1162/0898929042568541
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koester, D., Holle, H., & Gunter, T. C. (2009). Electrophysiological evidence for incremental lexical-semantic integration in auditory compound comprehension. Neuropsychologia, 47, 1854–1864. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.02.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperman, V., Bertram, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2008). Morphological dynamics in compound processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 1089–1132. doi: 10.1080/01690960802193688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperman, V., Schreuder, R., Bertram, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2008). Reading polymorphemic Dutch compounds: Toward a multiple route model of lexical processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 876–895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange, J. J., Wijers, A. A., Mulder, L. J. M., & Mulder, G. (1999). ERP effects of spatial attention and display search with unilateral and bilateral stimulus displays. Biological Psychology, 50, 203–233. doi: 10.1016/S0301-0511(99)00009-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libben, G. (2006). Why study compound processing? An overview of the issues. In G. Libben & G. Jarema (Eds.), The representation and processing of compound words (pp. 1–11). Oxford: Oxford university press.
   Google Scholar
• Libben, G., Derwing, B. L., & de Almeida, R. G. (1999). Ambiguous novel compounds and models of morphological parsing. Brain and Language, 68, 378–386. doi: 10.1006/brln.1999.2093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindfield, K. C., Wingfield, A., & Goodglass, H. (1999). The role of prosody in the mental lexicon. Brain and Language, 68, 312–317. doi: 10.1006/brln.1999.2094
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynott, D., & Connell, L. (2010). The effect of prosody on conceptual combination. Cognitive Science, 34, 1107–1123. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01119.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGregor, L. J., & Shtyrov, Y. (2013). Multiple routes for compound word processing in the brain: Evidence from EEG. Brain & Language, 126, 217–229. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marelli, M., Aggujaro, S., Molteni, F., & Luzzatti, C. (2012). The multiple-lemma representation of Italian compound nouns: A single case study of deep dyslexia. Neuropsychologia, 50, 852–861. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.01.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marelli, M., & Luzzatti, C. (2012). Frequency effects in the processing of Italian nominal compounds: Modulation of headedness and semantic transparency. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 644–664. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinnon, R., Allen, M., & Osterhout, L. (2003). Morphological decomposition involving non-productive morphemes: ERP evidence. Neuroreport, 14, 883–886. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200305060-00022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQueen, J. M., Cutler, A., & Norris, D. (2003). Flow of information in the spoken word recognition system. Speech Communication, 41, 257–270. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6393(02)00108-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondini, S., Luzzatti, C., Zonca, G., Pistarini, C., & Semenza, C. (2004). The mental representation of verb–noun compounds in Italian: Evidence from a multiple single-case study in aphasia. Brain and Language, 90, 470–477. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00458-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nübling, D., & Szczepaniak, R. (2011). On the way from morphology to phonology: German linking elements and the role of the phonological word. Morphology, 18, 1–25. doi: 10.1007/s11525-008-9120-7
   Google Scholar
• Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oostenveld, R., & Praamstra, P. (2001). The five percent electrode system for high-resolution EEG and ERP measurements. Clinical Neurophysiology, 112, 713–719. doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(00)00527-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. J. (1992). Event-related potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 785–806. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(92)90039-Z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paap, K. R., Newsome, S. L., McDonald, J. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1982). An activation–verification model for letter and word recognition: The word-superiority effect. Psychological Review, 89, 573–594. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.89.5.573
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollatsek, A., Hyönä, J., & Bertram, R. (2000). The role of morphological constituents in reading Finnish compound words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 820–833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratarelli, M. E. (1995). Modulation of semantic processing using word length and complexity: An ERP study. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 19, 233–246. doi: 10.1016/0167-8760(95)00015-K
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quasthoff, U. (2002). Deutscher Wortschatz im Internet [Online database]. Leipzig: University of Leipzig. Retrieved from http://www.wortschatz.uni-leizpig.de/.
   Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. (2005). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Regel, S., Gunter, T. C., & Friederici, A. D. (2011). Isn't it ironic? An electrophysiological exploration of figurative language processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 277–293. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Fornells, A., Clahsen, H., Lleo, C., Zaake, W., & Münte, T. F. (2001). Event-related brain responses to morphological violations in Catalan. Cognitive Brain Research, 11, 47–58. doi: 10.1016/S0926-6410(00)00063-X
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salverda, A. P., Dahan, D., & McQueen, J. M. (2003). The role of prosodic boundaries in the resolution of lexical embedding in speech comprehension. Cognition, 90, 51–89. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00139-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandra, D. (1990). On the representation and processing of compound words: Automatic access to constituent morphemes does not occur. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42A, 529–567. doi: 10.1080/14640749008401236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiller, N. O., Horemans, I., Ganushchak, L., & Koester, D. (2009). Event-related brain potentials during the monitoring of speech errors. Neuroimage, 44, 520–530. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schirmer, A., Kotz, S., & Friederici, A. D. (2002). Sex differentiates the role of emotional prosody during word processing. Cognitive Brain Research, 14, 228–233. doi: 10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00108-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schreuder, R., Neijt, A., Van der Weide, F., & Baayen, R. H. (1998). Regular plurals in Dutch compounds: Linking graphemes or morphemes? Language and Cognitive Processes, 13, 551–573. doi: 10.1080/016909698386438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semenza, C., De Pellegrin, S., Battel, I., Garzon, M., Meneghello, F., & Chiarelli, V. (2011). Compounds in different aphasia categories: A study on picture naming. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 33, 1099–1107.
   Google Scholar
• Semenza, C., & Mondini, S. (2006). The neuropsychology of compound words. In G. Libben & G. Jarema (Eds.), The representation and processing of compound words (pp. 71–95). Oxford: Oxford university press.
   Google Scholar
• Soto-Faraco, S., Sebastián-Gallés, N., & Cutler, A. (2001). Segmental and suprasegmental mismatch in lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 412–432. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2000.2783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taft, M. (2004). Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 745–765. doi: 10.1080/02724980343000477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1976). lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 15, 607–620. doi: 10.1016/0022-5371(76)90054-2
   Google Scholar
• Vergara-Martínez, M., Duñabeitia, J. A., Laka, I., & Carreiras, M. (2009). ERP correlates of inhibitory and facilitative effects of constituent frequency in compound word reading. Brain Research, 1257, 53–64. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.12.040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, I., & Raimy, E. (2002). The acquisition of compound vs. phrasal stress: The role of prosodic constituents. Journal of Child Language, 29, 225–250. doi: 10.1017/S0305000902005020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vroomen, J., & de Gelder, B. (1997). Activation of embedded words in spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 710–720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weyerts, H., Penke, M., Dohrn, U., Clahsen, H., & Münte, T. F. (1997). Brain potentials indicate differences between regular and irregular German plurals. NeuroReport, 8, 957–962. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199703030-00028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, X., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (1995). Morphological structure in the Chinese mental lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 545–600. doi: 10.1080/01690969508407114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwitserlood, P. (1994). The role of semantic transparency in the processing and representation of Dutch compounds. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 341–368. doi: 10.1080/01690969408402123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar