The representation of compound headedness in the mental lexicon: A picture naming study in aphasia

REFERENCES

• Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data. A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Badecker, W. (2001). Lexical composition and the production of compounds: Evidence from errors in naming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16, 337–366. doi: 10.1080/01690960042000120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bien, H., Levelt, W., & Baayen, R. (2005). Frequency effects in compound production. PNAS, 102, 17876–17881. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0508431102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Mauro, T., Mancini, F., Vedovelli, M., & Voghera, M. (1993). Lessico di frequenza dell'italiano parlato. Milano: Etaslibri.
   Google Scholar
• Di Sciullo, M., & Williams, E. (1987). On the definition of word. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunabeitia, J. A., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2007). The role of the frequency of constituents in compound words: Evidence from Basque and Spanish. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(6), 1171–1176. doi: 10.3758/BF03193108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Yagoubi, R., Chiarelli, V., Mondini, S., Perrone, G., Danieli, M., & Semenza, C. (2008). Neural correlates of Italian nominal compounds and potential impact of headedness effect: An ERP study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25, 559–581. doi: 10.1080/02643290801900941
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisson, S., Niswander-Klement, E., & Pollatsek, A. (2008). The role of semantic transparency in the processing of English compound words. British Journal of Psychology, 99, 87–107. doi: 10.1348/000712607X181304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L. (2007). Conceptual combination: Implications for the mental lexicon. In G. Libben & G. Jarema (Eds.), The representation and processing of compound words (pp. 145–169). Oxford: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L. (2009). Constituent integration during the processing of compound words: Does it involve the use of relational structures? Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 20–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2008.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, R. (2007). Compounding in Aphasia: A cross-linguistic review (BA Thesis). Swarthmore College, Department of Linguistics, Swartmore, PA. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10066/10186
   Google Scholar
• Guevara, E., & Scalise, S. (2008, February). Heads in compounding: Variation and patterns. 13th international morphology meeting – Book of Abstracts, Vienna, Austria, p. 43.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, W., Poeck, K., Weniger, D., & Willmes, K. (1983). Der Aachener Aphasie Test (AAT). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Hyönä, J., & Pollatsek, A. (1998). Reading Finnish compound words: Eye fixations are affected by component morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1612–1627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 434–446. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, N., Bi, Y., & Caramazza, A. (2008). A tale of two frequencies: Determining the speed of lexical access for Mandarin Chinese and English compounds. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 1191–1223. doi: 10.1080/01690960802250900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarema, G., Busson, C., Nikolova, R., Tsapkini, K., & Libben, G. (1999). Processing compounds: A cross-linguistic study. Brain and Language, 68, 362–369. doi: 10.1006/brln.1999.2088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarema, G., Perlak, D., & Semenza, C. (2009). The processing of compounds in bilingual aphasia. Aphasiology, 24, 126–140. doi: 10.1080/02687030902958225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraemer, H. C., & Blasey, C. M. (2004). Centring in regression analyses: A strategy to prevent errors in statistical inference. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 13, 141–151.
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–38; discussion 38–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libben, G., Gibson, M., Yoon, Y. B., & Sandra, D. (2003). Compound fracture: The role of semantic transparency and morphological headedness. Brain and Language, 84, 50–64. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00520-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luzzatti, C., Willmes, K., & De Bleser, R. (1996). Aachener Aphasie Test: versione italiana (2nd ed.). Firenze: Organizzazioni Speciali.
   Google Scholar
• Lynott, D., & Ramscar, M. J. A. (2001, September). Can we model conceptual combination using distributional measures? Twelfth Irish Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science, Maynooth, Ireland, pp. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Marelli, M., Aggujaro, S., Molteni, F., & Luzzatti, C. (2012). The multiple-lemma representation of Italian compound nouns: A single case study of deep dyslexia. Neuropsychologia, 50, 852–861. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.01.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marelli, M., Aggujaro, S., Molteni, F., & Luzzatti, C. (2013). Understanding the mental lexicon through neglect dyslexia: A study on compound noun reading. Neurocase, 19, 128–144. doi: 10.1080/13554794.2011.654222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marelli, M., Crepaldi, D., & Luzzatti, C. (2009). Head position and the mental representation of nominal compounds: A constituent priming study in Italian. The Mental Lexicon, 4, 430–454. doi: 10.1075/ml.4.3.05mar
   Google Scholar
• Marelli, M., & Luzzatti, C. (2012). Frequency effects in the processing of Italian nominal compounds: Modulation of headedness and semantic transparency. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 644–664. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondini, S., Jarema, G., Luzzatti, C., Burani, C., & Semenza, C. (2002). Why is “Red Cross” different from “Yellow Cross”? A neuropsychological study of noun–adjective agreement within Italian compounds. Brain and Language, 81, 621–634. doi: 10.1006/brln.2001.2552
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondini, S., Luzzatti, C., Zonca, G., Pistarini, C., & Semenza, C. (2004). The mental representation of Verb-Noun compounds in Italian: Evidence from a multiple single-case study in aphasia. Brain and Language, 90, 470–477. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00458-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semenza, C., Arcara, G., Facchini, S., Meneghello, F., Ferraro, M., Passarini, L., … Mondini, S. (2011). Reading compounds in neglect dyslexia: The headedness effect. Neuropychologia, 49, 3116–3120. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.07.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semenza, C., De Pellegrin, S., Battel, I., Garzon, M., Meneghello, F., & Chiarelli, V. (2011). Compounds in different aphasia categories: A study on picture naming. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 33, 1099–1107.
   Google Scholar
• Semenza, C., Luzzatti, C., & Carabelli, S. (1997). Morphological representation of compound nouns: A study on Italian aphasic patients. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 10, 33–43. doi: 10.1016/S0911-6044(96)00019-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semenza, C., & Mondini, S. (2006). Neuropsychology of compound words. In G. Libben & G. Jarema (Eds.), The representation and processing of compound words (pp. 71–95). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1976). Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 607–620. doi: 10.1016/0022-5371(76)90054-2
   Google Scholar
• Williams, E. (1981). On the notions “lexically related”, and “head of a word”. Linguistic Inquiry, 12, 245–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwitserlood, P. (1994). The role of semantic transparency in the processing and representation of Dutch compounds. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 341–368. doi: 10.1080/01690969408402123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar