Processing of nominal compounds and gender-marked determiners in aphasia: Evidence from German

REFERENCES

• Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Wurm, L. H., & Aycock, J. (2007). Lexical dynamics for low-frequency complex words: A regression study across tasks and modalities. The Mental Lexicon, 2, 419–463.
   Google Scholar
• Badecker, W. (2001). Lexical composition and the production of compounds: Evidence from errors in naming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16, 337–366. doi: 10.1080/01690960042000120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badecker, W., Miozzo, M., & Zanuttini, R. (1995). The two-stage model of lexical retrieval: Evidence from a case of anomia with selective preservation of grammatical gender. Cognition, 57, 193–216. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(95)00663-J
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bi, Y., Han, Z., & Shu, H. (2007). Compound frequency effect in word production: Evidence from anomia. Brain and Language, 103, 55–56. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2007.07.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bien, H., Levelt, W. J. M., & Baayen, R. H. (2005). Frequency effects in compound production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 17876–17881. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0508431102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biran, M., & Friedmann, N. (2012). The representation of lexical-syntactic information: Evidence from syntactic and lexical retrieval impairments in aphasia. Cortex, 48, 1103–1127. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.05.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanken, G. (2000). The production of nominal compounds in aphasia. Brain and Language, 74, 84–102. doi: 10.1006/brln.2000.2338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bölte, J., Dohmes, P., & Zwitserlood, P. (2012). Interference and facilitation in spoken word production: Effects of morphologically and semantically related context stimuli on picture naming. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1, 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Burchert, F., Lorenz, A., Schröder, A., De Bleser, R., & Stadie, N. (2011). Sätze Verstehen: Neurolinguistische Materialien für die Untersuchung von syntaktischen Störungen beim Satzverständnis. Hofheim: NAT-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Butterworth, B. (1983). Lexical representation. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production: Vol. 2., Development, writing and other language processes (pp. 257–294). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A. (1997). How many levels of processing are there in lexical access? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 177–208. doi: 10.1080/026432997381664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A., Costa, A., Miozzo, M., & Bi, Y. (2001). The specific-word frequency effect: Implications for the representations of homophones in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1430–1450.
   Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A., & Miozzo, M. (1997). The relation between syntactic and phonological knowledge in lexical access: Evidence from the tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon. Cognition, 64, 309–343. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(97)00031-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A., & Miozzo, M. (1998). More is not always better: A response to Roelofs, Meyer, and Levelt. Cognition, 69, 231–241. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00057-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, T. M., & Chen, J. Y. (2006). Morphological encoding in the production of compound words in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 491–514. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2005.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chialant, D., & Caramazza, A. (1995). Where is morphology and how is it processed? The case of written word recognition. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 55–76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chiarelli, V., Menichelli, A., & Semenza, C. (2007). Naming compounds in Alzheimer's disease. The Mental Lexicon, 2, 261–272. doi: 10.1075/ml.2.2.07chi
   Google Scholar
• Cholewa, J., & De Bleser, R. (1996). Further neurolinguistic evidence for morphological fractionation within the lexical system. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 9, 95–111. doi: 10.1016/0911-6044(96)00002-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bleser, R., Cholewa, J., Stadie, N., & Tabatabaie, S. (1997). LeMo, an expert system for single case asessment of word processing impairments in aphasic patients. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 7, 339–365. doi: 10.1080/713755540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bleser, R., Cholewa, J., Stadie, N., & Tabatabaie, S. (2004). Lemo—Lexikon modell-orientiert, Einzelfalldiagnostik bei Aphasie, Dyslexie und Dysgraphie. München/Jena: Urban & Fischer.
   Google Scholar
• Delazer, M., & Semenza, C. (1998). The processing of compound words: A study in aphasia. Brain and Language, 61, 54–62. doi: 10.1006/brln.1997.1878
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Saffran, E. M., & Gagnon, D. A. (1997). Lexical access in aphasic and non-aphasic speakers. Psychological Review, 104, 801–838. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.104.4.801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dohmes, P., Zwitserlood, P., & Bölte, J. (2004). The impact of semantic transparency of morphologically complex words on picture naming. Brain and Language, 90, 203–212. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00433-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorentino, R., & Poeppel, D. (2007). Compound words and structure in the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22, 953–1000. doi: 10.1080/01690960701190215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friederici, A. D., & Jacobsen, T. (1999). Processing grammatical gender during language comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 467–484. doi: 10.1023/A:1023264209610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisson, S., Niswander-Klement, E., & Pollatsek, A. (2008). The role of semantic transparency in the processing of English compound words. British Journal of Psychology, 99, 87–107. doi: 10.1348/000712607X181304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funnell, E. (1987). Morphological errors in acquired dyslexia: A case of mistaken identity. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39, 497–539. doi: 10.1080/14640748708401801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glindemann, R., Klintwort, D., Ziegler, W., & Goldenberg, G. (2002). Bogenhausener Semantik-Untersuchung. München/Jena: Urban & Fischer.
   Google Scholar
• Goldrick, M., & Rapp, B. (2002). A restricted interaction account (RIA) of spoken word production: The best of both worlds. Aphasiology, 16, 20–55. doi: 10.1080/02687040143000203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gumnior, H., Bölte, J., & Zwitserlood, P. (2006). A chatterbox is a box: Morphology in German word production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 920–944. doi: 10.1080/016909600824278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havik, E., & Bastiaanse, R. (2004). Omission and substitution of definite and indefinite articles in the spontaneous speech of agrammatic speakers with Broca's aphasia. Aphasiology, 18, 1093–1102. doi: 10.1080/02687030444000543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heister, J., Würzner, K.-M., Bubenzer, J., Pohl, E., Hannefort, T., Geyken, A., & Kliegl, R. (2011). dlex-DB- Eine lexikalische Datenbank für die psychologische und linguistische Forschung. Psychologische Rundschau, 62, 10–20. doi: 10.1026/0033-3042/a000029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hittmair-Delazer, M., Andree, B., Semenza, C., De Bleser, R., & Benke, T. (1994). Naming by German compounds. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 8, 27–41. doi: 10.1016/0911-6044(94)90004-3
   Google Scholar
• Huber, W., Poeck, K., Weniger, D., & Willmes, K. (1983). Der Aachener Aphasie Test (AAT). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Indefrey, P., & Levelt, W. J. (2004). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognitition, 92, 101–144. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2002.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 434–446. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, N., Bi, Y., & Caramazza, A. (2008). A tale of two frequencies: Determining the speed of lexical access for English and Mandarin Chinese compounds. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 1191–1223. doi: 10.1080/01690960802250900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, N., & Caramazza, A. (2003). The selection of closed-class words in noun phrase production: The case of Dutch determiners. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 635–652. doi: 10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00531-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jescheniak, J., & Levelt, W. (1994). Word frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 824–843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jescheniak, J. D., Schriefers, H., & Lemhöfer, K. (2012). Selection of freestanding and bound gender-marking morphemes in speech production: A review. Language and Cognitive Processes, 1, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Ji, H., Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L. (2011). Benefits and costs of lexical decomposition and semantic integration during the processing of transparent and opaque English compounds. Journal of Memory and Language, 65, 406–430.
   Google Scholar
• Juhasz, B. (2007). The influence of semantic transparency on eye movements during English compound word recognition. In R. van Gompel, M. Fischer, W. Murray, & R. Hill (Eds.), Eye movements: A window on mind and brain. (pp. 373–389). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Köpcke, K.-M., & Zubin, D. (1984). Sechs Prinzipien für die Genuszuweisung im Deutschen: Ein Beitrag zur natürlichen Klassifikation (“Six principles for gender assignment in German: A contribution for natural classification”). Linguistische Berichte, 93, 26–50.
   Google Scholar
• Köster, D., Gunter, T. C., Wagner, S. S., & Friederici, A. D. (2004). Morphosyntax, prosody, and linking elements: The auditory processing of German nominal compounds. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1647–1668. doi: 10.1162/0898929042568541
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Heij, W., Mak, P., Sander, J., & Willeboordse, E. (1998). The gender-congruency effect in picture-word tasks. Psychological Research, 61, 209–219. doi: 10.1007/s004260050026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemhöfer, K., Spalek, K., & Schriefers, H. (2008). Cross-language effects of grammatical gender in bilingual word recognition and production. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 312–330. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2008.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking—From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, W., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libben, G. (1998). Semantic transparency and processing of compounds: Consequences for representation, processing, and impairment. Brain and Language, 61, 30–44. doi: 10.1006/brln.1997.1876
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libben, G., Gibson, M., Yoon, Y., & Sandra, D. (2003). Compound fracture: The role of semantic transparency and morphological headedness. Brain and Language, 84, 50–64. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00520-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenz, A., Heide, J., & Burchert, F. (2014). Compound naming in aphasia: Effects of complexity, part of speech, and semantic transparencyj. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29, 88–106.
   Google Scholar
• Lüttmann, H., Bölte, J., Böhl, A., & Zwitserlood, P. (2011). Evidence for morphological composition at the form level of speech production. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23, 818–836. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2011.575774
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luzzatti, C., & De Bleser, R. (1996). Morphological processing in Italian agrammatic speakers: Eight experiments in lexical morphology. Brain and Language, 54, 26–74. doi: 10.1006/brln.1996.0060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahon, B. Z., Costa, A., Peterson, R., Vargas, K. A., & Caramazza, A. (2007). Lexical selection is not by competition: A reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 503–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marelli, M., Aggujaro, S., Molteni, F., & Luzzatti, C. (2012). The multiple-lemma representation of Italian compound nouns: A single case study of deep dyslexia. Neuropsychologia, 50, 852–861. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.01.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marelli, M., Aggujaro, S., Molteni, F., & Luzzatti, C. (2013). Understanding the mental lexicon through neglect dyslexia: A study on compound noun reading. Neurocase, 19, 128–144. doi: 10.1080/13554794.2011.654222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marelli, M., & Luzzatti, C. (2012). Frequency effects in the processing of Italian nominal compounds: Modulation of headedness and semantic transparency. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 644–664. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meunier, F., Seigneuric, A., & Spinelli, E. (2008). The morpheme gender effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 88–99. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miceli, G., Silveri, M. C., Romani, C., & Caramazza, A. (1989). Variation in the pattern of omissions and substitutions of grammatical morphemes in the spontaneous speech of so-called agrammatic patients. Brain and Language, 36, 447–494. doi: 10.1016/0093-934X(89)90079-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (1999). The selection of determiners in noun phrase production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 388–391.
   Google Scholar
• Mondini, S., Luzzatti, C., Zonca, G., Pistarini, C., & Semenza, C. (2004). The mental representation of verb-noun compounds in Italian: Evidence from a multiple single-case study in aphasia. Brain and Language, 90, 470–477. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00458-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarrete, E., Basagni, B., Alario, F.-X., & Costa, A. (2006). Does word frequency affect lexical selection in speech production? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1681–1690.
   Google Scholar
• Pollatsek, A., & Hyönä, J. (2005). The role of semantic transparency in the processing of Finnish compound words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 261–290. doi: 10.1080/01690960444000098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, B., & Caramazza, A. (2002). Selective difficulties with spoken nouns and written verbs: A single case study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 15, 373–402. doi: 10.1016/S0911-6044(01)00040-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (1992). A spreading activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition, 42, 107–142. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(92)90041-F
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (1996). Morpheme frequency in speech production: Testing WEAVER. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology (pp. 135–154). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer, Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A., & Baayen, H. (2002). Morphology by itself in planning the production of spoken words. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 132–138. doi: 10.3758/BF03196269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1998). A case for the lemma-lexeme distinction in models of speaking: Comment on Caramazza and Miozzo (1997). Cognition, 69, 219–230. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00056-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruigendijk, E., & Bastiaanse, R. (2002). Two characteristics of agrammatic speech: Omission of verbs and omission of determiners: Is there a relation?. Aphasiology, 16, 383–395. doi: 10.1080/02687030244000310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruigendijk, E., & Friedmann, N. (2008). On the relation between structural case, determiners, and verbs in agrammatism: A study of Hebrew and Dutch. Aphasiology, 22, 948–967. doi: 10.1080/02687030701831482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandra, D. (1990). On the representation and processing of compound words: Automatic access to constituent does not occur. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42A, 529–567.
   Google Scholar
• Scarnà, A., & Ellis, A. W. (2002). On the assessment of grammatical gender knowledge in aphasia: The danger of relying on explicit metalinguistic tasks. Language and Cognitive Processes, 17, 185–201. doi: 10.1080/0169096014300038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiller, N. O., & Caramazza, A. (2003). Grammatical feature selection in noun phrase production: Evidence from German and Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 169–194. doi: 10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00508-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiller, N. O., & Caramazza, A. (2006). Grammatical gender selection and the representation of morphemes: The production of Dutch diminutives. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 945–973. doi: 10.1080/01690960600824344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreuder, R., & Baayen, H. (1995). Modeling morphological processing. In L. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing. (pp. 131–154). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Schriefers, H. (1993). Syntactic processes in the production of noun phrases. Journal of Experimental Psychology—Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 841–850. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.19.4.841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schriefers, H., & Jescheniak, J. D. (1999). Representation and processing of grammatical gender in language production: A review. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 575–600. doi: 10.1023/A:1023264810403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schriefers, H., Jescheniak, J. D., & Hantsch, A. (2002). Determiner selection in noun phrase production. Journal of Experimental Psychology - Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 941–950. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.28.5.941
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schriefers, H., & Teruel, E. (2000). Grammatical gender in noun phrase production: The gender interference effect in German. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 86–102.
   Google Scholar
• Semenza, C., De Pellegrin, S., Battel, I., Garzon, M., Meneghello, F., & Chiarelli, V. (2011). Compounds in different aphasia categories: A study on picture naming. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neurosychology, 33, 1099–1107. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2011.603691
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semenza, C., Luzzatti, C., & Carabelli, S. (1997). Morphological representation of nouns: A study on Italian aphasic patients. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 10, 33–43. doi: 10.1016/S0911-6044(96)00019-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyboth, M., Blanken, G., Ehmann, D., Schwarz, F., & Bormann, T. (2011). Selective impairment of masculine gender processing: Evidence from a German aphasic. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 28, 564–588. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2012.687714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spalek, K., Bock, K., & Schriefers, H. (2010). A purple giraffe is faster than a purple elephant: Inconsistent phonology affects determiner selection in English. Cognition, 114, 123–128. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.09.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spalek, K., & Schriefers, H. J. (2005). Dominance affects determiner selection in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 103–119. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2004.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprenger, S. A., Levelt, W. J. M., & Kempen, G. (2006). Lexical access during the production of idiomatic phrases. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 161–184. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2005.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taft, M. (2003). Morphological representation as a correlation between form and meaning. In E. Assink & D. Sandra (Eds.), Reading complex words (pp. 113–137). Amsterdam: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Taft, M. (2004). Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 745–765.
   Google Scholar
• Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1976). Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 607–620. doi: 10.1016/0022-5371(76)90054-2
   Google Scholar
• van Turennout, M., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (1998). Brain activity during speaking: From syntax to phonology in 40 milliseconds. Science, 280, 572–574. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5363.572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, E. (1981). On the notions “lexically related” and “head of word”. Linguistic Inquiry, 12, 245–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zubin, D. A., & Köpcke, K.-M. (2009). Gender control: Lexical or conceptual?. In P.O. Steinkrüger & M. Krifka. (Eds.), On inflection (pp. 237–262). Berlin, New York: Mouton De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Zwitserlood, P. (1994). The role of semantic transparency in the processing and representation of Dutch compounds. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 341–368. doi: 10.1080/01690969408402123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar