Semantic interference in a randomized naming task: Effects of age, order, and category

REFERENCES

• Abdel Rahman, R., & Melinger, A. (2009a). Semantic context effects in language production: A swinging lexical network proposal and a review. Language & Cognitive Processes, 24, 713–734. doi: 10.1080/01690960802597250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alario, F.-X., & Moscoso del Prado Martin, F. (2010). On the origin of the “cumulative semantic inhibition” effect. Memory & Cognition, 38(1), 57–66. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.1.57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Au, R., Joung, P., Nicholas, M., Obler, L. K., Kaas, R., & Albert, M. L. (1995). Naming ability across the adult life span. Aging & Cognition, 2(4), 300–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W. (1983). Ad hoc categories. Memory & Cognition, 11, 211–227. doi: 10.3758/BF03196968
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., & Bolker, B. (2011). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 2.14.1. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
   Google Scholar
• Belke, E., & Meyer, A. S. (2007). Single and multiple object naming in healthy ageing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(8), 1178–1211. doi: 10.1080/01690960701461541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belke, E., Meyer, A. S., & Damian, M. F. (2005). Refractory effects in picture naming as assessed in a semantic blocking paradigm. Quarterly Journal of experimental Psychology Section A – Human Experimental Psychology, 58(4), 667–692. doi: 10.1080/02724980443000142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belke, E., & Stielow, A. (2013). Cumulative and non-cumulative semantic interference in object naming: Evidence from blocked and continuous manipulations of semantic context. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(11), 2135–2160. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.775318.
   Google Scholar
• Biegler, K. Al., Crowther, J. E., & Martin, R. C. (2008). Consequences of an inhibition deficit for word production and comprehension: Evidence from the semantic blocking paradigm. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25(4), 493–527. doi: 10.1080/02643290701862316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A. S. (1981). Inhibition in cued retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 7, 204–215.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, D., MacKay, D. G., Worthley, J., & Wade, E. (1991). On the tip of the tongue: What causes word finding failures in young and older adults? Journal of Memory & Language, 30, 542–579. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(91)90026-G
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, D. M., & Shafto, M. A. (2004). Aging and language production. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(1), 21–24. doi: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01301006.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connor, L. T., Spiro, A., Obler, L. K., & Albert, M. L. (2004). Change in object naming ability during adulthood. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 59B(5), P203–P209. doi: 10.1093/geronb/59.5.P203
   Google Scholar
• Cooper Cutting, J. C., & Ferreira, V. S. (1999). Semantic and phonological information flow in the production lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory & Cognition, 25, 318–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlgren, D. J. (1998). Impact of knowledge and age on tip-of-the-tongue rates. Experimental Aging Research, 24, 139–197. doi: 10.1080/036107398244283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damian, M. F., & Als, L. C. (2005). Long-lasting semantic context effects in the spoken production of object names. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 31, 1372–1384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damian, M. F., & Bowers, J. S. (2003). Locus of semantic interference in picture–word interference tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 111–117. doi: 10.3758/BF03196474
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damian, M. F., Vigliocco, G., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2001). Effects of semantic context in the naming of pictures and words. Cognition, 81, B77–B86. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00135-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Saffran, E. M., & Gagnon, D. A. (1997). Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. Psychological Review, 104(4), 801–838. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.104.4.801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druks, J., & Masterson, J. (2000). An Object & Action Naming Battery. Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Evrard, M. (2002). Ageing and lexical access to common and proper names in picture naming. Brain & Language, 81, 174–179. doi: 10.1006/brln.2001.2515
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkbeiner, M., & Caramazza, A. (2006). Now you see it, now you don't: On turning semantic interference into facilitation in a Stroop-like task. Cortex, 42, 790–796. doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70419-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, W. N., & Kuçera, H. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, W. R., & Dungelhoff, F.-J. (1984). The time course of picture-word interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10, 640–654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, J. K. (2002). Phonological neighborhood effects in aphasic speech errors: Spontaneous and structured contexts. Brain and Language, 82, 113–145. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00001-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, J. K., (2012). Influences of age-related language change on speaker perceptions. Academy of Aphasia 2012. Procedia: Social & Behavioral Sciences, 61, 240–241.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, J. K., & Kindred, N. K. (2011). Word retrieval in ageing: An exploration of the task constraint hypothesis. Aphasiology, 25(6–7), 774–788. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2010.539699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, J. K., & Kurczek, J. (2013). The aging neighborhood: Phonological density in naming. Language & Cognitive Processes. Advance online publication. Retrieved from http://dx:doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2013.837495
   Google Scholar
• Howard, D., Nickels, L., Coltheart, M., & Cole-Virtue, J. (2006). Cumulative semantic inhibition in picture naming: Experimental and computational studies. Cognition, 100, 464–482. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.02.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao, E. Y., Schwartz, M. F., Schnur, T. T., & Dell, G. S. (2009). Temporal characteristics of semantic perseverations induced by blocked-cyclic picture naming. Brain & Language, 108, 133–244. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2008.11.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juncos-Rabadan, O., Facal, D., Rodriguez, M. S., & Pereiro, A. X. (2010). Lexical knowledge and lexical retrieval in aging: Insights from a tip-of-the-tongue study. Language & Cognitive Processes, 25(10), 1301–1334. doi: 10.1080/01690961003589484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H., & Weintraub, B. (2001). The Boston Naming Test-revised. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger.
   Google Scholar
• Kavé, G., Knafo, A., & Gilboa, A. (2010). The rise and fall of word retrieval across the lifespan. Psychology & Aging, 25(3), 719–724. doi: 10.1037/a0018927
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll, J. F., & Stewart, E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory & Language, 33, 149–174. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1994.1008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaGrone, S., & Spieler, D. H. (2006). Lexical competition and encoding in young and older speakers. Psychology & Aging, 21(4), 804–809. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.21.4.804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver, G. D., & Burke, D. M. (1993). Why do semantic priming effects increase in old age? A meta-analysis. Psychology & Aging, 8(1), 34–43. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.8.1.34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahon, B. Z., Costa, A., Peterson, R., Vargas, K. A., & Caramazza, A. (2007). Lexical selection is not by competition: A reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 33, 503–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, R. A., & Kartsounis, L. D. (2000). Wobbly words: Refractory anomia with preserved semantics. Neurocase, 6, 487–497. doi: 10.1080/13554790008402719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (2003). When more is less: A counter-intuitive effect of distractor frequency in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 228–258. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.2.228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirman, D. (2011). Effects of near and distant semantic neighbors on word production. Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 11, 32–43. doi: 10.3758/s13415-010-0009-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppenheim, G. M., Dell, G. S., & Schwartz, M. F. (2010). The dark side of incremental learning: A model of cumulative semantic interference during lexical access in speech production. Cognition, 114, 227–252. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.09.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3–900051–07–0, Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Roach, A., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Grewal, R. S., & Brecher, A. (1996). The Philadelphia naming test: Scoring and rationale. Clinical Aphasiology, 24, 121–133.
   Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (1992). A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition, 42, 107–142. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(92)90041-F
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A., Piai, V. M., & Schriefers, H. (2013). Context effects and selective attention in picture naming and word reading: Competition versus response exclusion. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 655–671. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2011.615663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossion, B., & Pourtois, G. (2004). Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart's object set: The role of surface detail in basic-level object recognition. Perception, 33, 217–236. doi: 10.1068/p5117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002b). E-Prime reference guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Schnur, T. T., Schwartz, M. F., Brecher, A., & Hodgson, C. (2006). Semantic interference during blocked-cyclic naming: evidence from aphasia. Journal of Memory & Language, 54(2), 199–227. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2005.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnur, T. T., Lee, E., Coslett, H. B., Schwartz, M. F., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2005). When lexical selection gets tough the LIFG gets going: A lesion analysis study of interference during word production. Brain & Language, 95, 12–13. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2005.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M. F., & Hodgson, C. (2002). A new multiword naming deficit: Evidence and interpretation. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 19, 263–288. doi: 10.1080/02643290143000187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, familiarity and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 6, 174–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. K., & Burke, D. M. (2002). Asymmetric aging effects on semantic and phonological processes: Naming in the picture-word interference task. Psychology & Aging, 17, 662–676. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.17.4.662
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson-Schill, S. L. & Botvinick, M. M. (2006). Resolving conflict: A response to Martin & Cheng (2006). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(3), 402–408. doi: 10.3758/BF03193860
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhaeghen, P., & Cerella, J. (2008). Everything we know about aging and response times. In S. M. Hofer & D. F. Alwin (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive Aging (pp. 134–150). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S. (2002). The influence of phonological similarity neighbors on speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(4), 735–747.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (2004). A web-based interface to calculate phonotactic probability for words and nonwords in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 481–487. doi: 10.3758/BF03195594
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S., & Sommers, M. S. (2003). The facilitative influence of phonological similarity and neighborhood frequency in speech production in younger and older adults. Memory & Cognition, 31(4), 491–504. doi: 10.3758/BF03196091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitkovitch, M., & Humphreys, G. W. (1991). Perseverant responding in speeded naming of pictures: It's in the links. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 664–680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (2008). Wechsler adult intelligence scale(4th ed. (WAIS-IV)). New York, NY: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeldon, L. R., & Monsell, S. (1994). Inhibition of spoken word production by priming a semantic competitor. Journal of Memory & Language, 33(3), 332–356. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1994.1016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilshire, C. E., & McCarthy, R. A. (2002). Evidence for a context-sensitive word retrieval disorder in a case of nonfluent aphasia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 19, 165–186. doi: 10.1080/02643290143000169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar